Before your child is injected

Unspecified

549

Brother

-6

#16 [Permalink] Posted on 15th December 2021 21:41

Asaaghir wrote:

View original post

Quote:

let them continue with assisted homicide?

We are all grown ups here. We don't take medical advice from forums. We all have family physicians and doctors we go to with questions about our health and well-being.

Quote:

Isn't it their duty to verify the truth?

Yes, it is, and they verified to the best of their ability and satisfaction. They did not agree with our data and references. They went by a different set of data and references.

Quote:

They even said they know that there are side effects and that is normal

If they have come to the conclusion that this is normal, why would they investigate further? Their experts are telling them that benefits outweigh risks.

Quote:

The information on this forum was from the makers of the PCR test kits, from qualified doctors who were dismissed because they stood up, from the former CEO of Pfizer. From whistle blowers who risked their lives but knew they had to uphold the truth. Now we have it from the creator of the mRNA technology!

There is just as much data and references and testimonials by other equally qualified doctors, experts, and scientists and they conclude that benefits outweigh risks. We might not agree with this, but that does not mean everyone else also thinks this way.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+0 -0Facepalm x 1

sharjan8643

Spinistan Throne

1,099

Brother

736

#17 [Permalink] Posted on 15th December 2021 21:57

sharjan8643 wrote:

View original post

The end of this is to say that they wouldn't listen to someone who they assumed wasn't qualified enough!

report post quote code quick quote reply

+0 -0Agree x 1

Asaaghir

6,677

Brother

933

#18 [Permalink] Posted on 15th December 2021 21:57

Quote:

If they have come to the conclusion that this is normal, why would they investigate further? Their experts are telling them that benefits outweigh risks.

Zero benefits can never outweigh risk of death. You do not need to feel obliged to defend the wrong. You are also spreading misinformation right now. There are zero health benefits. Absolutely zero. When every non-vaccinated non-masker is healthier and natural compared to the injured, disabled, modified and dead vaccinated people, you have no argument of health benefits and/or no reason to defend their wrong argument. There are zero benefits. All the health benefits stated by corporate agencies are lies as proven in so many threads. "You'll be able to travel and eat in restaurants." "Free donuts, burgers and now pizzas" are not health benefits.

You will not be warned again for spreading disinformation. Wrong is wrong and I for one has had enough.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Informative x 1

I am not a Mufti

Unspecified

1,063

Brother

1,125

#19 [Permalink] Posted on 16th December 2021 08:26

sharjan8643 wrote:

View original post

Ok, they were not open-minded enough.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+2 -0Creative x 2

fod1083

London

26,726

Brother

9,647

#20 [Permalink] Posted on 16th December 2021 09:28

fod1083 wrote:

View original post

a tweet on the lighter side of life on a very serious topic

Loading tweet

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Creative x 1

Actions are judged by intentions, so each man will have what he intended.
ابو محمد

Spinistan Throne

1,099

Brother

736

#21 [Permalink] Posted on 16th December 2021 17:00

Quote:

The unfortunate truth is that we're gonna have to have many children die before people wake up here, that's what's going to happen and that's what's got the founders of the unity project 'Just live it right now' is that we're rushing forward pelnel, willy-nilly on damaging and killing children. and now they're going to launch clinical trials in basically very young children, two to three, okay, and there will be childhood death, there will be childhood damage, and it seems that we're going to have to have that for people to wake up, to get through this brain fog they're all suffering...

Dr. Malone

www.bitchute.com/video/8Dc6nRyHqZwJ/ 43 seconds

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

Asaaghir

Spinistan Throne

1,099

Brother

736

#22 [Permalink] Posted on 22nd December 2021 11:53

DR TEDROS ON "BOOSTING CHILDREN" - TAKE A LISTEN!

www.bitchute.com/video/hiujJqIquuCY/ Less than a minute

Quote:

Some countries are using the boosters to kill children?

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

Asaaghir

London

26,726

Brother

9,647

#23 [Permalink] Posted on 23rd December 2021 18:09

Asaaghir wrote:

View original post

Fact checkers have debunked this video.

