Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

How did female Scholars learn & teach?

You have contributed 47.4% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
abu mohammed, Taalibah, Naqshband66, dr76
#16 [Permalink] Posted on 14th September 2014 13:07
ali wrote:
View original post


Though the question is based on a lie, which is a grievous wrong, the content of the answer debunks what many non-scholars on here have been promoting. Perhaps your focus should be equally on that, but it won't, because it's not digestible for you.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Dislike x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
27,552
Brother
9,601
abu mohammed's avatar
#17 [Permalink] Posted on 14th September 2014 13:58
What use is it when the foundations are based on lies?
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
#18 [Permalink] Posted on 14th September 2014 14:42
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post


The main foundation and focus of that article is the haraam ijtihad performed by layman acting like muftis whose misguidance is being eagerly swallowed by members here.

I agree that to lie about a particular layman being a mufti is wrong, even though he acts like one, and the language used is incredibly distasteful but if we're honest it's also quite revealing that not one person here seems to show the slightest outrage at the salafi fiqh and modernist arguments being used by members here used to misguide others.

We shouldn't lose sight of these offences being committed here. For example to say that the deobandi position is based on culture was a lie that was received, tolerated, and swallowed here without a single objection. That in itself is very concerning. To be fair, a few objections were made by a handful of brothers with respectful language but those were immediately deleted due to 'fitnah'. Which goes to show that the real problem is with the bitter truth, not the language used.

What exposes the modernist tendencies here conclusively is that while salafi fiqh is being tolerated here, calls are being made to ban south African fatwas. Give it a few years and there will be no difference between us and the modernists. The gap is lessening rapidly even if we choose to bury our heads in the sand.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Like x 1Disagree x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
27,552
Brother
9,601
abu mohammed's avatar
#19 [Permalink] Posted on 14th September 2014 15:22
Not one person rated the post in question!

Each and everyone has made their own comments, in or out of context, but only one is targeted!

Fatwa's or opinions of various Ulama have been posted regardless of background just to show another view whether it's accepted or not.

Frankly, I don't see why we should be giving this a platform to speak from or answer for individuals.

A lie was instigated based upon a member who has never claimed to be a scholar and is well known not to be one.

The one who should fear any repercussions is the questioner at hand.

Since no further clarification is required by others adding fuel to a person masquerading as a seeker of truth, but who is in fact an agreed upon liar, this thread can stay locked as its also not on topic.

If the accused would like to comment, then he knows full well on how to do that - his blogs.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Winner x 1
back to top