- Home
- abu mohammed's Blog
- Taqleed
Recent Blog Entries
Newer Posts
posted by
abu mohammed on 27th October 2010
-
1 comment
A comment sometimes passed by misinformed Ahle Hadtih: If the Ahle Hadith were wrong, Shaikh Abdul Qadir Jailani would not have been an Ahle Hadith. He used to make raful yadain (lifting the hands between different postures of salah). Does there still remain any doubt about him being an Ahle Hadith? The Answer to these insults To call Shaikh Abdul Qadir Jailani an Ahle Hadith is another lie just like all the other lies. Shaikh sahib was a follower of Imam Ahmed ibn Hambal (R.A), (Ghunyatut-taalibeen pg.431) whereas the Ahle Hadith refer to taqlid as shirk. He considered making Nabi (S.A.W) a waseelah (means to gain from Allaah)
posted by
abu mohammed on 27th October 2010
-
0 comments
The name of the Imam of Madinah was Imam Malik (R.A). The SAlafi claim that they follow the Imams of Madinah, but they dont even accept what he says. This is just a deception with the Imam of Madinah; in fact Salafi differ in many ways. Lets compare the Salafi with the Imam of Madinah. (You = Salafi/Wahabi/Ahle Hadith/Najdi) 1) You lift your hands at the time of ruku. The Imam of Madinah says he does not even know what is the lifting of the hands (is meant for). (Mudawwatuhul Kubra, Nadwi pg.168 vol.1) 2) You are in the opinion of making masah on the turban, and the Imam of Madinah does not give permission to do so. (Muwatta Imam Maalik r.a pg.23)
posted by
abu mohammed on 27th October 2010
-
6 comments
Which ruling of the Ahle Hadith/Salafi/Wahabi/Najdi/Ghair Muqallid or what ever they call themselves now, and Shias is the same? Remember that the Salafi DO go through a process of Evolution, but their fundamental beliefs will remain. Lets take a look. References have been given to these claims. 1)Nawaab Noorul Hasan Khan who is a Ghair muqallid says that the saying of a Sahabi (ra) is not a valid proof, (Urful Jaadi pg.207 vol.1) and this is precisely what the Shias believe. 2) Waheeduz Zamaan a Ghair muqallid scholar says it is okay to say yaa Ali or yaa Muhammed, (Hadiyyatul Mahdi pg.24) and this is also a Shiite belief. 3) He also says that there is no consensus on giving preference to Shaikhain (Abu Bakr (ra) and Umar (ra) over all other Sahaba (R.A)), (Hadiyyatul Mahdi pg.94) this is also a Shiite belief. 4) To mention the names of the Khulafaa-e-raashiDeen in the (Friday) sermon is an innovation, (Hadiyyatul Mahdi pg.90) this is also a Shiite belief.
posted by
abu mohammed on 27th October 2010
-
0 comments
Many of the senior Ahle Hadith ulama of the past had major differences. You may contemplate them. 1. Shokaani Sahib and Nawaab Siddeeq Hasan Khan Sahib, who were both Ghair muqallids, say that Jumuah salah without the khutba is valid. (Roudathun nadiyyah) Waheeduz Zamaan Sahib says that it will not be valid. (Hadiyyatul Mahdi) 2. Waheeduz Zamaan says that one has to read Taawwuz in every rakat. (Ibid) Nawaab Sahib says it is masnoon at the beginning of the salah only. (Roudathun nadiyyah) 3. Nawaab Sahib says the tasbihaat in ruku and sajdah are Sunnat. Waheeduz Zamaan says it is waajib. 4. Nawaab Sahib says that it is permissible to write qibla or kabaa (as an indicator
posted by
abu mohammed on 26th October 2010
-
0 comments
Done by the Prophet but its not his Sunnat What do the Ahle Hadith say (In Green) compared to what we have to say. This topic is based on the Topi/Hat. We often hear people saying, that which Nabi (S.A.W) had done is called, Sunnat. To practice on it will earn us rewards, even if he only did it a few times. This is an incorrect definition of Sunnat. That which Nabi (S.A.W) had done once or twice, or that which Nabi (S.A.W) had discontinued, will not be termed as Sunnat. Then what is a Sunnat? That which Nabi (S.A.W) had perpetually done is called Sunnat, while that which he had stopped doing, or had at some point done but never again done, will not be Sunnat.
posted by
abu mohammed on 22nd October 2010
-
4 comments
[h]A Question posed by the Ghair Muqalid [b] "Those who compiled the Sihah Sitta (six authentic books of Ahadith), were they Muqallids or Mujtahids?"[/h][/center] This is a wonderful question. Imam Bukhari (R.A) selected certain Ahadith from many hundred thousand Ahadith to compile Bukhari Shareef. He knew many hundred thousand Ahadith by heart, yet he made taqleed of Imam Shaafi (R.A). We understand from this that a Muhaddith like Imam Bukhari (R.A) even had no choice but to make taqleed of a mujtahid. Imam Bukhari (R.A) would have also been a Ghair Muqallid if it were just sufficient to know Ahadith to free oneself from taqleed. Where do you stand
no matter how a great an aalim of the day you may be? You certainly cannot learn more Ahaadith than Imam Bukhari (R.A). Imam Muslim (R.A) has listed approximately 4000 Ahaadith which are not repeated (in his compilation). He was also a follower of Imam Shaafi (R.A). Imam Abu-Dawud (R.A) has also listed close to 4000 Ahaadith in his Sunan of Abu-Dawud. Despite being such a great muhaddith he followed Imam Ahmed ibn Hammbal. Imam Thirmizi (R.A) also narrates 4000 Ahaadith in his (book) thirmizi, yet he was also a follower of Imam Shaafi (R.A). Ibn Majah (R.A) lists 4341 Ahaadith in his book, yet he too was a follower of Imam Shaafi (R.A). Imam Nasai (R.A) has listed approximately 4000 Ahaadith in the Sunan of Nasai, yet he too was a follower Imam Shaafi (R.A). We would have to make another decision if you know more Ahaadith than those who compiled the sahih sitta, but if you know less Ahaadith than them, you have no choice but to make taqleed. We would like to ask Imam Bukhari (R.A) as to what forced him into making taqleed when he knew so many Ahaadith. We would also like to ask Imam Muslim (R.A) why he chose to make taqleed. Imam Thirmizi (R.A) should also be asked why he took the road of taqleed. We would ask Imam Nasai (R.A) if he was short of any hadith for him to have also chosen to follow an Imam. We would like to ask Imam Abu-Dawud (R.A) why he went to the door of Imam Ahmed ibn Hammbal (R.A) when he knew so many Ahaadith. We also need to ask Ibn Majah (R.A) what compelled him to make taqleed. Would you term these illustrious people as ignorant. Whatever judgment you wish to pass on them, you may pass on us. One needs to be conscious and his senses when passing a judgment.
posted by
abu mohammed on 22nd October 2010
-
2 comments
[h]Taqleed[/center] For the Urdu speakers http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNKeFR3kGyg&feature=related For the non Urdu Speakers, (Please note, my Urdu is NOT my mother tongue or my second language so I can not fully translate the interview word to word)Dr Zakir Naik is saying that Taqleed is to follow with the eyes shut, this is a basic definition, for example, if you have trust in someone like a doctor, you go to the Doctor for medication & you take the medication with no questions asked, this is to accept with your eyes shut, He says the word Taqleed comes from a word used for the ropes that are tied around the necks of animal. He then says that if you investigate that the person you are taking from trust him fully, then its not a problem. But if you find some strong evidence that goes contrary to the findings of the one being followed in light of the Quran & Hadith, and you STILL follow that person then, THIS is called Taqleed. (upto 58sec). Then he says that if you go to a Mufti and he passes a Fatwa and you accept it because he is more knowledgable than the rest of the ordinary people, fine, but if someone comes to you and says that the fatwa is wrong and here is the evidence from Quran & Hadith, and you still accept the wrong fatwa, after all the evidences has been given and you still follow this way, then THIS is called Taqleed. And in My (Dr Zakir Naik) opinion this is wrong. (Upto 1min 35sec) Yes I agree with you upto here The interviewer is asking him that all the people who are Muqallids (make Taqleed of 1 Imam) are they preserving the Deen in a positive manner or are they causing harm to the Deen. Dr Zakir Naik says that it has caused Harm to the Deen. Then he quotes the famous saying from all the Imams that "If you find any fatwa of mine that goes against the Quran and Hadith, then let go of my fatwa"Yes, they made this statements as they were Muhaddith, Mujtahids and the greatest Faqihs that ever lived. This statement was for the other Mujtahid Imams of which there has not been one for a very very long time. [url=http://www.muftisays.com/blog/abu+mohammed/429_06-10-2010/the-persians-%26amp%3B-hidden-knowledge-.html]Please click here to see the greatness of an Imam[/color]Dr Zakir Naik is suggeting that when the Imams came, the collections of Hadith had not been done, this was done way after that and they knew that they didnt have all the Hadith or information needed to pass the most accurate judgement. Even though they were closer to the era of the Prophet (SAW) and that thay saw the Sahaba (Only Imam Abu Hanifa saw some) and the Tabi'een, They were from the Kharul Quroon, The best of generations. They did not intend to create a FIRQA AKA Sect.(upto 2mins 44sec)WRONG again, (I have heard Dr Zakir speak many many times even live, He is my favourite speaker on comparative religion, and he always says that he use to stammer and Alhumdillilah I have never heard him stammer before until today. Then he goes onto say that in my practice, for example Imam Abu Hanifa says that in Salah after Surah Fatiha has been recited, one must say Aameen slowly, where as when I read Sahih Bukhari, it says in many places "Say Aameen loudly" "Aameen bil Jahr", therfore I say Aameen loudly. Thats why I say I am 100% Hanafi because Imam Abu Hanifa says that if you find stronger evidence then that is my way, therefore, those who claim to be Hanafi are only 80% Hanafi. LIE, LIE, LIE, Mufti Abdur Raheem Limbada in his talk [url=http://www.masjidequba.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=37&Itemid=61]The Reality of the Salaf Part2, it can be heard here, Brilliant talks, Press the Stand by button to switch it on, he says that This is a LIE against Imam Bukhari, (although it will be found in other books), The word "LOUDLY" "JAHR" is not used, Look it up in the Arabic version. Infact, I think he even said jokingly that if you can find me this Hadith in Sahih Bukhari I will give you £1000. He said that the wording is the same as is for the Hadith regarding rising from Ruku where the Muqtadi (follower) says Rabana lakal Hamd, so if the wording is the same, then why dont you say Rabana lakal Hamd loudly.[/color] He then goes on and on. Then he quotes the Famous verse of the Quran, O you who believe! Follow Allah; follow the Messenger and those of authority (Amr) amongst you. And if you dispute, then refer to Allah and the Messenger if you really do believe in Allah and in the last day. (Surah al-Nisaa Verse 59)[url=http://www.muftisays.com/viewarticle.php?article=zntaqleed](This time fully for a change)[/url] fine, lets not dispute, I am a normal man, but there is a conflict in the view of Aameen, So one should investigate the matter and follow the most correct opinion, we are not following anything new here, he says all four schools accept that after the Quran, Sahih Bukhari is the most authentic book of Hadith. Imam Bukhari came 200 years after the Prophet (SAW) So If Sahih Bukhari is the most authentic book after the Quran, then If there are countless Hadith in Sahih Bukhari that tells us to say Aameen loud (NOT TRUE) then why dont we follow that.
posted by
abu mohammed on 21st October 2010
-
1 comment
How could Ahle Hadith and Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaat be the same Taken from a [url=http://www.muftisays.com/archive/topic/4421/answering-salafis-pdf-downloads.html]PDF, page 22 The Gift to The Ahlul Hadith[/url][/b] Many times you hear the phrase "Theres is no difference in between the two" Please note: As time goes by, the theory of evolution comes into place with these people, therefore some of the differences are no longer present. 1. The ahlus Sunnah follow an Imam; Whilst the Ahle Hadith considers following an Imam to be shirk.
posted by
abu mohammed on 21st October 2010
-
1 comment
A common Question often asked. Taken from a [url=http://www.muftisays.com/archive/topic/4421/answering-salafis-pdf-downloads.html]PDF, page 17 The Gift to The Ahlul Hadith[/b] Question by the Ghair Muqallid "Tell me, why are you called Hanafi and not Muhammedi? So, are you a Hanafi or a Muhammedi? Answer by the Hanafi "Today you have mimicked the wahaabis and said good-bye to your brain! Question by the Ghair Muqallid "How is that?" Answer by the Hanafi "Your question is like my asking you whether it is Saturday or January; or is it Wednesday or February? Any intelligent person would be astounded, for if there were any conflict (in meaning) between January and Saturday, only then would this question be sensible. When today can be the Saturday and also be January then there is no difference between the two. Rather, the question should be, is today Saturday or Sunday? Is it the month of January or that of February? A day will oppose another day, and a month would oppose another month. I can also ask you questions like yours. Are you a ghair muqallid or a human? Are you an Ahle Hadith or a human? Are you Pakistani or Panjaabi? Just as these questions are incorrect in your opinion, the question of being a Muhammedi or Hanafi is incorrect. Should your question be correct, would you kindly answer the above three questions of mine? The answer to such questions would just be swearing.
posted by
abu mohammed on 20th October 2010
-
1 comment
This post is an inspiritation from the work of Brother Muadh_Khans [url=http://www.muftisays.com/forums/the-true-salaf-as-saliheen/4504/real-life-discussion-with-a-local-madkhali-%28extreme-salafi%29.html]Discussion with a local Madkhali, (Extreme Salafi)[/url] Click on highlighted text to view, Brilliant. Please rate it. In a conversation with a brother who was trying to tell me that we need to find the strongest opinion and follow that and not follow one Imam, This is how the conversation went: (This conversation was through email, hence the style of speech and typing) I had mentioned to the brother that I was going to send him a statement by Shaykh Uthaymeen: First I sent the link It is important to follow 1 Imam, I'll send you a [url=http://www.muftisays.com/blog/abu+mohammed/463_20-10-2010/shaykh-uthaymeen%2C-follow-1-school.html]link to what Shaykh Uthaymeen says about it[/i] So the Brother replied
Older Posts
Categories
Latest Blog Entries
Search this blog
Subscribe to abu mohammed's Blog
abu mohammed's Links
Blogs Disclaimer: The views expressed in these blogs are those of the author(s). The blog is monitored with set guidelines. Inapproproate content should be reported on our forums for the attention of our moderators.