Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

Can Sacred Knowledge be Obtained from Books Alone?

You have contributed 0.0% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
Taalibah
Rank Image
Seifeddine-M's avatar
London
4,762
Brother
4,174
Seifeddine-M's avatar
#1 [Permalink] Posted on 13th February 2012 09:47
By Moulana Muhammad ibn Moulana Haroon Abassommar

Question.)


Some people have stated that the Ijaza system and the Isnad of a scholar is essential whereas others say that one does not require Isnad or Ijazah to be a scholar and that knowledge can be obtained from books alone.

Which is the correct opinion and is there any evidence to prove this point?


Answer.)


To acquire knowledge under the expertise of a fully qualified, Sunnah conscious Aalim of Deen is absolutely essential. Failure to do so generally results in absolute misguidance. In fact, this has been the practice of the Ambiyaa, as well as our pious predecessors.

1. The holy Qur'an was revealed by Almighty Allah Ta'ala for guidance and knowledge of the Ummah. But, without the explanation of Rasulullah Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam the meanings would definitely be misunderstood. Allah Ta'ala addresses Rasulullah Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam in the Qur'an, 'And we have revealed to you the Qur'an, so that you may explain to the people what was revealed to them.' This is the greatest, most evident proof for our view.

2. Allah Ta'ala mentions in the Qur'an, 'Ask the people of knowledge if you do not know.'

3. Sayyiduna Daawud (Alayhis salaam) is said to have benefited emmensely from Luqmaan al-Hakeem (Alayhis salaam), before Daawud (Alayhis salaam) received prophethood. (Tafseer Qurtubi)

4. Sayyiduna Moosa's (Alayhis salaam) sojourn to Sayyiduna Khidhr (Alayhis salaam) is well-known and enshrined in the holy Qur'aan..

5. Furthermore, during the era of the Tabi'een, whenever anyone would claim to have any knowledge, he would be questioned as to which person he has acquired that bit of knowledge from. (Muslim)

6. Hafiz Khateeb al-Baghdadi (RA), the famous Muhaddith of the fifth century, states in his book, 'Taqyidul Ilm' (pg.61), 'Many scholars of the classical times had - at the time of death - either destroyed his book himself or instructed so. This was due to the fear that it may end up in the hands of ignorant ones who would not understand its verdicts and would only take the apparent meanings there from.' He thereafter narrated several incidents of the classical scholars who had done so. From among them were: Imam Abeda al-Salmani, Imam Shu'bah ibn Hajjaaj, Imam Abu Qilabah and Imam Eesa ibn Yunus. (Ibid pgs.61-62)

7. Imam Muhammad ibn Sireen, Hakam ibn Atiyyah and Wakee ibnul Jarrah have all stated that the primary cause for the misguidance of Banu Israel was the books that they inherited from their forefathers. (refer Taqyidul Ilm pg.61 and its footnotes)

8. Imam al-Awzaa'iee (RA) says, 'Knowledge was sublime for as long as it was obtained from the mouths of the learned men. But when it ended up in books, it's Noor (divine light) disappeared.' (Ibid pg.64) Note: The purpose of the previous 3 quotations is to prove that mere studying of books is incorrect and void of divine assistance. The ideal would be to study those very same books under the auspices of a learned teacher. In no way do we intend to degrade the books of Shari'ah whatsoever.

9. Imam Malik (RA) was once asked if knowledge could be acquired from one who did not sit in the company of the Ulama (instead he sufficed with books only). He replied in the negative and said, 'Knowledge should not be acquired except from one who has memorized, accompanied the scholars, practiced upon his knowledge and has piety in him.' (refer Adabul Ikhtilaf pg.145)

10. Shaykh Muhammad Awwamah (an unparalleled Muhaddith of these times) mentions beautifully in his book, 'Adabul Ikhtilaf', 'They (the Ulama) never used to pay attention to one who did not have any Ustadh (teacher), neither would they consider such a person worthy of even being spoken to due to him being prone to mistakes.' He further says, 'Qadi Iyad and others have narrated that when Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal was requested by the ruler of his time (al-Mu'tasim) to discuss a certain matter with ibn Abi Du'ad, he (Imam Ahmad) turned his face away and said, 'How can I discuss with such a person whom I have never seen at the door of any Alim ever!' (Ibid pg.144)

We hope that the above 10 points are enough to convince and satisfy any person who has the slightest idea of sufficing on the study of books only without the supervision of a suitable Ustadh (teacher).

We will end this discussion with the translation of a famous poem which is attributed to Imam Shafi'ee (RA) and is quite famous on the tongues of the Ulama. he says: Oh my brother, You will never acquire knowledge without these six things: Intelligence, desire, poverty, Sojourn, tutorship of an Ustadh as well as a long consistent period (of studying under him)

(ibid pg.142 - 143)

And Allah Ta'ala Knows Best


http://www.albalagh.net/qa/0025.shtml
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
Seifeddine-M's avatar
London
4,762
Brother
4,174
Seifeddine-M's avatar
#2 [Permalink] Posted on 8th April 2013 10:45
Question:

What is your view of the saying, "The one whose teacher is his book, his errors are greater than that which he is correct in"?

Answer:

This is the expression which we know, and it is correct, as the one who does not study with the people of knowledge, does not take knowledge from them, and does not understand the path that they have passed upon in seeking knowledge, certainly makes many errors. Also, it may be unclear and doubtful to him the difference between what is right and what is wrong or incorrect regarding specific issues, as he has not fully understood the Sharee'ah evidences, nor the established methods which the people of knowledge have made use of; meaning those which they utilised and acted upon in making such determinations.

(However,) as to whether his mistakes will be more numerous than they are correct, then this is something debatable. But in any case, he will make many mistakes, as he did not learn from the people of knowledge nor benefit from them. Thus, he does not understand the principles which must be utilised in reaching conclusions, and therefore makes many mistakes. Additionally, he cannot distinguish between mistakes and what is correct within printed and manuscript books, as an error may appear in a book and he does not have the familiarity and ability to recognise that, and so believes it to be correct. He then may give a ruling of permissibility for that which Allaah has forbidden, or declare forbidden that which Allaah has made permissible, because he lacks insight. This occurs simply because of a printing or writing error that he came across in a book.

For example, it may state, "Such and such is not permissible," while what is correct from the original text is that it is permissible, as there may be an unwarranted addition to the text of that printing which is an error. Or the opposite where it says, "Such and such is permissible," while what is correct in the original text is that it is not permissible. This would be caused by an omission in that specific printing or line, and this is a tremendous mistake. Similar is the expression, "...what is correct is such and such," while what is actually correct is that it should state, "....what is not correct is such and such." So he would get confused in this because of his lack of perceptiveness and knowledge and so does not recognise an error that may be present in a book, or situations similar to this.

[Shaykh 'Abdul 'Azeez Ibn 'Abdillaah Ibn Baaz رحمه الله: A Collection of Rulings and Various Statements, vol 7, p243]
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top