Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

UK government data shows the COVID vaccines kill more people than they save

You have contributed 0.0% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
To appreciate this topic, click 'Appreciate Topic' on the right.
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
24,913
Brother
9,212
abu mohammed's avatar
#1 [Permalink] Posted on 10th August 2022 10:31
New UK government data shows the COVID vaccines kill more people than they save

I've been asking everyone: Show me the all-cause mortality data proving the vaccines are safe. I finally got some data. It's from the UK government and it's devastating. REALLY devastating.

Steve Kirsch
May 5 2022

Overview
New UK government data allows us to analyze the data in a way we couldn’t before. This new analysis shows clearly that the COVID vaccines kill more people than they save for all age groups. In other words, they shouldn’t be used by anyone. The younger you are, the less sense it makes.

Anyone can validate the data and methodology. The results make it clear that the COVID vaccines should be halted immediately.

If the vaccines really work, then why hasn’t any government anywhere in the world produced a proper risk-benefit analysis that shows the opposite result?

If the vaccines work, then why do all the lines in Figure 6 below show that Dose 1 and Dose 2 of the vaccines kill more people than they save?

Not a single public health authority in any country will have a conversation with us on the record to justify their vaccine recommendations by producing an all-cause risk benefit analysis similar to what I computed here. I wonder why?


The data showed that for most age ranges, the vaccine reduced your chance of dying from COVID, but it increased your chances of dying from other causes. The former effect was smaller than the latter effect so the vaccines are nonsensical.

For example, if you are 25 years old, the vaccine kills 15 people for every person it saves from dying from COVID. Below 80, the younger you are, the more nonsensical vaccination is.

The cells in Figure 1 with a * means that the vaccinated had more COVID deaths than the unvaccinated. This is known as “negative vaccine efficacy.” This wasn’t surprising since we’ve been claiming that the vaccines damage your immune system.

Above 80, the UK data was too confounded to be useful. Until we have that data, it’s irresponsible to make a recommendation.

I describe below (in link) how you can compute this yourself from the UK data.

Please share this result on all your social media platforms. One user got 10,000 likes in less than 24 hours on Twitter and he had only 2,000 followers. So Twitter permanently suspended his account. So probably not a good idea to share on Twitter. According to Twitter, “health officials consider the COVID-19 vaccines safe for most people” and therefore any UK government data that shows that they are lying is a violation of Twitter Community Standards.


Read full article and how data is interpreted using spreadsheets.
stevekirsch.substack.com/p/uk-government-data-shows-nobod...

Loading tweet


Scroll down the article to find stevekirsch.substack.com/i/53602264/the-quality-of-the-data and see how the quality of the data is biased when released. But when professors get their hands on it, it's game over!

Summary
Based on this new UK government data, we can estimate a true risk-benefit ratio for each age group. For all groups, it’s negative. The younger you are, the less sense it makes to take the vaccine. Figure 6 is a visual way to see this. All the dose 1 and 2 curves are above the unvaccinated line.

It shows clearly that our governments have been publicly killing us with these vaccines and vaccine mandates.

The data was used is fully reported data right from the UK government and the math is straightforward. The row I used was not normalized or manipulated. It was the hardest row to prove my point. The only way to explain the results is that the vaccines kill more people than they save. But you can also look at Figure 6 too.

At a minimum, this result should cast serious doubt about the safe and effective narrative. I took a dataset that was clearly biased to show a positive vaccine result and found a hugely negative signal hidden inside by selecting data that should have shown the opposite. No tricks were used. That shouldn’t have been possible if the vaccine was really safe.

We need to see a proper analysis on the data and we need to see it now.

The medical community has never demanded to see a proper risk-benefit study before recommending the vaccines. To this day, they continue to this day to keep their head in the sand and not demand to see the ACM data. It’s deplorable.

Until we see the data and the study and validate both showing the vaccines are safe and effective, the vaccines should not be used.

Please share this article and help us get the word out.

stevekirsch.substack.com/p/uk-government-data-shows-nobod...
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
24,913
Brother
9,212
abu mohammed's avatar
#2 [Permalink] Posted on 12th August 2022 11:31
Research and analysis
Coronavirus vaccine - summary of Yellow Card reporting
Updated 4 August 2022

www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-v...

4,342 INJURIES/DEATHS TO CHILDREN- UK
27/07/22

UK ADVERSE EVENTS:
 •2,226 DEATHS
•1,507,677 INJURIES
• 4,342 INJURIES/DEATHS TO CHILDREN
• 51,164 INJURIES/DEATHS AFTER BOOSTERS
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Yasin's avatar
UK
6,567
Brother
1,374
Yasin's avatar
#3 [Permalink] Posted on 12th August 2022 12:42
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post

Based on the fact that only 1 in a hundred and according to some 1 in 500 actually report damages and adverse reactions considering most think it's unrelated.

So actual figures is probably at least:

434,200 INJURIES/DEATHS TO CHILDREN- UK
27/07/22

UK ADVERSE EVENTS:
•222,600 DEATHS
•150,767,700 INJURIES
• 434,200 INJURIES/DEATHS TO CHILDREN
• 5,116,400 INJURIES/DEATHS AFTER BOOSTERS

These figures seem more realistic according to observation.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top