"sister-in-islam" wrote:
"Muadh_Khan" wrote:
Asslamo Allaikum, There was a time when Deobandees were known to be the defenders of Sunnah and destroyers of Bidah. Now in Deobandi Masajid & Darul-ulooms we have: Khatam of Qur'aan Yaseen Khatam Seerah Conferences in Rabiul-Awwal Tahajjud Jamaat Taraweeh finish in 1 night!
www.sunniforum.com/forum/showthread.php?68459-Status-of-S... May Allah (SWT) help us (Ameen).
wasalam. i dont know much to be honest because i try staying away from sect thing,but i do agree with brother to an extend,we round here in the birmingham in this month in a deoband mosques do have some sort of celebration,last year my friends son was in a deoband mosque and he said they celebrating the birth of the prophet,i dont think any naat were involved,i guess seerah programs were...but i feel deoband and brelavi have lot of similarities ..E.G i see deoband mufti's giving taweez for sickness so do bralavi mufti's i find they have lot in common.Allah knows best,i pray Allah only guide us on that path the one you sent our prophet on.ameen.
Asslamo Allaikum,
Unfortuanately we cannot hide from these matters. There is a well known Deobandi Alim who did participate in Meelad.
There is nothing technically wrong with "Ta'weez" and what matters is what is inside of it! I personally don't use it but thats my personal choice.
In my humble opinion these matters are coming from Ulama and groups who are EXTREME in Tassawuff and their Tassawuff has TAKEN OVER their Fiqh.
During the Scholars Scribe course in Dewsbury the following Q/A took place and since this was transmitted on the Masjid Speaker it is for public knowledge.
German Brother: Is a Mureed obligated to follow his Shaykh in every way?
Mufti Zubair Dudha (HA): No! unless the Shaykh is a Faqih and his matters in the Fiqh are also Hujja for laymen. Shaykh Imadadullah Mohajir Makki (RA) was the Shaykh of Ulama like (Shaykh) Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanwi (RA) but there were many occasions where they did'nt follow their Shaykh in matters of Fiqh.
There are matters in which I don't follow my Shaykh i.e. Arifbillah (Shaykh) Hakeem Akhtar Saheb (HA) because my Shaykh is not a Faqih.
If your Shaykh is a Shaykh of Tassawuff & also a Faqih (i.e. Mufti Taqi Usmani (HA) or Mufti Ibraheem Desai (HA) or other Mufti) then you follow him in both Tassawuff & Fiqh because he is Hujjah in both.
Otherwise you follow your Shaykh in matters of the heart (Tassawuff).
The underlined explaination is my understanding and the rest of the words are pretty close to the best of my memory. In UK there are Mashaykh who are neither Muhadith (Scholars of Hadeeth) nor Fuqaha (Scholars of Fiqh) and their Mureeds (students) follow them in these matters and thats' the problem!
Another example is that in Fiqh Shaykh (Maulana) Yusuf Motala (HA) and his Mureeds raise their finger and keep it raised in Salah while Shaykhul-Hadeeth (Maulana) Zakariyya (RA) used to raise his finger and drop it.
Another example is that in Fiqh I have observed that Prawns was served in a Majlis where Arifbillah (Shaykh) Hakeem Akhtar Saheb (HA) had given a talk and many of his Mureeds (UIama & laymen) DID NOT eat because it is Makrooh in the Hanafi Madhab and Mufti Zubair Dudha (HA) forbade people from eating it because of his own Fatwa (according to Hanafi Madhab).
Brothers who spend time in the company of these Mashaykh have a better chance of keeping their eyes open and observing these matters. If you read the history of Ulama of Deoband this concept is DEAD CLEAR. In UK its an issue because of ignorance of people and "overhype".
There is no concept in Islam where you are DEAD CERTAIN that something is wrong and you still follow it because you see a Shaykh or a Maulana doing it.
Jazakullah Khairun