Pakistani Inqilaab

I shall be the happiest person if men with taqwa rule us. But that looks impossible now. Even the followers of religious shaykh won't dream that the shuyookh will be ruling them. We are listening of politics and religion through JI leaders for 60 odd years. But they themselves have given up. So let us be practical.

But till we get pious rulers.

We shall be happy if the rulers take guidance from the shuyookh, not from the west like it happened during Gen k@lb musharraf. He hated the ulema the most.

Think of a scenario when padri and Imran take over power. Real chaos. Imran will move the youth towards west (hours of  DJ music during inquilab reflects that) and padri will push bidah and shirk. 

We would be happy when we have rulers like Gen Zia ul Haq. He had the most respect for Ulema-e-haq and was acting on their mashwarah.

And to run a country Piety is not the only factor.

Islam entered Indian masses through the Auliya-Allah and it was Tassawuff and the Akhlaaq of Nabi (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) which won our hearts and souls and not theology. In fact, Indian Muslims for 1000+ years have NEVER given the upper hand to religious clergy. In Pakistan in the 1970’s and then towards the end of 1990’s the people overwhelmingly votes for religious parties and within one cycle replaced them with Secular/Atheist parties.

Ulama won't win power in Pakistan politically as things stand; no chance! 

Here is very good analysis of the situation.

I agree with khan sahib.

I recall the saying of Dr. Nadir Ali Khan DB (many times he has quoted this). 

"eis mein bahas naheen hai ke zameen per kiss ki hukoomath hai, eh dekho diloen per kiski hukomath hai, Mohammadrurrasoolullah Salallahu alayhi wa sallam ki".

This I have witnessed during janazah of political leaders and Janazah of Shuyookh, Wallah!!    No comparison, people in tears, a big load of footwear left after the janazah procession, people in semi-conscious mode running without footwear. And in dua after burial, they would not have cried so loudly in janazah of their nears and dears. The death of the shuyookh is never conveyd through media and within hours, a large crowd from round the globe gathers.

So that is the love people have for their shuyookh.

And in janazah of political leaders, majority is hired crowd.

And another thing;

 Rulers and monarch always bowed before Auliya Allah, never the other way. 

And during confrontation, Auliya always won; "Hunooz Dilli dhoor Asth" "Abhi dilli dhoor hai".

So  present scenario demand that let us work towards "Bottom to top approach" and it is working,;  "Top to bottom approach" can go parallel.  Revolution can install leaders, but as the shaykh said "When you have junaid baghdadi as your ruler and the public is razeel, nothing will work".

Wallahu A'alam

In India, the actions of Hindu fanatic political leaders who get  power using their religion make the local hindus distance themselves from their religion. "subah mein ram ram,shaam mein sharaab sau gram"

Hope that will not happen in Pakistan. Deen badnaam honay na paaye.

Slightly expanded...

www.muftisays.com/blog/Muadh_Khan/3749_18-09-2014/imran-k...

Mufti Saheb (HA),

There is nothing Islamic in Imran Khan or his party or his Dharna to actually try to analyse his actions as "Baghawat" but why has this common sense escaped Junaid Jamshaid who publicly backed him on TV a day or so ago.

You know that this is not a realistic response. Junaid Jamshaid has access to loads of Ulama and there is no possible way that he will come on National TV and simply make his own Ijtehaad, he has enough Taqwa not to jeopardise his Aakhira.

Which means he is consulting Ulama who disagree with you and Mufti Rizwan (HA) and 700 pages of research.

This excuse of Bhagawat (rebellion) is the biggest political football used in Islamic history, Ulama loyal to certain fractions used this to issue Fatwa…Saudi Ulama have been using it to issue Fatwas against those who oppose the Royal family since 1926. The fundamental issue is that Nawaz Sahreef and Muslim league (although supported by Darul-uloom Karachi) are neither Islamically elected, nor Islamically accountable nor Islamically minded so where does the question of Bhagawat (rebellion) come from? Do Ulama in Pakistan now recognise elections as a viable and Sharia accountable vehicle for ascendency to power? In that case is Nawaz Shareef the legitimate Islamic Haakim of Pakistan which implies that his Hukum will override the Fatwaas of Ulama (as a Haakim).

If your assessment and research is correct then to counter the narrative present your argument in a way that people can read and understand (if not agree).

The Shariah injunction of his rallies (music, free mixing etc) is clear but there is no need to ascribe it to Baghawat (rebellion). Your ascription to Baghawat (rebellion) is based on Ijtehaad while clear violations of Islamic commands is a certainty so why not highlight the certainty?

Can we compare Tahreek insaaf party with Aaam Aadmi Pary of India. And Imran Khan with Kejriwal or Anna Hazare.

If yes, Kejriwal could deliver when he was in opposition. He created fear in rulers mind about corruption and misrule. Even the corrupt beuracrats and officers had jitters of getting exposed.

But;

When Kejriwal tasted power he failed. He could not deliver. That is more tragic.

Similarly Imran Khan  could be good in opposition, like the Marxist and Aam Aadmi party in India. Patriotism and honesty of  Imran khan is unquestionable. But power; he shall fail. It is a very very complex country.

So people here would like to see a stable government and also a powerful opposition. Allow democracy to grow.