Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

How to remove a metal structure with ease?

Jump to page:

You have contributed 1.9% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
Moonlight, abuzayd2k
Rank Image
In Need of Teaching's avatar
Offline
USA
1,059
Brother
478
In Need of Teaching's avatar
#61 [Permalink] Posted on 25th January 2020 19:04
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post

I'm simply stating it is a sound scientific approach to things and it is used in regards to law enforcement investigations as well.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+3 -0Like x 3
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
26,146
Brother
9,541
abu mohammed's avatar
#62 [Permalink] Posted on 25th January 2020 19:04
In Need of Teaching wrote:
View original post

True, once it's done the damage intended, I'll move it :)

Also, it for help, not :)

If it's in the hoax or people's say section, it might not get a look into because a lot of people have made their mind up on the low level lies :(
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 1Agree x 2Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
26,146
Brother
9,541
abu mohammed's avatar
#63 [Permalink] Posted on 25th January 2020 19:06
In Need of Teaching wrote:
View original post

What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?

The simplest answer or solution is to blame it on the butler :)
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 1Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
In Need of Teaching's avatar
Offline
USA
1,059
Brother
478
In Need of Teaching's avatar
#64 [Permalink] Posted on 25th January 2020 19:07
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post

Yeah, I know it might end up getting buried, but that's not my intent.
Hopefully it will remain active if on People's Say. If it's decided to merge it, it would, in all likelihood, be lost.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 2
back to top
Rank Image
In Need of Teaching's avatar
Offline
USA
1,059
Brother
478
In Need of Teaching's avatar
#65 [Permalink] Posted on 25th January 2020 19:08
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post


Not true at all, that may be the case in the board game, but not in real life.
I also said that an investigation will pursue the other avenues of possibility.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 2Agree x 1
back to top
Rank Image
xs11ax's avatar
Unspecified
3,243
Brother
2,554
xs11ax's avatar
#66 [Permalink] Posted on 25th January 2020 19:24
How did they pin it on Bin Laden? What was their evidence?
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 2
back to top
Rank Image
In Need of Teaching's avatar
Offline
USA
1,059
Brother
478
In Need of Teaching's avatar
#67 [Permalink] Posted on 25th January 2020 19:26
xs11ax wrote:
View original post


If you're asking me, I simply don't know.
As I said, I have not devoted time into researching this. Until I do, I can only say that there is a reasonable doubt.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 2
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
26,146
Brother
9,541
abu mohammed's avatar
#68 [Permalink] Posted on 25th January 2020 20:14
xs11ax wrote:
View original post

They found an intact Arab passport amongst the melted steel and debris 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ and the simple solution is to link it to bin laden.

They needed an excuse to invade The Islamic land of Mullah Umar.

I can list a few more if you need, but pause and think about it. A passport?

Oh wait, unless the terrorist ejected out in mid air before collision and it fell out of his back pocket, hmm that must be it then. I can't believe I've been thinking it was an inside job all this time ;)
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 1Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
xs11ax's avatar
Unspecified
3,243
Brother
2,554
xs11ax's avatar
#69 [Permalink] Posted on 25th January 2020 20:15
In Need of Teaching wrote:
View original post

Asking everyone.

report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 2
back to top
Rank Image
abuzayd2k's avatar
Offline
Eraf
1,317
Brother
404
abuzayd2k's avatar
#70 [Permalink] Posted on 26th January 2020 01:38
Yasin wrote:
View original post

My "logic" or lack thereof is subordinate to my belief. I believe the majority view because to my feeble mind it seems to be the simpler explanation so I will pidgeon-hole all "evidence" to suit my belief.

None of the evidences to the contrary have convinced me because I am not smart enough to figure out if they are right or wrong.

When the whole thing blows over and everyone agrees that it was all a conspiracy then I will also gladly change my views. Until it remains a conspiracy theory I will side with the majority opinion.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+3 -0Like x 3Facepalm x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abuzayd2k's avatar
Offline
Eraf
1,317
Brother
404
abuzayd2k's avatar
#71 [Permalink] Posted on 26th January 2020 01:40
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post

Is this part of the NIST report findings?
report post quote code quick quote reply
+3 -0Like x 3
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
26,146
Brother
9,541
abu mohammed's avatar
#72 [Permalink] Posted on 26th January 2020 09:48
abuzayd2k wrote:
View original post

Majority of who?

More than 50% Of Americans say the government is concealing the truth.

More than 50% of Americans believe it was an inside job.

More than 50% believe it was a false flag operation.

In the UK more than 50% of the public voted to Brexit.

Since more than 50% got the vote, UK is leaving the European Union.

So what is the majority in terms of numbers?

abuzayd2k wrote:
View original post

The NIST report is bogus! The fact that they say
Quote:
2008 report by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) which found that WTC7 collapsed after fires on multiple floors "caused a critical support column to fail, initiating a fire-induced progressive collapse that brought the building down"


Did you watch the 58 second video?

Since this is now proven to be false, even admitted by Muadh somewhat, how can we continue to read further?

You guys are saying that we provide proof and evidence as snippets and say, it starts with a lie and isn't credible enough so there is no need to go any further and end your debate there as if its unbeatable. Now I'm asking you to use your own logic on yourself and admit that it is a lie!

Isn't that hypocrisy?

The NIST report is bogus. The owner of the building is heard clearly ordering it to be demolished once the public had cleared the way!

Please ask yourself and then tell me what is more apparent, the 2001 live news commentary, the phone call from the owner, the points made by the mayor and the final decision from the owner of the building on September 11th Or a sold out crew who put together a report in 2008?
report post quote code quick quote reply
+3 -0Like x 1Winner x 1Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
26,146
Brother
9,541
abu mohammed's avatar
#73 [Permalink] Posted on 26th January 2020 10:15
I appreciate that 58 seconds was not enough to prove that the NIST report was bogus. ;)

I have here another video, in less than 3 minutes NIST lies proven again with LIVE news broadcast.

Here you can see with your own eyes, the NBC news reporter saying that "Lets look over there at the brown building, the Wtc7 and I've just been told by an officer that it's going to come down soon"

Then CNN saying live on the news that Wtc7 is going to blow up!

This video also has proof of bombs going off, floor by floor and this is being discussed by the firemen.
youtu.be/huGNzqtLN0k

Edit: the first 3 minutes is enough of the 4 minute video. Also note/watch the windows implode not explode!
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 1Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
26,146
Brother
9,541
abu mohammed's avatar
#74 [Permalink] Posted on 26th January 2020 10:51
A closeup of the Wtc7 in a preplanned rigged building being detonated so it can be brought down on order!

10 seconds less than 58 second video, so may not be credible enough :(

youtu.be/iOo7eW5c5SQ

Again, see the patterns of how and where the bombs were set for it to come down freefall style

Or if you prefer a 28 second video to prove that the NIST report is bogus. youtu.be/-zVwBv_1CAE Larry Silverstien saying they ordered it to be pulled and then watched it come down!!! Same video but shorter as I understand people don't have time for the truth :(
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 1Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abuzayd2k's avatar
Offline
Eraf
1,317
Brother
404
abuzayd2k's avatar
#75 [Permalink] Posted on 26th January 2020 11:49
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post

Please understand that I am not trying to be dismissive of your strong feelings on the matter. I can appreciate that you hold a different view of things based on evidence you consider compelling. For me none of this is compelling. I don't know what the absolute truth is. When given the two competing narratives, it is just my opinion that the NIST report is the closest thing to a complete investigation. Maybe I am just part of the deluded minority.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 2Facepalm x 1
back to top

Jump to page: