Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

Stabbing in London shouting "This is for Syria"

You have contributed 13.3% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
To appreciate this topic, click 'Appreciate Topic' on the right.
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
811
Brother
1,555
super-glue's avatar
#1 [Permalink] Posted on 5th December 2015 23:01
Leytonstone stabbing: Man 'screams this is for Syria' in knife attack at Tube station

A man has been arrested after a stabbing at Leytonstone Tube station in which it is claimed he screamed "this is for Syria".

Scotland Yard were called just after 7pm to reports a man's throat was slashed in an attack inside the Tube station and other people were being threatened with a knife.

Horrific images circulating on Twitter show a pool of blood on the floor near the ticket barriers and a confrontation in the station.

A video shows witnesses shouting at the man to drop his weapon before he is apprehended by officers.

Police confirmed a Taser had been used at the station.

According to Sky News, the alleged suspect shouted "this is for Syria" but the Met have not confirmed it.

A Met spokesman said: "Police were called at 7:06pm on Saturday, December 5, to reports of a stabbing at Leytonstone underground station. The male suspect was reportedly threatening other people with a knife.

"Met officers attended the scene. A man was arrested at 19:14pm and taken to an east London police station where he remains in custody. A Taser was discharged by one of the Met officers.

"Officers from British Transport Police are now dealing with the incident at the scene. We are aware of one man having sustained serious stab injuries. We await details of any other injuries."

He was taken to an east London police station where he remains in custody.


www.standard.co.uk/news/london/leytonstone-stabbing-man-a...
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
811
Brother
1,555
super-glue's avatar
#2 [Permalink] Posted on 5th December 2015 23:05
So only Sky News claims the man shouting "This is for Syria"?

I saw the video and there's blood. Meaning there was a stabbing. People reacting, lots of chaos. Remember the lee rigby video hoax? Where people were calmly walking past and smiling?

So this is a real incident that occurred.

NO MENTION ON BBC - Is that because the Elites were not involved to prepare the story beforehand like how they accidentally reported Building 7 collapsing on 9/11 half an hour before it actually collapsed?

Seriously though why is this not on BBC? Maybe I can't find it but surely it's a top story no?
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
811
Brother
1,555
super-glue's avatar
#3 [Permalink] Posted on 6th December 2015 01:15
And there you go

Leytonstone Tube station stabbing a 'terrorist incident'
www.bbc.com/news/uk-35018789

Quote:
Commander Richard Walton, who leads the counter-terrorism unit, said: "We are treating this as a terrorist incident. I would urge the public to remain calm, but alert and vigilant.[/quote]

Right..... so scare everyone and they but remain calm. What exactly qualifies this as a "terror attack" compared to "mass murder shootings or killing spree by mental white non-Muslims that happen outside pubs or even in schools?

[quote]"The threat from terrorism remains at severe, which means that a terrorist attack is highly likely."


They won't give up scaring people and it won't be long before they link this person to Muzlamic Extremists
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
#4 [Permalink] Posted on 6th December 2015 01:54
Salaams,
Here's what I've noticed
Media headlines "this is for syria"
Media video is cut short.
Actual video on YouTube is longer and the guy recording shouts you ain't no Muslim.
The eyewitnesses that have been quoted don't mention syria.
Also this is a minutes walk away from McDonald's where a Muslim women was punched in the face recently (according to many people, but I can't verify this)
Now what I want to know is what is the condition for classing this as terrorism in relation to other incidents throughout the country and even beyond
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
811
Brother
1,555
super-glue's avatar
#5 [Permalink] Posted on 6th December 2015 02:54
abcdefghijklmnop wrote:
View original post


I saw that video. She was literally knocked out cold. But that's not news worthy and nor is it terrorism if it's terrorising Muslims. The media hypocrisy is obvious as the media is a private organisation. Anyone who pays BBC license fee is an accomplice to their crimes and I firmly believe they'll be questioned on the day of judgement why they supported the BBC financially for their crimes.

I'm also from London and there is no fear on the streets amongst the youth except from drunks, thugs and gangs. But why bother with criminals when they have peaceful Muslims to watch 24/7. The far right extremists like EDL are free to do as they please as they're deemed a "far right POLITICAL PARTY" lol instead of illiterate criminal hate preaching thugs.

If an Imam was to even say that a Muslim cannot truly befriend a non-Muslim due to clashes of cultures or way of life then he'd be a hate preacher and it'd be on Question Time, documentaries, every news channel (as has already happened)

If anyone is part of any forum or group with non-Muslims or EDL members who happen to know how to use a computer then please invite them here
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
#6 [Permalink] Posted on 6th December 2015 10:20
Its going to be viscous circles and get very bad in europe. As government, media and public discriminates more against us, there will be more brothers who will try to fight back like this attack. Its bit concerning how many brothers secretly support the salafi takfiri mentality. Some are even quite open like that Maulana Huzaifah who tried to push that view here. He obviously felt that he was doing something important for ummah. Problem is that hes not alone, his elder brother also a Maulana and bigger isis supporter. Theyre real people and do exist. That salafi mentality has been around for a while and will only increase as oppression against muslims continue to increase here and worldwide. False flag or not, at the end these kind of brothers are not too bright in the head and very easy to manipulate by the government.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Disagree x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
27,477
Brother
9,579
abu mohammed's avatar
#7 [Permalink] Posted on 6th December 2015 13:08
guest374 wrote:
View original post

There are no isis supporters on this forum.

There was one (possibly a couple) of members including one Maulana who has then since retracted their liking, Alhumdulillah.

You will not find anyone here that welcomes isis, openly or secretly.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
27,477
Brother
9,579
abu mohammed's avatar
#8 [Permalink] Posted on 7th December 2015 08:13
"You ain't no Muslim bruv"

This is being spread far and wide on social media, my question is, why did the witness say that?

Was it to justify the act if it was done by a Muslim? as that's what it looks like.

IF someone carried out this attack in the name of Syria, does being a Muslim, justify this act?

Or was it to denounce the connection with Muslims?

Shouldn't it have been, "This ain't Islam bruv" IF it is linked to the Muslims or Syria?

These words, cunningly puts the blame and link to the Muslims immediately.
Posted via the Muftisays Android App
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
1,410
Brother
706
#9 [Permalink] Posted on 7th December 2015 10:13
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post



my point exactly with the not in my name business or muslims coming out to condemn terrorism. it automatically makes us even more of a target. also its funny how so many idiots are using that hashtag. one minture they say IS are takfiri now they are doing takfir themselves. alot of the peiple using this hasshtag the the scum who when u give tham dawah is say oh only Allah can judge can carry on drinking or whatever filth it is they dp.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,704
Brother
289
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#10 [Permalink] Posted on 7th December 2015 20:25

abu mohammed wrote:
View original post

IF it happened its an instant reaction of a bystander upon a situation which he probably never encountered before in his life. Its not a deliberated Fatwa of 500 Muftees over a 3 day conference.

Sometimes people say to their friend, "YouaintnoManBruv!" is it  a deliberated position of a man's sexuality or just a saying to imply that what you did wasn't really very manly like?

How do you interpret the situation?

 

 

report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 2
back to top
Rank Image
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
4,071
Brother
4,053
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf's avatar
#11 [Permalink] Posted on 7th December 2015 20:46
Muadh_Khan wrote:
View original post


I have to agree I was expecting a greater backlash against the Muslim community from the media when I heard of this incidence.

My feeling is that this Brothers shout of "You aint No Muslim Bruv" and it trending on twitter probably helped circumvent and pre-empt the media.

report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
1,410
Brother
706
#12 [Permalink] Posted on 7th December 2015 21:13
i cant understand if he said it just the once but to say it again and again. also as u you said you usually have that sort of banter with mates. you wont say it to a random guy. and lets say for argument sake he didnt mean it why are millions of muslims using it now? whats their justification? i just saw interview with the attackers brother. he had mental issues and was known for it. he was abusing drugs too. why condemn isis clowns for making rash takfir yet remain silent when we do same against them? for all of isis faults and evils i still wont call them kuffar just seriously deviated and gone way to extreme.

also isnt this what the west wants? muslism callin each other kaafir
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
1,410
Brother
706
#13 [Permalink] Posted on 7th December 2015 21:15
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf wrote:
View original post



you may be right i was expecting more backlash but i rather have the backlash rather than mass takfir taking place. so each time a muslim does a paris like attack ( which probably be a few months time) are we just going to go on social media calling them kaafir?
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,704
Brother
289
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#14 [Permalink] Posted on 7th December 2015 21:20

mkdon101 wrote:
View original post

What makes you classify this as Mass Takfeer? Which principles are you employing, Brother?

report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
4,071
Brother
4,053
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf's avatar
#15 [Permalink] Posted on 7th December 2015 21:22
mkdon101 wrote:
View original post


Well I dont know if you are deliberately taking the Contrarian position on these issues. But all I can say your deductions and the conclusions in your posts seem some what eccentric to me.

report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top