Enquiry sent on 1st January 2022
Deadline for response: 14 days
Response: No acknowledgement - No response
In reference to your webinar on YouTube www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTamhhV9oro, for the safety of the public I have 2 initial concerns to raise on statements made and I hope we receive an honest response for this.
[Transcript from YouTube] You said:
At 63:34: "if a certain percentage of the community have a certain immunity to a particular virus which clearly is causing a lot of harm, there still is that skepticism people who who are still questioning covid uh whether it's actually uh no different to any typical virus."
What is the "clearly is causing a lot of harm" based on considering "covid" has never been isolated (CDC).
"The United States Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in Atlanta has confirmed in writing they do not have any real-life, isolated, purified, sample of the SARS-CoV-2 Virus and cannot provide any records about that virus, which allegedly causes COVID-19."
Please clarify what data of "harms and deaths" your statement is based on which drives your webinar's agenda. It is critical to note that "died with covid" is not in any way or form "died from covid" where the former is based on PCR tests that is proven to be fraudulent for the purpose of its use and is on video record from no other than the Nobel Prize winning inventor of the PCR.
Kindly let us know what you based this claim on. Jazakumullah.
[Transcript from YouTube] You stated:
At 63:52: "i mean all you need to do is just go to the your nearest muslim graveyard and you'll see the number of deaths that you would find at this time of year uh relative to this particular year in particular is quite large you know it's you must be completely on a different planet if you don't think that is infecting and causing deaths uh from that bit of perspective."
I personally did this for Leicester and found your statement to be far from the truth.
Context: Leicester: The city that's suffered the longest
Based on this, the most clear deaths should be Leicester so I got the stats from this city that has a large Muslim community.
As you can clearly see from this official data of ALL DEATHS in Leicester and not just Muslims, 2020 (covid year) had lower overall deaths than 2015, 2016 and 2017. Statistics are done per x and not just quantity. For example, 100 deaths are higher than 2 deaths. But 100 deaths from 100,000 (0.1%) is lower than 2 deaths in 100 (2%). So statistically the 2 deaths is actually higher. Looking at only number of deaths gives false stats and rulings derived from false information would be null and void. The same with using "cases" based on proven fraudulent PCR tests to determine cause of death.
There's public data similar to this gained through the Freedom of Information Act for other parts of the country and every single one shows lower deaths in 2020 in relation to population of and city as well as numbers alone.
What public statistical death data did you base your statement on where if we don't see it then we must be from another planet?
This email will be published online after 14 days along with your response inshaAllah. I hope you can clarify the above by providing your data or by retracting your statements and considering a follow up webinar to correct the false information.