The Aggression of these sects
They are willing to spill blood and post henchmen around to physically attack their opponents. Yet the kufaar and murtadeen mock Nabie Salallahu Alayhi Wasallam on a daily basis
but they NEVER dream of rising up in defense of Nabie Salallahu Alayhi Wasallam. They say “….adopt patience…”. And they brand defenders of our beloved Nabie Salallahu Alayhi Wasallam as – “thugs and hooligans”.
By Allah I swear that these people have zero love for Nabie Salallahu Alayhi Wasallam[/quote]
It seems under their Khawariji Khilafat they have been granted a divine love-o-meter to measure amount of love for Rasoolullaah's

in people's heart!
8.
Quote:
Personal experience[/quote]
I was really expecting to read stories of his real encounter with Shuyookh of Tasawwuf or their followers but what I got is that boring Salafi drum beating- no variation.
Quote:
Their concept of someone harming a wali is totally crooked and they misquote the hadeeth wherein Allah proclaims: “Whoever harms a wali of mine can expect war from me”
They actually have absolutely no clue to the actual meaning of this Hadeeth. If they did truly understand its meaning, they would obviously never limit it to “India buzrugs” and their “khalifas”. In other words a wali has attained sainthood through a manmade hereditary system, very similar to the Christian sainthood methodology. Thus this structure effectively denies the description of a true wali mentioned in the Quran and Sunnah.
When Allah describes a true mujahid as his wali, they refuse to acknowledge that and will not hesitate to insult and curse him. Their typical modus is to condemn and curse the mujahedeen daily. Are they not afraid of the “war” which Allah will declare upon them for harming his friends?[/quote]
Therefore, can we assume that Ameerul Khawarijeen doesn't consider Mullah Muhammad 'Umar (Hafizahullaah) to be a true Mujahid? Because he is wholeheartedly accepted by Deobandi 'Ulama and except deviants, no one condemn or curse him.
9.
Quote:
World wide Influence
Unfortunately this sheikh-mureed system is widely acknowledged especially in India and western countries.
The more followers the sheikh acquired, the greater his influence and “maqbooliat” (accepted by Allah). He receives royal treatment and in most cases they are usually surrounded by the “laanies” and other worldly influential doctors, lawyers, and hazrat worshippers- people who are all too willing to sponsor their first class luxurious world tours. The journeys and Disneyland rides are termed “islah majlis” (whatever that means) and are accompanied by many holidaymakers with packages generally packed with expensive tourist’s attractions and peppered with daily doses of “min janibillah malfoozat” (talks placed into the heart by Allah) dished out on the fly which in turn are so readily swallowed by the most eager head nodding and torso swirling mureeds. Plus the generous offerings, sumptuous meals and celebrity quality transport. Their food and drink leftovers are treated as holy and divided as booty among themselves.
But when we ponder the lives of the noble Sahabah and those after them, the true saints of Allah never do we discover this type of system. They never acquired thousands of mureeds, they never indulged in sumptuous meals and they were never entertained by “laanies”.[/quote]
Every person knows about simple and poor lifestyle of numerous Deobandi 'Ulama. This Jahil is trying to generalise them with some deviated persons.
Unfortunately his sect's Ameer and commanders can be accused more of what he is saying about others.
10.
Quote:
Buzrug?
A buzrug is a Persian term used to denote a wali or saint of Allah.
So what is a wali in its true sense? Let us search the Quran and Sunnah.
The Quran describes them as virtuous, steadfast in Salah, Zakaah AND Jihad. They were also honest, sincere, noble, faithful, harsh upon the kufaar, soft and kind to the Muslims, perpetual in salaah and never feared the chastising of the chastisers. All the Sahabah had these qualities so we could indisputably declare them as Awliyah (plural of wali). And their weapons were always strung upon their shoulders or at their sides.[/quote]
IS fulfills these criteria by calling Muslims as Kuffar and being harsh upon them, soft and kind to Khawarij groups who follow them.
Quote:
If we search for a true wali of Allah we find another description in a Hadeeth: “…should he ask for or say anything, not much attention would be paid, should he ask for your daughters, he will be refused…”, in brief a person you don’t care much about. Allah says that by his honor if this person should even take an oath, Allah will fulfill it accordingly.
Does al Baghdadi fulfill this criterion?
[quote]
Sheikh-Mureed
So now, where did all this really originate from? There are many theories, but the most obvious would be a copycat guru system. The Sheikh-Mureed is based upon the same system implemented by the gurus of India and the pre-Islam fire worshippers of Persia. The Sheikh-Mureed system is governed by orders similar to the guru orders and they pass on their “spiritual” blessings down into their successor’s hearts with a “chest to chest” connection. The sufis also claim to have connected chains leading right up to Ali Radhi-Allahu-Anhu. May Allah forbid! Where do they get this information from? Not a single narration or authentic source could verify these chains and “spiritual khilaafa” of the Sahabah. This is another deviant way to divert the true physical khilaafa of the Sahabah into the spiritual realm of their “buzrugs”.
There are also certain dangerous beliefs attached to the sheikh, for example, that they constantly receive kashf of every movement of their mureeds; their actions should never be challenged, even if it be against Sharia. Nor are you allowed to even endorse nahi anil munkir (preventing wrong) amongst them. How could you ever find fault with a “sinless buzrug”? Did you ever dream of voicing your dislike for their anti Shariah actions? Do you raise your voice when your sheikh and his mureeds are seated in a packed mixed audience watching dolphins and their scantily clad maidens’ antics accompanied by corresponding music? You are commanded to believe that their actions should never be questioned as they are perpetually in a “haal” (lofty spiritual state) under the throne of Allah. Their followers truly believe that their sheikhs are in contact with Allah and whatever they speak or write is “…a noor (divine light) directly from the throne of Almighty Allah”. Na-oezo-billah what shirk and blasphemy! Many of the books written by these buzrugs contain lies, fabrications and unauthentic hadeeth, yet their followers refer to these books as “ light directly from the Arsh of Allah”, May Allah forbid.
Sweeping statement...
11.
[quote]
Spiritualism
So what does spiritualism actually mean? It is foreign to Islam and cannot be found anywhere in the Quran and Sunnah and the lives of the Sahabah. Most of the books written or orated from the buzrugs are filled with spiritualism claimed to be derived from verses of the Quran and Hadeeth.
However, most of their sources are from the Mathnawi by Moulana Rumi. Sufis have branded the mathnawi as the “quran of Persia” –May Allah forbid. And when they do quote the verses of the Quran and hadeeth it is simply presented not to expound the Quran or the Sunnah, but merely as symbols to confirm their own spiritual explanations which were claimed to be either received as “ilhaam”(revelation) or “ilqa” (direct communication from Allah). Millions of rands (and in most cases public funds) are wasted publishing these sufi books and fairy tales which became freely available in all the masaajids of South Africa with some masjids boasting entire lined corridors to such an extent that they have replaced the Quran -another cunning method utilized by shaytaan to remove the Quran from our lives. A similar incident is mentioned in the Quran of a kaafir who attempted to direct the believers away from the Quran with his imported fairy tales from Rome and other ancient cities. Look at his punishment…
He perhaps didn't hear anything about their Imam Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Qayyim's (Raheemahullaah) books on Tasawwuf.
12.
[quote]
Sahr
In addition to being murjiahs, an integral part of this Indian system was their involvement with superstitions, aamils and sahr (black magic). Any “molvi”or ”moulana” who can “speak” to jinns or remove sahr is known as an “Aamil”. They are very similar to the bone throwing Black sangomas of South Africa. It has absolutely nothing to do with Islam and in many cases these “aamils” practice open shirk and kufr. Unwary Muslims flock to them but despite constant warnings against these frauds, they are simply too naïve to realize that their association with these dajjals is plain kufr and shirk.
To compound this baatil, many of these “aamils” are “khalifas of the great buzrugs of India” – so now these aamils are holy people of Allah who can’t be wrong, people who are blessed with “special” nusrah (aid) – Subhanallah, what blasphemy.
His sheer ignorance makes it too hard to believe that he is actually an old ex-Deobandi.
13.
[quote]
Journey to the truth
It was a painful experience to abandon a lifetimes involvement with a highly treasured system which convinced all of its adherents to be the true deen of Islam. But Allah requires you to forfeit all your idols and only worship him- that is true imaan. The mushriks of Mecca knew the truth, but they refused to abandon their dear lifelong idols.
It was not easy to reject the current Deobandi system founded by luminaries who were perhaps not part of the irjah camp and who readily supported active Jihad as well as its promotion, but history is scant on such matters. Although Deoband was allegedly involved in great battles, no historical facts could verify these claims. No mujahideen were housed, or produced from this institution. On the contrary, our stay in Deoband did not reflect Jihad at all. The Deobandi institution strictly implements its original Nanotwi constitution without modifications and if any Jihad doctrines ever existed, why did it vanish? In fact the current principal (a grandson of the original founder) at our time was totally against any Jihad or opposing the mushrik government. When the Indian mushrik government was forcefully castrating the Muslims, he was calling for peace and co-operation with these mushriks.
Many Deobandis will scramble to defend this allegation with claims that some hazrats were even martyred in a battle. That may be true to a certain extent but Jihad was definitely NOT Deobandi policy, otherwise every Deobandi would naturally be a fully fledged mujahid. An institution’s products are always reflected in their ideology. If the ideology was Jihad, the graduates would definitely also reflect Jihad –NEVER the opposite. Deobandis will claim that history is full of “the great Jihad of Deoband and their 14,000 Ulama slaughter tale” This is a fabrication with absolute no authentic source
Here are my questions-
Where did he get unauthenticity of these information from?
If from Kuffar's books, then why is he relying on Kuffar to get information?
Who really fought against British empire?
14.
[quote]
Jihad is Islam and denial is kufr
Note Well: Sufi ideology expressively denies Jihad, not necessarily in word form, but in actions, teachings and intentional elimination of Jihad verses which brought about a new world order of “spiritual Jihad”.
This ideology clearly opposes the Quran and Sunnah.
...........................................................................
Actually these are excuses presented by those who refuse to partake in jihad. The Quran mentions one such person who came to Nabie Sallalu-alayhi-wasallam at the time of recruiting for the battle of Tabuk. This person claimed that he had a weakness for roman girls. So he would like to be excused from Jihad. So he presented an excuse similar to the sufi excuse “until islah of the nafs has been made…”
A verse was then revealed wherein Allah reprimanded him severely and described his remaining behind as the actual great fitna. Observe how Allah rebukes people who present these false excuses!