Hazratji Mualana Ilyas Saheb used to say
"To bring a sifat on us, we must give dawah on the Sifat"
Daie's Qurbani, amals will be directly proportional to his Dawah to be effective.
Tableegh is not Dawah, Tableegh is Islah!
Before I answer the other queries? Who has hit dislike on her post? What has the poor girl done which deserves such treatment?
Is this an error?
Your own post answers your question.
Loading Qur'aan Verse
Do you order righteousness of the people and forget yourselves while you recite the Scripture? Then will you not reason?
From your own post
In the light of Quran and Hadith, a very large number of ‘Ulama have unanimously mentioned that one who is lacking in a particular deed, may still invite others towards it.
‘Allamah Nawawi (rahimahullah) writes in his commentary on Sahih Muslim:
‘The ‘Ulama have stated that is is not a precondition in one who engages in enjoining good and forbidding evil, that he himself be abiding to what he advocates.
In fact, he is duty bound to enjoin good even if he is lacking in implementing it, just as he is bound to forbid wrong although he is involved in the same wrong.
This is because one has 2 separate responsibilities;
If he lacks in one of these responsibilities, how would that allow him to lack in the other?!
The same explanation has been echoed by the general Mufassirun (commentators of Quran) under verse: 44 of Surah Baqarah.
Hafiz Ibn Kathir (rahimahullah writes in the commentary of this verse of Surah Baqarah:
‘Commanding good and practising upon it are 2 separate responsibilities. Either one of these will not fall away even if an individual fails in the other. This is themost correct viewof the earlier and latter scholars.
Tableegh is not Dawah, it is Islah (as envisioned, stated, articulated, demonstrated and practised by the Ulama associated with Tableegh). In other words, you go in Jamaat to reform yourself and you go in Jamaat with an intention to reform yourself (while informing others). Thus I respectfully disagree with your opinion and state that within the context of Tableeghi Jamaat, your assertion is not wrong, it is not applicable.
P.S: Once again, before reacting emotionally please read carefully as I have neither disrespected nor insulted you in anyway. You are free to disagree.
This cannot be undone and I am sure it will be greatly appreciated.