Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

Saudi Arabia Condemns the offensive statements insulting the Holy Prophet (saw)

You have contributed 0.0% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
abuzayd2k
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
26,609
Brother
9,621
abu mohammed's avatar
#31 [Permalink] Posted on 14th June 2022 13:43
We aren't hadith scholars and it has been mentioned before, www.muftisays.com/forums/76-the-true-salaf-as-saliheen/73...


If I'm not mistaken, the second hadith quoted is for Muslim v Muslim. Wallahu alum.

We aren't dealing with Muslims here.


This is the honor of our Prophet (saw) being discussed, not some sect or plague.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
26,609
Brother
9,621
abu mohammed's avatar
#32 [Permalink] Posted on 14th June 2022 14:09
Quote:
it breaks our hearts and fills them with anger, and we are prepared to sacrifice our lives in defence of the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) – is nevertheless something which brings us glad tidings of their doom, and tells us that the end of their supremacy is at hand. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“Truly, We will suffice you against the scoffers”

[al-Hijr 15:95]

Allaah will suffice His Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) against the criminals who mock him. He says (interpretation of the meaning):

“For he who hates you (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم), he will be cut off (from posterity and every good thing in this world and in the Hereafter)”

[al-Kawthar 108:3]

i.e., he is scorned and humiliated and cut off from all that is good.

When the Muslims besieged a stronghold and its people resisted, then they heard them mocking and reviling the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), they would sense that victory was at hand, and it would only be a short time before Allaah granted them victory, to avenge His Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him).

Al-Saarim al-Maslool (p. 116-117).

There are many historical cases where those who mocked the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) were destroyed and finished off.

Moreover, why do they resent the leader of mankind, Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him)?

They resent him because he called people to believe in the Oneness of God (Tawheed), and they do not believe that God is One.

They resent him because he venerated his Lord, may He be blessed and exalted, and declared Him to be far above what these fabricators say, as they attributed a wife and son to Him.

They resent him because he called people to the loftiest of morals and to give up the lowest. He called them to virtue and to block all the means that lead to immorality, but they want moral disorder and unlimited sexual liberty.

They want to indulge in the swamp of evil whims and desires, and they have got what they want!

They resent him because he is the Messenger of Allaah! Allaah, may He be exalted, is the One Who chose him above all mankind to convey His message and receive His revelation.

islamqa.info/en/answers/86109/our-attitude-concerning-moc...
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
57
Brother
30
#33 [Permalink] Posted on 14th June 2022 15:10
Okay then i am asking a practical question , what a Indian Muslim shall do ? In this complex situation , where No Muslim country is actually supporting us other than just condemning few of Indian authorities actions and Indian Muslims have been left to face their own fate.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
26,609
Brother
9,621
abu mohammed's avatar
#34 [Permalink] Posted on 14th June 2022 15:36
Honest servant wrote:
View original post

The below is not my response. I'm not a scholar, but this is one response.

Quote:
Salam.
Can a Muslim take law into his own hands in the case of blasphemy even no actions taken by the government or no legal rulings will be applied on that particular person who is at the higher state doing blasphemy or any kind of criminal act if that’s written in the law of a particular State?

What must be done in that regard if no one is taking action against such person ?

Answer


Wa’alaykum as Salam wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuhu,

Islam has given certain individuals specific commandments. For example, a female is commanded not to fast and pray when she experiences her periods. A man cannot practice on this when he is in an impure state.

Likewise, the laws of implementing and executing Islamic laws have been vested with the government. It is their duty to take action against one who turned renegade, or commited other crimes, likes stealing, drinking alcohol etc. If they do not fulfill those laws, then we cannot take the law into our own hands and implement the law. Rather, we should write letters to the government, and continue to make Dua for the rulers.

Since we cannot execute the law ourselves, if someone left the fold of Islam, our duty will be to invite him back to this wonderful religion, and clear any misconceptions which he may have had.

And Allaah Ta’aala knows best

Wassalaam,

Ismail Moosa (Mufti)
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
57
Brother
30
#35 [Permalink] Posted on 15th June 2022 08:52
Yes this is what i myself felt , every ruling of islam does not apply to common man , we are suppose to do what is within our capacity without going against rule of land and without damaging public properties since we are living in non Islamic country we have limitations and we have to think more before we act . Maulana Sajjad Noumani sb is giving series of lectures to become more responsible Muslim, to our community . Being helpful to other humans and educate our surroundings real teaching of Islam with our best character towards everyone.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
26,609
Brother
9,621
abu mohammed's avatar
#36 [Permalink] Posted on 15th June 2022 10:55
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abuzayd2k's avatar
Offline
Eraf
1,318
Brother
404
abuzayd2k's avatar
#37 [Permalink] Posted on 15th June 2022 11:07
Honest servant wrote:
View original post
Quote:
Maulana Sajjad Noumani sb is giving series of lectures to become more responsible Muslim, to our community
Mashallah, Maulana Sajjad DB gives us, by far, some of the best advice to what common Muslims in India should be doing. Maulana has a good understanding of India's political environment as well as social and educational challenges faced by Muslims. He is one of the last few people left among the seniors who does not shy away from commenting on current events without compromising on Sharia, and he knows his way around dealing with the machinations of the Hindutva extremists as well as the liberals.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abuzayd2k's avatar
Offline
Eraf
1,318
Brother
404
abuzayd2k's avatar
#38 [Permalink] Posted on 15th June 2022 12:30
Engineer Muhammad Ali Mirza says that when Europe attacked the Honor of our Beloved Prophet, on him be peace, the two most vocal protests on the world stage were Rajab Tayyab Erdogan (Turkey) and Imran Khan (Pakistan). The Arabs were mute spectators, because the attackers were European.

When the Arabs spoke up against India during the current attacks on the Honor of our Prophet (PBUH), it was at the direction of the US, who wanted to show India its place for supporting Russia during the Ukraine conflict.

Clip: twitter.com/i/status/1536720676735766528

Full video: www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTl1AiumFkc
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
57
Brother
30
#39 [Permalink] Posted on 15th June 2022 13:44
Possibly it was with acceptance of USA ,i am also suspecting what happened with Indian Muslims later in India was also a signal to these western countries .
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
1,043
Brother
1,117
#40 [Permalink] Posted on 15th June 2022 14:25
It is possible that the Arab outcry was dictated, however, I have a hard time believing that Qatar would be taking such dictation. Or maybe it's the case that the earlier initiative taken by Erdogan and Imran Khan finally woke up the Arabs to their role as the defender of Prophet's (saw) honor.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abuzayd2k's avatar
Offline
Eraf
1,318
Brother
404
abuzayd2k's avatar
#41 [Permalink] Posted on 16th June 2022 02:18
We will know for sure if the Arabs have awoken when the Europeans next decide to exercise their right to "free speech."
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
57
Brother
30
#42 [Permalink] Posted on 16th June 2022 08:35
Indian Govt has come up with AGNIPATH scheme to recruit people in indian Army , strange thing this recruitment is only for 4 years ,why any government will recruit just for 4 years unless they have some hidden plan behind ? are they preparing for something in this 4 years?
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abuzayd2k's avatar
Offline
Eraf
1,318
Brother
404
abuzayd2k's avatar
#43 [Permalink] Posted on 16th June 2022 13:09
The Agnipath is actually a copy of something similar in the US, called the Tour of Duty. It is a way to ensure a regular supply of young men and women in the armed forces at a much lower cost to the government.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Rajab's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
2,079
Brother
970
Rajab's avatar
#44 [Permalink] Posted on 18th June 2022 13:12
Agniveer Recruitment Scheme is nothing but legitimately raising quasi military force for their party and sangh for future use.

Swayamsevaks who were trained with stick will get top notch armed training from armed forces and get rewarded from taxpayers coffers.

Hitler did the same with SS which started as hall security and later trained by regular German army. SS men were all loyal German Nazi party members. Hitler used them to silence all dissension both inside and outside Germany. Heinrich Himmler who headed SS was a loyal party worker, not a regular career militarist. SS was responsible for liquidation of political opposition and undesirable activists including Jews.

This new Frankenstein monster will be unleashed upon political opposition, minorities and any unwanted activists in future.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top