Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 
Top Members

Coronavirus and Dajjal

Jump to page:

You have contributed 0.0% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
To appreciate this topic, click 'Appreciate Topic' on the right.
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,212
Brother
9,642
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#121 [Permalink] Posted on 28th June 2020 15:54
bint e aisha wrote:
View original post


This is an English forum so many may not understand the "conspiracies" of Peer Zulfiqar's Tareeqa so here is the English translation for people:

Translation:

Syed Khalil-ur-Rahman Sajjad Nomani (RA) wrote:


Dear respected Brothers and Sisters,

Today, we will Insha’Allah begin to ponder upon Surah Al-Kahf (Chapter 18).

As we have elaborated previously a number of times that a specific effect of this Surah (as told to us) is that Allah Ta’ala has embedded protection from the (evil) of Dajjal in this Surah.

Thus, we thought it prudent to first discuss Dajjal and evil machinations associated with this Fitnah (i.e. trial and tribulation).

The same discussion is continuing.

I would like to reiterate as a reminder and due to the significance and importance of the matter I do not consider it futile to continue to repeatedly remind of the issue, on that contrary I consider the (repeated reminders) necessary.
I have stated previously that we glean from what we have been told by Dajjal that he will be given extraordinary control and powers over the affairs of this world.

He will be able to travel at extraordinary speeds.

He will be able to bring any kind of weather anywhere at will.

He will have control over the rains.

In summary, he will have overwhelming control over the climate.

We know that advance nations on this Earth (those who are technologically and scientifically advanced) have the means to make it rain on any part of the globe, they have the means to increase the crop yields (many folds) wherever they want and they can impose droughts wherever they wish.

Technology is available by which they can present scenes and scenarios which the viewers will believe to be actual and real footage.

Many similar things are being witnessed by us.

Will Dajjal use and utilise the end (maximum advancement) of these technologies? This conclusion isn’t as far-fetched as it once was.

What I want to say now is that despite all of these (apparent technological) advancements, his name is “Dajjal” which is derived from “Dajal” which in Arabic means “To deceive”

This means that the objectives for which he will use the science and technology will be contrary to good causes like elimination of poverty, elimination of hunger, peace, justice, equality.

Rather, he will use the scientific and technological means, power, resources and control over affairs of this (world) to spread hatred, corruption and evil in this world, to crush the weak and for similar misguided purposes.

The most information tool in his arsenal will be “misinformation” or “deception”. Whatever he will show will have a different reality but the majority of people of this world will believe the apparent (rather than the actual reality). In fact, they will even lose the ability to investigate or try to get to the reality.

Consider my words carefully; they will lose the ability to investigate (the reality).

They will no longer possess any ability of capability to visualise the things as they are.

They will keep on being deceived.

I want to think about it! How many things and how many ways are we being deceived? In fact, what are we not being deceived in?

The drinks which are popular and prevalent today, are the (ingredients) not harmful to humans and their generations?

The games and sports which are popularised today, are they meant to popularise (health and fitness) or are they meant to take people’s money (in the name of entertainment) and then ensure that the money reaches certain families?
Deception.

The current political system, is it not entirely based on deception? The best and most refined system of today is “Democracy”, peel the layers and dig deep into this “Democracy”. Firstly, people cannot select their representatives, the political parties select candidates and make their representatives stand in the elections. You all know very well on which grounds these candidates are selected. Do (these political parties) look for the most honest, candid and peace loving members of the society who have the desire to serve the poor or the underprivileged? Do they check for these qualities in their candidates?
There is a saying of our times, “The Wining Horse”! He may be a gangster, criminal, killer, may have criminal cases on him, he may raped countless women, he may have even committed murder but because he has the ability to win an election, he is given the party representation to stand in elections.

Will these people (when elected) serve the poor, underprivileged, the deprived or raise the voices of the oppressed? Can you expect something like this from them?

Then, these people are representatives of their party and not of the public (who voted them).

They cannot speak a single word against the whip, against the will of their leadership.

They cannot speak, they cannot raise the problems of the public (at their will). They can only speak whatever they are permitted or ordered to speak about.

Is this “Government of the People, For the People, by the People?”

Where are the “people” in this Democratic system, it is pure deception!

Imagine a person in your society who is truly an honest and upright person, does not lie, stands with the oppressed, serves the poor, arranges for the education of the poor children and does countless other good deeds and does no harm to anyone. The “vote” of this person is the same (in value) as the vote of the biggest criminal of the society. Both of these votes are equal so how can a system generated from this be based on justice and equality?

What I am trying to says is whatever is going on in this world is deception and absolute deception.

Those behind the scenes who are the ringleaders of this system (based purely on deception), how are they controlling this elaborate system of deception I say with certainty that this will also become apparent in the coming days and it has started to become apparent.

People of this world are discovering that there are certain people of this word who worship Shaytaan (The Devil), “Worship” the Shaytaan, and they have a “spiritual” connection and I am hesitant to use this word “spiritual” but they have an unseen contact with “Shaytaan”. They are getting powers from Shaytaan and guidance from there.

