Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

Counter Terrorism and Security Bill UK Muslims

You have contributed 0.0% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
Taalibah, MUSLIMAH_119
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
27,565
Brother
9,601
abu mohammed's avatar
#1 [Permalink] Posted on 8th January 2015 12:31
THE COUNTER-TERRORISM
and SECURITY BILL
AND BRITISH MUSLIMS
 
As salaamu alaykum,
We are writing to highlight the urgent need for you to play your part in preventing the Government’s current Counter-terrorism and Security Bill being passed as law in its current form. The proposed legislation could bear serious consequences for British Muslims including:
  • Having your passport seized for up to 30 days by border police or immigration officials;
  • A ban (on British citizens) from entering the UK for up to 2 years, effectively rendering you stateless during that time;
  • Entire 'nationalities' of passengers being barred from travelling into the UK;
  • The Government being able to intercept your mail;
  • The Government’s highly criticised ‘Prevent’ programme (which many feel treats with Muslims through the prisms of security and suspicion) to be enforced on councils, schools and universities.
This is a deeply troubling piece of legislation for British Muslims and will change our lives forever if it is passed in its current form. The Bill is already near the Third Reading stage and could become law if you don’t act soon.
You can find out more about the Counter-terrorism and Security Bill and the human rights issues it raises in our briefing here.
 
WHAT CAN YOU DO?
 
1. SEND AN EMAIL TO YOUR MP TODAY

We have already provided a template letter. All you need do is copy and paste its contents into the window that opens when you click on this link: https://www.writetothem.com - which allows you to send an email to your MP in one simple step.
 
2. VISIT YOUR MP THIS WEEKEND

You will need to call their office (details can be found on the link provided above) and make an appointment. Alternatively, ask to meet your MP in Parliament this week to allay your fears about the Bill and why s/he must not support it.
 
Jazakallaho Khair 
 
Download Template Letter
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Twitter
Website
Website
Copyright © 2015 MEND, All rights reserved.
Any views expressed by an individual within this e-mail do not necessarily reflect the views of the company. Whilst we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure that this e-mail and any attachment has been checked for viruses, we cannot guarantee that they are virus free and we cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of software viruses. We would advise that you carry out your own virus checks, especially before opening an attachment. Please note that MEND monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. MEND is a marketing name of MEND Ltd, a not for profit company limited by guarantee, number 08820152 

Our mailing address is: 

MEND
St Brides Chambers
8 Salisbury Court
London, London EC4Y 8AA
United Kingdom

report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
27,565
Brother
9,601
abu mohammed's avatar
#2 [Permalink] Posted on 12th January 2015 01:45
UK security and counter-terrorism
Anti-terror bill a threat to academic freedom, MPs tell Theresa May
Universities should be exempt from duty, home secretary told by MPs and peers on parliament’s joint human rights committee

Dr Hywel Francis MP, chair of the joint committee on human rights.

Monday 12 January 2015 00.01 GMT

Universities should be exempt from a new counter-terror duty that could seriously restrict academic freedom of speech, MPs and peers have told the home secretary, Theresa May.

The warning from parliament’s joint human rights committee comes before the second reading on Tuesday in the House of Lords of May’s counter-terrorism and security bill, which includes powers that could require colleges to ban extremist speakers from campuses.

A Home Office consultation paper issued just before Christmas says universities “must take seriously their responsibility to exclude those promoting extremist views that support or are conducive to terrorism”.

It says university staff will be expected to refer students at risk of being drawn into terrorism to external anti-radicalisation programmes and to challenge extremist ideas, including non-violent extremism, that can be used to justify terrorism.

The scrutiny report by the cross-party committee says extra safeguards to “protect fundamental liberties” are still needed in the bill, which is designed to tackle the threat of suspected British jihadis travelling to and returning from fighting in Syria and Iraq.

Home Office ministers have already indicated that they will include some form of judicial oversight of the home secretary’s new power to issue temporary exclusion orders designed to facilitate the “managed return” of those who are “believed to have engaged” in terrorism abroad.

But ministers have yet to spell out how the concession will work. David Anderson QC, the official terror laws watchdog, has proposed there should be a prior permission court hearing where only “obviously flawed” applications could be refused followed by a shorter and simpler review procedure after the orders have been imposed.

The MPs and peers on the joint human rights committee however go further and say the power to exclude a UK national for up to two years contains “a very real risk that the human rights of UK nationals will be violated”.

They suggest that a process of ‘“managed return” could be better achieved by requiring returning UK nationals who are suspects to provide their travel plans in advance on pain of a criminal penalty if they fail to do so.

But the MPs and peers also express alarm at the proposed extension of the Prevent counter-radicalisation strategy that would see a new duty placed on universities, schools, local authorities and others to “prevent people from being drawn into terrorism”.

Institutions that repeatedly fail to do this face the possibility of a ministerial direction enforced by a court order.

The committee said it was concerned about the implications for freedom of expression and academic freedom.

“Lack of legal certainty over the definitions of terms such as ‘extremism’ referred to in the draft guidance on the use of the power means that universities will not know with sufficient certainty whether they risk being found in breach of the new duty,” it said.

This legal uncertainty will have a “seriously inhibiting effect on bona fide academic debate” in universities.

The MPs and peers say universities should be removed from the list of authorities that the new duty will cover.

Dr Hywel Francis, Labour MP for Aberavon and chair of the committee, said: “As open and rigorous debate about ideas is itself one of the most powerful tools in the struggle against terrorism and the extremism which often breeds terrorism, this is surely counter-productive.”

The Home Office said most universities already had a clear understanding of their Prevent-related responsibilities, including the need to ensure and promote freedom of speech while having due regard for the welfare of students, staff and visitors.

“Institutions already demonstrate some good practice in these areas. We do not envisage the new duty creating large new burdens on institutions and intend it to be implemented in a proportionate and risk-based way,” officials say in the draft guidance.

The Guardian
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
Jinn's avatar
Unspecified
2,891
Brother
279
Jinn's avatar
#3 [Permalink] Posted on 13th February 2015 20:46
Salam

I'm surprised nothing on this has been posted yet on here....

Quote:
Some quick Notes about how the CTS Bill can affect us in practice:

The problem with this Bill is the definition of extremism. Can suspect you of holding 'extremist' ideas, if for example
- you made zakat payment to Syria to help orphans,
- your child writes poems about injustice in Palestine,
- you attend a mosque in which they say Homosexuality is Haram and sinful
- you attend a demonstration against British army fighting Muslims even though being polite and not agressive
- you send a text or What'sApp message, Facebook or Twitter post about any of the above, it gives them reasons for suspicion

This is very dangerous because the idea is to change the way we think, speak about Islam until they are happy.

Problems if they suspect you:

1. Passports can be seized at discretion of the Home Office without notice,or any evidence for up to 14 days - if a Muslim wanted to travel to say Turkey, Egypt, Pakistan, Bangladesh even, they can seize your passport at the airport and prevent you from flying. They do not need to give you a reason.

2. Exclusion order - again if you went to a Muslim country for example Turkey, Egypt, Pakistan, Bangladesh, all it takes is someone that dislikes you to tell the authorities that so and so went to this country to fund certain or support certain activities. No proof needed, the authorities can stop you from returning for up to 2 years.

***You might even be innocent but still will be inconvenience and you will have no right to do anything about it***

3. If you are suspected, under TPIMs they can force you to relocate from where you live. So someone in East London can be forced to move to away from London and in the middle of nowhere away from friends, family and relatives.

4. They will force schools, colleges, hospitals, doctors, nurses, dentist, police, etc to report you or your children for signs of extremism.

****Eg. Clean shaven man suddenly grows a beard, a girl who suddenly decides to wear hijab, if people suddenly decide to show interest in praying fasting in schools or in the workplace, basically demonstrating any "sudden change" in religiousness must indicate that this person "may be" under the influence of radicalisation.***

5. De-radicalisation - this could mean a child can be taken into social care to prevent influence of parents sending him or her to a madrasah which teaches with what is deemed 'anti British values'

6. Airlines will need to disclose personal info to the authorities in advance to help with point 1. and 2.

Hopefully some of these examples will give an indication as to how dangerous this Bill is, and the inconvenience it will have based on pure suspicion and not evidence. Any evidence that exist, is behind closed doors. Neither the suspect or their lawyers will have access to this evidence and therefore will not be able to make a case against it.

The problem is with definition and secrecy of evidence.


Sign petition without delay now! Protect the future of Muslims in the UK

stopthebill.co.uk/petition/
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
27,565
Brother
9,601
abu mohammed's avatar
#4 [Permalink] Posted on 13th February 2015 21:20
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Yasin's avatar
UK
6,700
Brother
945
Yasin's avatar
#5 [Permalink] Posted on 13th February 2015 21:33
Threads merged
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Jinn's avatar
Unspecified
2,891
Brother
279
Jinn's avatar
#6 [Permalink] Posted on 6th July 2015 15:26
So what happened about this bill in the end ?

Was 'PREVENT' a result from this bill ?

report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top