Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

I Have a Purpose

Jump to page:

You have contributed 0.5% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
Muadh_Khan, Naqshband66, Taalibah, Jinn, samah, the fake shaykh, abu mohammed, Acacia, dr76, my176, Abdullah bin Mubarak, BHAI1, Maria al-Qibtiyya, Abu Salma, Umm Khadeejah, abuzayd2k, Abdur Rahman ibn Awf, ALIF, sipraomer, hmdsalahuddin, saa10245, bint e aisha, a2z, tanveerzakee
6 guests appreciate this topic.
Rank Image
Maripat's avatar
Offline
Gham-o-Huzn
3,269
Brother
3,512
Maripat's avatar
#391 [Permalink] Posted on 7th July 2015 12:49
Summary of My Purpose, Once Again

I praise Allah SWT and send peace salutations on beloved Prophet.

I would like to live my like according to the way of life brought to us by our beloved Prophet (SAW).

From India to the rest of the world the environment is against it to varying degrees.
There is encroachment upon our personal space.
I would like that space back.
For myself, my family, friends and the whole of Muslim Ummah.
I also believe that it will be better for the mankind as a whole if the affairs of the world are managed according to the tenets of Islam.
I say it not because of a theory or imperical evidence but outrightly out of my faith for the way of life preferred by the Lord of the worlds will be vastly better than any way of life designed by us to the best of our abilities and perfection.

I also assert that out of so many interpretations of islam available to us the best is offered by the Elders and Scholars of Deoband.

Those who do not agree with us are of course free to do that. We do not impose our views on others.
But we would like to be left alone to live our life the way we prefer it.


The environment today is by and large Islamophobic and there are reasons for that.
We got to hold on to this info for the sheer complexity of political environment today is so complex that without paying enough attention to these bitter realities one is at the risk of being left completely clueless.

In India the environment is anti-Muslim and anti-Islamic for from 771Ac upto 1857 India was rules to smaller and larger extents by Muslims who were a numerical minority and Islam originated outside India and hence the majority still takes it as a foreign religion, an imposter.

In the rest of the world the environment is Islamophobic because that environment is largely decided by the western Christian mindset that has been anti-Islamic from the days of infancy of Islam. Though the west has to a very large extent moved away from Christianity but their mindset continues to be anti-Muslim and Islamic due to ideological inertia.

Muslims are by and large aware of both of these situations but they are too wary and scared to even state the truth. To ask for their rights, natural rights, would be the next step but that at the moment of writing is a much bigger problem.

There will be people wo now will argue that why aim for the impossible.
I am against them.
Every Friday sermon exhorts us to believe that this world was created for us believers and we were created for the hereafter.
If this world was created for us then we have all the freedom to live our lives according to Islam.

Our problem is compounded by the fact that so many Muslim countries are ruled by such people who will not like to hear the name of Islam. These rulers might be seen praying in the mosques and fasting but they really are against Islam and indeed scared of Islam more than US President or British Prime Minister. I personally know stories from Iraq and Libya of yesteryears where a youngman sporting a beard or appearing in the morning prayers would by hinted ina non-subtle manner that he should enjoy life. that he should not take Islam seriously.

Do we Muslims have a comprehensive programme or a proposal to take our space back from those agencies who have encroached upon it? Here I have to repeat once again that let alone taking steps to regain our space even acknowledgeing this state of affairs is a risky step in many places. But this task of liberating our personal space from encroachment has to be taken.

In this regard there is a false hope. There have been several tall religious figures who wanted us to believe that the current sorry state of Muslim Ummah is due to lack of Islam in our lives and due to our distance from Qur'an. On the face of it this looks like a wonderful diagnosis but it is patently false. When such people talk about sorry state they certainly mean the worldly state of Ummah. the materialistic angle is in their mind. While proposing the solution the prescription is completely religious. That the diagnosis might be right but the cure is false can be seen from the fact that societies that are not religious are today very affluent.

There is clear case of wrong mixture of the religious and secular in these discussions. Problem of Muslim Ummah is to prosper worldly without giving up Islam. Clergy knows it but they are scared that Muslims will give up Islam in pursuit of worldly life. They are not very forthright otherwise they would tell us directly to go for the worldly means without compromising on Islam. There are exceptions of course but over all clergy does not realize that our worldly problems have worldly reasons and solutions. Our Ulama have been advocating Makkan solutions to Medinite problems. This is the third major obstacle in our path to solutions to the problems of Ummah.