In the coming days, many things will become apparent and I say that they have started to become apparent.

Names of those who have been worshipping “Shaytaan” for 40 years are coming into the public domain.

Reality is becoming apparent that the communication and information technology (which has advanced very far in our times) is linked (somewhere and in some way) to Satanic knowledge.

I know that many of you will become anxious after hearing this and other will laugh.

Ok, you can laugh for a few more days but the reality will not be hidden for too long.

These people are being brought forth in front of the world and some of it is due to this “Corona” which is “Dajjalic Drama” itself. Allah Ta’la has begin to expose some of these hidden affairs.

I will not fully elaborate because I should also wait a few more days for it.


My Comments:

I am a Muslim and I believe in the Powers of Allah Ta'ala, neither Dajjal nor Shaytaan has been given control over the affairs of this world.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1Agree x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
22,684
Brother
9,067
abu mohammed's avatar
#122 [Permalink] Posted on 28th June 2020 15:55
bint e aisha wrote:
View original post

Allahu alum!

Partially, yes. Otherwise, I have no idea to what what extent.

We can't go round blaming everything on evil. Allah has full knowledge, how, when, why etc etc.

When something comes from Allah as a punishment or cleansing of society, we shouldn't go round attributing it to Dajjal and his henchmen. That's half of Shaytans job done!
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Agree x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
99
Brother
162
#123 [Permalink] Posted on 28th June 2020 16:18
Shaikh sajjad nomani sab db mentions that the name of people who have been worshipping satan for 40 years are coming into the public domain.

Does anyone know who the Shaikh is referring to here?
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,212
Brother
9,642
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#124 [Permalink] Posted on 30th June 2020 15:43
Muadh_Khan wrote:
View original post


Question: Does infection spread via Viruses: Continuation

The abusive ignorant brigade had 48 + 48 hours to challenge the information from Qur'aan and the Sunnah and as usual, the cowards have gone into hiding because they have no basis in the Qur'aan and the Sunnah to spread their ignorance.

The first two responses can be accessed here:

www.muftisays.com/forums/14-peoples-say/13467-coronavirus...

www.muftisays.com/forums/14-peoples-say/13467-coronavirus...

Part 6: Coronavirus (COVID-1) Distancing in Rows?

In the Hanafi Madhab, arrangement of rows in Salah (and not leaving gaps) is Sunnah and not an obligation, a very important and emphasised Sunnah but Sunnah nonetheless. Thus, if a person leaves gaps in Salah (without a valid excuse) the Salah will be valid albeit contrary to Sunnah and the person may be committing a sin by neglecting a Sunnah.

Challenge to the insulting Cowards: Refute this position above from the Hanafi Madhab!


Having said, leaving gaps for a valid excuse is permitted and commonly mentioned in the books of Fiqh. Darul-uloom Deoband has officially considered the matter and issued an official Fatwa that distancing in the rows due to Coronavirus is permitted.

www.darulifta-deoband.com/home/ur/Salah-Prayer/179482

In other words, this falls within the excuses allowed within the Hanafi Madhab.

This is also the position of ALMOST ALL major Hanafi Darul-ulooms of the world. Thus it will be necessary for laymen to make Taqleed of this official position and discard the figment of imagination of the insulting cowards particularly when they offer no evidence for their position.

askimam.org/public/question_detail/45325

Question: Salams What is the ruling on social distancing in mosques? Is it accepted? Jazakallah

In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.

As-salāmu ‘alaykum wa-rahmatullāhi wa-barakātuh.

In principle, Taswiya of the Sufoof i.e. Joining the rows and not leaving gaps in between the rows is strongly emphasized in Shariah.[[1] It is disliked to leave a gap or space in between the rows.[2] However, in the context of covid-19, if one practices on social distancing in the Masjid, he will be excused.[3][4]

This is also the Fatwa from Darul Iftaa Deoband. Please find the fatwa attached.

And Allah Ta’āla Knows Best

Mahmood Suliman

Student Darul Iftaa
Gaborone, Botswana

Checked and Approved by,
Mufti Ebrahim Desai.


موطأ مالك رواية محمد بن الحسن الشيباني (ص: 56)

أَخْبَرَنَا مَالِكٌ، أَخْبَرَنَا أَبُو سُهَيْلِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ، وَأَبُو النَّضْرِ مَوْلَى عُمَرَ بْنِ عُبَيْدِ اللَّهِ، عَنْ مَالِكِ بْنِ أَبِي عَامِرٍ الأَنْصَارَيِّ، أَنَّ عُثْمَانَ بْنَ عَفَّانَ، كَانَ يَقُولُ فِي خُطْبَتِهِ: «إِذَا قَامَتِ الصَّلاةِ، فَاعْدِلُوا الصُّفُوفَ، وَحَاذُوا بِالْمَناكِبِ، فَإِنَّ اعْتِدَالِ الصُّفُوفِ مِنْ تَمَامِ الصَّلاةِ» ، ثُمَّ لا يُكَبِّرُ حَتَّى يَأْتِيَهُ رِجَالٌ قَدْ وَكَّلَهُمْ بِتَسْوِيَةِ الصُّفُوفِ، فَيُخْبِرُونَهُ أَنْ قَدِ اسْتَوَتْ فَيُكَبِّرُ. [ص:57]

قَالَ مُحَمَّدٌ: يَنْبَغِي لِلْقَوْمِ إِذَا قَالَ الْمُؤَذِّنُ حَيَّ عَلَى الْفَلاحِ أَنْ يَقُومُوا إِلَى الصَّلاةِ فَيَصُفُّوا، وَيُسَوُّوا الصُّفُوفَ، وَيُحَاذُوا بَيْنَ الْمَنَاكِبِ، فَإِذَا أَقَامَ الْمُؤَذِّنُ الصَّلاةَ كَبَّرَ الإِمَامُ، وَهُوَ قَوْلُ أَبِي حَنِيفَةَ رَحِمَهُ اللَّهُ



سنن أبي داود (1/ 178)

حَدَّثَنَا عِيسَى بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ الْغَافِقِيُّ، حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ وَهْبٍ، ح وَحَدَّثَنَا قُتَيْبَةُ بْنُ سَعِيدٍ، حَدَّثَنَا اللَّيْثُ، وَحَدِيثُ ابْنِ وَهْبٍ أَتَمُّ عَنْ مُعَاوِيَةَ بْنِ صَالِحٍ، عَنْ أَبِي الزَّاهِرِيَّةِ، عَنْ كَثِيرِ بْنِ مُرَّةَ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عُمَرَ، قَالَ قُتَيْبَةُ: عَنْ أَبِي [ص:179] الزَّاهِرِيَّةِ، عَنْ أَبِي شَجَرَةَ - لَمْ يَذْكُرِ ابْنَ عُمَرَ - أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ، قَالَ: «أَقِيمُوا الصُّفُوفَ وَحَاذُوا بَيْنَ الْمَنَاكِبِ وَسُدُّوا الْخَلَلَ وَلِينُوا بِأَيْدِي إِخْوَانِكُمْ - لَمْ يَقُلْ عِيسَى بِأَيْدِي إِخْوَانِكُمْ - وَلَا تَذَرُوا فُرُجَاتٍ لِلشَّيْطَانِ وَمَنْ وَصَلَ صَفًّا وَصَلَهُ اللَّهُ، وَمَنْ قَطَعَ صَفًّا قَطَعَهُ اللَّهُ»، قَالَ أَبُو دَاوُدَ: أَبُو شَجَرَةَ كَثِيرُ بْنُ مُرَّةَ، قَالَ أَبُو دَاوُدَوَ: " مَعْنَى وَلِينُوا بِأَيْدِي إِخْوَانِكُمْ: إِذَا جَاءَ رَجُلٌ إِلَى الصَّفِّ فَذَهَبَ يَدْخُلُ فِيهِ فَيَنْبَغِي أَنْ يُلِينَ لَهُ كُلُّ رَجُلٍ مَنْكِبَيْهِ حَتَّى يَدْخُلَ فِي الصَّفِّ "



البحر الرائق شرح كنز الدقائق ومنحة الخالق وتكملة الطوري (1/ 375)

وَإِنْ وَجَدَ فِي الصَّفِّ فُرْجَةً سَدَّهَا وَإِلَّا فَيَنْتَظِرُ حَتَّى يَجِيءَ آخَرُ كَمَا قَدَّمْنَاهُ، وَفِي فَتْحِ الْقَدِيرِ وَرَوَى أَبُو دَاوُد وَالْإِمَامُ أَحْمَدُ عَنْ ابْنِ عُمَرَ أَنَّهُ - صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ - قَالَ «أُقِيمُوا الصُّفُوفَ وَحَاذُوا بَيْنَ الْمَنَاكِبِ وَسُدُّوا الْخَلَلَ وَلِينُوا بِأَيْدِي إخْوَانِكُمْ وَلَا تَذَرُوا فُرُجَاتٍ لِلشَّيْطَانِ وَمَنْ وَصَلَ صَفًّا وَصَلَهُ اللَّهُ وَمَنْ قَطَعَ صَفًّا قَطَعَهُ اللَّهُ»

وَرَوَى الْبَزَّارُ بِإِسْنَادٍ حَسَنٍ عَنْهُ - صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ - «مَنْ سَدَّ فُرْجَةً فِي الصَّفِّ غُفِرَ لَهُ»

