Mufti-e-Azam Pakistan Mufti Rafi Usmani (HA) on being Deobandi!

Do you believe this to be Aqeedah of Asharees and Maturidees and Deobandees? FEEL free to check any Deobandi book before answering?

askimam.org/public/question_detail/17354

In brief, it is incorrect to say that Allah Ta’ala is literally “everywhere” and “on his throne”. “Everywhere” is an area restricted within six dimensions. “Throne” is a restricted entity. Allah Ta’ala is the creator of Makaan (place) and the creator of Makaan (place) cannot be contained within his creation, ie, place. Books stating that Allah Ta’ala is everywhere intend thereby the absolute knowledge of Allah Ta’ala. (Fatawa Al-Mahmudiyya, vol 1, pg 244, Faruqiyya)

FEEL free to check Salafees who have the opposite Aqeedah in this matter i.e. Allah Ta'ala is UPWARDS and ON the throne!

You are changing tactics again!

I have asked you what is a “Deobandi” and a reference and you have been unable to provide anything. Finally, you have come up with a definition it does not matter whether you are interested in it or not.

The question (being asked for the umpteenth time) would a person cease to be a “Deobandi” in your opinion if he (or she) violates the definition put up by yourself.

And for the umpteenth time, you have the option to merely say:

I am making Taqleed of the Ulama by calling myself a “Deobandi” and I actually do not understand the term in depth and its implications to debate and argue.

But you are not saying this! You are claim to be an authority on the topic so my question to you is:

Would a person cease to be a “Deobandi” in your opinion if he (or she) violates the definition put up by you?

 It is good to read and understand before posting something.

If you have understood it, please tell us:

1. What is a “Deobandi”?
2. What will make a person a “Deobandi”?
3. How will a person cease to be a “Deobandi”?

Because you are prone to violent outbursts and emotional breakdown, I am not saying that a person will become a Kaafir or get out of Ahlus-Sunnah Wal-Jamaah, we are discussing “Deobandi”!

So again from the article:

1. What is a “Deobandi”?
2. What will make a person a “Deobandi”?
3. How will a person cease to be a “Deobandi”?

But you are arguing!

1. You are imposing a definition and then erasing anyone who does not fit your definition out of being a “Deobandi”
   
2. If you do not wish to argue you can say “I call myself a Deobandi in Taqleed” but I actually do not know the definition and what makes someone a “Deobandi” or a “Non-Deobandi”
   

1 is reasonable, 2 is a debate.

You are trying to debate! Do you wish to debate? In that case you will be questioned...

Then why are you debating about something in which you lack in depth knowledge? Make Taqleed and move as Allah Ta’ala has commanded you.

You have no right to ask anything of me because how would you know whether what I am saying is right or wrong?

It’s like asking a Mas’ala in the Hanbali Madhab, how would you know I am telling you the truth or not?

For the umpteenth time! I am not, Mufti Rafi Usmani (HA) is!!!

You do not have to understand something to make Taqleed of Ulama. Everybody you pray Salah you do not know the in-depth analysis of how each Mas’ala is derived and yet you pray so that is fine and (needed).

In your case you are saying:

1.    I do not understand it
2.    YET, I want to question and debate you

It is a STUPID position to be in.

How can you question someone without having an understanding about something? You are just arguing for the sake of your Nafs and just making stuff up as you go along because you are clearly saying, “I do not understand it”.

Ajeeb…

You can change the question and ask, “I do not understand this issue in depth, and can you help me understand it?” OR you can say, “I would like to understand your point of view, although I disagree with it because other Ulama use this term” and it is amicable situation. Which I am not interested it, by the way…I don’t care if your call yourself “Deobandi” or any other “Bandi” for that matter.

You have no right to question me about a topic which “You do not understand?”

Your whole attitude stinks of arrogance…

1.    I do not understand it
2.    YET, I want to question and debate you
3.    I want to prove you wrong although I do not know the subject and I could be wrong and you could be right BUT I still want to question you

What arrogance!

In which other field do you go around questioning people and also admit, “I do not understand the topic but I will debate with you anyways!”

HOW WOULD YOU KNOW IF MY ANSWER IS RIGHT OR WRONG? THAT IS MY POINT!!!

You do not need to engage in silly antics, you need to grasp what is being said:

You ask me to say, “What is your name in Tamil?” Here is the scenario:

1. You do not know Tamil
2. But you wish to debate with me about the translation being accurate.

How is that possible?

You can ask me, “I do not know Tamil so I wish to learn how to say it”.

OR you can say, “I know English and Urdu so I will stick to it”

OR you can say, “I know ABC who knows Tamil and he or she says it this way so I will stick to it…Although I do not know whether what you are saying is right or wrong but I will stick to someone I know”

How can you debate with me in Tamil while simultaneously admitting that you do not know Tamil?