Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

Event 201

You have contributed 0.0% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
abuzayd2k
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
26,501
Brother
9,598
abu mohammed's avatar
#1 [Permalink] Posted on 18th January 2021 03:53
www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/about

About the Event 201 exercise

Event 201 was a 3.5-hour pandemic tabletop exercise that simulated a series of dramatic, scenario-based facilitated discussions, confronting difficult, true-to-life dilemmas associated with response to a hypothetical, but scientifically plausible, pandemic. 15 global business, government, and public health leaders were players in the simulation exercise that highlighted unresolved real-world policy and economic issues that could be solved with sufficient political will, financial investment, and attention now and in the future.

The exercise consisted of pre-recorded news broadcasts, live “staff” briefings, and moderated discussions on specific topics. These issues were carefully designed in a compelling narrative that educated the participants and the audience.

The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation jointly propose these recommendations.

Purpose
In recent years, the world has seen a growing number of epidemic events, amounting to approximately 200 events annually. These events are increasing, and they are disruptive to health, economies, and society. Managing these events already strains global capacity, even absent a pandemic threat. Experts agree that it is only a matter of time before one of these epidemics becomes global—a pandemic with potentially catastrophic consequences. A severe pandemic, which becomes “Event 201,” would require reliable cooperation among several industries, national governments, and key international institutions.

Recent economic studies show that pandemics will be the cause of an average annual economic loss of 0.7% of global GDP—or $570 billion. The players’ responses to the scenario illuminated the need for cooperation among industry, national governments, key international institutions, and civil society, to avoid the catastrophic consequences that could arise from a large-scale pandemic.

Similar to the Center’s 3 previous exercises—Clade X, Dark Winter, and Atlantic Storm—Event 201 aimed to educate senior leaders at the highest level of US and international governments and leaders in global industries.

It is also a tool to inform members of the policy and preparedness communities and the general public. This is distinct from many other forms of simulation exercises that test protocols or technical policies of a specific organization. Exercises similar to Event 201 are a particularly effective way to help policymakers gain a fuller understanding of the urgent challenges they could face in a dynamic, real-world crisis.



More in the link above
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0
back to top
Rank Image
Asaaghir's avatar
Spinistan Throne
1,097
Brother
734
Asaaghir's avatar
#2 [Permalink] Posted on 23rd January 2021 13:59
Everything we see today was rehearsed way in advance, fake news articles, fake propaganda, fake questions, fake answers, fake saviours.

That's how a simulation works.

All planned before coronavirus was released!


Here is another old video release.

Watch it before our stalker removes it from youtube

youtu.be/AoLw-Q8X174

Selected moments from the Event 201 pandemic tabletop exercise hosted by The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY. The exercise illustrated the pandemic preparedness efforts needed to diminish the large-scale economic and societal consequences of a severe pandemic.

Drawing from actual events, Event 201 identifies important policy issues and preparedness challenges that could be solved with sufficient political will and attention. These issues were designed in a narrative to engage and educate the participants and the audience.



Do you recall the exercises carried out in the world trade centre in case of an attack?

Preplanned too!

These aren't coincidences, these are planned and organised events with big players.

Do yourself justice and watch and understand.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
42
Brother
21
#3 [Permalink] Posted on 23rd January 2021 21:11
I'm not sure if I've missed something but I don't find this extraordinary in the least. The event was held in October 2019 and at that time Corona virus was a thing and there was the possibility of it becoming a pandemic, so it's normal for them to discuss the response etc.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
26,501
Brother
9,598
abu mohammed's avatar
#4 [Permalink] Posted on 23rd January 2021 22:45
SunniSeeker wrote:
View original post

Bill Gates denied this event even took place in an interview with the BBC. His company together with many others actually organised the even6. Denial as before.

See this thread too www.muftisays.com/forums/55-members-research-group/13824-...

And even more interesting is this thread. www.muftisays.com/forums/93-truth-or-hoax--islamic-topics...

What I found intriguing about it is the fact that they ran simulated news runs covering exactly what we are seeing today.

They didn't just plan this in October!

They did simulations for 911 and the London attacks. They did their training just days before. It's not rocket science why do so this. They need to make sure everyone is in agreement, every government, every nation, every capable business and so on.

Please watch the second video in the second link. This was planned way before 2019 even started.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
42
Brother
21
#5 [Permalink] Posted on 24th January 2021 01:13
JazakAllahu khayr that makes more sense now...I knew I was missing something!
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Asaaghir's avatar
Spinistan Throne
1,097
Brother
734
Asaaghir's avatar
#6 [Permalink] Posted on 25th January 2021 20:46
SunniSeeker wrote:
View original post

Can you explain what you've now understood. You will be helping others understand who are too embarrassed to ask.

I've read most of your posts in the past even though they are few, some on politics and some on fiqh. So your extra post will be a welcome ia.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Asaaghir's avatar
Spinistan Throne
1,097
Brother
734
Asaaghir's avatar
#7 [Permalink] Posted on 1st August 2021 12:12
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Asaaghir's avatar
Spinistan Throne
1,097
Brother
734
Asaaghir's avatar
#8 [Permalink] Posted on 29th September 2021 01:22
www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/Center-projects/...

The Center’s SPARS Pandemic exercise narrative comprises a futuristic scenario that illustrates communication dilemmas concerning medical countermeasures (MCMs) that could plausibly emerge in the not-so-distant future. Its purpose is to prompt users, both individually and in discussion with others, to imagine the dynamic and oftentimes conflicted circumstances in which communication around emergency MCM development, distribution, and uptake takes place. While engaged with a rigorous simulated health emergency, scenario readers have the opportunity to mentally “rehearse” responses while also weighing the implications of their actions. At the same time, readers have a chance to consider what potential measures implemented in today’s environment might avert comparable communication dilemmas or classes of dilemmas in the future.

The self-guided exercise scenario for public health communicators and risk communication researchers covers a raft of themes and associated dilemmas in risk communications, rumor control, interagency message coordination and consistency, issue management, proactive and reactive media relations, cultural competency, and ethical concerns. To ensure that the scenario accounts for rapid technological innovation and exceeds the expectations of participants, the Center’s project team gleaned information from subject matter experts, historical accounts of past medical countermeasure crises, contemporary media reports, and scholarly literature in sociology, emergency preparedness, health education, and risk and crisis communication.

The scenario is hypothetical; the infectious pathogen, medical countermeasures, characters, news media excerpts, social media posts, and government agency responses are entirely fictional.

Project team lead: Monica Schoch-Spana, PhD

Project team: Matthew Shearer, MPH; Emily Brunson, PhD, associate professor of anthropology at Texas State University; Sanjana Ravi, MPH; Tara Kirk Sell, PhD, MA; Gigi Kwik Gronvall, PhD; Hannah Chandler, former research assistant at the Center

Date completed: October 2017

report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
17
Brother
-123
#9 [Permalink] Posted on 29th September 2021 11:49
This post has been reported. It could be due to breaking rules or something as simple as bad use of bbcodes which breaks the page format. We will attend to this soon.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -1Dislike x 1Facepalm x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Asaaghir's avatar
Spinistan Throne
1,097
Brother
734
Asaaghir's avatar
#10 [Permalink] Posted on 29th September 2021 11:56
Londoner wrote:
View original post

I'd rather see propagators of lies, banned!
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Yasin's avatar
UK
6,674
Brother
925
Yasin's avatar
#11 [Permalink] Posted on 29th September 2021 12:48
Asaaghir wrote:
View original post

They are banned here.

"Conspiracy Theory" is the only reply the absolute brainwashed have. No need to respond to them. Just report the post. Their posts will be censored Facebook style and then a few limitations will ensure they don't stain the forum with the same old weak "conspiracy theory" argument.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Asaaghir's avatar
Spinistan Throne
1,097
Brother
734
Asaaghir's avatar
#12 [Permalink] Posted on 17th November 2021 16:59
Asaaghir wrote:
View original post

Let's carry on with Part 2 of Event 201.

17 October 2025 Will this take place like Event 201 or was this just one of the planned scenarios in case covid-19 didn't go ahead?

THE SPARS OUTBREAK BEGINS CHAPTER ONE
Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security
Page 4
In mid-October 2025, three deaths were reported among members of the First Baptist Church of St.
Paul, Minnesota. Two of the church members had recently returned from a missionary trip to the
Philippines, where they provided relief to victims of regional floods. The third was the mother of a
church member who had also traveled to the Philippines with the church group but who had been only mildly sick himself. Based on the patients’ reported symptoms, healthcare providers initially guessed that they had died from seasonal influenza, which health officials predicted would be particularly virulent and widespread that fall. However, laboratory tests were negative for influenza. Unable to identify the causative agent, officials at the Minnesota Department of Health’s Public Health Laboratory sent the patients’ clinical specimens to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), where scientists confirmed that the patients did not have influenza. One CDC scientist recalled reading a recent ProMed dispatch describing the emergence of a novel coronavirus in Southeast Asia, and ran a pancoronavirus RT-PCR test. A week later, the CDC team confirmed that the three patients were, in fact, infected with a novel coronavirus, which was dubbed the St. Paul Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SPARS-CoV, or SPARS), after the city where the first cluster of cases had been
identified.

89 page pdf from the same source as OP www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/pubs_archive/pub... Or watch the video in the title of this post.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
26,501
Brother
9,598
abu mohammed's avatar
#13 [Permalink] Posted on 17th November 2021 17:50
Asaaghir wrote:
View original post

Interesting that Coronavirus of 2021 was mentioned already. This means that they went ahead with the plans and planned further into 2025 to 2028

So we are currently on page 14 of the pdf in comparison to 2026. i.e. "Wednesday, January 14, 2026. Officials Recommend use of unsafe SPARS drug for children"
"Wednesday, January 14, 2026. CDC Officials: 'SPARS drug may be ineffective. Use it anyway."

It's all about money for the big pharmaceutical companies.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
26,501
Brother
9,598
abu mohammed's avatar
#14 [Permalink] Posted on 18th November 2021 11:27
Asaaghir wrote:
View original post

Page 44 "Lovers and Haters"

What happens when a Muslim Imam declares the vaccine as Haram in a tweet in August 2026 and how it was dealt with!

Of course, this is scripted so they have planned for every scenario. Nothing new to what is happening here.

I like how they have created scenarios and images of tweets from the CDC, FDA, anti-vaxxers, vaccine deaths, reactions and so on.

Going by what was shown in Event 201 and this Event of 2025-28 I'm assuming that if Event 201 didn't take place, then this was the plan they were going ahead with (starting from 2023) or these were just plans in the making that needed to be executed as soon as possible. It seems like this is a 5 year plan! What we are seeing and hearing today, is written in this script from many years ago. We are simply living these events now.

This is an interesting script - Probably be seen in Hollywood already (Songbird, based on covid-23)
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
Asaaghir's avatar
Spinistan Throne
1,097
Brother
734
Asaaghir's avatar
#15 [Permalink] Posted on 18th November 2021 13:11
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post

I remember your post where you responded to a question with an imaginative story of how and why these people create such plans how they get away with it with a huge following from the medical experts. Abuzayd even commented on your imagination. You were not wrong to think so. Let me try and find that post and share it here as Event Abu Muhammad ;) In the mean time, let the readers ponder over the script they are living in now. lol!

Here's a rundown of the events documented (from the pdf) Seeing how things developed over time, big pharma knew that they needed to be protected from lawsuits. Event 201 covered them for that. But this event doesn't cover them. I think they went for Event 201 and dropped the SPARS version. Only time will tell.

If I'm not mistaken, this timeline was created in 2017.

RESPONSE SCENARIO TIMELINE
Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security The SPARS Pandemic

2025
October The first US deaths occurred due to SPARS. Initially, these deaths were thought to (something missing in original file)

November Cases of SPARS were reported across Minnesota and in six other states.

Thanksgiving holiday travel and Black Friday shopping facilitated spread of SPARS beyond the Midwest (26 states and multiple other countries by mid-December).

The WHO declared the SPARS pandemic to be a Public Health Emergency of International Concern.

December No treatment or vaccine for SPARS existed, but there was some evidence that the
antiviral Kalocivir could be effective as a therapeutic.

A proprietary vaccine developed and manufactured by a multinational livestock conglomerate (GMI) was proposed as a potential foundation for a human vaccine. The vaccine was developed to combat an outbreak of a similar respiratory coronavirus in hooved mammal populations in Southeast Asia, but the vaccine had not been licensed by any regulatory authority or tested in humans.

There were concerns over potential

2026
January The US government contracted CynBio to develop and produce a human SPARS vaccine based on the GMI animal vaccine.

The HHS Secretary invoked the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) to provide liability protection for the vaccine manufacturer and providers. Congress authorized and appropriated emergency funds under the PREP Act to provide compensation for potential adverse side effects from the vaccine.

Following reports of Kalocivir’s limited success in treating patients with severe SPARS infections, the FDA issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the antiviral. Kalocivir had been evaluated as a therapeutic for SARS and MERS, and several million doses were maintained in the SNS, which could be deployed as necessary while production capacity was established to meet demand.

January The FDA, CDC, and NIH provided seemingly conflicting communications regarding the safety and efficacy of Kalocivir.

In the United States, public anxiety around SPARS resulted in extensive use of Kalocivir, frequent self-reporting of SPARS symptoms, and a surge in demand for medical care.

By late January SPARS was detected in 42 countries and all US states.

February A lack of cultural competency in FDA and other governmental communication became
apparent among various ethnic groups in the United States.

A video of 3-year-old vomiting and fainting after taking a dose of Kalocivir was widely and rapidly spread via social media, strengthening opposition to the EUA.

March The FDA released updated efficacy and side effect information for Kalocivir. Social
media reports regarding Kalocivir were more ubiquitous than official releases.

The UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency and the European Medicines Agency jointly authorized the emergency use of a new antiviral, VMax, in the United Kingdom and throughout the Eurpoean Union. Some Americans attempted to gain access to VMax online or by traveling to Europe.

April The CDC publicized an updated (and significantly lower) case fatality rate in the United States; the perception of lesser risk triggered a drop in public interest.

May Production of Corovax, the SPARS vaccine produced by CynBio, was well underway.

Federal agencies initiated a communications campaign using well-known public figures with mixed results. Polls indicated a 15-23% increase in SPARS and Kalocivir knowledge nationwide. Hip hop icon BZee had success promoting public health messaging with an online video clip, but he lost credibility when he compared volunteers for Corovax trials with “volunteers” from the Tuskegee syphilis study.

Similarly, former President Bennett provided a non-committal response when asked if she would want Kalocivir for her new grandson.

May Public health agencies discovered that a relatively new social media platform, UNEQL, was being used as a primary means of communication in college-aged populations.

June Corovax entered the final stage of its expedited review, and production capacity was increased. Ten million doses were expected to be available by July with fifty million more in August.

The CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice (ACIP) announced vaccine priority groups. Healthcare providers were not included as a priority, inciting protests by doctors and nurses across the country.

In order to prioritize distribution of limited Corovax supply, the federal government requested that states report summary information for patient electronic health records (EHRs) to estimate the number of individuals in high-risk populations. This effort was met with resistance from the public, who protested the federal government accessing their private medical information.

July A week prior to initiating the nationwide vaccination program, damage to a power grid in the Pacific Northwest resulted in a widespread power outage that lasted two weeks. State and local public health agencies initiated communications programs using posters and flyers to promote the vaccination program in the absence of electronic media.

Social media efforts across the country promoted the vaccination campaign, and crowdsourced data helped to increase efficiency in distributing the vaccine.

August The Corovax vaccination program met resistance from several groups: alternative medicine proponents, Muslims, African Americans, and anti-vaccination activists. Initially operating independently, these groups banded together via social media to increase their influence.

September Japan announced that it would not approve Corovax for use in Japan in favor of developing and producing its own vaccine.

October College students predominantly on the east and west coasts, staged protests against the unequal global availability of Corovax. Vaccination rates among these students were below average for college students in other areas of the country.

November The anti-anti-vaccine movement, formed in the wake of the 2015 measles outbreak in the United States, reignited their efforts to combat the anti-vaccination super-group.

The FDA, CDC and other federal agencies also redoubled their communications efforts to promote the Corovax campaign.

An increasing number of post-SPARS pneumonia cases were reported across the country.

December The nationwide vaccination program was expanded beyond the initial priority populations to include the rest of the country.

Federal agencies initiated a vaccination communication program involving targeted
online advertisements.

2027
February Post-SPARS pneumonia cases stressed inventories of antibiotics across the country.
The HHS Secretary authorized distribution of the oldest lots of antibiotics from the SNS to supplement the antibiotic supply nationwide.

Tests of antibiotics in the SNS inventory determined that 94% of the remaining antibiotics in the oldest lots maintained sufficient potency. Tests conducted in August 2026 provided the basis for extending the expiration of these lots from 2027 to 2029.

March Rumors spread via traditional and social media that the government was dispensing
expired antibiotics.

Alyssa Karpowitz, a leader in the natural medicine movement, sought medical care at an emergency department after natural remedies failed to resolve her son’s bacterial pneumonia. After successful treatment with proper antibiotics from the SNS supply, she touted the benefits of “expired” antibiotics in her social media circles.

April Crowd-sourced and independent epidemiology analysis of Corovax side effects conflicted with official federal reports. The independent analyses gained popularity in traditional and social media due to visual presentation and interactive content.

Government attempts to respond with data and press releases largely failed.

May Reports of Corovax side effects began to gain traction. Several parents of children who
experienced neurological symptoms after receiving the vaccination sued the federal government and CynBio. The lawsuit was dropped when they learned of compensation funds available through the PREP Act and the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Trust Fund.

November Initial reports of long-term side effects of the Corovax vaccine emerged. These reports arose primarily from those in the initial priority (high-risk) populations and were few in number. With little available data and numerous pre-existing conditions, initial studies were unable to identify a statistically significant association with any long-term effects. Claims for compensation were placed on indefinite hold until further data could be gathered and analysis completed.

In response to public demand for long-term side effect compensation, the HHS Secretary invited Congress to conduct an independent investigation of the federal compensation process to alleviate concerns of impropriety.

The public and media pressured Congress to increase the funds authorized for compensation under the PREP Act.

2028
August The SPARS pandemic was officially declared to be over; however, experts remain
concerned about domestic animal reservoirs and the potential for future outbreaks.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top