وَفِي أَبِي دَاوُد عَنْهُ - صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ - قَالَ «خِيَارُكُمْ أَلْيَنُكُمْ مَنَاكِبَ فِي الصَّلَاةِ» وَبِهَذَا يُعْلَمُ جَهْلُ مَنْ يَسْتَمْسِكُ عِنْدَ دُخُولِ دَاخِلٍ بِجَنْبِهِ فِي الصَّفِّ وَيَظُنُّ أَنَّ فَسْحَهُ لَهُ رِيَاءٌ بِسَبَبِ أَنَّهُ يَتَحَرَّكُ لِأَجْلِهِ بَلْ ذَلِكَ إعَانَةٌ لَهُ عَلَى إدْرَاكِ الْفَضِيلَةِ وَإِقَامَةٌ لِسَدِّ الْفُرُجَاتِ الْمَأْمُورِ بِهَا فِي الصَّفِّ وَالْأَحَادِيثُ فِي هَذَا كَثِيرَةٌ شَهِيرَةٌ اهـ وَفِي الْقُنْيَةِ وَالْقِيَامُ فِي الصَّفِّ الْأَوَّلِ أَفْضَلُ مِنْ الثَّانِي، وَفِي الثَّانِي أَفْضَلُ مِنْ الثَّالِثِ هَكَذَا؛ لِأَنَّهُ رُوِيَ فِي الْأَخْبَارِ أَنَّ اللَّهَ تَعَالَى إذَا أَنْزَلَ الرَّحْمَةَ عَلَى الْجَمَاعَةِ يُنْزِلُهَا أَوَّلًا عَلَى الْإِمَامِ، ثُمَّ تَتَجَاوَزُ عَنْهُ إلَى مَنْ بِحِذَائِهِ فِي الصَّفِّ الْأَوَّلِ، ثُمَّ إلَى الْمَيَامِنِ، ثُمَّ إلَى الْمَيَاسِرِ، ثُمَّ إلَى الصَّفِّ الثَّانِي وَرُوِيَ عَنْهُ - عَلَيْهِ السَّلَامُ - أَنَّهُ قَالَ «يُكْتَبُ لِلَّذِي خَلْفَ الْإِمَامِ بِحِذَائِهِ مِائَةُ صَلَاةٍ وَلِلَّذِي فِي الْجَانِبِ الْأَيْمَنِ خَمْسَةٌ وَسَبْعُونَ صَلَاةً وَلِلَّذِي فِي الْجَانِبِ الْأَيْسَرِ خَمْسُونَ صَلَاةً وَلِلَّذِي فِي سَائِرِ الصُّفُوفِ خَمْسَةٌ وَعِشْرُونَ صَلَاةً» . وَجَدَ فِي الصَّفِّ الْأَوَّلِ فُرْجَةً دُونَ الثَّانِي فَلَهُ أَنْ يُصَلِّيَ فِي الصَّفِّ الْأَوَّلِ وَيَخْرِقَ الثَّانِي؛ لِأَنَّهُ لَا حُرْمَةَ لَهُ لِتَقْصِيرِهِمْ حَيْثُ لَمْ يَسُدُّوا الصَّفَّ الْأَوَّل

مراقي الفلاح شرح نور الإيضاح (ص: 116)

"ويصف الرجال" لقوله صلى الله عليه وسلم: "ليلني منكم أولو الأحلام والنهى" فيأمرهم الإمام بذلك وقال صلى الله عليه وسلم: "استووا تستوي قلوبكم وتماسوا تراحموا" وقال صلى الله عليه وسلم: "أقيموا الصفوف وحاذوا بين المناكب وسدوا الخلل ولينوا بأيدي إخوانكم لا تذروا فرجات للشيطان من وصل صفا وصله الله ومن قطع صفا قطعه الله" وبهذا يعلم جهل من يستمسك عند دخول أحد بجنبه في الصف يظن أنه رياء بل هو إعانة على ما أمر به النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم وإذا وجد فرجة في الصف الأول دون الثاني فله خرقه لتركهم سد الأول ولو كان الصف منتظما ينتظر مجيء آخر فإن خاف فوت الركعة جذب عالما بالحكم لا يتأذى به وإلا قام وحده وهذه ترد القول بفساد من فسح لامرئ داخل بجنبه وأفضل الصفوف أولها ثم الأقرب فالأقرب لما روى أن الله تعالى ينزل الرحمة أولا على الإمام ثم تتجاوز عنه إلى من يحاذيه في الصف الأول ثم إلى الميامن ثم إلى المياسر ثم إلى الصف الثاني وروى عنه صلى الله عليه وسلم أنه قال: "تكتب للذي خلف الإمام بحذائه مائة صلاة وللذي في الجانب الأيمن خمسة وسبعون صلاة وللذي في الأيسر خمسون صلاة وللذي في سائر الصفوف خمسة وعشرون صلاة "

حاشية الطحطاوي على مراقي الفلاح شرح نور الإيضاح (ص: 306)

"أقيموا الصفوف" أي عدلوهها قوله: "وحاذوا بين المناكب" ورد كأن أحدنا يلزق منكبه بمنكب صاحبه وقدمه بقدمه قوله: "وسدوا الخلل" أي الفرج روى البزار بإسناد حسن عنه صلى الله عليه وسلم: "من سد فرجة في الصف غفر له"



[ii] الدر المختار شرح تنوير الأبصار وجامع البحار (ص: 78)

