Taliban 2.0

11,625

Brother

162

#361 [Permalink] Posted on 9th December 2025 10:42

Muadh_Khan wrote:

View original post

As I explained...Now from Afghan sources.

Block all trade and seal the border in cooperation with Iran, China and Tajikistan.
Hold Mullah Hibatullah Akhundzada directly responsible for each act of Terrorism in Pakistan
Follow Turkiye's lead and create a buffer zone along the border and push Taliban 2.0 back a few KMs, bulldoze all buildings and clear the area.

Taliban 2.0 can sellout Kashmir, Indian Muslims and be friendly with Hindus but they won't be able to trade, get educated or get medical care.

Either choose Terrorism or choose Afghanistan.

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

There is no Plan B!

http://www.central-mosque.com/

11,625

Brother

162

#362 [Permalink] Posted on 10th December 2025 18:34

December 10, 2025: 1000 Afghan Ulama sign the Fatwa

The current Taliban government of Afghanistan was described as an Islamic government, and its defense was stated to be a religious duty for every citizen.
In the event of any foreign aggression, resistance and defense were described as religious obligations for all citizens.
Every Muslim is required to uphold the Taliban government’s commitment that Afghan territory will not be used against any foreign country.
Participation by any Afghan citizen in militant activities outside the country was declared impermissible, and it was stated that the government is responsible for preventing such involvement.
It was stated that all Muslims and Islamic countries should maintain mutual brotherhood and relations, and that religious scholars should promote public awareness of this through mosques and pulpits.

Afghans have a habit of breaking their word and oath, lets see what happens.

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

There is no Plan B!

http://www.central-mosque.com/

11,625

Brother

162

#363 [Permalink] Posted on 10th December 2025 23:44

Mamati Deobandees AND Afghan Jihad

Shaykhul-Qur'aan Maulana Muhammad Tahir YusufZai (Panjpiri) is probably one of the greatest experts on Qur'aan in Pakistan, a direct students of Darul-uloom Deoband and a master of the Qur'aan as acknowledged by Mufti Zarwali Khan (RA) and Mufti Mengal.

Maulana (RA) returned from Haramain and dedicated his life to reformation of his (Pushtun) people upon Qur'aan and Sunnah according to Akabir of Deoband and on some issues exceeded and disagreed.

He sent his (middle son) Major Muhammad Amir to Army who joined the ISI and became a daring officer during Soviet-Afghan Jihad.

Watch this Interview from an officer who witnessed Jihad and his views on Afghans, Taliban and Jihad

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

There is no Plan B!

http://www.central-mosque.com/

Unspecified

2,269

Brother

1,082

#364 [Permalink] Posted on 11th December 2025 07:35

The Afghan Taliban reject the Durand Line and talk about Pashtun areas on both sides, including the former FATA, as one divided homeland. The Durand Line is a border drawn in 1893 between Afghanistan and British India, later inherited by Pakistan, but never fully accepted by Afghanistan. For Pakistan, everything on its side of that line is clearly Pakistani territory and anything across it is foreign. For the Taliban, Pashtun communities on both sides are part of a shared historical space rather than two neatly separate countries.

FATA was a region in Pakistan called the Federally Administered Tribal Areas, along the Pakistan–Afghanistan border, made up mostly of Pashtun tribal districts with a special legal system, the Frontier Crimes Regulation, instead of normal provincial law. Internationally, this former tribal belt is recognised as part of Pakistan, and in 2018 it was merged into Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, so FATA no longer exists as a separate administrative region.

Against this background, a large gathering of Afghan scholars and tribal elders in Kabul has reportedly declared that defending Afghanistan’s sovereignty in response to airspace violations is a religious obligation and that resisting aggression counts as sacred jihad. They also urged the Taliban authorities to enforce the supreme leader’s order banning people from travelling abroad for fighting, and stressed that Afghan soil must not be used against any other country, giving the Islamic Emirate religious cover to act against those who ignore this.

In reality, this kind of statement is unlikely to end TTP activity or cross border attacks involving the Afghan Taliban side and the Pakistan Army. The Taliban still understand ideas like “abroad” and “sovereignty” differently from Islamabad in the Pashtun belt, and everything depends on how far they are actually willing or able to move against TTP networks on their own territory. The resolution sounds strong on paper, but it does not fix the deeper problems over the border, the shared Pashtun space, or the lack of trust between Kabul and Islamabad.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Informative x 1

Rajab

11,625

Brother

162

#365 [Permalink] Posted on 11th December 2025 17:27

Rajab wrote:

View original post

Almost all borders of Afghanistan were defined by non-Muslims as follows:

1884-1886: Border between Afghanistan and Russia defined by Anglo-Russian boundary commission. These are the modern borders with Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Tajikistan
1893: Durand Line between Afghanistan and India which is now the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan
1905: Defined by Great Britain to be the border between Afghanistan and Iran by the Anglo-Persian commission, later ratified again in 1919.

Afghanistan accepts the other Kaafir border delineations except Durand Line with Pakistan? Why is that? Because Pakistan gained independence in 1947 and evolved while Afghanistan remains a tribal society with nothing to show and this hostility has remained since 1947.

The only exception is during Taliban 1.0 as Afghans were grateful for the blood which people of Pakistan shed for its freedom.

Taliban 2.0 are deeply unpopular in Afghanistan so it is in their interest to stoke up the forever national hatred against Pakistan and it is clearly popular policy. This is akin to "always bubbling Anti-immigrant" strategy in the West which Politicians exploit.

What does Taliban 2.0 and Afghanistan lose?

Everything in Afghanistan depends on Pakistan and there is no other way to put it. People of Pakistan unlike Afghans have never had hatred against Afghanistan or its people and opened their doors for decades. The policies of Taliban 2.0 are eroding goodwill in Pakistan and no matter which Government comes, people of Pakistan specifically Pushtuns and people in Karachi will never forget what Taliban 2.0 are saying in their speeches.

There is no prosperity or even survival in Afghanistan without Pakistan and Taliban 2.0 are buying the future of their country by hateful rhetoric.

People of Pakistan want to friction-less trade with Afghanistan but the economy of Pakistan can absorb the shock if the trade is curtailed, people of Afghanistan cannot trade, get educated or get medical care without Pakistan.

And sane voices in Afghanistan are saying this!

amu.tv/214911/

Karachi is a lifeline for Afghanistan which has no alternative! Geographies have no alternative.

The rich Taliban 2.0 can send their daughters to school in Middle-East and go to India for treatment but the ordinary afghans can only carry their sick on their backs through mountain passes to a Hospital in Peshawar and their daughters can only come to Peshawar or Karachi!

Taliban 2.0 is gambling with the future of their country in their animosity towards Pakistan.

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

There is no Plan B!

http://www.central-mosque.com/

Unspecified

2,269

Brother

1,082

#366 [Permalink] Posted on 11th December 2025 18:18

Pakistan's military sentences its former spy chief to 14 years in jail. Faiz Hameed was known to be a staunch supporter of Imran Khan, and took early retirement shortly after Khan was ousted in a no-confidence vote in 2022.

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

Rajab

11,625

Brother

162

#367 [Permalink] Posted on 11th December 2025 21:53

Rajab wrote:

View original post

There are two statements DG ISPR made which need to be dissected and analyzed

Sentenced to 14 years of rigorous imprisonment by a military court after being found guilty of engaging in political activities, violating the Official Secrets Act and misusing authority and government resources.
Faiz Hameed was given full rights, including the ability to choose his defense team, and retains the right to appeal

1 = Non-Sense because nobody in Pakistan Army has ever been punished for that and there is no evidence for any of this and that's why nothing has been made public.

2 = His Attorney was Mian Ali Ashfaq who is a Pakistan Army (ISI) Asset which means that the whole thing was a farce...

Therefore, it is most likely that this conviction will be overturned!

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

There is no Plan B!

http://www.central-mosque.com/

11,625

Brother

162

#368 [Permalink] Posted on 13th December 2025 16:20

إِنَّا لِلَّٰهِ وَإِنَّا إِلَيْهِ رَاجِعُونَ

The mother of Mullah Omar has passed away in Afghanistan. May Allah Ta'ala forgive her sins and grant her Jannatul-Firdaus (Ameen).

Allah Ta'ala honored her with a pious and principled son in a society where power and influence is gained by money and he remained upon the Sunnah throughout his life.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+0 -0Ameen x 2

There is no Plan B!

http://www.central-mosque.com/

11,625

Brother

162

#369 [Permalink] Posted on 13th December 2025 22:20

Taliban 2.0 claim that they have nothing to do with TTP activities and Ulama in Pakistan should address the matter.

Here is a direct rebuttal to both claims from Mufti Taqi Usmani (HA)

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Informative x 1

There is no Plan B!

http://www.central-mosque.com/

11,625

Brother

162

#370 [Permalink] Posted on 17th December 2025 19:29

Bagram Airbase Issue?

I presented an analysis on the SMDA: Strategic Defense Between Pakistan & Saudi Arabia a few weeks ago. Towards the end, I indicated that President Trump might be positioning Pakistan to take charge of Bagram Airbase which will be a disaster for Pakistan.

Taliban 2.0 have handed over the technical running of Bagram to India and there are dozens of Indian technicians working on the airbase, this doesn't concern Pakistan as there is nothing substantial related to Pakistan's security from Bagram. Taliban 2.0 will never gain any meaningful technical proficiency anytime in the near future.

However, clear and direct Indian presence may trigger American response from Trump...

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Informative x 1

There is no Plan B!

http://www.central-mosque.com/

Taliban 2.0

Font Size

Font Weight