Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

☆ 1969 Moon Landings were FAKE

Jump to page:
The thread starter has marked this thread as Member Locked so only the thread starter can reply
This means the thread starter has used the option to disable replies when starting the thread. This is not a decision made by the site.
Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
abu mohammed, abuzayd2k
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
23,000
Brother
9,530
abu mohammed's avatar
#76 [Permalink] Posted on 8th February 2019 12:52
One of the many Moon Rock samples they allegedy brought back from the moon turned out to be a fake.

No surprise there!
Moon Rock Turns Out to be Fake

Astronauts who landed on the Moon collected 2,415 samples of Moon rocks weighing a total of 842 pounds (382 kilograms). Most of these rocks were collected during the Apollo 15, 16, and 17 missions.
phys.org/news/2009-09-moon-fake.html#jCp

The Dutch national Rijksmuseum made an embarrassing announcement last week that one of its most loved possessions, a moon rock, is a fake -- just an old piece of petrified wood that's never been anywhere near the moon.

The Rijksmuseum is famous for its fine art collections, especially paintings by Rembrandt and other masters. One of its lesser known objects, the "moon rock", was first unveiled in October 2006 as the centerpiece of a "Fly me to the moon" exhibition. At that time, the museum said the rock symbolized the "exploration of the unknown, colonization of far-away places and bringing back of treasures..." A reading about the "moon rock" was even held on October 7 because it was a full moon!

The rock was given as a private gift to former prime minister Willem Drees Jr in 1969 by the U.S. ambassador to The Netherlands, J. William Middendorf II, during a visit by the Apollo 11 astronauts, Armstrong, Collins and Aldrin, soon after the first moon landing. Drees had been out of office for 11 years, but was considered an elder statesman.

When Drees died in 1988, the rock was donated to the Rijksmuseum, where it has remained ever since. According to a museum spokeswoman, Ms Van Gelder, no one doubted the authenticity of the rock because it was in the prime minister's own collection, and they had vetted the acquisition by a phone call to NASA.

According to an article published by the Rijksmuseum, at one time the rock was insured for approximately half a million dollars, but its actual value is probably no more than around $70.

Former U.S. ambassador, Mr Middendorf was unable to recall the exact details of how the rock came to be in the U.S. State Department's possession. It is known that NASA gave lunar rocks to over 100 countries in the 1970s, but when the rock was displayed in 2006 a space expert told the museum he doubted any material would have been given away so soon after the manned lunar landing.

Researchers from the Free University of Amsterdam immediately doubted the rock was from the moon, and began extensive testing. The tests concluded the rock was petrified wood. U.S. embassy officials were unable to explain the findings, but are investigating.

Even though the tests found the piece is not of lunar origin, the Rijksmuseum curators say they will keep it anyway as a curiosity.
report post quote code quick quote reply
back to top
Rank Image
xs11ax's avatar
Unspecified
3,158
Brother
2,253
xs11ax's avatar
#77 [Permalink] Posted on 8th February 2019 14:05
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post

So if the other rocks can be analysed and confirmed to be from the moon, would that count as proof that man has been or sent probes to the moon?
report post quote code quick quote reply
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
23,000
Brother
9,530
abu mohammed's avatar
#78 [Permalink] Posted on 8th February 2019 14:30
xs11ax wrote:
View original post

What is the composition of a moon rock?
What chemicals should they be looking for?

For all we know, they picked up samples from a large crater on earth and said it was from out of this world, without a doubt.



I've seen such rocks in the Natural History Museum, they look like they came from the sea bed :) Some were boring whilst others were interesting.

Scientists can only go by meteorites for now.
report post quote code quick quote reply
back to top
Yasin's avatar
UK
6,051
Brother
154
Yasin's avatar
#79 [Permalink] Posted on 8th February 2019 14:41
xs11ax wrote:
View original post


If rocks were confirmed to be from the moon through analysis (see below) then it would only tell you that the rocks are from the moon. It would in no way prove man set foot on the moon. It wouldn't even prove that a probe brought it back because it's said that the poles have a lot of lunar rocks there as debris.

Then there's analysing the rocks. It can only be analysed if there's moon rock samples otherwise it's simply a theory based on things like foreign composition which would tell you it's not from Earth. But then it can be from anywhere and not just the moon.
report post quote code quick quote reply
back to top
#80 [Permalink] Posted on 8th February 2019 14:52
My "andar ki awaaz" (inner voice) is saying, insha Allah one day the fake moon landing will be exposed.
But, I am not denying that, today USA posses 'state of art technology'. They are masters. But lies must get exposed.
report post quote code quick quote reply
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
23,000
Brother
9,530
abu mohammed's avatar
#81 [Permalink] Posted on 8th February 2019 15:08
Why no one will be able to prove if the rock is from the moon or not!

They have already prepared and answer!
Quote:
It’s been known for a long time that pieces of the moon can be blasted off the surface during impacts and then later hit the Earth as meteorites. This new study now provides evidence that the opposite can also occur – bits of rock from Earth can also end up on the moon – waiting to be discovered by future human or robot explorers.


This is a rock that came from the moon, but it only got there due to debris from earth :(

These people have all their tracks covered :)

earthsky.org/space/is-this-ancient-moon-rock-from-earth

Is this ancient moon rock from Earth?
By Paul Scott Anderson in EARTH | SPACE | February 3, 2019
An intriguing ancient rock found on the moon and brought back by the Apollo 14 mission may actually have originated from Earth, a new study says.

Part of this rock is granite composed of quartz, feldspar, and zircon crystals – all common on Earth but rare on the moon. Did it originate from Earth? Image via NASA.
report post quote code quick quote reply
back to top
Rank Image
Rajab's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
1,219
Brother
732
Rajab's avatar
#82 [Permalink] Posted on 13th February 2019 08:13
report post quote code quick quote reply
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
23,000
Brother
9,530
abu mohammed's avatar
#83 [Permalink] Posted on 13th February 2019 09:57
Rajab wrote:
View original post

I saw this website before along with ton's of other proofs that they did land on the moon. To be honest, they don't hold much truth in them.

These people have a degree or PhD in Waffling :)

Here's a couple of questions:
1) Who raised the camera to follow lift off from the moon? Did they leave Steven Speilberg on the Moon? youtu.be/tS4gpRCjIbE?t=157 (just a couple of seconds)
2) In the 3D image of Japans view, how is it that they got exactly the same latitude and longitude (I appreciate that it's a 3D render :( but so precise)



The Japanese are basically saying to the American's, if you can do it so can we and here's the proof. If America deny it, then case closed. Since America can't deny it, Japan is in a win win situation :)

I wonder if Japan will claim to have found America's flag, or should I say, exposed their false flag!

There are further evidences from Asia about how they have also faked interviews from space (delays in communication and sudden instant response) and floating in gravity...They are simply following American tactics.
report post quote code quick quote reply
back to top
Yasin's avatar
UK
6,051
Brother
154
Yasin's avatar
#84 [Permalink] Posted on 13th February 2019 12:37
Rajab wrote:
View original post


Every single one of these weak & inaccurate answers from the moon landing believers have been answered.

And think about it, the fact that they have to use answers to scrutiny as evidence for man landing is proof enough they don't have actual evidence. The problem for them is that all of their 1960's evidence actually disproves them so they don't use that.
report post quote code quick quote reply
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
702
Brother
1,324
super-glue's avatar
#85 [Permalink] Posted on 13th February 2019 13:45
So there's 5 claims here to try and prolong the second biggest lie in the history of mankind.

1. Van Allen Radiation Belts
To NASA's own admission it's lethal. The astronauts were not even aware of them. These are supposed scientists going to the moon and they weren't aware? The radiation protection, insulation is a lie as the crafts were tinfoil (quite literally). The level fluctuating is also misinformation. The truth is, they are to their own admission stumped with this challenge and that should say enough.

2. Flag flapping
They posted 2 frames and used the age old excuse of it waving while they're planting it only. There's plenty of video proof showing the flag waving wildly with barely any force on it. And another where it moves when one walked past it. This would be impossible on the moon.

3. Stars on the moon
This is the only half valid excuse because to capture stars the camera must be set for it. But the fact that they took zero photos of the stars should raise so many questions. I mean look at all the absolutely useless photos in their archive. So it's not really the lack of stars in the photos that's the issue, it's the lack of photos of stars.

4. Shadows
The only excuse they have is uneven terrain. Yes this distorts shadows slightly but it does not change change the angles of where the light is hitting the raised portion. So they avoided the issue by stating an obvious fact. They didn't even address the length of shadows which proves a light source close by.

5. The "C" rock
This is pointless. Both sides are just theories.

6. Modern Proofs
a. Japanese photo: Absolutely fake. It's almost funny for that to be taken seriously. A 2003 nokia camera has better resolution.

b. Footprints and spacecraft
Debunked within minutes by anyone who can count. Check the scale of the satellite image. Then work out how huge the spacecraft and their footprints are. Their old lies had some weight but this is all just desperate.

c. Moonrocks - Proven to be available at the poles on Earth, proven to be fake as well. This is not proof at all.
report post quote code quick quote reply
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
23,000
Brother
9,530
abu mohammed's avatar
#86 [Permalink] Posted on 14th February 2019 12:06

Made in China :) Cheap Fakes


This is a Pro Christian video and starts the video off well with cheap fakes and then make comparisons. Not bad https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvJ2B_YczN8


If you can't beat them, join them :(

report post quote code quick quote reply
back to top
Rank Image
sipraomer's avatar
Offline
MARS
2,170
Brother
236
sipraomer's avatar
#87 [Permalink] Posted on 17th February 2019 04:37
I apologize if these questions have already been answered but I am asking them because these are important.

1. Did Soviet Union object at that time that USA is lying about the moon landings?
2. Did Russia prove today that USA was lying?
3. Did USA reject recent Chinese moon landings?
4. Are all of these major powers lying unanimously in this?
5. Did any advanced country reject the claims of all of these three countries?
6. Are all the developed countries hiding the truth or are lying in this regard?
7. So is the one world government already there and is Dajjal keeping them silent from criticizing each other in this matter?

I have just skimmed through this thread and not studied it in detail. Please pardon me for these dumb questions but these are very important for me. Please answer them.
report post quote code quick quote reply
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
702
Brother
1,324
super-glue's avatar
#88 [Permalink] Posted on 17th February 2019 12:57
1. Did Soviet Union object at that time that USA is lying about the moon landings?

No they didn't publicly. Check the gas deals they had the time and also the drought. Too much was at steak.

2. Did Russia prove today that USA was lying?

The government? Not publicly.

3. Did USA reject recent Chinese moon landings?

No

4. Are all of these major powers lying unanimously in this?

Probably

5. Did any advanced country reject the claims of all of these three countries?

What's an advanced country?

6. Are all the developed countries hiding the truth or are lying in this regard?

No one is hiding it and there's no efforts to hide it. They just promote it through their education and persist through TV with pseudoscience and blatant lies but it works on the general public so it's enough. NASA themselves constantly admit about the issues of beyond low Earth orbit.

7. So is the one world government already there and is Dajjal keeping them silent from criticizing each other in this matter?

I haven't met Dajjal and I don't plan to so I don't think anyone in the world except Israel can answer this. As for world government that's been in the works for over 70 years and it's there you can say.
report post quote code quick quote reply
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
23,000
Brother
9,530
abu mohammed's avatar
#89 [Permalink] Posted on 17th February 2019 13:19
report post quote code quick quote reply
back to top
Rank Image
sipraomer's avatar
Offline
MARS
2,170
Brother
236
sipraomer's avatar
#90 [Permalink] Posted on 17th February 2019 13:28
super-glue wrote:
View original post


Jazak Allah for your reply.
report post quote code quick quote reply
back to top

Jump to page: