Professor Maripat. Your comment on "Collapse and Free Fall" made me go back into history :)
It took me back to my college and uni days and later back to 911.
I wanted to cinfirm my understanding of the difference between a "collapse" and "free-fall" and I agree with you, somewhat.
A building collapsing makes sense but for the roof to come down at free fall cannot make sense and that's what been baffling me.
However, I did touch upon this 2 and 3 years ago in one of my favourite threads "How to remove a metal structure with ease?"
So, if the roof was timed to come down at free fall speed, how could that even be possible with everything below it. The only logical yet illogical explanation would be to say that the roof had nothing undeneath it! That is the only possible yet insane way.
abu mohammed wrote:
They found an intact Arab passport amongst the melted steel and debris 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️ and the simple solution is to link it to bin laden.
They needed an excuse to invade The Islamic land of Mullah Umar.
I can list a few more if you need, but pause and think about it. A passport?
And funny enough, I now know why that can be explained :(
My answer was always there in the post but lacked a bit of understanding
www.muftisays.com/forums/94-propaganda-lies-hoax/12425-sp...
So, to get back to our predicament:
The towers didn't collapse. The roof was correctly timed to come down at free fall space because there was nothing underneath the roof!
As ridiculous as this sounds, it is true!
Can anyone explain how any why?