ولو صلى على رفوف المسجد إن وجد في صحنه مكانا كره كقيامه في صف خلف صف فيه فرجة

قلت: وبالكراهة أيضا صرح الشافعية

قال السيوطي في (بسط الكف في إتمام الصف)، وهذا الفعل مفوت لفضيلة الجماعة الذي هو التضعيف لا لاصل بركة الجماعة، فتضعيفها غير بركتها، وبركتها هي عود بركة الكامل منهم على الناقص اهـ

ولو وجد فرجة في الاول لا الثاني له خرق الثاني لتقصيرهم، وفي الحديث من سد

فرجة غفر له وصح خياركم ألينكم مناكب في الصلاة وبهذا يعلم جهل من يستمسك عند دخول داخل بجنبه في الصف ويظن أنه رياء كما بسط في البحر، لكن نقل المصنف

وغيره عن القنية وغيرها ما يخالفه، ثم نقل تصحيح عدم الفساد في مسألة من جذب من الصف فتأخر، فهل ثم فرق؟ فليحرر (الرجال) ظاهره يعم العبد (ثم الصبيان) ظاهره تعددهم، فلو واحدا دخل الصف



الدر المختار وحاشية ابن عابدين (رد المحتار) (1/ 570)

الصَّفِّ الْأَوَّلِ مِنْ خَارِجِهَا يَكُونُ مَكْرُوهًا. وَيُؤْخَذُ مِنْ تَعْرِيفِ الصَّفِّ الْأَوَّلِ بِمَا هُوَ خَلْفَ الْإِمَامِ أَيْ لَا خَلْفَ مُقْتَدٍ آخَرَ أَنَّ مَنْ قَامَ فِي الصَّفِّ الثَّانِي بِحِذَاءِ بَابِ الْمِنْبَرِ يَكُونُ مِنْ الصَّفِّ الْأَوَّلِ لِأَنَّهُ لَيْسَ خَلْفَ مُقْتَدٍ آخَرَ، وَاَللَّهُ تَعَالَى أَعْلَمُ



[iii] الأصل المعروف بالمبسوط للشيباني (1/ 197)

قلت أَرَأَيْت رجلا صلى مَعَ الإِمَام وَبَينه وَبَين الإِمَام حَائِط قَالَ يجْزِيه قلت فَإِن كَانَ بَينه وَبَين الإِمَام طَرِيق يمر فِيهِ النَّاس وَهُوَ عَظِيم قَالَ لَا يجْزِيه وَعَلِيهِ أَن يسْتَقْبل الصَّلَاة لِأَن هَذَا لَيْسَ مَعَ الإِمَام قلت أَرَأَيْت إِن كَانَ فِي الطَّرِيق الَّذِي بَينه وَبَين الإِمَام مصلون يصلونَ بِصَلَاة الإِمَام صُفُوفا مُتَّصِلَة قَالَ صلَاته وَصَلَاة الْقَوْم تَامَّة قلت من أَيْن اخْتلف هَذَا وَالْأول قَالَ إِذا كَانَ الطَّرِيق لَيْسَ فِيهِ من يُصَلِّي لم يجزه الصَّلَاة قَالَ لِأَنَّهُ قد جَاءَ الْأَثر فِي ذَلِك أَنه من كَانَ بَينه وَبَين الإِمَام نهر أَو طَرِيق فَلَيْسَ مَعَه وَإِذا كَانَ فِي الطَّرِيق مصلون فَلَيْسَ بَينهم وَبَين الإِمَام طَرِيق قلت أَرَأَيْت إِن كَانَ بَينهم وَبَين الإِمَام صف من نسَاء قدامهم يصلين بِصَلَاة الإِمَام قَالَ لَا يجزيهم



الحجة على أهل المدينة (1/ 289)

وَقَالَ مُحَمَّد بن الْحسن مَا بَين رحاب الْمَسْجِد والدور الَّتِي تلصق بِالْمَسْجِدِ فرق لِأَن ذَلِك إِذا كَانَ مَوْصُولا بِالْمَسْجِدِ والصفوف مُتَّصِلَة بذلك يجْزِيه فَإِنَّهُ لَا طَرِيق بَينهم وَإِنَّمَا يكره أَن يصلوا فِي مَوضِع بَينهم وَبَين الإِمَام فِيهِ طَرِيق فيكونون بِمَنْزِلَة من لَيْسَ مَعَ الإِمَام



بدائع الصنائع في ترتيب الشرائع (1/ 145)

وَأَمَّا النَّهْرُ الْعَظِيمُ فَمَا لَا يُمْكِنُ الْعُبُورُ عَلَيْهِ إلَّا بِعِلَاجٍ كَالْقَنْطَرَةِ وَنَحْوِهَا، وَذَكَرَ الْإِمَامُ السَّرَخْسِيُّ أَنَّ الْمُرَادَ مِنْ الطَّرِيقِ مَا تَمُرُّ فِيهِ الْعَجَلَةُ وَمَا وَرَاءَ ذَلِكَ طَرِيقَةٌ لَا طَرِيقٌ، وَالْمُرَادُ بِالنَّهْرِ مَا تَجْرِي فِيهِ السُّفُنُ، وَمَا دُونَ ذَلِكَ بِمَنْزِلَةِ الْجَدْوَلِ لَا يَمْنَعُ صِحَّةَ الِاقْتِدَاءِ، فَإِنْ كَانَتْ الصُّفُوفُ مُتَّصِلَةً عَلَى الطَّرِيقِ جَازَ الِاقْتِدَاءُ؛ لِأَنَّ اتِّصَالَ الصُّفُوفِ أَخْرَجَهُ مِنْ أَنْ يَكُونَ مَمَرَّ النَّاسِ فَلَمْ يَبْقَ طَرِيقًا بَلْ صَارَ مُصَلًّى فِي حَقِّ هَذِهِ الصَّلَاةِ، وَكَذَلِكَ إنْ كَانَ عَلَى النَّهْرِ جِسْرٌ وَعَلَيْهِ صَفٌّ مُتَّصِلٌ لِمَا قُلْنَا، وَلَوْ كَانَ بَيْنَهُمَا حَائِطٌ، ذُكِرَ فِي الْأَصْلِ أَنَّهُ يُجْزِئُهُ، وَرَوَى الْحَسَنُ عَنْ أَبِي حَنِيفَةَ أَنَّهُ يُجْزِئُهُ، وَهَذَا فِي الْحَاصِلِ عَلَى وَجْهَيْنِ: إنْ كَانَ الْحَائِطُ قَصِيرًا ذَلِيلًا بِحَيْثُ يَتَمَكَّنُ كُلُّ أَحَدٍ مِنْ الرُّكُوبِ عَلَيْهِ كَحَائِطِ الْمَقْصُورَةِ - لَا يَمْنَعُ الِاقْتِدَاءَ؛ لِأَنَّ ذَلِكَ لَا يَمْنَعُ التَّبَعِيَّةَ فِي الْمَكَانِ، وَلَا يُوجِبُ خَفَاءَ حَالِ الْإِمَامِ.

وَلَوْ كَانَ بَيْنَ الصَّفَّيْنِ حَائِطٌ: إنْ كَانَ طَوِيلًا وَعَرِيضًا لَيْسَ فِيهِ ثُقْبٌ - يَمْنَعُ الِاقْتِدَاءَ، وَإِنْ كَانَ فِيهِ ثُقْبٌ لَا يَمْنَعُ مُشَاهَدَةَ حَالِ الْإِمَامِ - لَا يَمْنَعُ بِالْإِجْمَاعِ، وَإِنْ كَانَ كَبِيرًا: فَإِنْ كَانَ عَلَيْهِ بَابٌ مَفْتُوحٌ أَوْ خَوْخَةٌ فَكَذَلِكَ



المبسوط للسرخسي (2/ 117)

وَتَحْقِيقُ هَذَا الْكَلَامِ أَنَّ الْقِيَاسَ أَنْ تَفْسُدَ صَلَاتُهُ بِتَرْكِ الِاسْتِخْلَافِ مِنْ أَوَّلِ الصُّفُوفِ، وَإِنْ كَانَ فِي الْمَسْجِدِ لِخُلُوِّ مَوْضِعِ الْإِمَامَةِ وَهُوَ الْمِحْرَابُ عَنْ الْإِمَامِ وَلَكِنْ تَرَكْنَا هَذَا الْقِيَاسَ مَا دَامَ الْإِمَامُ فِي الْمَسْجِدِ؛ لِأَنَّ جَمِيعَ الْمَسْجِدِ فِي حُكْمِ مَكَان وَاحِدٍ؛ وَلِهَذَا صَحَّ اقْتِدَاءُ مَنْ وَقَفَ فِي آخِرِ الْمَسْجِدِ بِالْإِمَامِ

البحر الرائق شرح كنز الدقائق ومنحة الخالق وتكملة الطوري (1/ 385)

وَفِي الْمُجْتَبَى وَفِنَاءُ الْمَسْجِدِ لَهُ حُكْمُ الْمَسْجِدِ يَجُوزُ الِاقْتِدَاءُ فِيهِ، وَإِنْ لَمْ تَكُنْ الصُّفُوفُ مُتَّصِلَةً وَلَا تَصِحُّ فِي دَارِ الضِّيَافَةِ إلَّا إذَا اتَّصَلَتْ الصُّفُوفُ اهـ.