I've watched the fuller clip of this video on the WHO website, but they omitted this part, which I think was a response to a question that came later on. It can only be found on sites where they cannot be silenced.

They've (fact checkers) said that he mispronounced the syllable and said cil/kill for chil... and that there is no other possibility or explanation.

I would maybe accept that if he was reading from a document or if he paused and corrected himself, but instead, he wasn't reading anything out and he didn't pause or show any sort or error in his facial expressions or body language.

He used the weapon of mass destruction and this video would be perfect in that thread with the water spout, the tongue and the heart!

I have to keep reminding myself that fact checkers are random Meta guys who provide their own opinion and do not base anything on facts. They are like narcissists who convince themselves of their own opinions and push their conclusions on everyone else. And everyone else believes it.

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

Actions are judged by intentions, so each man will have what he intended.
ابو محمد

6,677

Brother

933

#24 [Permalink] Posted on 24th December 2021 00:52

Quote:

They are like narcissists who convince themselves of their own opinions and push their conclusions on everyone else. And everyone else believes it.

They're actually paid employees with tasks given to make something true or false.

They were unheard of before covid and mRNA jabs.

They are owned by vaccine shareholders.

They admitted in court that they publish opinions and not facts.

Taking fact checkers seriously for anything is like taking wikipedia seriously as an encyclopedia. It's mixed with half truths and half propaganda. With intent and purpose.

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

I am not a Mufti

London

26,726

Brother

9,647

#25 [Permalink] Posted on 11th January 2022 14:06

Quote:

DATA PROTECTION ACT/GDPR-SCHOOLS

There are more stories of children who are being asked by teachers to disclose their vaccine status in class.
This sort of humiliation is not only immoral but also illegal.
These tactics are to coerce, humiliate and bully children.
Some children have also been asked to disclose their parent’s vaccination status.

Teachers should be reported for this behaviour.
They should also be sent copies of the Data Protection Act and the rules of GDPR which schools must adhere to.

gdpr-info.eu/art-5-gdpr/

ukgdpr.fieldfisher.com/chapter-8/article-82-gdpr/

www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/section/144

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

Actions are judged by intentions, so each man will have what he intended.
ابو محمد

London

26,726

Brother

9,647

#26 [Permalink] Posted on 26th January 2022 09:52

Number of reports of injuries and deaths for children aged 1 month-17 years (to be updated)

Australia 3,000

VAERS 25,802

MHRA (UK) 2,471

VigiAccess (WHO) 12,344

EudraVigilance (EMA) 18,749

t.me/childcovidvaccineinjuriesuk

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Informative x 1

Actions are judged by intentions, so each man will have what he intended.
ابو محمد

London

26,726

Brother

9,647

#27 [Permalink] Posted on 4th February 2022 09:06

Pfizer vaccine for infants and children under five: 5 facts you need to know

Pharma giant pushes vaccine for small children despite failure in clinical trials
featured post image
Pfizer is widely expected to ask the FDA for an emergency-use authorization of its COVID-19 vaccine in infants and young children as early as today. Pfizer, together with BioNTech, its German partner in the production of its COVID vaccine, hopes to begin administering the shots to infants as young as 6 months worldwide, starting in the United States later this month.

1. Pfizer and the FDA are moving forward DESPITE the failure its drug trials on children under 5

Pfizer and BioNTech already reported in December that,

Pfizer and BioNTech wrote:

“two doses of the pediatric vaccine failed in 2-, 3- and 4-year-olds to trigger an immune response comparable to what was generated in teens and older adults.”

The company did claim then, though, to have achieved an, “adequate immune response in children 6 months to 2 years old.”

2. A third dose is already planned

Due to the disappointing results from the trials of the two-shot regimen in children under 5, Pfizer immediately began testing a third dose on those children, amending its study to provide for a third injection to each of the participating children eight weeks after their second shot.

An anonymous administration official reported that a briefing of federal health officials by Pfizer, which included Dr. Anthony Fauci, the White House’s chief medical adviser for its response to the coronavirus, included,

“a ‘robust conversation’ that three doses were likely to be much better than two shots [in children under 5] … But to get to three, you have to get two shots first … There’s interest in seeing this move forward.”

3. The third dose may already be added to the scheduled dosing of infants and young children by April

Pfizer announced in January that it expects data on this third shot to be available by April. The Washington Post added that, according to “knowledgeable individuals” the submission of this new data is expected to lead to its addition to the vaccine schedule for young children:

“Once that information is submitted, regulators are expected to authorize a third dose of the pediatric vaccine. ‘We know that two doses isn’t enough, and we get that,’ said one of the people familiar with the situation. ‘The idea is, let’s go ahead and start the review of two doses. If the data holds up in the submission, you could start kids on their primary baseline months earlier than if you don’t do anything until the third-dose data comes in.’” [Emphasis added].

4. The dose is much smaller than the adult dose

The version of the vaccine to be administered to children under 5 is a 3-microgram dose in each shot, one tenth of the dose in the adult vaccine. Children aged 5 to 11 receive 10 microgram doses while adults, as well as children 12 and older, receive 30 micrograms in each injection. As with adults, the two injections are scheduled three weeks apart.

5. Pfizer’s market share and profit margin set to spike

With a global population of more than 600 million children under the age of 5, Pfizer Inc. (PFE) will greatly expand its market share for COVID-19 vaccines if its request for multi-dose use in this age group is approved. Although the company previously forecasted “sales of $26 billion in revenue for 1.6 billion vaccine doses, therefore at an average cost per dose of $16.25,” the per dose cost is set to spike.

Oxfam, a global organization that fights poverty and injustice, explains,

“Never in history have governments been buying more doses of vaccines for one disease and the large-scale production should drive down costs, enabling companies to charge lower prices. Yet the EU reportedly paid even higher prices for its second order from Pfizer/BioNTech. Dramatic price escalation is predicted to continue in the absence of government action and with the possibility of booster shots being required for years to come. The CEO of Pfizer has suggested potential future prices of as much as $175 per dose - 148 times more than the potential cost of production …

“Analysis of production techniques for the leading mRNA type vaccines produced by Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna – which were only developed thanks to public funding to the tune of $8.3 billion - suggest these vaccines could be made for as little as $1.20 a dose.”

americasfrontlinedoctors.org/news/post/pfizer-vaccine-for...

Additional evidence and sources in link

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

Actions are judged by intentions, so each man will have what he intended.
ابو محمد

Spinistan Throne

1,099

Brother

736

#28 [Permalink] Posted on 7th February 2022 11:01

abu mohammed wrote:

View original post

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

Asaaghir

Spinistan Throne

1,099

Brother

736

#29 [Permalink] Posted on 8th February 2022 11:00

Doctors said a 6-year-old needs the COVID vaccine; now he has myocarditis and can’t walk

alphanews.org/doctors-said-a-6-year-old-needs-the-covid-v...

Really upsetting to see children in this state :(

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Informative x 1

Asaaghir

London

26,726

Brother

9,647

#30 [Permalink] Posted on 12th February 2022 16:38

CVAG urge “pause” to child covid roll-out in light of “shocking” new data

The Children’s Covid Vaccines Advisory Group of more than 80 doctors, professors and scientists, has written to the UK’s JCVI, the CMOs and the health secretary to urge an immediate pause to the covid vaccine roll-out for children. Here is a copy of the letter in full.

Thursday, 10th February 2022

Professor Wei, JCVI

Professor Sir Chris Whitty, CMO

Sajid Javid, Secretary of State, DHSC

Dear Professor Wei, Professor Whitty and Mr Javid,

We wrote to you and also the MHRA last month regarding urgent investigation of the acknowledged increase in all cause mortality in males aged 15-19 since the Pfizer covid vaccine rollout commenced in this age group in May 2021. ONS have acknowledged in the High Court in London, that the figure of 402 excess deaths is significantly higher than the previous 5 year average of 337 deaths. Indeed they stated it is probably an underestimate because of delays for coroners’ cases. This equates to at least one additional teenage boy dying each week. It is thus very disappointing not to have received any response.

