Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

How to remove a metal structure with ease?

Jump to page:

You have contributed 1.9% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
Moonlight, abuzayd2k
Rank Image
In Need of Teaching's avatar
Offline
USA
1,059
Brother
476
In Need of Teaching's avatar
#91 [Permalink] Posted on 26th January 2020 15:03
In Need of Teaching wrote:
View original post

I really don't want to kill the thread, simply because I enjoyed (not initially tho) falling into the click bait trap.
It was clever, creative and quite possibly the best use of click bait I've seen in a long time.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+3 -0Like x 3Agree x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
24,656
Brother
9,127
abu mohammed's avatar
#92 [Permalink] Posted on 28th February 2022 12:15
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post

This post needs a major relook!

Quote:
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda. The popular chant, "9/11 was an inside job," is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that "19 bad guys with box cutters did it." Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court. Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.

The order of crime solving is to determine

1) WHAT happened, then

2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then

3) WHO did it. And only then can we address

4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).

Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime. You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief. You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don't even know what crime to charge them with. If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you'd better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. Yet, before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.

Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory. My research is not speculation. It is a forensic investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11.


All related videos
www.youtube.com/user/911EmpiricalEvidence

Until the48 minute bitchute video isn't understood (or all the YouTube videos in above link) No one should respond without further investigation.

The evidence provided is irrefutable. www.bitchute.com/video/HhZl0sYFMbv5/ 48 minutes. I watched 5 minutes of it then couldn't put it off!

The Matrix quote in the video, "It's never been done before, 'That's why, it'll work'"

A book I would like to have www.amazon.com/Towers-Evidence-Directed-Free-energy-Techn... and probably will have soon inshaAllah.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Winner x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
24,656
Brother
9,127
abu mohammed's avatar
#93 [Permalink] Posted on 28th February 2022 15:13
abu mohammed wrote:
Forget Newton's Law. We need to look at Nikola Tesla! Free Energy that could solve much of the world's problems but is being kept hidden for other powers!


www.youtube.com/watch?v=3n4mnRszNhw short video

You will live to see man-made horrors beyond your comprehension. - Nikola Tesla

One thing mentioned in this video (authenticity unknown) "Some shrewd reporter asked Dr. Tesla at this point, What he would need to destroy the Empire State Building and the Dr. replied 'Vibration will do anything. It would only be necessary to step up the vibration of the building and the building would come crashing down. That's why soldiers break step crossing the bridge."

And this quote, with a source
Quote:
Tesla later described what he called his “telegeodynamic oscillator,” presumably a similar machine. “It is so powerful” he said, “that I could now go over to the Empire State Building and reduce it to a tangled mass of wreckage in a very short time. I could accomplish this result with utmost certainty and without any difficulty whatever. I would use a small mechanical vibrating device, an engine so small you could slip it in your pocket. I could attach it to any part of the building, start it in operation, allowing 12 or 13 minutes to come to full resonance. The building would first respond with gentle tremors and the vibrations would then become so powerful that the structure would go into resonant oscillations of such great power and amplitude that rivets in the steel beams would be loosened and sheared off. The outer stone coating would be thrown off and the skeleton steel structure would collapse in all its parts.”

teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/articles/nikola-tesla-incr...

Absolutely fascinating find don't you think.

All the links are adding up on what happened to the Metal Structure!

Of course, who and why can then be narrowed down as per the readers' imagination for now. But one thing is for sure, it wasn't the Muslims!
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
547
Brother
-162
#94 [Permalink] Posted on 1st March 2022 01:51
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post
Quote:
telegeodynamic oscillator
The defense research industry gets first dibs on any new technology. Eventually it gets declassified, because the enemy also comes up with something similar, and the tactical advantage is lost. Simple economics then comes into play. Mobile telephony, specifically CDMA, is an example.

Tesla passed away in 1943. Have we seen this technology used in war time scenarios over the last 80 years?

Please don't take this to be a confrontational post, but this is precisely why the opinion of someone like brother Maripat is important. He has been teaching physics at the undergraduate and postgraduate university level for close to 30 years. He is a Muslim, and a man of taqwa. His opinion should carry weight, in the spirit of referring matters to those of demonstrated competence.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Ha Ha x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
24,656
Brother
9,127
abu mohammed's avatar
#95 [Permalink] Posted on 1st March 2022 08:35
sharjan8643 wrote:
View original post

50 years ago, the USA went to the moon *face palm* is there such a technology that can take them 50 years later? NO!

How can I say NO with such confidence? They have admitted it!

The dustification of the two buildings happened!
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Winner x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
547
Brother
-162
#96 [Permalink] Posted on 1st March 2022 09:53
I don't understand what this new "Ha Ha" rating is about. I wasn't too sure about the facepalm rating either.
Quote:
Facepalm emoji
Emoji Meaning
A hand shown pressing against the head of a person, commonly written as facepalm. Used to display frustration or embarrassment at the ineptitude of a person or situation.
Is someone trying to point out my ineptitude and also laughing about it?
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
24,656
Brother
9,127
abu mohammed's avatar
#97 [Permalink] Posted on 1st March 2022 10:23
sharjan8643 wrote:
View original post

I love the facepalm rating and it doesn't mean the post is rubbish or sometihng like that.

Many times I get facepalm posts as a reaction to what I posted and it simply means they acknowledge it as a facepalm moment too and it doesn't mean that what I have posted was not worth posting.

So, the face palm rating could have two meanings. It can be positive and it could be negative. The post itself will give that clue away.


Ha Ha is similar. it could be used to show that the reader found the post funny if it was a joke or it could mean a LOL (something I have stopped using for many years now). Again, it can be a positive or negative and the post itself and the readers can make their own mind up.

It's not the same as Like or Dislike, yet they are similar without giving a positive or negative rating on the reps.

I don't like to use the dislike rating for anyone, so I use disagree and facepalm and now I can use the Ha Ha rating or face palm and the readers who are following the threads will understand why or make sense of why it was given.

For the record, I gave the Ha Ha rating for this statement alone:
sharjan8643 wrote:
The defense research industry gets first dibs on any new technology. Eventually it gets declassified, because the enemy also comes up with something similar, and the tactical advantage is lost. Simple economics then comes into play. Mobile telephony, specifically CDMA, is an example.

Tesla passed away in 1943. Have we seen this technology used in war time scenarios over the last 80 years?

Hence my response in the post and rating given :)

Hope that makes sense.

Any further questions on off topic Ha Ha and facepalm ratings, please post here www.muftisays.com/forums/63-the-light-side/12441-facepalm...
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
24,656
Brother
9,127
abu mohammed's avatar
#98 [Permalink] Posted on 14th March 2022 16:52







No buildings left...
A common story is that the debris was quickly shipped to China or somewhere in Asia. This is untrue - this image was taken before the destruction of WTC 7 (seen in the background). There is very little of the buildings remaining.

There was no rubble. From an engineers perspective, this is impossible! But from the doctors explanation of free-energy, it makes total sense and the "Dustification" is right in front of our eyes! Laws of Physics prove what happened on that day was shocking!










Quote:
Look at what was left
A reminder of how much material disappeared. The highlighted area in the left picture is shown in the right picture.

report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
24,656
Brother
9,127
abu mohammed's avatar
#99 [Permalink] Posted on 25th March 2022 16:11
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post

Impossible Physics

Skip to 3 minutes and 55 seconds or watch until there and see how the wing damage happened "after" explosion.
brandnewtube.com/watch/9-11-conclusive-evidence-the-plane...

On this day, Physics was insulted and Physicians were tricked! After this, Muslims were murdered AND blamed for this Magic.

No damage to the building can be seen where the wing has already passed through the walls! Watch the video for clearer image.
Pause the same video at 5 minutes and 50 seconds and then watch for 3 seconds to see the wing vanish without impact. Pure Miracle and only a miracle can defy physics!
2714-Wing.JPG
Downloads: 3
    [33.02 kB]
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1
back to top
Yasin's avatar
UK
6,490
Brother
1,426
Yasin's avatar
#100 [Permalink] Posted on 25th March 2022 17:46
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post

Academic drones won't understand these experts. It shatters their worldly belief system and breaks their indoctrination data they soaked up in schools to rubble. The speed issues, the cartoon physics, the road runner effect, no sounds, the stabalisation of the flight path into buildings jumping rapidly, the dustification of 110 steel reinforced concrete towers in mid-air and so much more.. it really is beyond their limited understandings. The more indoctrination, the higher the degree the more limited their critical and deductive reasoning abilities become.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Agree x 1Winner x 1Ha Ha x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Asaaghir's avatar
Spinistan Throne
1,060
Brother
708
Asaaghir's avatar
#101 [Permalink] Posted on 25th March 2022 18:13
Yasin wrote:
View original post

People say it went through like a hot knife in butter.

But this piece of clip is brilliant. Because no man on earth can put a hot knife through butter without leaving an "incision" lol

Wow!

The only possible explanation of this on butter would be that the butter melted back into shape and sealed the entry point faster than the shutter speed of the camera lol. or you fake it.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 1Winner x 1
back to top
Yasin's avatar
UK
6,490
Brother
1,426
Yasin's avatar
#102 [Permalink] Posted on 25th March 2022 18:18
Asaaghir wrote:
View original post

It really is laughable. The video you posted, some of the questions posed to experts to confirm the absurdity had them laughing before they answered. It still baffles me how a human thinking person can actually fall for the evil so badly that they go even beyond justifying and agreeing with the slaughter of 1 million plus Muslims.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Agree x 2
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
24,656
Brother
9,127
abu mohammed's avatar
#103 [Permalink] Posted on 25th March 2022 20:01
Yasin wrote:
View original post

Correction, the video I posted.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Agree x 1
back to top
Yasin's avatar
UK
6,490
Brother
1,426
Yasin's avatar
#104 [Permalink] Posted on 26th March 2022 09:28
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post

Yesterday was quote the wrong person day. I even quoted wrong member when replying. Today's a new day.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top

Jump to page: