Re -- Pfizer Oxford vaccine thread

London

27,522

Brother

9,590

#16 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd March 2022 00:29

sharjan8643 wrote:

View original post

abu mohammed wrote:

View original post

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

Actions are judged by intentions, so each man will have what he intended.
ابو محمد

Unspecified

549

Brother

-6

#17 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd March 2022 00:53

abu mohammed wrote:

View original post

Quote:

I'm not drifting away from your post. I'm putting it back into perspective.

We only got to the vaccines because of the virus. So the answers for the virus should justify the vaccine right? So it is important we know the percentage of deaths by virus!

Brother AM, you posted the Pfizer report and derived a conclusion from it. You specifically pointed to table 1 on pg 7. I started this thread to try and understand with your help what was in the report. I would like to restrict the discussion only to the contents of this particular report for the time being.

We can discuss the virus in a separate thread. This is for my own clarity. Would you agree that this is a reasonable request?

Also, can I request that any one person engage me for the entirety of this discussion, so I can reply as coherently as possible? Nothing would make me happier than having brother Yasin guide me through the reading of this report, because I greatly admire his style of short and focused posting, but I've already started a discussion with brother AM, so I would like to continue with him alone until I've understood the report.

Once again, brother AM, I request that you keep your replies as short and simple as possible, like you are explaining this to a child. One point at a time.

Also, as a common courtesy, only for this thread, can people stop rating my posts with facepalms and Ha-Ha facepalms? I'm fine with disagree, old, and dislike ratings, but I personally am uncomfortable with receiving facepalms and Ha-Ha facepalms when I'm only trying to ask questions to get a better understanding of the report.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Informative x 1

sharjan8643

6,700

Brother

944

#18 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd March 2022 02:37

sharjan8643 wrote:

View original post

You asked what suggests deaths from vaccines. The answer from the report itself is Pfizer's own study.

The actual deaths are much more, the evidence is plenty but to answer your question, it's Pfizer's study. "May not" is not a claim saying "is not"

"May not" is inconclusive whereas "study shows" is conclusive. Why do you choose the inconclusive statement over the conclusive one? Even though Pfizer are recorded frauds and criminals with the biggest fines in history Abu Mohammed is using data from the ones you follow blindly (Pfizer) and even though deaths are so much higher he's only using the low number from Pfizer but how is even a single death okay? Death is death, not 1 is acceptable.

There's videos of people dropping dead within minutes of the three real mRNA jab as opposed to the placebo, if that's not enough, there's millions of testimonies from victims and families, if that's not enough there's scientist explanations on why the mRNA jab is killing, a scientific explanation. If that's not enough, there's an entire database of reports with millions of reports including death and all have similar symptoms, coincidence? if that's not enough, there's open data as well as council data of deaths after the vaccine rollout compared to before which also shows an increase, hospitalizations after vaccine and the number that vaccinated compared to not.

There's so much evidence but those blinded by big pharma, main stream news, incentives, free burgers and donuts and and those under the influence of western glamour will never see the obvious facts and truths.

ان الله يهدي من يشاء و يضل من يشاء

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Like x 1

I am not a Mufti

Unspecified

549

Brother

-6

#19 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd March 2022 04:21

Yasin wrote:

View original post

Again, brother Yasin, I would be more than happy to engage you in discussion, but as I've already said

Quote:

Also, can I request that any one person engage me for the entirety of this discussion, so I can reply as coherently as possible? Nothing would make me happier than having brother Yasin guide me through the reading of this report, because I greatly admire his style of short and focused posting, but I've already started a discussion with brother AM, so I would like to continue with him alone until I've understood the report.

I will gladly answer your questions, but please let my conversation with brother AM come to its conclusion first. I will then return to address all your comments, questions, and concerns. I hope that is not too much to ask.

Quote:

ان الله يهدي من يشاء و يضل من يشاء

May Allah Taala guide me to what is True and what pleases Him. Ameen.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Ameen x 2Informative x 1

sharjan8643

London

27,522

Brother

9,590

#20 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd March 2022 07:53

@sharjan8643

What is your question again?

Then I'll explain to you my understating of children before moving on to any other points I should need to highlight

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

Actions are judged by intentions, so each man will have what he intended.
ابو محمد

Unspecified

549

Brother

-6

#21 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd March 2022 08:54

abu mohammed wrote:

View original post

Quote:

@sharjan8643

What is your question again?

You posted a dailyexpose article here. Correct?

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Agree x 1Informative x 1

sharjan8643

Unspecified

549

Brother

-6

#22 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd March 2022 09:04

abu mohammed wrote:

View original post

Quote:

Then I'll explain to you my understating of children before moving on to any other points I should need to highlight

Please hold off on this for now. You can explain this to me after we are done discussing the original digitalexpose post, which is the purpose of this thread. Would that be okay?

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Informative x 1Facepalm x 1

sharjan8643

Unspecified

549

Brother

-6

#23 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd March 2022 10:49

sharjan8643 wrote:

You posted a dailyexpose article here. Correct?

AM wrote:

Agree

Excellent. Thank you.

The daily expose article discusses a UKHSA report. Correct?

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Informative x 1

sharjan8643

London

27,522

Brother

9,590

#24 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd March 2022 10:55

sharjan8643 wrote:

View original post

Do you still want me to explain things simply as I would to a child?
A: Yes
B: No
C: Break down this question even more

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

Actions are judged by intentions, so each man will have what he intended.
ابو محمد

Unspecified

549

Brother

-6

#25 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd March 2022 11:23

abu mohammed wrote:

View original post

Quote:

Do you still want me to explain things simply

A. Yes

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Informative x 1

sharjan8643

London

27,522

Brother

9,590

#26 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd March 2022 11:25

Okay, be patient :)

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

Actions are judged by intentions, so each man will have what he intended.
ابو محمد

Unspecified

549

Brother

-6

#27 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd March 2022 12:11

abu mohammed wrote:

View original post

Quote:

Okay, be patient :)

I'm completely at ease with the way our conversation is currently proceeding, thank you. If I need any clarification, I'll be sure to ask you. For now, if you could please just answer this question?

Quote:

The daily expose article discusses a UKHSA report. Correct?

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Informative x 1

sharjan8643

London

27,522

Brother

9,590

#28 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd March 2022 12:26

sharjan8643 wrote:

View original post

If I recall correctly, that is not your original question. Unless I have answered your question already. Can you confirm which it is please.

Have I or Yasin answered your Original Question?

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

Actions are judged by intentions, so each man will have what he intended.
ابو محمد

Unspecified

549

Brother

-6

#29 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd March 2022 13:25

abu mohammed wrote:

View original post

AM wrote:

Have I or Yasin answered your Original Question?

This one?

sharjan8643 wrote:

You posted a dailyexpose article here. Correct?

Yes, you answered with an "Agree" rating.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Informative x 1Facepalm x 1

sharjan8643

London

27,522

Brother

9,590

#30 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd March 2022 13:42

sharjan8643 wrote:

View original post

That is still not your first question!

Have I answered your original question with clarity and do you accept it and understand it?

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

Actions are judged by intentions, so each man will have what he intended.
ابو محمد

Re -- Pfizer Oxford vaccine thread

Font Size

Font Weight