Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

An answer is needed

You have contributed 0.0% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
To appreciate this topic, click 'Appreciate Topic' on the right.
Rank Image
Arfatzafar's avatar
Offline
India
1,269
Brother
1,586
Arfatzafar's avatar
#1 [Permalink] Posted on 1st March 2016 06:53
In this article, eleven difficult passages in the Koran which have defied the efforts of both Muslim commentators and orientalists to explain them are interpreted as corruptions resulting from faulty copying by scribes. Emendations of the text are proposed to bring it as close as possible to the form it had when first spoken by the prophet Muhammad. At the end, a few changes are made in the author's old hypothesis that the Mysterious Letters at the head of some of the surahs are old abbreviations of the basmalah.
A curious feature of studies on the Koran in the West over the last 150 years is the scant attention paid by scholars to the Koranic text as such. Orientalism has many excellent works on the Koran to its credit, but one seeks in vain for a systematic application of the techniques of textual criticism to the textual problems of the Koran, although classicists and Biblical scholars have for centuries made continuous efforts to improve the quality of the texts that are the bases of their disciplines. It is difficult to see why this should be so. Early Koran scholars such as Fleischer, Noldeke, and Goldziher were good textual critics; they were all well educated in classical and Biblical studies, and they made good editions of later Arabic texts that are still in use today.
Whatever the reasons, Western scholarship, with very few exceptions,(1) has chosen to follow the Muslim commentators in not emending the text. When faced with a problem, the Westerners have resorted to etymologizing and hunting for foreign words and foreign influences. They have produced a great deal of valuable scholarship important for our study of the Koran and the origins of Islam, but where they exercised their skill on corrupt texts, they, of course, produced only fantasies......
www.thefreelibrary.com/Some+proposed+emendations+to+the+t...
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
27,479
Brother
9,579
abu mohammed's avatar
#2 [Permalink] Posted on 1st March 2016 11:04
Quote:
In this article, eleven difficult passages in the Koran which have defied the efforts of both Muslim commentators and orientalists to explain them are interpreted as corruptions resulting from faulty copying by scribes.


This is nonsense. even if the scribes made errors, there were so many people who learnt it by heart and was checked, rechecked over and over again and what we have today is what was revealed to the Prophet (saw).

If the scholars can't answer, it doesn't mean that there are possible errors because Allah has promised to preserve His book.

This is propaganda and not something we need to get into at all.

Halalified YT Audio


Was there something wrong with Ancient Qur'anic Manuscripts of Sana'a? - Dr. Shabir Ally
Halalified YT Audio
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
616
Brother
528
#3 [Permalink] Posted on 1st March 2016 17:05
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top