Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

Zakir Naik: Touching Quraan without Wudhu

You have contributed 7.9% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
abu mohammed
1 guest appreciates this topic.
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,925
Brother
352
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#31 [Permalink] Posted on 9th September 2013 11:47
25

Anonymous wrote:
View original post

Asslamo Allaikum,

If someone talks about my mother/daughter/sister/wife in a sexual manner in front of Na-Mehrams and they all laugh about it you better believe that I won't be talking to them!

Wrong or right but I will react.

And if they are talking about some other Muslim Sister I would still talk and forbid this trash no matter whether I know her or not.

We shouldn't joke about Sisters in this lucid, evil, Haram manner. In Islam we respect our Muslim women like our own mothers, sisters, daughters. If we want to marry someone we give proposal according to Sunnah and do things properly. A Muslim woman is not a commodity which should be discussed in the open

I am Sorry but I feel very seriously about these matters.

 

 

 

report post quote code quick quote reply
+3 -0Agree x 2Winner x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
27,574
Brother
9,602
abu mohammed's avatar
#32 [Permalink] Posted on 9th September 2013 15:33
I don't get it!!!!

We were all disgusted with Abu Aminah Bilal Philips' comment, so why get upset about "a" reaction?

I can only see 1 reason for anyone to get upset and that is the tone or language brother Muadh had used at the time (20 years ago). Apart from that, I see no other reason to get upset or disgusted with the response of a Muslim brother who stood up for an unkown Muslim sister, that too in front of her husband!

Hats off to you brother Muadh.

(This is my opinion and not the opinion of MuftiSays)
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Winner x 2
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,925
Brother
352
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#33 [Permalink] Posted on 9th September 2013 16:11

abu mohammed wrote:
View original post

I didn't stand up properly, I was too young...Just felt bad and didn't do much except for making my displeasure clear

report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
27,574
Brother
9,602
abu mohammed's avatar
#34 [Permalink] Posted on 9th September 2013 16:22
Still, it wasn't even the lowest form of Iman, i.e. to dislike it from the heart. All those others who laughed at AMBP's comments or the Imam in America hardly showed any sign of Iman!
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
brooklynyte4ever's avatar
nyc
484
Brother
382
brooklynyte4ever's avatar
#35 [Permalink] Posted on 9th September 2013 23:57
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post

Salams brother

I forwarded this comment of bilal Philips to the majlis. I'm waiting for a reply on the status of his man's iman. Did you hear from any ulema that a comment like this one ( bilal philipd) can be Kufr? Please let me know.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
27,574
Brother
9,602
abu mohammed's avatar
#36 [Permalink] Posted on 10th September 2013 01:19
It is obvious what the Majlis will come up with.

I also believe that making a mockery of the Deen is Kufr. The question is did AABP make a mockery of the deen or simply disrespect our sisters.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
brooklynyte4ever's avatar
nyc
484
Brother
382
brooklynyte4ever's avatar
#37 [Permalink] Posted on 10th September 2013 11:47
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post


It's still good to let them know. The ulema need to be updated with stuff like this one.I can imagine the majlis putting this incident in the questions/ answer section of the majlis newspaper.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
27,574
Brother
9,602
abu mohammed's avatar
#38 [Permalink] Posted on 5th October 2015 09:57
Question

What is the basis in the Quran and hadith (with their authenticity of the ahadith) for touching the Quran with Wuzu?

Answer

1. Sayyiduna Hakim ibn Hizam (radiyallahu’anhu) reported that Rasulullah (sallallahu’alayhi wasallam) told him:

‘Do not touch the Quran unless you are in a state of purity.’

(Mustadrak Hakim, vol.3 pg.485, Al-Mu’jamul Kabur, Hadith: 3135 & Sunan Daraqutni, Hadith: 440)

Declared authentic (sahih) by Imams Hakim & Dhahabi (rahimahumallah)

(Al-Mustadrak, vol.3 pg.485)

2. ‘Allamah ‘Ayni (rahimahullah) has cited similar words like the above on the authority of Sayyiduna ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (radiyallahu’anhuma) and has classified it as authentic (sahih) too.

(‘Umdatul Qari, before Hadith: 297)

3. Sayyiduna ‘Amr ibn Hazm (radiyallahu’anhu) reported that Rasulullah (sallallahu’alayhi wasallam) wrote the following instruction to the people of Yemen:

‘Only those who are in the state of purity may touch the Quran.’

(Sahih Ibn Hibban; Al-Ihsan, Hadith: 6559, Mustadrak Hakim, vol.1

pg.396 & Sunan Daraqutni, Hadith: 435-439)

Declared authentic (sahih) by Imam Ibn Hibban (rahimahullah).

The above authentic Hadiths are sufficient to prove this matter.

4. This is further supported by one explanation of the verse:

‘None should touch it [the Quran] besides those who are purified.’

(Surah Waqi’ah, verse: 79, See Tafsir Ibn Kathir)

5. Sayyiduna Salman (radiyallahu’anhu) also quoted the above verse to support the issue of touching Quran with wudu. See Sunan Daraqutni, Hadith: 442-445.

And Allah Ta’ala Knows best,

Answered by: Moulana Muhammad Abasoomar
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top