Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

Discussion with a follower of Ahmadiyyah sect...

Jump to page:

You have contributed 0.0% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
dr76, abu mohammed, Muadh_Khan, Abdullah1, Yasin, AishaZaynap
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
14
Brother
0
#76 [Permalink] Posted on 13th August 2015 03:23


And no we are not like Shias or Jews brother. YOU WILL NEVER FIND ANY INNOVATION IN AHMADIYYA. Shias have so much bidaah and insult the Khalifa Rashideen. Shias hit themselves and practice temporary marriages which are all bidaah. Some sects have music and dancing in Mosques, some sects believe in grave worshipping etc. also BELIEVING JESUS IS ALIVE IN THE SKY IS AN INNOVATION. You will find that Ahmadiyya is free from all these innovation.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Optimistic x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
14
Brother
0
#77 [Permalink] Posted on 13th August 2015 03:28
"Who knows what Qur'an they use"

We use the Holy Quran revealed to Muhammad (saw). Why would we have a different Quran Nauzobillah?

Infact I will ONLY be using translations from your SUNNI WEBSITES, to prove Jesus has died, once we get more indepth in this debate.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Arslan.'s avatar
Unspecified
909
Brother
82
Arslan.'s avatar
#78 [Permalink] Posted on 13th August 2015 04:54
@Ahmadi al-kadh-dhaab

(1) Any response to the multitudes of ahadeeth in which Rasulullah salAllaahu `alayhi wassallam explcitly states he is the LAST and FINAL prophet and that no prophet will come after him?

(2) Raf' is used in ahadeeth for raising the hands ("Chapter on raising the hands" in Bukhaari). Now tell me, do we 'spritually' raise our hands in salaat or 'physically'?

report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Arslan.'s avatar
Unspecified
909
Brother
82
Arslan.'s avatar
#79 [Permalink] Posted on 13th August 2015 04:58
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Winner x 2
back to top
Rank Image
Arslan.'s avatar
Unspecified
909
Brother
82
Arslan.'s avatar
#80 [Permalink] Posted on 13th August 2015 05:24
Dumb qadiyaanis will always restrict the discussion to "isa" and the word "rafa", but never mention the DISGUSTING and HORRIFIC things Mirza shaytaan said about the `Isa `alayhis salaam and his mother.

Mirza Ghulam Shaytaan said:

- Jesus was from a family of prostitutes
- Jesus had an inclination towards prostitutes
- Jesus was arrogant and conceited
- Jesus was an alcoholic and gluttonous person
- Jesus had a habit of uttering foul language
- Maryam (`alayhas-salaam) was a zaaniyah

These (and there's A LOT more than this) are all recorded and well-known statements of Mirza Ghulam Shaytaan.

report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Yasin's avatar
UK
6,700
Brother
944
Yasin's avatar
#81 [Permalink] Posted on 13th August 2015 06:08
AhmadiTruth wrote:
View original post

Your post was not deleted. Show some dignity.

Quote:
We say Jesus died NATURALLY!
and your proof for this? What was the natural death? Where was the death? When?
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,704
Brother
289
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#82 [Permalink] Posted on 13th August 2015 07:44
Arslan. wrote:
View original post


This is the fundamental crux of the issue. If the Qadiyanees allege Mirza Ghulam Ahmed to be a Prophet, lets discuss the statements of the "Prophet"

Why should we discuss about XYZ and their words?
Posted via the Muftisays Android App
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
xs11ax's avatar
Unspecified
3,243
Brother
2,561
xs11ax's avatar
#83 [Permalink] Posted on 13th August 2015 09:19
question for the follower of mirza qadiyyani....

do you people accept the sahih hadith of prophet (saw)?
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Jinn's avatar
Unspecified
2,891
Brother
279
Jinn's avatar
#84 [Permalink] Posted on 13th August 2015 10:21
AhmadiTruth wrote:
View original post


Is that why you have your 'own' understanding of the Qur'an? Is that what your scholars have taught you guys like, that sunnis are lied to by their scholars and don't know what they're talking about, beautuful thing about ahlus sunnah is that we have a 'isnaad', system and virtually everything can be verified.