وَبِهَذَا عُلِمَ أَنَّ الِاقْتِدَاءَ مِنْ صَحْنِ الْخَانْقَاهْ الشَّيْخُونِيَّةِ بِالْإِمَامِ فِي الْمِحْرَابِ صَحِيحٌ، وَإِنْ لَمْ تَتَّصِلْ الصُّفُوفُ؛ لِأَنَّ الصَّحْنَ فِنَاءُ الْمَسْجِدِ، وَكَذَا اقْتِدَاءُ مَنْ بِالْخَلَاوِي السُّفْلِيَّةِ صَحِيحٌ؛ لِأَنَّ أَبْوَابَهَا فِي فِنَاءِ الْمَسْجِدِ وَلَمْ يَشْتَبِهْ حَالُ الْإِمَامِ، وَأَمَّا اقْتِدَاءُ مَنْ بِالْخَلَاوِي الْعُلْوِيَّةِ بِإِمَامِ الْمَسْجِدِ فَغَيْرُ صَحِيحٍ حَتَّى الْخَلْوَتَيْنِ اللَّتَيْنِ فَوْقَ الْإِيوَانِ الصَّغِيرِ، وَإِنْ كَانَ مَسْجِدًا؛ لِأَنَّ أَبْوَابَهَا خَارِجَةٌ عَنْ فِنَاءِ الْمَسْجِدِ سَوَاءٌ اشْتَبَهَ حَالُ الْإِمَامِ أَوْ لَا كَالْمُقْتَدِي مِنْ سَطْحِ دَارِهِ الْمُتَّصِلَةِ بِالْمَسْجِدِ فَإِنَّهُ لَا يَصِحُّ مُطْلَقًا وَعَلَّلَهُ فِي الْمُحِيطِ بِاخْتِلَافِ الْمَكَانِ



المبسوط للسرخسي (2/ 35)

(قَالَ): وَمَنْ صَلَّى الْجُمُعَةَ فِي الطَّاقَاتِ أَوْ فِي السُّدَّةِ أَوْ فِي دَارِ الصَّيَارِفَةِ أَجْزَأَهُ إذَا كَانَتْ الصُّفُوفُ مُتَّصِلَةً لِأَنَّ اتِّصَالَ الصُّفُوفِ يَجْعَلُ هَذَا الْمَوْضِعَ فِي حُكْمِ الْمَسْجِدِ فِي صِحَّةِ الِاقْتِدَاءِ بِالْإِمَامِ بِدَلِيلِ سَائِرِ الصَّلَوَاتِ وَالِاصْطِفَافُ بَيْنَ الْأُسْطُوَانَتَيْنِ غَيْرُ مَكْرُوهٍ لِأَنَّهُ صَفٌّ فِي حَقِّ كُلِّ فَرِيقٍ وَإِنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ طَوِيلًا وَتَخَلُّلُ الْأُسْطُوَانَةِ بَيْنَ الصَّفِّ كَتَخَلُّلِ مَتَاعٍ مَوْضُوعٍ أَوْ كَفُرْجَةٍ بَيْنَ رِجْلَيْنِ وَذَلِكَ لَا يَمْنَعُ صِحَّةَ الِاقْتِدَاءِ وَلَا يُوجِبُ الْكَرَاهَةَ



[iv] مجلة الأحكام العدلية (ص: 18)

(الْمَادَّةُ 21) : الضَّرُورَاتُ تُبِيحُ الْمَحْظُورَاتِ


State of the Insulting, Abusive Cowards:

  1. 1 or 2 have permanently run away
  2. 1 comes after a few days, insults, gets the thread locked and leaves. I want him to directly contradict Darul-uloom Deoband!


report post quote code quick quote reply
+3 -0Like x 1Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
mSiddiqui's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
308
Brother
-67
mSiddiqui's avatar
#125 [Permalink] Posted on 30th June 2020 17:26
muftionline.co.za/node/31478

Mufti Muhammad Abdus-Salam Chatgami from Bangladesh and others aren’t in agreement with that position that you are posting. Take up your cudgels with them.

Scholars are differing. You, a non entity shouldn’t need to discuss anything further. You start a debate from nothing and for no reason. Do something else with your time.
By your ludicrous response about the women in ertugal it can be successfully gauged that you are a tool!

They have their evidences. Millions of people are in agreement with this. Majority of Pakistan isn’t social distancing in Salah. Why are you so flustered and worked up for?

If you have a problem with the other position. Contact them with all this information and the 48 hour limits you prescribe.

Mr. Khan you don’t know what fear is.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Winner x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,212
Brother
9,642
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#126 [Permalink] Posted on 30th June 2020 18:31
mSiddiqui wrote:
View original post


Question on Principles on Taqleed from day one which you have not answered:

  1. Established position of Darul-ulooms and Institutes WORLDWIDE, officially deliberated and released

    VERSUS

  2. Individual position of an "Alim" or a "Few Ulama"


Please quote me principles of Taqleed where laymen are permitted to abandon 1 and follow 2?

Drop the Insults & cowardice and address the issue! Quote us the Usools (principles of the Hanafi Madhab)

Secondly, say it clearly and openly that you believe that Darul-uloom Deoband is misguided!

Come on, don't be a coward...and run away again

Thirdly, we are not discussing what people are or are not following, we are discussing the position of Darul-ulooms. For example, people are watching "pretty girls" on YouTube (as you claimed) so why should I question Ulama for that?
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
mSiddiqui's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
308
Brother
-67
mSiddiqui's avatar
#127 [Permalink] Posted on 30th June 2020 20:53
What are you on about?

There is no discussion, you are role playing in your head.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
914
Brother
332
#128 [Permalink] Posted on 30th June 2020 23:12
mSiddiqui wrote:
View original post

Earlier when this whole situation was unfolding Mufti Ebrahim Saleejee was saying all the hype over covid was a media conspiracy, and he compared it to how media covered and used 9/11. He said if covid was happening in poor african countries there would be no hype. It is happening in the west so therefore the media is focussing on it.He said many crime and murders take place but no one is trying to prevent those but everyone is speaking about covid. He said the same amount of people die every year, what is all of this media hype? He seemed to dismiss effectiveness of quarantine and isolation.

So quite frankly it is not wise to take advice on dealing with covid, or in fact any topic, from Mufti Saleejee, Mufti Ak Hosein and their likes in SA. Take from the likes of Mufti Taha Karaan. The Jamiatul Ulama SA and Jamiatul Ulama KZN also seemed more responsible and reasonable, as did Mufti Ebrahim Desai.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Agree x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
22,684
Brother
9,067
abu mohammed's avatar
#129 [Permalink] Posted on 30th June 2020 23:25
Muadh_Khan wrote:
View original post

This post has an opening italics code [i]but not a closing one [/i] and therefore, each post thereafter is appearing as italics.

Please update to rectify all posts automatically.

Error is here, please use rounded brackets instead. Original post has the [i] and is not showing because its expecting the completion.
Quote:
In principle, Taswiya of the Sufoof i.e. Joining the rows and not leaving gaps in between the rows is strongly emphasized in Shariah.[i] It is disliked to leave a gap or space in between
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,212
Brother
9,642
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#130 [Permalink] Posted on 1st July 2020 09:50
mSiddiqui wrote:
View original post


Drop the insults.
Pick up the courage.

Address the issue.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
mSiddiqui's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
308
Brother
-67
mSiddiqui's avatar
#131 [Permalink] Posted on 2nd July 2020 02:46
Muadh_Khan wrote:
View original post

These are not insults, this is your reality.

I am not duty bound to address you.
Your issues are in your head. Allah Ta'ala will decide on the day of judgement.
You start with abusive behavior and expect smiles in return. Condescending remarks are your only forte.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
bint e aisha's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
2,012
Sister
1,581
bint e aisha's avatar
#132 [Permalink] Posted on 13th July 2020 15:55
JazakAllahu khaira to the authorizer who opened the thread. I hope debates won't start again inshaAllah.

FACE MASKS


QUESTION

Respected Mufti Ebrahim Desai

Assalamu Alaikum

There is an article doing its rounds prohibiting the use of the mask and social distancing.
What is your response. Please guide us.

We are really thankful to you for all your mature and balance and consistent academic guidance ever since the lockdown. Your wisdom is becoming more clearer by the day. The Ulama in general and the masses value your insight.

May Allah reward you abundantly.
Ameen.

ANSWER

In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.

As-salāmu ‘alaykum wa-rahmatullāhi wa-barakātuh.

We have responded to this issue previously in detail. We have advised the public that if there is a medical need to cover the mouth in general and in Salah, the Salah will be valid. We have provided the fatwa of Darul Uloom Deoband, with signatures of 5 prominent Muftis. We still maintain that view and advise the public to take all precaution especially now that the pandemic is in its peak.

We take note of the article. Whilst we can present academic responses to the article, at this time and point, we are more concerned with the hardships faced by the Ummat in this pandemic. There are too many people from our own associates that are infected. The reports we receive about the nature of this virus and its effects on ones health is of great concern.

This is not the time for academic gymnastics and rebutting fatwas. We have passed that stage and the Community is now witnessing for themselves what was termed to be a ploy of Kuffar and similar conjectures. NOW IS TIME to express our support and compassion to the Ummat and assist to the best of our ability.

Anyone who wishes to discuss academic issues may meet me directly. That will be an appropriate domain for academic discussions. I will engage with him with utmost dignity, and honour.

We advise everyone to exercise precaution and safeguard yourselves and your family and associates from being infected.

We make dua to Allah to deliver us from this pandemic and once again bestow us with the bounties of Deen and Dunya.

Wassalaam

Mufti Ebrahim Desai
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,212
Brother
9,642
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#133 [Permalink] Posted on 13th July 2020 16:45
bint e aisha wrote:
View original post


Can you give me a link for this from the website?
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
bint e aisha's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
2,012
Sister
1,581
bint e aisha's avatar
#134 [Permalink] Posted on 13th July 2020 17:03
Muadh_Khan wrote:
View original post

I received this through their broadcast service on whatsapp.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
22,684
Brother
9,067
abu mohammed's avatar
#135 [Permalink] Posted on 13th July 2020 19:45
bint e aisha wrote:
View original post

They are in agreement to the masks and distancing, so the question was based on an article from a third party source which refused to accept medical advice and the advice given by senior Ulama?

Or is the question based on one of their previous articles which is obviously now null and void in their own eyes too. Basically, their latest position supercedes any previous opinion?

report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top

Jump to page: