akbar703 wrote:
View original post
What is the meaning of century? Do you understand what the word means???
Never asked you to discuss anything or even brought anything from first 500 years of Islam!
akbar703 wrote:
View original post
- Rasul-ullah ﷺ passed away in 632
- Sayyiduna Ali (RA) passed away in 661
- Sayyiduna Muwawiyah (RA) passed away in 681
- Sayyiduna Abu al-Tufayl Amir (RA) the last Sahabi (RA) passed away in 732
- Imam Abu Haneefa (RA) passed away in 767
- Imam Bukhari (RA) passed away in 870
My question is from 1187! How is a question from more than 500 years later, related to your Aqeedah?
akbar703 wrote:
View original post
Forget Hazrat Umar bin Abdul Aziz (RA) and even Ottomans until 1924! Let me take you in the middle of Islamic history
Salahuddin (RA):
- Nuruddin Zangi (RA): Turkoman Muslim who followed the Hanafi Madhab and Maturidi Aqeedah
- Salahuddin Ayyubi (RA): Kuridsh Muslim who followed the Shaf'ae Madhab and Ashari Aqeedah
- Qadi al-Fadil (RA): Arab Egyptian Muslim who either leaves Shiasm or was a Sunni but leaves the Fatimid regime
- Baha' ad-Din ibn Shaddad: Arab-Iraqi Scholar, followed Shaf'ae Madhab and Ashari Aqeedah
- Ibn Qudamah (RA): Arab Palestinian Scholars who followed the Hanbali Madhab and Athari Aqeedah
If you have doubts about my quotes, ask me for evidence and I will also ask you for your evidence for your quotes.
Please explain what made all these people join up to defend Al-Aqsa and fight against Crusaders when they came from dustant lands, ethnicity, languages, color, etc?
Take your time, use every tool at your disposal including AI and then explain this as it seems to be completely against
Quote:
Mr. Jinnah and his followers did not seem to realize that geography was against them. Muslims in undivided India were distributed in a way which made it impossible to form a separate state in a consolidated area. The Muslim majority areas were on the north-west and the north-east. These two regions have no point of physical contact. People in these two areas arc completely different from one another in every respect, except only in religion. It is one of the greatest frauds on the people to suggest that religious affinity can unite areas which are geographically, economically, linguistically and culturally different. It is true that Islam sought to establish a society which transcends racial, linguistic, economic and political frontiers. History has however proved that after the first few decades, or at most after the first century, Islam was not able to unite all the Muslim countries into one State on the basis of Islam alone.
This was the position in the past and this is the position today.
Clearly Islam was not failing to unite in 1187!
Thanks
