Blog Banner
Related Categories: Taqleed
27
Oct
2010

Confession of a Ghair Muqallid

27th October 2010
This is taken from the book where some of the other blogs have come from.

This is the final question and answer that took place between the Ghair Muqallid and the Hanafi.
(Green is the Ghair Muqallid) Actually (what had happened was,) I was working with a few Ghair muqalliDeen youngsters. These youngsters gave me a few books. I had no knowledge of what was written in these books. After having read these books I began lifting my hands (at various points in sasalah), I began to stand (in salah) with my legs spread apart, I began to place my hands on my chest (in salah) etc. You have answered all my questions with proofs and have explained things very well to me. Now I am at ease. What remains, is that I
have been affected by a few books. Could you perhaps do something about that?

Which books have they given you? Could you show them to me?
“Salatur Rasool” and “Sabeelur Rasool” both by, Hakeem Sawdiq Siyaalkoti and “Haqeeqatul-fiqh” by Yusu Jaipoori.
Brother! These are the very three books which the Ghair muqalliDeen give to people in an attempt to deviate them. They move people away from following Imam Sahib (R.A), and make them follow an ignorant Siyaalkoti. What a fraud! They create a dislike towards taqleed, and put a person back onto taqleed (in another form).
Is there anything wrong with the content of those books?
Is it possible to be a Ghair muqallid and not speak lies? Let us take a close look at
some of Hakeem Sawdiq Sahibs lies. Here is the book, Salatur rasool;
1) On pg.131 he writes the azaan and gives reference of Bukhari and Muslim, whereas this is not a narration of Bukhari. This is an accusation against Imam Bukhai (R.A)
2) On pg.161 he states that the hands should be raised up to the shoulders or the ears and gives reference of Bukhari and Muslim, whereas these words are not found in Bukhari.
3) He has mentioned a Hadith on pg.179 under the chapter regarding masnoon Qiraat and has given the reference of Muwatta Imam Malik. This is also a lie.
4) He has written the azaan mentioning Allaahu Akbar four times, on pg.135 and
gives reference of Muslim, whereas this too is a lie.
5) He mentions the words ‘laa yastadir’ on pg.134 and gives the reference of Bukhari and Muslim, whereas this belies both books.
The lies found in Sabeelur rasool;
1) He narrates a Hadith thus, ‘the best of deeds is the perfoming of salah in its initial time’ and gives reference of Bukhari. This is an open lie.
2) He mentions a narration regarding three talaaq (divorce) and gives the reference of Bukhari, whereas this is not in Bukhari.
3) In a similar manner he has added the words, all of a sudden, in the translation of the Hadith regarding three talaaqs, which is either a black or white lie.
4) He gives reference to Ibn Majah and Muwatta Imam Malik when mentioning the
incident that occurred at the time of Fajr regarding the recital of surah Fatiha
behind the Imam. This is a false claim, as this Hadith is not mentioned in both
these books.
Now you tell me, when Sawdiq, “truthful” speaks so much lies, what will the condition of the rest be? The lies mentioned in the book, ‘Haqeeqatul-fiqh’ are countless.

Nevertheless, I will make mention of a few so that the importance of this book becomes known to you.
1) The Hadith which tells us to tie the hands below the navel is a weak Hadith. He
gives the reference of Hidaayah for this.
2) The Hadith which tells us to tie the hands on the chest is an authentic Hadith. He
gives the reference of Hidaayah for this.
3) To read “allaahumma baa’id baini” is more correct than reading
“subhanakAllaahuma” (as thanaa in the beginning of salah.) He gives the
reference of Sharhe- Wiqayah for this.
4) The Hadith which mentions not to read surah Faatiha behind the Imam is a weak
Hadith. He gives reference of Sharhe-Wiqayah for this.
5) The Hadith “izaa kabbaral Imamu fa kabbiroo bi he” is a weak Hadith. He gives
reference of Sharhe-Wiqayah for this.
6) The saying of ameen is a stamp of acceptance. He gives reference of Sharhe-
Wiqayah for this.
7) The muqtadi should say ameen upon hearing the Imam’s ameen. He gives
reference of Durre Mukhtar for this.
8) The Hadith (in which we are told to make) raful yadain as compared to the one
(which tells us) not to make, is stronger. He gives reference of Hidaayah for this.
9) All the Ahadith which mention not to make raful yadain are weak. He gives
reference of Sharhe-Wiqyah for this.
10) To dispute/wrangle with the person who makes raful yadain is permissible. He
gives reference of Hidaayah for this.
All this is pure lies. The original text of the book should be presented. The Ghair
muqalliDeen scholars will never ever present the original text.
These are the three books which have had an effect on you without any reason, my brother. The result of this conversation
I will never lay my hands on such books which have so many lies in them. I seek refuge from (joining) such a sect in the future, which speak so many lies. You have put me at ease as far as every matter of mine. The truth of the matter is that we (only) learn a few Ahadith, and then fall behind (attacking) those who have (actually) dedicated their lives for the course of Deen. We have no knowledge whatsoever as far as which (Hadith) is abrogated, and which (Hadith) has replaced it. We should be praying for those who have sacrificed their lives in the preservation and presentation of all the rulings of Deen for us. At the times of difficult we go to them for the solution, and (at other times) we swear at them, this is sheer treachery. I am going to re-invite all those whom I have encouraged to read salah bare-headed, and make salaam with one hand. I am also going
to bring back those whom I have made to stand with their feet spread apart in salah. The very first lesson of those friends who had put me on this (path of Ghair muqalliDeen) was, not to go and question those who have knowledge regarding the Ghair muqalliDeen, but to go to the uneducated and those who have made no research, and pester them. I have joined forces with them and ridiculed my father on numerous occasions. I will seek forgiveness from him too. Today only have I realized how these people speak lies using the name of the Quraan and Hadith. They call everything Hadith. What will the condition of the general masses amongst them be, when the ulama amongst them speak so many lies? May Allaah protect every Muslim from speaking lies and may He guide one and all to follow in the footsteps of the pious predesessors. Ameen.


reference:
A Gift to the Ahle-Hadith
{By Abu Bilaal Jhangawi}
Translation Edited by: Mufti A H Elias (May Allaah protect him)
Shawaal 2029 – October 2008
Tags:
posted by abu mohammed on 27th October 2010 - 2 comments

2 Comments

ibnsuleman bhai wrote on 15 Sep 2012
assalamalaikum,indeed it is an eye opener.Will you please email me the entire book-A GIFT TO AHLE HADIS please or url which gives download sraight away.thanks.wassalam
Blogger's Reply:
Salaam, sorry for the delay in responding.

InshaAllah, these will be of benefit to you, as this is where most of the work comes from. Parts of my article was typed out manually from the book as I don't have it as a PDF format. Khair, inshaAllah this will be good.

www.muftisays.com/forums/members-research-group/4421/answering-salafi-s-pdf-downloads.html
 
zishan ulde wrote on 24 Nov 2012
assalamualaikum
my name is zishan i follow shafi madhab
in my family all are ahlehadis but i dont follow because they are continously blaming other madhabs they tell me where it is written that the namaz behind ghair muqallib is not accepted
plzz answer my question
Blogger's Reply:
Jazakallahu khair.

I am not a scholar and not in a position to answer such questions.

The truth is that Salah can de prayed behind ahle Hadith or one of the 4 schools as long as the Aqeedah is correct.

There are differences in certain opinions like many ahle Hadith do wuzu on top of normal cotton socks where as in Shafi' or Hanafi etc this is not allowed. (leather socks are allowed) therefore many people will not pray behind them if they know that the imams wuzu is incomplete according to their schools.

Allahu alum.
 
Write a comment
(required) - not published nor available to blogger
Blogs Disclaimer: The views expressed in these blogs are those of the author(s). The blog is monitored with set guidelines. Inapproproate content should be reported on our forums for the attention of our moderators.