Is that why you reject that Muhammad (saw) is the seal of Prophets when he has stated himself in ahadith?

Don't you think that if they're actually was to be a Prophet after Muhammad (saw) it would have been Umar رضي الله عنه as we have been told in ahadith? Umar was the second Khalifa of Islam and not a Prophet because prophethood ended with Muhammad (saw)

When other liars declared themselves as Prophets after the demise of Rasoolalah (saw) why did Abu Bakr Siddeeq رضي الله عنه send Khalid bin Walid رضي الله عنه to go deal with them?

If mirza your Prophet arose during the times of Khulafa-e-rashideen, do you think they would have accepted him or rejected him or would they have chopped his head off and why?

So I'm not sure where you learnt your deen from and from who but you need to go back, way back because you've been fed a whole can of worms meaning lies, go back even before advent of the sect of Ahmadiyyah go all the way back to the start of Islam and if your sincere in your quest you'll find answers and the truth and I can guarantee you it's definitely not what you've been taught.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 1Winner x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
295
Brother
154
#85 [Permalink] Posted on 13th August 2015 11:07
AhmadiTruth wrote:
View original post

Believing in prophets after Rasoolullah (saw) is far worse than innovation its called kufr. Innovation is the least of your worries.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+3 -0Like x 1Winner x 2
back to top
Rank Image
xs11ax's avatar
Unspecified
3,243
Brother
2,561
xs11ax's avatar
#86 [Permalink] Posted on 13th August 2015 11:07
do qadiyyanis believe that every muslim that came before their false prophet came was on error?
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,704
Brother
289
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#87 [Permalink] Posted on 13th August 2015 12:26

What does the Qur’aan say about Sayyidina Isa (AS)? VS Qadiyani Deception:

The Qadiyanees are notorious for twisting the words of Qur’aan displaying ignorance of the Arabic language and committing nothing but debauchery with the verses of the Book of Allah (SWT). Insha’Allah the following post will show the deception of the Qadiyanees from the Qur’aan itself.

When dealing with the Qadiyanees you need to understand that they don’t understand Arabic and their analysis is mostly based on (distorted) knowledge of Urdu. Their analysis is actually second (or even third) hand in most cases instead of directly accessing the Qur’aan. Since they lack the knowledge of the (Arabic) they are unable to do direct analysis, so they simply bicker over (Urdu or English) translations.

The most direct verse of the Qur’aan about Sayyidina Isa (AS) is as follows:

وَقَوۡلِهِمۡ إِنَّا قَتَلۡنَا ٱلۡمَسِيحَ عِيسَى ٱبۡنَ مَرۡيَمَ رَسُولَ ٱللَّهِ وَمَا قَتَلُوهُ وَمَا صَلَبُوهُ وَلَـٰكِن شُبِّهَ لَهُمۡ‌ۚ وَإِنَّ ٱلَّذِينَ ٱخۡتَلَفُواْ فِيهِ لَفِى شَكٍّ۬ مِّنۡهُ‌ۚ مَا لَهُم بِهِۦ مِنۡ عِلۡمٍ إِلَّا ٱتِّبَاعَ ٱلظَّنِّ‌ۚ وَمَا قَتَلُوهُ يَقِينَۢا. بَل رَّفَعَهُ ٱللَّهُ إِلَيۡهِ‌ۚ وَكَانَ ٱللَّهُ عَزِيزًا حَكِيمً۬ا

[4:157] and for their saying, .We have certainly killed the Masih Isa the son of Maryam, the Messenger of Allah., while in fact they did neither kill him, nor crucify him, but they were deluded by resemblance. Those who disputed in this matter are certainly in doubt about it. They have no knowledge of it, but they follow whims. It is absolutely certain that they did not kill him, [4:158] but Allah lifted him towards Himself. Allah is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

Analysis of the word Qatala in the veres of Sayyidina Isa (AS):

The (past) deception of the Qadiyanees was that Qatala doesn’t mean kill but it’s metaphorical. This is of course nothing but sheer stupidity because this word by definition and in the terms of the Qur’aan when used mean “physically killing”. It is used many times in the Qur’aan and here is 1 example:

وَإِذۡ قَالَ مُوسَىٰ لِقَوۡمِهِۦ يَـٰقَوۡمِ إِنَّكُمۡ ظَلَمۡتُمۡ أَنفُسَڪُم بِٱتِّخَاذِكُمُ ٱلۡعِجۡلَ فَتُوبُوٓاْ إِلَىٰ بَارِٮِٕكُمۡ فَٱقۡتُلُوٓاْ أَنفُسَكُمۡ ذَٲلِكُمۡ خَيۡرٌ۬ لَّكُمۡ عِندَ بَارِٮِٕكُمۡ فَتَابَ عَلَيۡكُمۡ‌ۚ إِنَّهُ ۥ هُوَ ٱلتَّوَّابُ ٱلرَّحِيمُ

[2:54] When Musa said to his people: .My people, you have wronged yourselves by your taking the calf (as God). So, turn in repentance to your Creator, and slay yourselves. That will be better for you in the sight of your Creator.. Then, He accepted your repentance. Indeed He is the Most-Relenting, the Very-Merciful.

So in the verses 4:157 & 4:158 the issue is dead clear that Sayyidina Isa (AS) was not Killed

Analysis of the word Salaba in the veres of Sayyidina Isa (AS):

There is NO OTHER meaning of the word Salaba in the Arabic language except to mean crucify on the Cross at all!

So in the verses 4:157 & 4:158 the issue is dead clear that Sayyidina Isa (AS) was neither Killed nor crucified

Analysis of the word Rafa in the veres of Sayyidina Isa (AS):

Qadiyanees are now left with nothing but clutching on straws and they say that Rafa doesn’t mean PHYSICAL ASCENSION but METAPHORICAL ASCENSION i.e. Sayyidina Isa (AS) was metaphorically or spiritually pulled to the heavens.

Here are a few examples where Rafa is used in the Qur’aan for Physical movement. You will note that if you take METAPHORICAL (movement) the verse will become totally meaningless:

ٱللَّهُ ٱلَّذِى رَفَعَ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَٲتِ بِغَيۡرِ عَمَدٍ۬ تَرَوۡنَہَا‌ۖ

[13:2] Allah is the One who raised the heavens without pillars that you can see them.

ءَأَنتُمۡ أَشَدُّ خَلۡقًا أَمِ ٱلسَّمَآءُ‌ۚ بَنَٮٰهَا. رَفَعَ سَمۡكَهَا فَسَوَّٮٰهَا

[79:27] Is your creation more difficult or that of the sky? He has built it, [79:28] He has raised its height, then made it proper,

Here are some few examples where Rafa is used in the Qur’aan for Metaphorical movement.

وَرَفَعَ بَعۡضَكُمۡ فَوۡقَ بَعۡضٍ۬ دَرَجَـٰتٍ۬

[6:165]... and raised some of you in ranks over others...

وَرَفَعَ بَعۡضَهُمۡ دَرَجَـٰتٍ۬‌ۚ

[2:253] ...and He raised some of them steps higher (in other respects)...

Qur’aanic word analysis shows us how this word is used, summarised as follows:

  1. Rafa is used 29 times in the Qur'aan
  2. 17 times it has been used in PHYSICAL sense
  3. 12 times it has been in METAPHORICAL sense

Each time when used in METAPHORICAL sense the context is specified right next to i.e. X has been raised over Y in terms of "superiority" or whatever the reason of "raising" may be!

In the beautiful verse about Sayyidina Isa (RA) notice the Arabic and lack of any context of "raising"  its just raised

بَل رَّفَعَهُ ٱللَّهُ إِلَيۡهِ‌ۚ

[4:158] but Allah lifted him towards Himself

  1. Ascension of Sayyidina Isa (AS) is PHYSICAL because we have no context on how to interpret "raising" and the rules of Arabic Grammar dictate that the method of raising to be described

We have Hadeeth upon Hadeeth which verifies that Sayyidina Isa (AS) was physically lifted to the Heavens.


