Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

☆ 1969 Moon Landings were FAKE

Jump to page:
The thread starter has marked this thread as Member Locked so only the thread starter can reply
This means the thread starter has used the option to disable replies when starting the thread. This is not a decision made by the site.
Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
abu mohammed, abuzayd2k
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
811
Brother
1,554
super-glue's avatar
#106 [Permalink] Posted on 8th February 2020 15:40
Shills trying to answer the shadow claim of uneven ground:

They show images of multiple light sources like


Then to "debunk" it they say it's uneven ground and show a photo of actual uneven ground where the light source is OBVIOUSLY the same.

Completely ignoring the photo evidence that's provided.

These are the tricks these shills use to fool. Just like the atheist do with the example of beneficial mutation when they say that mutations can also be harmful and then give a photo of that but not of the thing they're actually claiming about. Same tricks, different agendas.

It just seems much worse when Muslims are naive enough to think the immortal and all powerful supreme masters and overlords of the galaxy USA send humans to play golf on the moon using 1960's technology and 50 YEARS later where calculators are more powerful than 1960's computers it can't be done lol. While the believers are in their fantasies, I will continue to post evidence of the biggest fraud in history for those who do not suffer such cognitive dissonance.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+3 -0Like x 1Winner x 1Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
811
Brother
1,554
super-glue's avatar
#107 [Permalink] Posted on 8th February 2020 18:30
report post quote code quick quote reply
+3 -0Winner x 1Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
811
Brother
1,554
super-glue's avatar
#108 [Permalink] Posted on 9th February 2020 00:46




report post quote code quick quote reply
+3 -0Like x 1Winner x 1Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
811
Brother
1,554
super-glue's avatar
#109 [Permalink] Posted on 9th February 2020 00:58


From original apollo 14 and apollo 17 videos.
Clear evidence of wires as the pings are always vertically aligned where a harness would be attached to actors.

The hopping and unnatural movements? WIRES
report post quote code quick quote reply
+3 -0Like x 4Agree x 3Winner x 1Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
811
Brother
1,554
super-glue's avatar
#110 [Permalink] Posted on 9th February 2020 01:10
report post quote code quick quote reply
+3 -0Like x 1Winner x 1Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
811
Brother
1,554
super-glue's avatar
#111 [Permalink] Posted on 9th February 2020 01:21
report post quote code quick quote reply
+3 -0Like x 2Agree x 2Winner x 1Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
811
Brother
1,554
super-glue's avatar
#112 [Permalink] Posted on 9th February 2020 01:38


Literally no escaping from this one. The LM never moved so the photo is impossible on the moon unless someone parachuted to the moon or an alien took this photo. What will it be?
report post quote code quick quote reply
+3 -0Like x 1Winner x 1Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
811
Brother
1,554
super-glue's avatar
#113 [Permalink] Posted on 9th February 2020 16:58
Logic 101

Quote:
Have you ever wondered why they claimed to have walked on the moon in 1969, on the very first attempt, even though right here on earth Mt. Everest and the South Pole took numerous tries before success, allegedly accomplishing this amazing feat with fifty year older technology (a cell phone has one million times more computing power than all of NASA did back then), yet fifty years later, the farthest that NASA can send astronauts from the earth is only one-thousandth the distance to the moon, despite five decades more advancements in rockets and computers?

-thesleuthjournal
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Agree x 1Winner x 1Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
811
Brother
1,554
super-glue's avatar
#114 [Permalink] Posted on 9th February 2020 17:01
Logic 101

Quote:
Has there ever been a genuine technological achievement in the entire history of the world, such as the first automobile, the first airplane, or the first nuclear bomb, whose modern day capability was only 1/1000th of that which it was fifty years earlier? Seeing how it is impossible for technology to go backwards and today NASA can only send astronauts one-thousandth the distance to the moon as was claimed fifty years ago on the very first attempt with five decades older technology, the only remaining conclusion is that the 1969 claim was a government forgery. It is that simple and that sad.

The United States federal government, and its CIA, have lied and used false propaganda numerous times before, so we should not be surprised by this happening again, especially when there was no independent press coverage of the event whatsoever. During the incredible civil unrest caused by the highly unpopular Vietnam War at the time, a successful moon landing gave the American public something most needed to cheer about. The only way to assure its success, and not risk killing national heroes on live television during the most dangerous untried mission of all time, which is still impossible today, much less with 1960’s technology, was simply to stage it, like a bluff in poker. If it were not for people’s deep emotional attachment to the grandiose claim, they would easily see the truth of the fraud for the obvious reasons that I just gave. Instead, telling them the truth is like taking candy away from a child, who responds with curse-filled words while in the process of trying to improve their health.

The reason why I pursue this matter so relentlessly, is because once I realized that the grandiose event was indeed falsified, it sickens my soul to such a degree, that I feel enormously compelled to bring this historic crime into the light, for the most needed betterment of lost humanity.

-thesleuthjournal
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 2Agree x 2Winner x 1Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
811
Brother
1,554
super-glue's avatar
#115 [Permalink] Posted on 9th February 2020 17:04
Quote:
When I was a child, believing in Santa Claus was so much fun. Believing that we live in a magical world where men can fly to the moon on their very first attempt with 1960’s technology is fun too, even though the feat cannot be repeated fifty years later, by any nation on earth, including the one that allegedly did it first half a century ago, even though all truth reminds us that the South Pole, and Mt. Everest, and first flight, and the light bulb, were all never, ever achieved on the first attempt, and certainly never abandoned once achieved, never to be repeated again, as the claimed moon landings were of fifty years ago. The fact is, when you find out the truth about Santa Claus, you are glad to know it, even though it hurts a little, realizing that a painful truth is still better than a sweet lie.

-thesleuthjournal.com
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 1Agree x 2Winner x 2Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
811
Brother
1,554
super-glue's avatar
#116 [Permalink] Posted on 12th February 2020 22:15
Quote:
First of all, it has recently come to light through employee “whistling blowing” that United States spy agencies regularly use “Wikipedia”, as well as hundreds of other websites, for deceitful misinformation purposes, as they can anonymously post intelligent sounding pro-government thesis to the masses, intentionally contradicting and smugly belittling factual “conspiracy theories” of very real crimes, of which they themselves have committed, in an attempt to conceal their own wrongdoing through such contrary postings.

The fact that billions of our tax dollars are being spent each year by the government for the very purpose of concealing their own past crimes by investing so many resources toward the perpetual lying to their own citizens, is utterly and supremely disgusting.

...

When critics use statements like “empirical evidence (Because the Emperor says so?) is readily available to show that the manned moon landings did occur”, it not only shows their arrogance (which, in and of itself, demonstrates their blindness to the facts), it also exemplifies their desperation to make an argument, that is so much losing ground, that they have to resort to the tactic of claiming that if you don’t agree with them, you are somehow deficient in intelligence. Again, if the “moon landings” are so obviously real, and if there were no robust proof whatsoever of the missions deliberate falsification, then there would be no need whatsoever for the hundred plus films and websites, which took tens of thousands of hours to produce, solely dedicated to reassure the public of the “moon landings” genuineness! The fact that there are, is proof itself that mounting evidence does exist which proves the “moon missions” to be a CIA forgery, otherwise the deceptively claimed “obviousness” of their authenticity would speak for itself, without the repeated need of hundreds of websites and films to defend them. When a structure needs such continual precarious support and maintenance, this alone is evidence that the structure itself is not sound to begin with.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
811
Brother
1,554
super-glue's avatar
#117 [Permalink] Posted on 12th February 2020 22:18
The 400,000 employee fallacy

Quote:
Additional arguments against the fraud are reported to be the hundreds of thousands of people throughout the industry who contributed to the “moon missions”, who allegedly would have been informed of the fraud and kept it a secret. Again, seemingly a reasonable argument, yet it is not with only a little extra thought. Do you really think the CIA would be so careless as to tell hundreds of thousands of low-level contractors the goings-on of a top-secret project? Would the CIA really be so inept as to tell the person making the rocket’s door handle, or the glove or the boot of the spacesuit, that they were secretly faking the moon landings and to be sure not to tell anyone?! Do we really think the CIA is stupid enough to tell hundreds of thousands of low-level workers something they wanted to keep as a strict secret?! Furthermore, to say that “because my uncle worked at NASA and believed the ‘moon landings’ were real is proof that they were real”, is like saying that because my uncle worked as a vender at the Super Bowl and believed that the game was honest, that this is proof that the football players didn’t cheat in their game.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
811
Brother
1,554
super-glue's avatar
#118 [Permalink] Posted on 16th February 2020 22:42
Evidence of extra lighting against Nasa's information of having no additional light source except the sun:

Quote:
There is clear, irrefutable evidence that lighting was used in the still photographs, yet no lighting equipment was taken to the Moon. Consider the sequence of pictures of Aldrin descending the ladder on the shadow side of the LM during Apollo 11. Dr David Groves and David Percy have analysed the ‘hotspot’ on the heel of Aldrin’s right boot and found that a directional light was used – apparently placed just to the right of the camera position. This finding regarding the location of the light source is supported by a process known as 'ray tracing' – see below. Full details of this analysis can be found in the Appendix of Dark Moon.



AS11-40-5866 (close up)
Hot Spot an impossibility without direct lighting.


source
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
811
Brother
1,554
super-glue's avatar
#119 [Permalink] Posted on 17th February 2020 22:21
For those who do not understand the most damning evidence of faking the half way to the moon shot, what was shared was an unedited reel sent by Nasa (possibly by accident or by a whistle-blower) to a film maker for a documentary which was planned to be named "Did we go?" and later changed to "A funny thing happened on the way to the moon".

Ironic is the fact that never has Nasa publicly shared any unedited reels of the missions. This one that leaked is the only one shared in FULL for the public and it proves the fraud.

This post is to help break it down and all time stamps are kept so anyone who wants to see it can do so.


Astronaut informs here (which can be heard in the video) that the camera is right up against the window "camera is covering the entire window". And they're filming the Earth at a distance of 130,000 miles.

This is why around the Earth is the darkness of space.

Then it's zooms out.


And as it zooms out a little more. WHAT'S THIS?


A working light/dim light in the blackness of space? No, this is inside the craft meaning the camera was not pushed right up against the window but that had to be said..

This was said because they used trickery to show a small Earth at a distance. When the fixed transparency of Earth was removed from the window you see a BRIGHT LIGHT.


How? Wasn't it JUST a few seconds we saw a small Earth at a distance with all DARKNESS of space around it?

As the camera moves around, the window is still clearly lit and clearly BLUE. The colour is important to understand the source.


And the icing on the cake, we have a clear blue close by Earth with lovely clouds.


This is evidently not 130,000 miles away from Earth or all this is impossible. There's no scientific explanations, no response from Nasa. No denial from the astronauts who were confronted about this. In fact they swore, threatened and one was clearly recorded being asked if the CIA should be called and have the interviewer killed. (watch "Astronauts gone wild").
fakery1.jpg
Downloads: 70
    [12.15 kB]
fakery2.jpg
Downloads: 39
    [9.73 kB]
fakery3.jpg
Downloads: 71
    [10.31 kB]
fakery4.jpg
Downloads: 34
    [24.92 kB]
fakery5.jpg
Downloads: 51
    [21.61 kB]
fakery6.jpg
Downloads: 40
    [17.69 kB]
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
811
Brother
1,554
super-glue's avatar
#120 [Permalink] Posted on 25th February 2020 18:03
Probably the best documentary that takes into account every debunked claim and putting into context every event from 1960 to 1969.

Quote:
Another Massimo Mazzucco's outstanding production, just how he did with "September 11 The New Pearl Harbor" masterpiece, he brings light to so many people after years and year of brainwashing, showing the truth through solid research, hard evidence, excellent narrative and high quality production


3rd screen from the video:
Quote:
"None of the photographers we interviewed is a supporter of the so-called "moon-hoax theory." They have simply provided us with a technical analysis of the NASA pictures, without implying their personal opinion on the lunar debate.

All the pictures examined are NASA originals downloaded from the "Project Apollo Image Gallery" website.

All the video examined are the NASA originals distributed worldwide by Spacecraft Films."


www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpuKu3F0BvY
It's 3 hours and 34 minutes
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Creative x 1
back to top

Jump to page: