View original post
So you will ignore my post completely and post everything under the sun that has nothing to do with what I'm asking whatsoever? Someone actually messaged me to watch how it will be "brushed under the carpet" but I didn't think you would so brazenly like this.
Am I correct to conclude that you have no response to what was actually posted?
I'll continue to try and help you and quote you to ensure you know what it's about. I'll even advise on how to reply to someone:
1. Quote their question
2. Answer the question with information related to what the question is actually about. Don't ignore the question. Answer it honestly, calmly and without anger. Answer it always as if you're explaining to a child but without condescending tones and words.
So you've neither quoted the question nor answered it and instead posted other complaints that's clearly overwhelming your mind. Try separating that hatred and really read my post and try to answer only what's there.
To demonstrate, here's my response to your last post:
You said, "Its "implied""
What's implied? The OR? Wrong again. A comma NEVER implies an OR. Please don't ever write important documents if you think a comma can imply "OR" on its own or without stating that it's a list of options. For example:
You can choose ANY 1 of item1, item2, item3, item4, item5
Only in this case the comma is an OR because the comma represents a list with the preceding stipulation. On it's own it can NEVER imply or mean "OR" - Do you still claim it was implied or do you feel you made a mistake?
You said, "your co-conspirator"
How can advice about not using logical fallacies have a co-conspirator?
Or is this the age old tactic to try and discredit the flaws I pointed out in your approach? Is it an attempt to humiliate me? Is it an attempt to discredit me as a person? Is it to question my "ability" to have an opinion? I'm sincerely sorry that it's not working on me. I don't know if it's working on anyone else. Again, I will not stoop to firing such baseless labels and continue to stay on topic about using fallacies to dismiss information.
You are welcome to provide an explanation on why you repeatedly say "your con-conspirators" as if that justifies using logical fallacies to dismiss information.
You said, "You make rules to not debate and then break your own rules when it suits you"
Yes I make the rules to not debate as well as by advisers. But this is fine, you are still correct to say I make the rules not to debate.
But you said I break the rules? Do you know what we consider to be "debating"?
Did you know that debating is a very broad word that only means 'two sides formally putting opposing arguments forward'?
Did you know that has never banned? Please provide where ALL TYPES of debates are banned then you are correct and I will stop.
Please show me in this thread where I'm debating? Please show me any public thread where I'm debating as long as you understand what debating is. I've posted nothing but statements, questions and explanations (see the commas here, they mean AND, not OR).
If you disagree, I'd like to understand why you disrespect to this extent. In fact, if these replies were to any other member they would not have been approved. But as the disrespect and accusations were against me I allowed the posts to go through so you cannot use another false accusation that it wasn't approved because it was against me. The truth is, it would never be allowed no matter who you disrespect.
Please justify yourself. This is important.