Qadiyani Deception from his own Post:

From the Qur'aan:

وَٱذۡكُرۡ فِى ٱلۡكِتَـٰبِ إِدۡرِيسَ‌ۚ إِنَّهُ ۥ كَانَ صِدِّيقً۬ا نَّبِيًّ۬ا  وَرَفَعۡنَـٰهُ مَكَانًا عَلِيًّا

[19:56] And mention in the Book (the story of) Idris. He was indeed a Siddiq (man of truth), a prophet. [19:57] We raised him to a high place.

Agree with you that this is METAPHORICAL because you have the context . Now, note the verse of Sayyidina Isa (AS) which has NO CONTEXT explained:

بَل رَّفَعَهُ ٱللَّهُ إِلَيۡهِ‌ۚ

[4:158] but Allah lifted him towards Himself

From Prayer in Hadeeth:

Rafa in Salah is LIFTING the Hands, again notice that when raising is physical in Hadeeth the context is stripped (i.e. HOW is not mentioned)

حدثنا مسدد حدثنا عبد الله بن داود عن فطر عن عبد الجبار بن وائل عن أبيه قال رأيت رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم يرفع إبهاميه في الصلاة إلى شحمة أذنيه
 

Narrated Wa'il ibn Hujr (RA): I saw the Apostle of Allah(ﷺ) raising his thumbs in prayer up to the lobes of his ears. [Abu Dawud]

Again, note the verse of Sayyidina Isa (AS) which has NO CONTEXT explained:

بَل رَّفَعَهُ ٱللَّهُ إِلَيۡهِ‌ۚ

[4:158] but Allah lifted him towards Himself

report post quote code quick quote reply
+7 -0Like x 6
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
27,473
Brother
9,579
abu mohammed's avatar
#88 [Permalink] Posted on 13th August 2015 16:38
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 2
back to top
Yasin's avatar
UK
6,700
Brother
944
Yasin's avatar
#89 [Permalink] Posted on 14th August 2015 00:18
A quick overview log for everyone to see the true nature of the Qadiyani liars:


9th May 15:09: Arrives
Post #22 - Question 1 by byellow200 - Answered with giberrish on Post #24
Post #25 - Repeats question again with a request of simple yes or no - Ignored by Qadiyani
Post #26 - Question 2 by Jinn - Ignored by Qadiyani
Post #27 - Question 3 by byellow200 - Ignored by Qadiyani
Post #28 - Reminder for question 3 - Still ignored by Qadiyani
Post #29 - Question 4, 5 and 6 asked by xs11ax - Ignored by Qadiyani
Post #30 - byellow200 replies to Qadiyani's gibberish in Post #24 - No answer from Qadiyani
Post #31 - I ask for the Hadeeth that the Qadiyani kept mentioning post after post - Qadiyani points to Hadeeth
Post #33 - Question 7 by byellow200 - Ignored by Qadiyani
Post #24 - Question 8 by byellow200 - Ignored by Qadiyani
Post #35 - Information and Question 9 by Muadh_Khan - Sort of answered below...
Post #36 - Qadiyani answers to a question that was never even asked by Muadh. Then proceeds to copy/paste unrelated information completely ignoring the questions completely. The additional unrelated off-topic (against forum rules) portion of the post was removed to keep the thread ON TOPIC as the Qadiyani wanted in the first place.
Post #37 - Question 10 by Jinn - Ignored by Qadiyani
Post #38 - I post a basic answer to the Qadiyani's claim about the Hadeeth from Post #31 - the Qadiyani ignores answer and doesn't accept
Post #39 - Muadh_Khan repeats question and highlights it in red - answers...
Post #40 - the Qadiyani claims he CLEARLY said he agrees with both (he clearly doesn't know the meaning of clearly)
Post #40 - In the same post he continues his copy/pasting of unrelated information to topic and debate. This was removed with a polite request not to do that and just post answers.
Post #41 - Jinn posts Hadeeth on Khatmun-Nubuwwah - Ignored by Qadiyani
Post #42 - Jinn requests clarification - Ignored by Qadiyani
Post #43 - Jinn posts criteria of Imam Mahdi and poses Question 11 - IGNORED AGAIN
Post #44 - Muadh_Khan poses Question 12 - Answered by Qadiyani next post
Post #45 - Answers what was asked but follows up with twisting Muadh's words and making claims on his behalf
Post #46 - Muadh_Khan asks Question 13 - Qadiyani is now whining on Twitter according to reports
Post #47 - Jinn shows the courtesy to explain about the editing and cleaning up of thread - Ignored by Qadiyani
Post #48 - I explain why thread was split and cleaned up to maintain the discussion with the Qadiyani - Ignored by Qadiyani
Post #50 - Muadh_Khan posts summary and proof of more lies from the Qadiyani about his posts being removed!!! - Ignored by Qadiyani
The Qadiyani has disappeared.

So to summarise:
Approximate Questions Asked including clarifications: 21
Answers: 5
IGNORED: 16


Post #69 - Another Qadiyani arrives and puts forward his beliefs
Post #70 - Qadiyani asks for ONE verse and claims he'll leave the Qadiyani cult and ask forgiveness
Post #71 - I provide verse - Abu mohammed provides translation in Post #73
Post #72 - Abu Mohammed asks two questions (related to each other) - Qadiyani answers in post #76
Post #74 - Whines about a post being removed when it wasn't removed. It was split to a new thread, he replied to that also yet still continues to whine about it till now. Then asks for oaths to be taken about Khatmun-Nubuwwah
Post #75 - Replies to verse with absolute home-cooked commentary of the verses which was answered in detail by Muadh_Khan in Post #87
Post #78 - Arslan. poses questions - IGNORED
Post #79 - Answer posted to his fake commentary by Arslan.
Post #81 - I once again clarify about his whining that his post was NOT deleted. I also ask proof for his claims by quoting him - IGNORED by Qadiyani
Post #83 - xs11ax asks question - IGNORED
This has also disappeared and retreated to Twitter to whine about posts being deleted. AMAZINGLY not a single post, not even a full stop was removed or edited in his posts.



There seems to be a pattern with them:
1. They answer while they feel strong (early on)
2. Then ignore question or answer with unrelated information and pose questions about Isa عليه السلام more than anything else
3. When the questions can't be answered simply, start making accusations about censoring and deleting and cry about it on Twitter

That's 2 out 2 so far.

Lessons learnt:
Qadiyanis are natural liars. They feel no remorse in lying. They lie as easily as they breathe. The entire thread and his twitter whinging is ample proof of my claims. They truly are Kazhaab.

If they wish to return to defend their false prophet the son of Chiragh Bibi then they may do so. The conditions are simple, answer questions only. To pose questions you can start your own thread and you are not restricted.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 2
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
14
Brother
0
#90 [Permalink] Posted on 14th August 2015 02:31
Whoa, you guys sure have a lot of questions, is this a debate or an interview? I'm seeing no answers and the storm of accusations and allegations which will all be refuted.

I will be writing a detailed response to the following allegations raised:

La Nabbiya Badi, No prophet after me?

Rafa?

Disrespect to Jesus?

Proof Jesus died? (LOL is this even a question)

Do we accept Sahih Hadith? (LOL do you?)

Ahmadis have their own interpretation of Quran? (I will only use YOUR SUNNI SOURCES)

Believing in a prophet after Nabi saw is the worst innovation (Yet you believe in one LOL)

Prophets before Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad were liars?

Muadh trapped by his own logic

All these things will be answered in detail once I return. Please do your research, you're all going to be eating your words. And since you guys interviewed me with 20 questions, can I interview you aswell? you have ALOT to answer for.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Disagree x 1
back to top

Jump to page: