Q&A Home » Inheritance and Wills

Request for Sharia Guidance Regarding Partnership Assets, Lifetime Family Arrangements, and Determin

Last updated: 9th June 2026
Question ID: #13175
Short URL:
Printer Friendly Version Email this page


 
Alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh, Respected Fatwa Committee, We respectfully seek guidance regarding a family dispute concerning the estate of our grandfather. We are not requesting calculation of inheritance shares, but rather clarification of the Sharia principles that should govern the matter so that the family may resolve it according to the Qur’an and Sunnah Grandfather passed away leaving three sons — and three daughters. Background Son 3 migrated from India to Pakistan around 1990 to establish a business. During the Granfather’s lifetime, Son 3 received capital and financial assistance for this purpose. In addition, certain family assets in Pakistan were liquidated/distributed between the family members residing in Pakistan, namely Son 3 and one of the daughters. These assets were retained by them without being shared with the siblings residing in India. The daughter residing in Pakistan, has stated that her mother (Grandfather’s wife), had informed her that the common assets situated in Pakistan were intended for the children residing there, while the common assets situated in India were intended for the children residing in India. The daughters residing in India were given residential flats by the Grandfather during his lifetime and possession was transferred to them. Although there was no written statement that these represented their inheritance shares, the understanding of at least one surviving daughter was that this was her allocation from the family wealth. In India, the Grandfather, Son 1, and Son 2 were legal partners in the family business under a formal partnership deed with defined ownership shares: Grandfather: 40% Son 1: 30% Son 2: 30% Sons 1 and 2 actively managed, operated, and developed the business for many years through their full-time involvement, while the Grandfather reduced his daily involvement. During the Grandfather’s lifetime, the three business partners (himself along with Sons 1 and 2) had agreed that the wedding expenses of the children of Son 1 and Son 2 would be reimbursed from the business. The wedding expenses relating to Son 2’s children were paid from the business during the Grandfather’s lifetime. Son 1’s children were younger at that time, so their corresponding reimbursement was paid after the Grandfather’s death. At the time of this payment, Son 1 and Son 2 were the surviving business partners, and Son 2 accepted and agreed to this settlement before the remaining business capital was divided between them. During the Grandfather’s lifetime, certain properties and business-related assets were acquired from business funds and were legally registered/transferred to other family members with his knowledge and without objection. Current Issue Approximately eleven years after the Grandfather’s death, Son 3 has raised questions regarding certain arrangements relating to the Indian business and assets. In particular: He questions whether certain assets connected with Son 1 and Son 2 should be considered part of the Grandfather’s inheritance. He contends that the amount paid to Son 1 after the Grandfather’s death for his children’s wedding expenses should be treated as Son 1 receiving part of the inheritance, rather than a settlement of a pre-existing business agreement/obligation among the partners. We therefore respectfully request clarification on the following Sharia principles: Questions 1. Where a father and his sons were legal business partners with a written partnership deed and clearly defined ownership percentages, should inheritance apply only to the father’s actual ownership share at the time of death, or can the entire business and its assets be considered part of the father’s estate? 2. If business partners agreed during the father’s lifetime that certain family expenses would be reimbursed from the business, but the payment to one partner occurred after the father’s death due to timing circumstances, and the only remaining partners accepted and settled it, should this payment be considered: a settlement of a valid business obligation/agreement between partners, or an inheritance distribution received by that partner? 3. If assets were purchased, registered, or transferred during the father’s lifetime with his knowledge and acceptance, can heirs later challenge those arrangements after his death and include such assets within the inheritance estate? We request your guidance so that the family can correctly distinguish between: a. the actual estate (tarkah) left by our Grandfather at the time of death, b. valid partnership rights and obligations, and c. arrangements or transfers completed during his lifetime. Our aim is to apply one consistent Islamic principle to all family members and resolve this dispute fairly in a manner pleasing to Allah. Jazakum Allahu Khairan.



بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

الجواب حامداومصليا

In the case scenario, whatever your father left behind will be included in the inheritance after the fulfilment of debt and bequest.

1. Only father’s share and any assets belong to him will be included in the inheritance.

2. This will be included as a debt.

3. Any assets that were purchased for someone or transferred to someone with the agreement of the father will not be included in the inheritance.

And Allah knows best.

23 Dhul Hijja 1447/ 09 June 2026

Mufti
Answer last updated on:
10th June 2026
Answered by:
Ulamaa ID 04
Website
Location: London