Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

If Murphy was a Muslim?

You have contributed 0.0% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
abu mohammed, samah
Yasin's avatar
UK
6,700
Brother
945
Yasin's avatar
#1 [Permalink] Posted on 19th May 2014 15:12
If he was a Muslim man, the outcome, news report and media coverage would not be the same. I've highlighted some words in red in the article. I mean this guy was carrying an explosive onto a plane....


Edmonton pipe bomb: Airport security personnel ignored danger



Even after airport security in Edmonton realized a potentially dangerous pipe bomb had been seized from a departing passenger, they did not immediately call the RCMP, inexplicably ignoring the most basic safety and security protocols, sources with direct knowledge of the incident told CBC News.

The security personnel also did not follow protocol when they removed the steel pipe bomb, with its nearly three-metre-long fuse, from an X-ray machine instead of immediately shutting down the machine, triggering an alarm, calling in a nearby RCMP officer and securing the public’s safety.

Instead, a security guard, apparently not realizing it was a pipe bomb, offered to return it to the teenage passenger who had inadvertently carried it into the screening area in a camera bag. He declined to take it and was allowed to board a flight to Mexico with his family on Sept. 20, 2013.

“The gentleman should have been arrested on site,” said one of the security guards, who spoke with CBC News on condition of anonymity. “But the police had no idea this was going on, and they were never called.”

Security personnel placed the pipe bomb in a so-called “forfeit” bin along with seized items such as scissors and toothpaste. Sources tell CBC News that many security staff saw the pipe bomb. One security guard who saw the device said it was obviously a pipe bomb.

“People don't carry a lead pipe with two caps on each end around with them,” the guard said. “I mean, it is the perfect picture of what a pipe bomb looks like. And that is what triggered me, when I saw it. It was so realistic that it scared me."

Sources in Ottawa told CBC News that Murphy arrived at the airport with the pipe bomb wrapped in a bag from a "head shop" that sells drug paraphernalia. The bag had pictures of marijuana leaves on it. The wrapped bomb was inside the camera bag.

After the pipe bomb was caught by the scanner, the security screener looked at the images on the bag and assumed the pipe bomb was some kind of drug pipe. The inspector then swabbed the pipe bomb for drugs, but not for gunpowder. It tested negative for drugs.

Souces say the pipe bomb was reported the same day to the management of Garda, the security firm hired by the Canadian Transport Security Authority (CATSA) to screen passengers at Edmonton International Airport.

Despite this, the pipe bomb sat in an office for four days, until Sept. 24, when it was finally noticed by a CATSA official who called the RCMP. The Mounties arrested 18-year-old Skylar Murphy from Spruce Grove, Alta., when he returned from Mexico on Sept. 27.

Murphy pleaded guilty to possession of an explosive device and was given a one-year suspended sentence, a $100 fine, and ordered to make a $500 donation to a burn unit.

When contacted by CBC News, Murphy sought $600 for an interview, saying he wanted the money to pay the fine and the donation. CBC declined to pay and no interview was granted.

In emailed statements to CBC News, CATSA said an internal review was conducted, changes were made to ensure this type of security failure could not happen again, and employees were disciplined, including being suspended.

But the guard who spoke with CBC News on condition of anonymity said only minor changes have been made to security protocols, and the operator of the scanning machine, and others who were directly involved with the pipe bomb on that day, were working as recently as this week.

These latest revelations raise yet more troubling questions about not only the safety of Canada’s airport-security screening system, but also about how the incident was handled both by the agency responsible for airport security, the federal government, the RCMP and Alberta Justice.

According to a transcript of Murphy’s court case, the RCMP believed the teenager’s story that he didn’t intend to blow up an airplane because of his “shocked reaction” when security screeners discovered the device.

The RCMP based this belief on surveillance video from the airport.

“I didn’t view [the video] but [RCMP investigating officer] Const. [Jim] Kirkpatrick described to me, he said it was obvious on the surveillance video, when the object was pulled out of his bag, the shocked reaction he had,” Crown prosecutor Trent Wilson told the court at Murphy’s hearing on Dec. 5.

The court also heard testimony from the teenager that he obtained the gunpowder by stealing bullets from his mother’s fiancé, an Alberta sheriff. Alberta Justice issued a release saying RCMP had investigated the matter and found the sheriff’s weapon and ammunition had been properly stored.

Court transcripts reveal that another reason RCMP believed Murphy did not intend to harm anyone was that he returned from the vacation onSept. 27, when he was arrested by a large number of uniformed officers, a SWAT team and bomb-sniffing dogs.

The transcript shows he and a friend built the pipe bomb because they intended to blow up a shed for fun.

“Mr. Murphy also said he wanted to photograph the shed when he blew it up and that was why he had the bomb inside of his camera bag,” the prosecutor told the court.

“When Mr. Murphy packed for his flight he placed his camera bag inside his carry-on duffel bag. He emphatically denied that his intent was to cause damage to the airport or any aircraft. He claimed that he forgot the pipe bomb was inside his camera bag and he did not intend to try to take it on the airplane.”

The court transcript describes how the explosive device was discovered at the airport.

“An object, which was later confirmed by the RCMP explosive disposal unit members to be a fully functional pipe bomb was first identified by an employee conducting an X-ray inspection of Murphy’s bag,” the prosecutor said.

Murphy confirmed he was the owner of the bag.

“Items were taken out of the bag in front of Mr. Murphy,” the prosecutor said “The object was inside a small cloth bag and was made out of a five and a half inch long metal pipe with two threaded end caps. One end of the pipe had a fuse sticking out of it that measured over nine-feet long. The pipe was filled with black powder.

“The pipe bomb was not given back to Mr. Murphy and he was allowed to board his flight to Mexico,” the prosecutor told the court. The transcript makes no reference to the security screener attempting to return the pipe bomb to Murphy.

