Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

Taliban 2.0

Jump to page:

You have contributed 0.0% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
ALIF, khalidiqbal, abuzayd2k
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
27,253
Brother
9,737
abu mohammed's avatar
#286 [Permalink] Posted on 10th November 2025 19:56
Muadh_Khan wrote:
View original post

السلام عليكم

Nice to see your post once again on the forum.

This is just one tweet for such a huge allegation.

Readers will require your expertise with further input
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
bint e aisha's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
2,650
Sister
1,773
bint e aisha's avatar
#287 [Permalink] Posted on 11th November 2025 08:12
Muadh_Khan wrote:
View original post

The current Taliban regime is a red flag.
Mufti Abdul Raheem of Jamiatur Rasheed is also a red flag.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
bint e aisha's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
2,650
Sister
1,773
bint e aisha's avatar
#288 [Permalink] Posted on 11th November 2025 09:49
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Rajab's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
2,263
Brother
1,074
Rajab's avatar
#289 [Permalink] Posted on 11th November 2025 10:43
Pakistan is allowed to cooperate with USA but God forbid if Afghanistan cooperates with India.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Ha Ha x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
1,134
Brother
1,157
#290 [Permalink] Posted on 11th November 2025 10:50
The Pakistani population is at the moment the most anti-military and anti-ulema than it has ever been before. So any mufti who even appears to be siding with the military regime is labeled "darbari molvi". That's what is happening in the case of Mufti Abdul Raheem. People don't even trust Mufti Taqi Usmani to be impartial in his fatwas right now.

Taliban 2.0 is far from Mullah Omar's Taliban but I suspect the people representing them on Twitter may be making up their own rules about what is right and what is wrong. For example, being too liberal with ruling of deception being allowed during Jihad, by indulging in slander against Pakistani ulema. That also by using words of other Pakistani ulema.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
Rajab's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
2,263
Brother
1,074
Rajab's avatar
#291 [Permalink] Posted on 11th November 2025 12:44
fod1083 wrote:
View original post

Only official Taliban accounts should be considered credible, as many others are engaged in a blame game against Pakistan driven by nationalism, tribalism, and jingoism, and vice versa. The same applies to many Pakistani users on Twitter.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,543
Brother
133
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#292 [Permalink] Posted on 11th November 2025 16:53
Muadh_Khan wrote:
View original post


bint e aisha wrote:
View original post


This video and question has been directly forwarded to Muti Abdur-Rahim and he will reply to the matter in detail when he gets a chance.

In the meantime, from on the ground sources and eye witness Accounts from 1990s...

Taliban 1.0, Osama Bin Ladin and Mufti Abdur Rahim: Investigation

Jamiatur-Rasheed and specifically Mufti Abdur-Rahim was one of the first ones to warn Mullah Omar that “Jihadi activities” should be restricted to inside Afghanistan, and a practical Solution was provided to join various Jihadi organizations under a single Ameer and to restrict operations, otherwise Taliban will pay the price for it.

Osman bin Ladin reluctantly agreed but was not pleased about it because Al-Qaeda’s operations were primarily outside of Afghanistan and this decision by Mullah Omar clipped their wings.

There were many Afghans in Afghanistan with Arab and International links who were also not happy about this restriction, this is the time when large amounts of funding were flowing into Afghanistan for foreign operations.

Jamiatur-Rasheed, Zarb-e-Mumin (newspaper) and Mufti Abdur-Rahim were direct targets of rival fraction and wanted to create a distance between them and Mullah Omar.

Zarb-e-Mumin (newspaper) did a feature on the life of Mullah Omar and the staff photographer (Maulana Mahboobur-Rahman) took pictures of the mud house and this was also published in the newspaper. This was after Bill Clinton had fired cruise missiles on Afghanistan and American had ISTAR (Intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition, and reconnaissance) capabilities focused on Afghanistan way before 9/11.

Shortly afterwards the publication, there was an assassination attempt on the life of Mullah Omar. The rival fraction blamed it on the picture of Mullah Omar’s house in Zarb-e-Mumin (newspaper) and kidnapped Maulana Mahboobur-Rahman (the photographer) for being a foreign agent. He was going to be beheaded but he escaped and arrived back in Karachi sometime later.

The rival fractions in Taliban 1.0 and Taiban 2.0 regularly and openly claim Pakistani Ulama to be touts of CIA and ISI and its nothing new. During Operation Bunyan al Marsoos PAF (Pakistan Air force) hacked and intercepted Indian secure communication between Rafale Pilots and ground support and played it to the world, what do you think they can do to Taliban communication???

The Journalist “Faizullah Khan” who has created this story about Osama Bin Ladin and Mufti Abdur-Rahim got famous when he was arrested in Afghanistan, otherwise he is not an eyewitness of anything during Taliban 1.0 and it is well known.