Fourth problem is of internal divisions. Shias, Barelwis and Ghair Muqallids of various uncountable variety for every Salafi is an institution in himself and I do not deliver this as a complement. Dividing Ummah is a heinous act and that is what these people are doing. Personally I am not hopeful of any agreement with the Shias. With Barelwis and each class of Ghair Muqallids we must actively try to secure an agreement towards taking out our Ummah from the current mess. If we can secure agreements with all of them then we can focus our energies on the creative side rather then on internal fightimg.

For the time being this much of musings should be sufficient.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 1Winner x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Maripat's avatar
Offline
Gham-o-Huzn
3,269
Brother
3,512
Maripat's avatar
#392 [Permalink] Posted on 21st July 2015 06:05
Status of the Islamic State


There are two significant developments regarding the Islamic State formed by Abu Bakr Baghdadi. One, he has instructed that graphic violence of their videos be curtailed and two, he has made a will.

Because of the first decision one feels a bit relaxed because the sheer gory violence of their videos left one competely numb. Even the depraved violence oriented film makers of Hollywood must be in a state of shock after seeing the Islamic state videos. Clearly every one will hieve a sigh of relief at this directive by Baghdadi.

Import of the second directive will not be clear at all to the western mind while to Muslims it is rather transparent. It simply shows that he is not operating for personal glory but sincerily out of his religious devotion. Of course owing to the matters related to point one above no one can objectively assess at the moment whether his religious devotion has been beneficial to Islam and Muslims.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
Maripat's avatar
Offline
Gham-o-Huzn
3,269
Brother
3,512
Maripat's avatar
#393 [Permalink] Posted on 22nd July 2015 09:43
250
Permanent Glory of a Believer


India : Majority community dreaming of decimating Muslims under the spiritual and political leadership of RSS.
Pakistan : Thoroughly shaken up in the midst of clash of civilizations.
Gulf of Persia : In extremely bad shape under US/NATO/western military, political onslaught.
Central Asia : Not in good shape after coming out of USSR.

And so on.

Islamic world is in extremely vulnerable as well as miserable shape today.

Yet this is the best time to be a believer.
Best time is not when you are in power.
The best time is when you are struggling.
Ummah is today in a state of struggle.

This is the time to put your weight behind the Ummah of beloved Prophet (SAW).
There are many people who have realized the same.
They are the blessed people.

You may simply end up walking into oblivion but that walk will be most glorious.

Musa ibn abil Ghassan did not surrender to the forces of Kind Ferdinand V and Queen Isabela.
His decision was right.
Those commanders who surrendered were meted out with most horrible ends.

Musa was last seen fighting with four enemy soldiers.
He dispatched two of them to hell.
Then he was exhausted. Very seriously wounded.
Horse too was wounded.
That is when he jumped with his horse into the roaring waves of a river.

This walking into oblivion is much more glorious than receiving a 21 gun salute.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+4 -0Like x 1Winner x 3
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
1,011
Brother
881
#394 [Permalink] Posted on 23rd July 2015 14:54
Maripat wrote:
View original post

Mashallah a very powerful message Maripat. I pray that ALLAH blesses you.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Jinn's avatar
Unspecified
2,891
Brother
279
Jinn's avatar
#395 [Permalink] Posted on 23rd July 2015 15:22
Maripat wrote:
View original post


Sorry I didn't get this, left a will? And we can't objectively assess whether he's been good/bad for the Muslims, is that what you're trying to say??

First of all this guy and his gang of emotionally fuelled jahils have been a disaster for the Ummah, first with their fake sham khilafa which was not on shuura and vouched by any big scholars wouldwide, many even call it the first false dawn, because many were gullible and deluded out of their emotions who made that journey only to realise what it was actually about.

Secondly they kill other mujahideen (Muslims), in fact the spilling of Muslim blood they make it look like a walk in the park, have they forgotten about the severe admonitions about spilling blood unjustly that has been mentioned in the Quran?
they make mass takfeer, they are absent from the main battles and that is the removal of the Assad, they attack other mujahideen in the back, anyone who disagrees with them is a kafir, there are many vids which have actually documented their crimes and ulema worldwide have spoken out against them and condemned them.

Thirdly, the image they are painting of Muslims and Islam itself is not a pleasant one, but a barbaric ruthless extremist one where no mercy is showed to no one including women and children.

Fourthly, the actions of these khwarij are having implications on Muslims worldwide. They have similarities with khwarij bro and that's been common throughout history, the extreme hate towards the main body of Muslims, the takfeeri attitude. The harshness towards Muslims, the mass killings etc

If you really want to objectively assess, whether they have benefitted the Muslims and Islam then just ask yourself what I mentioned above and you'll get your answer, is this what Islam is about?? Is this what the best of creation (saw) taught, is this what his Sahaba رضي الله عنه were about?

Says it all really.
Walahualam
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Winner x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
1,011
Brother
881
#396 [Permalink] Posted on 23rd July 2015 15:37
Jinn wrote:
View original post

I think brother Maripat is saying we don't have much information about them. What you have said is true but Abu Eesa once did a very good post on them. He said they are not khawarij because there is a huge mix of people. Many are baathists and thus would not be pious enough to be khawarij whilst some are khawarij. I think it is too confusing. Let us not forget that the group is supposed to be more active in Iraq rather than Syria and that they adopt different strategies in both places. I find it strange that the media all of a sudden started covering them and ignoring the other resistance parties like Ahar ul shaam etc. For some reason I do believe that they are heavily infiltrated and some of them must be foreign agents however the vast majority seem to be people who are radicalized due to the actions of Asad and iraqi government/shia militia. So there are too many unknown factors and I do wonder why their crimes are broadcast whilst Asad crimes are not? Something is going on and it is very confusing.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Jinn's avatar
Unspecified
2,891
Brother
279
Jinn's avatar
#397 [Permalink] Posted on 23rd July 2015 15:48
london786 wrote:
View original post


It's all fishy no doubt bro and a lot done make sense logically

I often read Abu Eesas posts on his fb and as funny as he may be he does do a good analysis and make good points. So credit given where it's due.

In regards to khwarij akhi, I also used to be of the same view as yourself, till I heard that's it's not necessary they meet every criteria including the religiousness, but what you will find common amongst the kharijis throughout history is the similarities and even those exist today and due to those similarities ulema of the past would declare certain groups as khwarij because they had those similarities of mass killings, mass hate towards the main Muslim body and mass takfeer. For example ibn abidin hanafi rahimullah declared the Najdis (Abdul Wahhab and Co) khwarij of his era. If you're interested in the Najdis history a bit more, stumbled across a good read the other day, let me know and I'll hook you up with a link akhi Insha'Ala

Allah knows best
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Winner x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
1,011
Brother
881
#398 [Permalink] Posted on 23rd July 2015 16:29
Jinn wrote:
View original post

I am interested in the najdis as I believe they were khawarij also.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Agree x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Black Turban's avatar
Offline
Bangladesh
1,549
Brother
1,808
Black Turban's avatar
#399 [Permalink] Posted on 23rd July 2015 17:02
london786 wrote:
View original post


In refutations 'Ulama clearly pointed out deviation of Baghdadi and his generals. Since their inception, they have been adopting falsehood (yes, even Baghdadi lied many times when he was about to cut ties with AQ) to reach to their goals. Therefore, there's no room for doubt that every follower of this ideology is among Khawarij.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Jinn's avatar
Unspecified
2,891
Brother
279
Jinn's avatar
#400 [Permalink] Posted on 23rd July 2015 17:04
london786 wrote:
View original post


Stumbled across this thread on IA, there the brother mentioned that he originally made the thread on ummah forum so I've posted the link below :

The original Najdi/ Wahhabi movement was more extreme in bloodshed & Takfir than ISIS
www.ummah.com/forum/showthread.php?440604-The-original-Na...

Thread was an eye opener, and according to the Najdi's us all here would have been kafirs as I have come across no one here who hates the Ottomans. Interesting read nonetheless.

Breaking the horns of satan
hornofsatan.wordpress.com/2013/11/18/ibn-abdul-wahhab-mad...

This blog is also very good and I believe the 'darul tahqiq' team is behind it
wwww.wahhabisrefuted.wordpress.com/
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
Maripat's avatar
Offline
Gham-o-Huzn
3,269
Brother
3,512
Maripat's avatar
#401 [Permalink] Posted on 25th July 2015 11:10
Jinn and all the post about status of the Islamic State was merely to add the then latest info.
I am not presenting my assessment of the Islamic State and please do hold on to your own assessment for the media is not telling you the whole truth.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Agree x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Maripat's avatar
Offline
Gham-o-Huzn
3,269
Brother
3,512
Maripat's avatar
#402 [Permalink] Posted on 25th July 2015 11:35
Some Latest Tidbits


These little things are from the regime of pondering and clarified by Allah (SWT) by His Mercy. I have to record these before they evaporate into thin air and are lost for ever.

The Sufi Way


In the times of prevalence of life the best life is the one with least tension.
Hence a Sufi will live frugaly even in abundance. For example he will not waste water even while doing ablution in running water.

In times of death the best death is for a cause.
A Sufi will not leave the station even in times of outbreak of a disease.

The Barelwi Method


There is the 'Amal business even in our people - the amulets and all.
In Barelwis this is endemic.
This activity is so dark that one feels the suffocation simply by remembering it.
They are extremely arrogant about the perceived superiority of their tack.
This superiority complex comes from the inferiority complex of having no argument.
Hence the arrogance and abuse.
Personally I do not feel why should batil be left alone after all it is destines to go extinct and at the moment it is creating extreme misery for believers.

This basically is a reminder to myself for decommissioning Barelwi friends.

Ghazali (RA), Abdul Qadir Jilani (RA) and Mujaddid-e-Alf-e-Sani (RA)


I have said it earlier that Shaikh Jilani (RA) begins where Ghazali (RA) leaves. Hence former is the peak of Islamic sciences because of the latter. Effectively Mujaddid-e-Alf-e-Sani (RA) is merely the affirmation of above.

Where does it leave us?

There is the knowledge that we can get ourselves - secular sciences.
There is the revelation.
Rasoolallah (SAW) imparted to us whatever was necessary for us.
Our Elders have been explaining the divine knowledge to us.
This process reached its pinnacle at Shaikh Jilani (RA) via Imam Ghazali (RA) and Mujaddid (RA) affirmed this realization in his teachings.

In poetry this knowledge reached the peak in Rumi (RA).
We know him for eight hundred years.
West is realizing his stature only today, nay, only one part of his knowledge called love.

When they realize the rest they will become Muslims.
That is the character of the divine knowledge.

How to disseminate that knowledge to them?
Good question. The practical example is Shaikh Muinuddin Chishti (RA).
Or Shaikh Nuruddin Rishi (RA) and Amir Kabir Shah hamdani (RA) of Kashmir.
Whole societies become Muslims because of such people.

Q: Can this Sufi talk be connected to the ground reality today?
A: That is the purpose for which I have been breaking my head against the stone walls.


report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 1Winner x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Maripat's avatar
Offline
Gham-o-Huzn
3,269
Brother
3,512
Maripat's avatar
#403 [Permalink] Posted on 25th July 2015 11:40
Old Woman


Allah (SWT) will not destroy this world till there is a single believer, say an old woman remembering Allag (SWT) in a cave of a mountain.

This is a Hadith but let us not assume that the world will end in this way.
The hadith does not say that.

In the end Allah (SWT) will blow such a wind, after the coming rule of Hazrat Isa (SA) for forty years, that will extract the souls of all believers. No knowledge of Islam will be there. And one not so fine Friday Allah (SWT) will unleash His wrath on the unbelievers on the Earth.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Maripat's avatar
Offline
Gham-o-Huzn
3,269
Brother
3,512
Maripat's avatar
#404 [Permalink] Posted on 26th July 2015 09:40
What Allama Iqbal Did


Allama Iqbal completely scratched off all the dirt and sediments that had gathered upon the teachings of Islam. The operation was like combing with an iron comb and hence painful. Once you go through this process then you are completely free to walk or run on the expressway of Islam or, even better, fly into divine space.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Maripat's avatar
Offline
Gham-o-Huzn
3,269
Brother
3,512
Maripat's avatar
#405 [Permalink] Posted on 27th July 2015 09:23
london786 wrote:
View original post


Ameen to your supplications and Jazakallah.

Gaye Din Ke Tanha Tha Mein Anjuman Mein
Yahan Ab Mere Razdan Aur Bhi Hain

The days are gone when I was alone in the company
Today there others who share my concerns
Jinn wrote:
View original post

Quote:
Sorry I didn't get this, left a will? And we can't objectively assess whether he's been good/bad for the Muslims, is that what you're trying to say?? [/quote]
As I said earlier my post was merely information and absolutely no assessment of the effects of the content.
Quote:
First of all this guy and his gang of emotionally fuelled jahils have been a disaster for the Ummah, first with their fake sham khilafa which was not on shuura and vouched by any big scholars wouldwide, many even call it the first false dawn, because many were gullible and deluded out of their emotions who made that journey only to realise what it was actually about. [/quote]
My concerns are the the interests of Muslim Ummah. May be they are as bad as you say but their adversaries are equally bad. Main adversary has been blindly supporting similar atrocities of the Zionists for almost seven decades. And all of the info about them is filtered by the same adversaries. That adevesary has adopted the policies that are continuation of the crusades. What they did in Abu Gharaib, Bagram, Guantanamo Bay and countless similar out sourced jails all over the globe is not very widely known. We know all details about the third Reich but the truth of US interrogation centres we might never know for they have had opportunity to cover their deeds and obliterate all signs of their activities. It is very difficult for me to side with their view even if I can not speak against them. and the very fact that it is difficult to speak against them is a telling comment on the ground reality. May be the people active in middle east are as bad as their detractors want us to believe but why are they not telling us about their own activities? And I assure you when you know about Central African Republic you will go numb.
Quote:
Secondly they kill other mujahideen (Muslims), in fact the spilling of Muslim blood they make it look like a walk in the park, have they forgotten about the severe admonitions about spilling blood unjustly that has been mentioned in the Quran? [/quote]
According to a report US supported IS in the beginning.
They must have got the inspiration from Israel who plays with cards very close to heart.
The strategy is quite simple. ISIS began as a breakaway group of Al Qaida.
Unfortunately the US could not keep a control or a tab on it.
Now we have to believe their new version that IS is bad and in fact worse and the worst.
Quote:
they make mass takfeer, they are absent from the main battles and that is the removal of the Assad, they attack other mujahideen in the back, anyone who disagrees with them is a kafir, there are many vids which have actually documented their crimes and ulema worldwide have spoken out against them and condemned them.

Mass takfeer I do not know about.
They are certainly making inroads into Assad's space.
Brutalitywise they certainly are unprecedented but I hope they will calm down after the new directive from Baghdadi.
[quote]Thirdly, the image they are painting of Muslims and Islam itself is not a pleasant one, but a barbaric ruthless extremist one where no mercy is showed to no one including women and children.

This certainly is worrisome for there is this real danger of the masses taking their actions to be manifestation of Islam.
[quote]Fourthly, the actions of these khwarij are having implications on Muslims worldwide. They have similarities with khwarij bro and that's been common throughout history, the extreme hate towards the main body of Muslims, the takfeeri attitude. The harshness towards Muslims, the mass killings etc

Once again I do not get why are you calling them Khawarij and Takfiri.
[quote]
If you really want to objectively assess, whether they have benefitted the Muslims and Islam then just ask yourself what I mentioned above and you'll get your answer, is this what Islam is about?? Is this what the best of creation (saw) taught, is this what his Sahaba رضي الله عنه were about?

Clearly you are agitated.
I too was agitated when their news started coming out about one year ago.
But the news of similar atrocities against Muslims have been with us.
US engendered blasts in Shia and Sunni localities are so numerous that neither we can keep a count not fix the blame.
The brutal beheadings in cold blood first appeared in Central african Republic by Christian militia.
The media control is so near complete that you not going to get even the air of ground reality there.
I feel the events from there are more severe than IS events.
london786 wrote:
View original post

Jazakallah for chipping in.
Clearly he can not take in the actions of the IS.
None of us can take them in.
These are excessively brutal.
What he does not know is that the events from Central African Republic are even more nauseating.
Jinn wrote:
View original post

The US wants you to have a stand on the IS.
You are keen to oblige them.
Why?
There are various other actions possible.
For example ask them, the US, why they supported the ISIS initially.
Ask them how many times they will change their stance and their stand.
To win the cold war they used Muslim lives and used OBL.
Then when he turned against them they dumped and bumped him.
We meekly followed suit.
Then they supported ISIS against Al Qaida.
We were not informed about it.
We were supposed to fume at al qaida as well as ISIS while US was supporting ISIS.
Now ISIS has turned fearcely against US.
We are supposed to toe the US line.
And to top it all US is completely confounded by the IS.
Why have our opinion, interests become so subservient to US opinion and interests.

True IS is giving Islam and Muslims a bad name but we do have the option to not become the boots on the ground that US wants us to be.
Black Turban wrote:
View original post

I see.
But I can not vouch for this info.
By the time we are realizing the scale of horror perpetrated by the IS the western machinary had had implemented a complete clamp down on the info coming out of IS.
Thus now we have only the info desired by the west.

Do you know when a person comes up with a case against some one else then he gives only that info which is useful for his case. You have to listen to both sides to make up your mind and the first party usually leaves you in dark about some crucial matters.

Be very careful about the case presented by the west. they have not been friendly towards Islam and Muslims.

Jinn wrote:
View original post


Assuming that Wahhabi movement was more brutal than IS is not reassuring.
Both say the same thing - Muslims are exceedingly bad.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top

Jump to page: