Devils Advocate

Unspecified

549

Brother

-6

#31 [Permalink] Posted on 27th March 2022 03:22

Yasin wrote:

View original post

Quote:

Why do you reject these doctors and experts of decades:

I have never rejected any of these doctors, because I do not specialise in medical science, and so I have no grounds for rejecting a medical opinion.

These are all doctors having decades of experience in their field, and we will take from them everything that agrees with the opinion of their respective professional bodies. If they can convince their peers of their views, then we will also readily accept those claims.

Blocked from replying in this thread.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Like x 1

sharjan8643

Unspecified

549

Brother

-6

#32 [Permalink] Posted on 27th March 2022 03:29

Yasin wrote:

View original post

Quote:

Why do you prefer the government's official pseudoscience antiscience narrative over these experts?

I have never said that I concur with everything in the government narrative. Governments need to play on the emotions of a majority of its citizens because they want to get re-elected and stay in power. And the opposition will do everything in its power to discredit the ruling government so they can have a shot at power in the next elections.

Blocked from replying in this thread.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Like x 1

sharjan8643

Unspecified

549

Brother

-6

#33 [Permalink] Posted on 27th March 2022 03:31

Yasin wrote:

View original post

Quote:

Some things don't need to be said.

Is this the same as putting words in someone's mouth?

Blocked from replying in this thread.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Like x 1

sharjan8643

6,700

Brother

944

#34 [Permalink] Posted on 27th March 2022 13:58

sharjan8643 wrote:

View original post

Quote:

What is consensus? Who determines concensus? As far as the data and evidence proves, majority experts say the opposite of your believe. Is your consensus based on the believers of cartoon physics and pseudoscience or the based on consensus of majority experts because they outnumber the handful of contracted and paid government affiliated experts who give the laughable science to explain what happened.

So what's your consensus based on? And who has the authority to stamp what is the consensus?

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

I am not a Mufti

Unspecified

549

Brother

-6

#35 [Permalink] Posted on 27th March 2022 16:47

Yasin wrote:

View original post

Please see posts 58, 59, 60, 61 in this thread.

Blocked from replying in this thread.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Like x 1

sharjan8643

6,700

Brother

944

#36 [Permalink] Posted on 27th March 2022 16:57

sharjan8643 wrote:

View original post

So where's the consensus? Where's the majority 2 million engineers who agree with cartoon Walt Disney physics?

I sent you a list of 3000+ experts and engineers that doesn't even include the actual majority who know the truth and apply actual science. This is just the ones who signed. The rest can be found on private blogs and various videos.

Please send me your list, details, data of 2 million+ that you mention. Where is the evidence of this consensus? Does it actually exist?

Quote:

For the signatories' opinions to hold value, they will need to demonstrate expertise in a very narrow field through extensive publication of peer reviewed research on this particular topic. If they are not specialists in this very narrow field of high impact physics in the context of skyscraper destruction, then they make up only 0.2% of the experts in general field of engineering and architecture.

Where's the evidence of this statement? Is that again your own requirement? It doesn't take years of university to know basic physics. Many learn this at the age of 13. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know what free-fall is. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that a tin plane cannot cut through inches of steel and that too reinforced with various thicknesses of concrete. Who needs to demonstrate that they understand this lol? You are doing everything within your trolling abilities to dismiss everything that goes against your narrative and I find the effort quite pathetic and filled with Fitnah, Fasaad and misinformation.

Tell me, where did these requirements come from? Is it a law? Is it Shar'ee? Or is it from your pocket? Is a person incapable of understanding 2x2 without being a PhD mathematician because that's what you're pretty much saying. Answer.

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

I am not a Mufti

Unspecified

549

Brother

-6

#37 [Permalink] Posted on 27th March 2022 17:16

Yasin wrote:

View original post

For this discussion to be fruitful, we need to find some common ground and work our way from there. Would you agree this is a reasonable request?

Are you a member of any professional body? If not, please find someone in your circle of trust who is a member of a professional body and please let me know what they think of my explanation.

Are you summarily dismissing everything I've written as "trolling?"

Blocked from replying in this thread.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Like x 1Ha Ha x 1

sharjan8643

6,700

Brother

944

#38 [Permalink] Posted on 27th March 2022 17:51

sharjan8643 wrote:

View original post

Quote:

Tell me, where did these requirements come from? Is it a law? Is it Shar'ee? Or is it from your pocket? Is a person incapable of understanding 2x2 without being a PhD mathematician because that's what you're pretty much saying. Answer.

Don't make claims you can't back up so please answer or it'll be dealt with accordingly.

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

I am not a Mufti

Unspecified

549

Brother

-6

#39 [Permalink] Posted on 27th March 2022 18:07

Yasin wrote:

View original post

In the field of professional studies, competence in a subject is objectively demonstrated through the process of peer reviewed publication.

Please let me know if this answers your question.

Blocked from replying in this thread.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Like x 1

sharjan8643

Unspecified

549

Brother

-6

#40 [Permalink] Posted on 27th March 2022 18:11

Yasin wrote:

View original post

No, a person does not need a PhD in mathematics to understand what 2x2 is.

Blocked from replying in this thread.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Like x 1

sharjan8643

6,700

Brother

944

#41 [Permalink] Posted on 27th March 2022 18:15

sharjan8643 wrote:

View original post

And where is this rule or requirement from? From a peer reviewed publication or from your pocket again?

Missing data still: 2 million+ engineers consensus. Where's the data? Where the peer reviewed publication proving this? Where's the peer review publication proving you above requirement of requiring a peer reviewed publication? Or does this rule and requirement only apply to those go against the government narrative?

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

I am not a Mufti

Unspecified

549

Brother

-6

#42 [Permalink] Posted on 27th March 2022 18:25

Yasin wrote:

View original post

Contrary views are also published through peer review, if that's what you are asking.

Blocked from replying in this thread.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Like x 1

sharjan8643

6,700

Brother

944

#43 [Permalink] Posted on 27th March 2022 18:29

sharjan8643 wrote:

View original post

That's nowhere near what I'm asking.

I'm asking:
Where is the rule or requirement you posted from? From a peer reviewed publication or from your pocket?

Missing data still: 2 million+ engineers consensus. Where's the data? Where the peer reviewed publication proving this? Where's the peer review publication proving you above requirement of requiring a peer reviewed publication? Or does this rule and requirement only apply to those go against the government narrative?

These are all your own requirements. I'm not asking anything except what you believe is valid but you don't seem to want to provide it. I can only imagine why and unicorns come to mind.

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

I am not a Mufti

Unspecified

549

Brother

-6

#44 [Permalink] Posted on 27th March 2022 18:33

Yasin wrote:

View original post

Quote:

Missing data still: 2 million+ engineers consensus.

We have documented proof of 3000+ engineers and architects who are united on the issue of 9/11. However there are over 2 million engineers and architects in the US alone and they have not signed the petition/document. Do you agree?

Blocked from replying in this thread.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Like x 1

sharjan8643

Unspecified

549

Brother

-6

#45 [Permalink] Posted on 27th March 2022 18:39

Yasin wrote:

View original post

Quote:

I'm not asking anything except what you believe is valid but you don't seem to want to provide it.

Are you saying peer reviewed publication is not how a professional body recognises competence?

Blocked from replying in this thread.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Like x 1

sharjan8643

Devils Advocate

Font Size

Font Weight