Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

☆ 1969 Moon Landings were FAKE

Jump to page:
The thread starter has marked this thread as Member Locked so only the thread starter can reply
This means the thread starter has used the option to disable replies when starting the thread. This is not a decision made by the site.
Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
abu mohammed, abuzayd2k
Rank Image
Offline
MARS
2,170
Brother
338
#91 [Permalink] Posted on 18th February 2019 09:17
Asaaghir wrote:
View original post


My question has already been answered by Super Glue whom I consider a mature and knowledgeable person. And it was me who facepalmed your post addressing me previously. Now take your revenge.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Creative x 2
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
26,230
Brother
9,555
abu mohammed's avatar
#92 [Permalink] Posted on 19th February 2019 17:13
I love this interview and I don'tknow why :(

An 8 year old girl asks Buzz Aldrin a question. In his response, he says "We didn't go there"
Halalified YouTube Audio

There is a lot of speculation about the interview and many anti moon landing personel have also given him the benfit of doubt for many reasons. Nethertheless, still a good question and strange answer from Buzz, the second man to have walked on the spoon :)
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
988
Brother
1,099
#93 [Permalink] Posted on 19th February 2019 17:35
I think he meant we didn't go there again.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1Creative x 1Optimistic x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
26,230
Brother
9,555
abu mohammed's avatar
#94 [Permalink] Posted on 5th March 2019 16:35
Israeli spacecraft snaps Earth ‘selfie’ with flag from 23,000 miles away

Plaque on the side of Beresheet moon lander features phrases ‘Am Yisrael Chai’ and ‘small country, big dreams’

www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-spacecraft-snaps-earth-self...
The Beresheet spacecraft on Tuesday sent back a photo taken with its “selfie camera,” in which the Israeli flag can be seen 37,600 kilometers (23,000 miles) above Earth.

A plaque installed on the outside of the lunar lander depicts Israel’s national flag as well as the phrases “Am Yisrael Chai” (the people of Israel live) and “Small country, big dreams.”

Full story in link
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
26,230
Brother
9,555
abu mohammed's avatar
#95 [Permalink] Posted on 5th March 2019 16:43
How the Israeli Lunar module will land on the Moon
Youtube Video - Halalified (Video Only)

Muftisays Halalified YouTube Script

Play Video
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Creative x 1
back to top
#96 [Permalink] Posted on 6th March 2019 08:32
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post


Are there any similar animation videos for Apollo's return journey.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
26,230
Brother
9,555
abu mohammed's avatar
#97 [Permalink] Posted on 6th March 2019 09:08
Guest-14007 wrote:
View original post

Animated, most probably. You'll have to look for it, there are tons of videos online so it can be a waste of time.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Creative x 1
back to top
#98 [Permalink] Posted on 6th March 2019 09:23
There are no videos on return journey. Only video of falling on sea.

I can understand science, it is very complex return journey.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
26,230
Brother
9,555
abu mohammed's avatar
#99 [Permalink] Posted on 6th March 2019 09:28
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Creative x 1
back to top
#100 [Permalink] Posted on 6th March 2019 10:00
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post


It says it leaves moon's circular orbit and reenters earth.

Is it so simple? We watched the complexity of onward journey.

Gravitational pull on moon is 1/3 that of earth's.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
811
Brother
1,554
super-glue's avatar
#101 [Permalink] Posted on 22nd January 2020 19:16
I am continuing the thread only for those who actually care about the truth. The ones who are completely brainwashed and have no interest in genuine discussion please do not derail the thread

Undeniable evidence 1: The video of the astronauts faking being half way
Evidence 2: Radiation belts
Above 2 are covered and alhamdulilah not answered or debunked. A lot of effort was made by a few but failed miserably alhamdulillah.

Undeniable evidence 3:

Source: NASA

Click here for high res

1. Hot spot (sunlight does not cause hot spots)
2. all shadows diverge towards the hotspot (left side going at 2 o clock angle, center going at 12 o clock and right side going 10 o clock)

Nasa's answer: Uneven terrain
Proof that is a lie is within their own image (above) with objects side by side with barely any distance and on a flat terrain but angles are off. There's rocks in line (right) of the shadow of the head where they are almost at 9 o clock yet the astronauts shadow is straight up (12 o clock)

THIS IS NOT HOW SHADOWS FROM SUNLIGHT WORK

Moon landing believers use uneven terrain as one answer as that's from Nasa but you can see in the photo that's not the case. ALL shadows are going towards the hot spots.

Moon landing believers also use Myth Busters as an answer (lol) who did an experiment with studio lighting to recreate this. Why didn't they use the sun? Because they could not recreate this with the sun.
They created a simulation to prove Nasa's simulation is real. Jarrah White also proved that myth busters didn't know basic things about the "experiments" they conducted including the reflectivity. The producers also said it's "entertainment" and moon landing believers use them as if they're the ambassadors of science.

Note: According to their own story, the sun was the ONLY light source on the apollo "missions"
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
811
Brother
1,554
super-glue's avatar
#102 [Permalink] Posted on 23rd January 2020 16:30
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 1Creative x 1
back to top
#103 [Permalink] Posted on 23rd January 2020 17:10
I just got this data:
Moon's diameter = 3,474.2 Kms
(60 Kms orbit ignored) Pie X dia is 10,913 kms
10,913Kms is the distance command service module covers in around 2 hours, that is approximately 5450 km/hr velocity.

Here, lander capsule lifts off from lunar surface and flies for hundreds of kms, catches up with command and service module flying at 5450 kms/hr, quietly docks (gets attached to CS module). Men and material is transferred to CS module, lander capsule is detached and CS module returns to earth precisely on the ocean assigned.

My doubt is; all these happened in the first attempt itself. No multiple test flights were conducted.
History is, multiple mission failure in lander itself before successful landing.
Imagine if lander module would have missed the command and service module, "Armstrong lost in the sky" would have been the result.

All these risks were taken to beat the Soviets. And we are made to believe, it really happened at first attempt itself
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Like x 1Agree x 1Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
811
Brother
1,554
super-glue's avatar
#104 [Permalink] Posted on 23rd January 2020 18:27
Guest-49821 wrote:
View original post

It's not just the first feat in history to work first time without errors. And that too 6 times. It's also the ONLY so called technological advancement and achievement in history that hasn't been repeated in over 50 years. The only technological advancement that was never commercialised. The only achievement in history where the original telemetry data and blueprints were destroyed. Where original raw archive footage was recorded over "accidentally". The only "victory" in history where the victors looked like they're at a funeral or held at gun point in the post interview. The only feat in history where the ones involved contradict each other in polar opposite statements and the list can go on.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+3 -0Like x 1Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
811
Brother
1,554
super-glue's avatar
#105 [Permalink] Posted on 27th January 2020 11:07
Quote:
to date, only three countries have been able to put a man merely in Earth orbit - the United States, Russia, and China. That speaks to how difficult it is just to get into orbit. Next, consider how far away the moon is from the Earth: 240,000 miles. Since the alleged moon landings, no country even claims to have gone more than 400 miles from Earth and that was in the Space Shuttle. The International Space Station orbits at 200 miles above Earth. There is a big difference between 240,000 miles and 400 miles. Why can't anyone make it more than 400 miles from Earth today if we could make a 480,000 mile round trip in 1969?

NASA further asserts that three men were loaded into a rocket, flew 240,000 miles to the moon and then achieved lunar orbit. They say the spacecraft separated and two astronauts flew 60 miles to the surface of the moon, in a vacuum and 1/6 Earth gravity. They then hung out on the moon for up to three days in 250 degree heat, hit golf balls, rode a moon buggy — but what powered their life support (air conditioning) and equipment? They say BATTERIES.


-Jarrah White
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 1Creative x 1
back to top

Jump to page: