mkdon101 wrote:
View original post
He has always been like this, people just never paid attention and dug deeper (I am guilty, myself)
Rot always starts at the Top. Our Ulama don’t address these topics so laymen who live in the Google generation are curious, their minds wants to make sense of the world so they turn to the ONLY GUY who regularly talks about Ukraine, Crimea, Brexit.
Majority of the Muslims are neither well read (in Secular sciences or politics) or Islamic sciences so they are unable to grasp the poison this man has been spewing.
Our Ulama issue Fatwaas and expect laymen to STOP and OBEY them without convincing them of the errors of someone.
Despite seeing clear statements in this blog, there will be some who will say to “Take the Good and Leave the Bad”. No doubt this is a worthy statement but for those who are able to separate wheat from the chaff...unfortunately most laymen are not.
Rot is at the top. I have no idea whether he gets paid by Russia or CIA or ISI (and who cares?). I also don’t know and don’t care why he hates. The issue is that he is finding audience because of a capability gap within Islamic Scholarship. THAT IS THE MAIN PROBLEM!
The issue is not the analysis of WHY but HOW is he able to influence people? WHY is a Barelwee refuting him and 99% of Deobandee Ulama are silent or issuing 1-2 line Fatwaas.
www.muftisays.com/blog/Muadh_Khan/3397_02-08-2013/shaykh-...