We are writing further to ask you to pause the vaccines for children while you undertake and publish an urgent review of the risk/benefit analysis. In August 2021 you concluded that there was no medical justification for vaccinating healthy 12-15-year-olds, with the authorisation based on an aim to reduce school closures. But this new safety signal and the impact of this uncertainty, must affect your assessment of the risk to benefits.

Since that date, much has changed. The latest omicron variant has been shown to have a much lower risk of serious illness, hospitalisations and deaths than the previous alpha and delta variants circulating at the time of the decision. This is true for children as well as adults, so given the extremely low risk for children in previous waves, any potential for benefit must surely have dwindled to virtually zero. Also, in your analysis you failed to take due regard to naturally-acquired immunity, now demonstrated and widely accepted to be superior to vaccine acquired immunity. Children have had high rates of infection throughout recent weeks with at least 80% now estimated to be immune. In addition, the efficacy of Pfizer against omicron compared to previous variants is reduced to the point where infection rates are now higher in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated removing any potential indirect benefit to immune-compromised family members and perversely creating an increased risk to contacts of the vaccinated.

On the risks side of the balance sheet, we have further information regarding myocarditis, with an occurrence rate of 1/2680 young men in Hong Kong, where unlike the UK, this was sought systematically from the start of their rollout. Indeed they paused their second dose, just as the UK moved from one to two doses. Data from the US also confirm high rates of 1/9443 in males aged 16-17 after their second dose. We still have no follow-up data on the increasing number of children reported from the US with significant abnormalities on their cardiac MRI scans. We also have worrying information on all-cause mortality by vaccination status, which even from the original adult Pfizer trial showed a higher mortality for the vaccinated group. Side effects are higher when vaccinating those already immune. Other side effects such as increased blood clots will all be playing a part in this balance of risk. Non-fatal adverse events, particularly neurological, have the potential to blight the lives of affected children. The latest information from the CDC is extremely worrying, that of 4149 children, 100 (2.41%) had a serious adverse event, 15/4149 (0.36%) had increased troponin (12 confirmed to be myocarditis), 12/4149 (0.29%) had seizures, 2/4149 (0.048%) died (being evaluated). This in itself is a reason to review.

Furthermore, there is increasing evidence of impairment of immune function particularly following multiple doses of vaccine. Israel is now seeing serious illness and death after the fourth vaccine dose. There is also new bio-distribution data showing that mRNA and spike protein, far from being eliminated within a few days, are still persisting for 60 days or more. We have no knowledge of the long-term implications of vaccinating children against what is now acknowledged to be a very mild illness for them, indeed with 50% having no symptoms whatsoever..

With the arrival of omicron, SARS-CoV-2 has moved from pandemic to endemic. If the current situation had existed six months ago, there would have been no case made for commencing routine rollout for healthy children. Now, at a time when it is proposed that even those testing positive for omicron do not need to isolate. If omicron is no risk to others, why vaccinate? The prospect now of widening the coverage to 5-11s would be all the more ludicrous. We should, like Norway & Sweden, make clear that vaccination for this age group is simply not necessary.

The time has now come to pause and acknowledge that there is no emergency for children and that for them the balance of benefit and risk now clearly favours natural immunity. On that basis the routine programme could and should be halted. Failure to act will lay you open to liability for ongoing harms.

We would like to meet with you urgently, in order to support you in taking stock of all of the pertinent new and emerging data.