After 9/11, Mufti Abdur-Rahim and other Ulama went into hiding for months and all of it was not necessary if they were agents of ISI.

Lastly, Pakistani ISI was deeply embedded with the Taliban (as per the American sources) to the extent that American CIA relied on Pakistani military sources to confirm news about the Taliban, why would Pakistani agencies need Mufti Abdur-Rahim based in Karachi for this purpose?



report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
bint e aisha's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
2,650
Sister
1,773
bint e aisha's avatar
#293 [Permalink] Posted on 11th November 2025 18:46
Muadh_Khan wrote:
View original post

Faizullah Khan has not created this story. I've heard it from other reliable sources in Karachi as well.

Mufti Abdul Raheem and Jamiatur Rasheed were better at the time of Mufti Rasheed Ahmed Ludhianvi RA but now the institution is just being used to promote the narrative of Pakistan Army and Mufti Abdul Raheem is their most loyal puppet.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,543
Brother
133
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#294 [Permalink] Posted on 11th November 2025 20:00
The Journalist “Faizullah Khan” who has created this story about Osama Bin Ladin and Mufti Abdur-Rahim got famous when he was arrested in Afghanistan, otherwise he is not an eyewitness of anything during Taliban 1.0 and it is well known.

bint e aisha wrote:
View original post


I am Sorry and used the wrong words and he indeed didn't create this story as it existed in 1990s, he has merely narrated it. He was a nobody back then or even now to have any influence.

Everyone believes that the past was better and many times it indeed was.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
bint e aisha's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
2,650
Sister
1,773
bint e aisha's avatar
#295 [Permalink] Posted on 11th November 2025 20:07
Muadh_Khan wrote:
View original post

He is a good journalist and he does have influence as well here so I do follow him.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,543
Brother
133
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#296 [Permalink] Posted on 11th November 2025 21:33
bint e aisha wrote:
View original post


Sure...

Non-Scholar Pushtun Sources for Laymen:

This list is not in order except my Father 1st who took his secrets to his grave who is not on the list and never betrayed the "Official Secrets Act"



Listen to all of them and make your mind but here are the basics of Afghanistan

Afghanistan 101 for laymen:

Afghanistan has always been an underdeveloped landlocked Nation which cannot survive on its own. The only income in Afghanistan is to meddle (or not to meddle) in the affairs of those outside of Afghanistan:
  • Always ON: Funds flow from Chinese to keep Chinese Muslims quiet
  • Kashmir: Funds flow from Pakistani Deobandees and Pakistani state
  • Pakistan: Funds flow from Indians, Americans and Israelees
  • Iran: Funds flow from Iran to keep border with Iran secure or from Sunni (Muslims) to not do it


It is exactly the reason why Afghans came down to India and ruled the land because nothing fruitful can be done in Afghanistan. In 2025, Afghanistan has no choice but to rely on Pakistan for exports because Iran (is under International sanctions) and its border is less accessible.

Afghan, the mighty Fighter?:

Did Afghanistan beat British, Russian, American and NATO?

Yes but in a Terrain which is suited for Guerilla warfare and an entire (Nation of Pakistan) on their back to slip into, recuperate, plan, train, get medical assistance and ensure that their families are safe.

In 1997, the price of wheat shot 25% in Karachi because (of harsh winter) and the entire city happily paid so our Afghan Brothers can eat to their fill.

Afghans are not pitch battle mighty fighters against Pushtuns who are equally willing to fight till death, kill or be killed. It will be a whole new ballgame when the borders are sealed there is real time battle-field recon and those who trained you in Guerilla warfare are hunting you with complete air supremacy over your country! Afghans can only deploy Suicide bombers but extract price for each suicide attack in Pakistan upon mainland Afghanistan and this issue will be solved!

After hundreds of visits including from Mufti Taqi Usmani to hundreds of others, demarches, letters, resolutions, the message was not received by the Afghans until October 11, 2025!

[49:9 ] And if two groups of believers fight each other, then make peace between them. But if one of them transgresses against the other, then fight against the transgressing group until they ˹are willing to˺ submit to the rule of Allah. If they do so, then make peace between both ˹groups˺ in all fairness and act justly. Surely Allah loves those who uphold justice.

Those who died in Islamabad were civilians going about their daily lives...
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
3,944
Brother
3,998
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf's avatar
#297 [Permalink] Posted on 12th November 2025 13:15
Afghanistan has announced the exploration of alternative trade routes, via Central Asia and increased trade with India after Pakistan has continuously closed the borders.
Some trade in certain products to be eliminated altogether namely Pakistani manufactured Pharmaceuticals.

x.com/MyLordBebo/status/1988587038984331325?s=20
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,543
Brother
133
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#298 [Permalink] Posted on 12th November 2025 15:35
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf wrote:
View original post


2024: 70% of Afghan exports are to Pakistan with 40% sold locally and 30% exported outside. If Taliban want to destroy their country instead of stopping Terrorism, its their call.




Afghan-Pakistan Trade Route: Investigation

At the behest of India in 2012, Ashraf Ghani Government initiated the Herat Security Dialogue which was meant to shut out Pakistan and allow trade via other routes from Afghanistan. India has so far invested $370 million into Iranian Charbarah port and one of the reasons is to allow Afghan trade.

They had full access to US data, think tanks from US and India and all the experts at their disposal.

Amrullah Saleh the hardcore Indian Agent issued threats to Pakistan and forced the suspension of trade routes at Indian backing. The Afghan economy went into a meltdown and he had to beg for trade to be allowed back through Pakistan. The businessmen simply refused to follow Afghan Government's policy.

It is not possible for Afghanistan to trade via any other route, closure of trade is costing Afghanistan 100million USD. It is not possible due to these simple reasons:

  • Iran is under International sanctions so you cannot trade with the outside world using Iran.
  • Gawadar is a better and natural deep sea port then Chabahar.
  • The fruit and produce market is in Pakistan, the route is shorter, customers and markets established and ready. This market was worth 691 million USD for Afghanistan.
  • The Infrastructure towards Iran (as opposed to towards Pakistan) is not well developed.
  • Due to centuries of cultural and linguistic overlap, its easier to do business in and via Pakistan.


Besides trade, the biggest factor is (common) Afghans use education and medical facilities of Pakistan because they are easily accessible and Pakistani people unlike Iran are not hostile to Afghans.

Pakistan is just asking to Stop Supporting Terrorism from Inside Afghanistan but if Taliban want to destroy their country and their people like they did while supporting Al-Qaeda and ended up with the whole world bombing their population for 20+ years then let them make their choice.

The same Mullah Baradar who is issuing these statement has a Pakistani Passport and ID Card! .

If Taliban want to alienate 250 million Pakistanis who stayed hungry but fed them for over 40+ years, opened their hearts and homes to them and kick out Afghans and boycott their trade because Taliban do not want to STOP Terrorism then so be it.

Over 400+ attempts from Pakistan (from Mufti Taqi Usmani downwards) have been made to Taliban to ask them to STOP TERRORISM.


report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
3,944
Brother
3,998
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf's avatar
#299 [Permalink] Posted on 12th November 2025 16:54
Muadh_Khan wrote:
View original post


ALLAH knows best.
And conversely the Taliban have accused Pakistan of harbouring ISK militants.

If other countries are willing to facilitate trade and alternative trade routes with Afghanistan. Then perhaps the Taliban have taken the view of enduring short term pain for long-term gain.

So why are the Taliban harbouring militant groups?
And what benefit is it to them?
Where these groups operating from Afghanistan before the Taliban takeover? If so then why did Pakistan not take action during the American occupation?

Sure governments hostile to Pakistan, have taken advantage and funded and supporting these militant groups.

But have the Pakistans very brutal campaign in those areas, of Pakistan, during the Musharraf era and beyond not contributed to what we are seeing 2 decades later.

There is no black and white here, seems like an entire grey area.
What is the role of the Gulf Arab countries in all this? And their involvement in the proposed, IMEC, the India-Middle-East-Europe economic corridor, which goes through Israel.
What interference, and behind the scenes intrigue are they involved in, with this conflict between Pakistan and Afghanistan.

What is Americas role in this and they on the one hand, back slapping Pakistan, whilst at the same time, signing Trade and defence contracts with India.

As for the Indian port, in Iran what measures and sanctions have been imposed upon it and India?

In thinking to put the entire blame on the Taliban for this is fallacious, the Pakistani establishment are equally to blame.

Both of them need to realise that unity and close ties, between them will be beneficial to both sides.


report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,543
Brother
133
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#300 [Permalink] Posted on 13th November 2025 00:04
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf wrote:
View original post


You didn't understand the mechanics of trade within Afghanistan and export logistics so lets just drop the topic. I am not putting the blame of that on Taliban and you haven't understood what is being said.

Please provide a logical explanation for these figures, nothing has changed in Pakistan Army tactics, mission statements, policy or deployments.

Jazakallahu Khayran

Terrorism Killings in Pakistan:

  • 2019: 365 Killed
  • 2020: 506 Killed
  • 2021: 664 Killed
  • 2022: 971 Killed
  • 2023: 1513 Killed
  • 2024: 2236 Killed
  • 2025: 3341 Killed
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top

Jump to page: