Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

The International Stabilization Force (ISF) in Gaza

You have contributed 0.0% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
To appreciate this topic, click 'Appreciate Topic' on the right.
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,625
Brother
162
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#1 [Permalink] Posted on 17th December 2025 19:36
Israel inflicted unimaginable barbarity in clear view of the world upon Gaza, committed genocide and horrific human rights abuses yet failed in their singular objective

Mission: Disarm Hamas!

Now the world wants to give this mandate to 3rd party for others to incur casualties on behalf of Israel to disarm Hamas/Palestinians in the name of International Stabilisation Force (ISF)

This isn't about peacekeeping or protecting Palestinians but clearly about disarming Palestinians so they are like canon fodder to be butchered by Israel.

Lets evaluate the Pros/Cons of each nation and its army in the light of this clear objective.




report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,625
Brother
162
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#2 [Permalink] Posted on 17th December 2025 20:04
Nation Evaluation:

  1. USA: America and Americans are sick and tired of forever wars and its financial costs on US economy. The moment American soldiers land in Palestine, they will be a clear and present target. It is unlikely to happen for ISF but I strongly believe that at some point in the future American forces will be redeployed in (large numbers) in the Middle East to protect Israel, I believe this to be simply inevitable.
  2. Israel: Tried everything and failed! Simply unable to absorb the loses against Palestinians.
  3. Egypt: Willing to die for Israel but lack experience in peace keeping or disarmament role and cannot operate on its own. Will need a "War on Terror" or "Fighting Terrorism" pretense to deploy in Palestine and disarm Hamas. Israel agrees with their presence but knows military limitations.
  4. Indonesia: Willing to die for Israel but lack experience in peace keeping or disarmament role and cannot operate on its own. Will need a "War on Terror" or "Fighting Terrorism" pretense to deploy in Palestine and disarm Hamas. Israel agrees with their presence but knows military limitations.
  5. Turkiye: Fully capable, operationally, logistically and tactically from a military perspective to operate but there are two problems. Firstly, Israel will never allow Turkish military to operate so close to it (for HUMINT and SIGINT) i.e. intelligence gathering reasons. Secondly, Turkey has semi-democracy and if there is an incident against Palestinians the Turkish society will rise up and Erdogan (or whoever) will be swept aside in the wave of public anger. Israel has rightly declined it.
  6. Pakistan: General Asim Munir will sell his mother for money and the Ulama in Pakistan will back up this option under some pretext "Fighting Terrorism" etc and duly issue Fatwaas in favour. The Army will hand pick soldiers and they will duly shoot/kill Palestinians or whoever without a second thought! Israel knows and agrees. However, a large number of rank and file Pakistani soldiers will not accept shooting Palestinians and this will tear the fabric of Pakistani military and society.


The Ulama in Pakistan issue Fatwaas in support of National policy all the time, for example:

  • Fighting in Afghanistan was Fardh and Virtuous from 1979-1992.
  • Fighting in Afghanistan was ambiguous from 1992-2001.
  • Fighting in Afghanistan was discouraged from 2001-2021 and a foreign matter.
  • Fighting against Afghanistan is Fardh and Virtuous from 2024.


The clear and candid choice for both Americans and Israelees is Pakistan which will do whatever is necessary for peanuts.

December 16, 2025: Pakistan's military chief Asim Munir in spotlight over Trump's Gaza plan

www.reuters.com/world/china/pakistans-military-chief-asim...

This will tear Pakistan if General Asim Munir goes for it but he has no choice!

  • He is unpopular in Pakistan
  • Pakistan economy is in tatters


Traditionally Pakistan Military has always done the bidding for America whenever it falls on hard times i.e:

  • General Ayub: In the 1950s onwards to the extent to providing US Airbases for Captain Gary Powers to fly over USSR. This caused catastrophic hatred between USSR (and its client state Afghanistan) which persists to this day.
  • General Zia: Armed Mujahideen at the behest of American (CIA) and then thrust them over Afghanistan resulting in bloodshed for 4 decades for which people of Afghanistan will never forgive Pakistan. Pakistan could have assisted in Jihad and then left it for the Afghans to decide their own rules, instead the ISI tried to dictate terms in Afghanistan for decades.
  • General Musharraf: Gave airbases to America to conduct operations from Pakistani soil against the Taliban (which Pakistan had assisted), arrested and handed them to Americans.
  • General Kayani: Blockaded the retreat of Taliban 1.0 back into Pakistan
  • General Bajwa: Ousted the democratically elected Government of Imran Khan when it started making noises about Islamophobia.


The track record of Pakistani Army generals for the past 70+ years and its disasters are in front of us to witness but none of them have been so desperate and so needy and yet so incompetent as General Asim Munir. This guy takes being a dumbass to the next level!

If Pakistan Army deploys to Gaza, that will be the end of the Nation of Pakistan as we know it.

A Democratically elected Government will never do it! In other words, Imran Khan had to be removed not only from power but even from the circles of powers or from any connection to the people of Pakistan.

YET People in Pakistan communicate with outsiders and reveal Government plans and secrets so curtail this possibility WhatsApp is to be officially banned on Government devices soon.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0
back to top