The prosecutor asked the judge to impose a one-year, suspended sentence to a guilty plea of being in possession of an explosive device, which the judge granted.

Several American security experts told CBC News they were shocked Murphy wasn’t charged with a much more serious offence and jailed.

In sentencing Murphy, the judge scolded the teenager for stealing from his mother’s fiancé and for his bad judgment in producing such a dangerous device.

“Pipe bombs are used to kill people, to destroy property, they are used in war, they are used by terrorists, they are used by individuals who are in conflict, and they are very successful at killing people,” the judge told Murphy.

The judge also told Murphy that had he carried the pipe bomb to Mexico, he might have been facing a different fate.

“If the authorities had missed that pipe bomb and you had gone, in Mexico, through a screening device, you would not even get a trial, more than likely,” the judge said. “You would be in a Mexican jail and your grandfather and your family would be visiting you in that jail. And you would probably be learning Spanish by now, if you survived. I doubt you would have survived.”

The security guard who spoke to CBC said media coverage of the security failure has undermined public confidence in the screening system.

“We have got passengers coming up to us and harassing us now [saying], ‘Why are you searching my stuff or why are you taking my liquids away? I mean you guys let a pipe bomb go,’” the guard said.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Agree x 3
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
1,241
Brother
1,935
#2 [Permalink] Posted on 20th May 2014 18:01
السلام عليكم

This is real food for thought. The discrimination is very clear. If the same crime was committed by a Muslim, He would have been imprisoned for life and tortured in some secret location. Also it would have hit the headlines of every news outlet and stayed in the front page for weeks.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Agree x 4Winner x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Black Turban's avatar
Offline
Bangladesh
1,549
Brother
1,808
Black Turban's avatar
#3 [Permalink] Posted on 20th May 2014 18:23
Question: If Murphy was a Muslim?


Answer:
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Agree x 2Winner x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Black Turban's avatar
Offline
Bangladesh
1,549
Brother
1,808
Black Turban's avatar
#4 [Permalink] Posted on 20th May 2014 18:40
What if Anders Breivik Were a Muslim?


By Paul Oliver (August 3, 2011)


Anders Behring Breivik is an archetype of terrorism. He is a non-state actor who committed an attack against a non-military target for political means. It is difficult to understand how a citizen of one of the most peaceful, wealthy, and equitable countries in the world could transform into a right-wing, xenophobic, Christian extremist with no respect for human life.

And yet the reactions to Breivik's horrendous actions are interesting in their own right; they shed light on how people qualify ideological motivations and perceive threats. The general reaction within Western society is one of shock, not only because of the horrible rampage that killed 76 people, but because Breivik was a seemingly regular, well-adjusted Norwegian. Reactions to Breivik make me wonder how events would have played out differently had he been a Muslim.

Breivik's thoughts and actions closely resemble not his own culture, but the culture of hatred espoused by the likes of Al-Qaeda. "Onward, Christian soldiers!" Breivik said in a July 12 video. "Celebrate us, the martyrs of the conservative revolution, for we will soon dine in the Kingdom of Heaven."

Replace "Christian" with "Muslim," and you have a sentence that could very well have come from the mouth of Osama bin Laden. And yet the media generally portray Breivik as a violent sociopath. That may be true, but had a Muslim done the same thing, the conversation would be radically different. The focus would be on group identity, such as religion or terrorist groups, rather than the individual.

What is clear is that violent actions, taken independently, are not sufficient to engender fear and anger throughout a population. The West is not discussing the risk of Christian terrorism. Instead, Westerners recognize that Breivik is an anomaly who does not represent Judeo-Christian values despite his protestations otherwise, and right-wing Christians do not see the need to ask introspective questions about the impact of the attack on their beliefs. They simply do not see Breivik as a member of their group despite Breivik's very public and overt efforts to associate with them. Whether or not the Christian or right-wing communities renounce his actions, as is the case with Muslims after Islamic terrorist attacks, is not an issue.

The double standard is frustrating to many Muslims, but it is at least partially understandable because it hints at a cultural division that explains how Christianity and Islam are viewed in the West. The reactions are so fundamentally different that something must be going on at a deep cultural level. That root is an issue of trust.

Western cultures understand very little about Islam. Most Westerners probably do not know the Five Pillars of Islam, or know that Christians and Muslims have lived in peace for centuries at a time in the past, or that some of the greatest literary, scientific, and mathematical advances in the history of the world were the result of Islamic scholars working in the great universities of the Arab world.

In fact, a 2010 Gallup Poll found that 63% of Americans rated their own knowledge of Islam as either "very little" or "none at all." Westerners make little effort to differentiate between Islam and terrorism, and they do not have any interest in doing so. The world is too complicated to figure it all out, and simplification is the easiest (not to mention most dangerous) coping mechanism. Many Westerners do not trust Muslims because they do not know who they are or what they believe.

But when it comes to issues of Christianity or right-wing politics, Westerners are well-versed and comfortable with the tenets of these belief systems. They understand the mainstream positions, they have family and friends who belong to these labels, and they understand the limitations of cultural acceptability. Westerners trust that their right-wing Christian neighbors will be peaceful, productive members of society. They may not agree with their opinions, but they agree that they are safe.

The Breivik attacks are tragedies that strike a certain chord of outrage among us all. It rattles the core of Western security because the attacker is one of our own. There is no easy target of blame, no evil foreign villain to point fingers at. Had Breivik been Muslim, he would have been lumped into a generic category of Islamic fundamentalists we don't know much about but certainly know how to hate. So in some ways, a Muslim Breivik would be more comforting, more familiar. Instead, the West must look in at itself and reconcile with a new and unsettling threat from within.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top