Yours sincerely,

Dr Rosamond Jones, MD, FRCPCH, retired consultant paediatrician

Professor Keith Willison, PhD, Professor of Chemical Biology, Imperial, London

Professor David Livermore, BSc, PhD, Professor of Medical Microbiology, University of East Anglia

Professor Anthony J Brookes, Professor of Genomics and Health Data Science, University of Leicester

Professor Richard Ennos, MA, PhD. Honorary Professorial Fellow, University of Edinburgh

Professor Angus Dalgleish, MD, FRCP, FRACP, FRCPath, FMed Sci, Professor of Oncology, St Georges Hospital, London

Professor John Fairclough FRCS FFSEM retired Honorary Consultant Surgeon

Professor Norman Fenton, CEng, CMath, PhD, FBCS, MIET, Professor of Risk Information Management, Queen Mary University of London

Professor Anthony Fryer, PhD FRCPath, Professor of Clinical Biochemistry

Lord Moonie, MBChB, MRCPsych, MFCM, MSc, House of Lords, former parliamentary under-secretary of state 2001-2003, former consultant in Public Health Medicine

Dr Theresa Lawrie, MBBCh, PhD, Director, Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd, Bath

Dr John Flack, BPharm, PhD. Retired Director of Safety Evaluation, Beecham Pharmaceuticals

1980-1989 and Senior Vice-president for Drug Discovery 1990-92 SmithKline Beecham

Professor Anthony J Brookes, Professor of Genomics & Health Data Science, University of Leicester

Dr Alan Mordue, MBChB, FFPH. Retired Consultant in Public Health Medicine & Epidemiology

Dr Roland Salmon, MB BS, MRCGP, FFPH, Former Director, Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre Wales

Dr Gerry Quinn, PhD. Postdoctoral researcher in microbiology and immunology

Katherine MacGilchrist, BSc (Hons), MSc, CEO/Systematic Review Director, Epidemica Ltd.

Mr James Royle, MBChB, FRCS, MMedEd, Colorectal surgeon

Dr Livia Tossici-Bolt, PhD, Clinical Scientist

Dr Elizabeth Evans MA(Cantab), MBBS, DRCOG, Retired Doctor

Dr Rohaan Seth, Bsc (hons), MBChB (hons), MRCGP, Retired General Practitioner

Dr Emma Brierly, MRCGP, General Practitioner

Dr Geoffrey Maidment, MD, FRCP, retired consultant physician

Mr Malcolm Loudon, MBChB, MD, FRCSEd, FRCS(Gen Surg), MIHM,VR, Consultant Surgeon

Dr Alan Black, MBBS, MSc, DipPharmMed, retired pharmaceutical physician

Dr David Cartland, MBChB, BMedSci, General practitioner

Dr Peter Chan, BM, MRCS, MRCGP, NLP, General Practitioner, Functional medicine practitioner

Dr Greta Mushet, MBChB, MRCPsych, retired Consultant Psychiatrist in Psychotherapy

Dr Samuel McBride, MBBCh, BAO, BSc, MSc, MRCP (UK) FRCEM, FRCP (Edinburgh), NHS Emergency Medicine & geriatrics

Mr Ian F Comaish, MA, BM BCh, FRCOphth, FRANZCO, Consultant ophthalmologist

Dr Branko Latinkic, BSc, PhD, Reader in Biosciences

Dr Helen Westwood MBChB MRCGP DCH DRCOG, General Practitioner

Michael Cockayne, MSc, PGDip, SCPHNOH, BA, RN, Occupational Health Practitioner

Mr Anthony Hinton, MBChB, FRCS, Consultant ENT surgeon, London

Dr Tanya Klymenko, PhD, FHEA, FIBMS, Senior lecturer in Biomedical Sciences

Michael Cockayne, MSc, PGDip, SCPHNOH, BA, RN, Occupational Health Practitioner

Dr Carmen Wheatley, DPhil, Orthomolecular Oncology

Dr Charles Lane OBE, Molecular Biologist

Mr Angus Robertson BSc (Med. Sci.) MB ChB FRCS(Ed) FFSEM(UK) Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

Dr Michael D Bell, MBChB MRCGP Retired General Practitioner

Dr Jayne LM Donegan, MBBS, DRCOG, DCH, DFFP, MRCGP, General Practitioner

Dr David Critchley, BSc, PhD in Pharmacology, 32 years’ experience in Pharmaceutical R&D

Dr Keith Johnson, BA, D.Phil (Oxon), IP Consultant for Diagnostic Testing

Julie Annakin, RN, Immunisation Specialist Nurse

Rev Dr William J U Philip MB ChB, MRCP, BD, Senior Minister The Tron Church, Glasgow, formerly physician specialising in cardiology

Dr Jonathan Rogers MBChB (Bristol) MRCGP DRCOG Retired NHS General Practitioner

Dr Pauline Jones, MB BS, Retired General Practitioner

Dr Emma Brierly, MBBS, MRCGP, General Practitioner

Dr Elizabeth Burton, MB ChB, Retired General Practitioner

Dr Franziska Meuschel, MD, ND, PhD, LFHom, BSEM, Nutritional, Environmental and Integrated Medicine

Dr Michael Bazlinton, MBCHB MRCGP DCH

Dr Holly Young, BSc, MBChB, MRCP, Consultant Palliative Care Medicine

Dr Julian Tomkinson, MBChB, MRCGP, General Practitioner, GP Trainer, PCME

Dr David Bramble, MBChB, MRCPsych, MD, Consultant Psychiatrist

Dr Christina Peers, MBBS, DRCOG, DFSRH, FFSRH, Menopause Specialist

Dr Chris Newton, PhD, Biochemist working in immuno-metabolism

Dr Christopher Exley, PhD, FRSB, Bioinoganic Chemist

Dr Sarah Myhill, MBBS, Retired General Practitioner

Jessica Righart, Senior Critical Care Scientist

Dr Michael D Bell, MBChB, MRCGP, retired General Practitioner

Dr Angharad Powell, MBChB, General Practitioner

Dr Stephen Ting, MB CHB, MRCP, PhD, Consultant Physician

Mr Ahmad K Malik, FRCS (Tr & Orth), Dip Med Sport, Consultant Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgeon

Dr Catherine Hatton, MBChB, General Practitioner

Dr Kulvinder S. Manik MBChB, MRCGP, MA(Cantab), LLM, Gray’s Inn

Dr Stefanie Williams, MD, Dermatologist

Kim Bull, Foundation Degree in Paramedic Science, Paramedic

Margaret Moss, MA (Cantab), CBiol, MRSB, Director, The Nutrition and Allergy Clinic, Cheshire

Dr Haleema Sheikh, MRCGP, General Practitioner

James Cook, NHS Registered Nurse, Bachelor of Nursing (Hons), Master of Public Health (MPH)

Dr Jonathan Engler, MBChB, LlB (Hons), DipPharmMed

Dr Clare Craig, BMBCh, FRCPath, Pathologist

Dr David Bell, MBBS, PhD, FRCP(UK), Public Health Physician

Dr Ruth Wilde, MB BCh, MRCEM, AFMCP, Integrative & Functional Medicine Doctor

John Collis, RN, Specialist Nurse Practitioner

Dr Damien Downing, MBBS, MRSB, private physician

Mr Lasantha Wijesinghe, FRCS, Consultant Vascular Surgeon

Dr Claire Mottram, BSc Hons, MBChB, Doctor in General Practice

Dr Ali Haggett, Mental health community work, 3rd sector, former lecturer in the history of medicine

Dr Jenny Goodman, MA, MBChB, Ecological Medicine

Suzanne Tomkinson BSc MSc CSci FIBMS Senior Biomedical Scientist (Clinical Biochemistry)

Dr Felicity Lillingstone, IMD DHS PhD ANP, Doctor, Urgent Care, Research Fellow

Dr Marco Chiesa, MD, FRCPsych, Consultant Psychiatrist & Visiting Professor, UCL

Anna Phillips, RSCN, BSc Hons, Clinical Lead Trainer Clinical Systems (Paediatric Intensive Care).

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Informative x 1

Actions are judged by intentions, so each man will have what he intended.
ابو محمد

Before your child is injected

Font Size

Font Weight