November 03, 2026: US Elections

12,014

Brother

378

#1 [Permalink] Posted on 2nd November 2026 01:54

Early Predictions:

Democrats will take the House of Representatives
Democrats will take most states (as Governors)
It will be absolutely brutal for Trump and Republicans (GOP)
Democrats may take over Senate or will be seriously close...

The most critical race for America is Abdulrahman Mohamed "Abdul" El-Sayed in Michigan and if he wins إن شاء الله it will be a massive Earthquake across America.

Already less then 36 hours to go and there has been unprecedented move by AIPAC backers and just for this unprecedented move I want El-Sayed to win!

Americans (on all political sides) are genuinely stunned at this!

Possible Aftermath:

I believe that Trump being a narcissistic will do something completely unhinged unless GOP unite against him due to a thumping they are about to get.

Elections in my GOP dominated state are not even close with Democrats running double-digit leads...

If things turn the way polls are going, this will be unprecedented loss in America for AIPAC and the Zionists!

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

There is no Plan B!

http://www.central-mosque.com/

London

27,624

Brother

9,608

#2 [Permalink] Posted on 2nd November 2026 09:51

From hearing what Rabbi's have been saying; Muslims come from Ishmaelites and they are the children of the servant and they are the broom for the Jews. The Jews are using the Muslims the sweep the Christians out (either by fighting or conversion - it does't matter to the Jews). Even though openly it might seem that AIPAC are not happy, the one holding the cards is very happy!

See

abu mohammed wrote:

View original post

abu mohammed wrote:

View original post

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

Actions are judged by intentions, so each man will have what he intended.
ابو محمد

Unspecified

1,182

Brother

1,179

#3 [Permalink] Posted on 2nd November 2026 10:27

What options does Trump realistically have? Even nuking Iran won't get the desired results now. Since people will still consider him a warmonger.

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

fod1083

Unspecified

2,360

Brother

1,117

#4 [Permalink] Posted on 2nd November 2026 12:59

Zohran Mamdani winning the NYC mayoral race last year was a massive wake-up call for the US Democratic establishment. It showed voters weren't just going to accept being ignored over the Biden-Harris administration's handling of Gaza.

Seeing Mamdani win a major US election while entirely rejecting AIPAC money was brilliant to watch. With the US midterms tomorrow, it’ll be interesting to see if progressives like Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan, Mai Vang in California, and Melat Kiros in Colorado can carry that momentum. If they win, it proves the Democrats can actually shift left without relying on pro-Israel lobbying money to get elected.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+0 -0Agree x 2

Rajab

Unspecified

2,360

Brother

1,117

#5 [Permalink] Posted on 2nd November 2026 13:07

fod1083 wrote:

View original post

Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer.

Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.

To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha.

The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people.

And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final.

We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it.

Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made.

They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making.

One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Informative x 1

Rajab

12,014

Brother

378

#6 [Permalink] Posted on 2nd November 2026 15:39

Rajab wrote:

View original post

I do not believe a Tactical Nuke over Pickaxe mountain is going to work even with a Direct Surface Impact! Unless you do several Tactical Nuke strikes in a coordinated manner

Iran is a huge country a few Tactical Nukes will not be the end of the world for them but the retaliation is going to finish Arabs and the their tiny despotic regimes.

The map below for the Nuclear fallout is a little exaggerated but partially right.

fod1083 wrote:

View original post

abu mohammed wrote:

View original post

So maybe that's what Israel in their genocidal quest wants to do to the Arabs because dropping Tactical Nukes on Iran doesn't bring much battlefield benefits.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Informative x 1

There is no Plan B!

http://www.central-mosque.com/

Unspecified

1,182

Brother

1,179

#7 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd November 2026 06:50

Wouldn't it have to be a much bigger nuke for the fallout to reach Karachi and New Delhi?

So far amongst the nuclear-armed states none have been courageous enough to strike first, except for the US. So in essence, apart from the US, the nukes of those countries are only for show and tell. But if the US strikes again with nukes, it is essentially open season for Russia which will then be emboldened to use it to decide their own war. And who knows India and Pakistan may follow suit. That's the real fallout from the use of nukes.

Of course Netanyahu couldn't care less about such fallouts. He's more concerned with following the orders of whoever is pulling his strings.

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

fod1083

12,014

Brother

378

#8 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd November 2026 13:42

fod1083 wrote:

View original post

The fallout from a Nuclear strike on Iran will either impact Pakistan/Afghanistan or Middle East depending on the season and wind pattern and rainfall OR maybe both.

Either (or both) is a good result for genocidal bloodthirsty Israel and they have shown that they don't care about the International backlash.

For me, the war in Iran may be similar to Suzez Canal crisis of 1956 which signaled the end of British empire and rise of America.

Trump's foolish incursion into Iran could be the end of American hegemony and rise of Israeli dominance. However, Israel doesn't have the demographics to rule the world for too long, no amount of technology can make up for the lack of humans who will wield that technology!

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

There is no Plan B!

http://www.central-mosque.com/

November 03, 2026: US Elections

Font Size

Font Weight