Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

Noor Zaman Shazli Batil Peer ( exposed by his ex Khalifah )

Jump to page:

You have contributed 15.1% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
MUSLIMAH_119
2 guests appreciate this topic.
Rank Image
Jinn's avatar
Unspecified
2,891
Brother
279
Jinn's avatar
#16 [Permalink] Posted on 4th May 2014 22:21
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post


Akhi the reason why I posted it here I didn't know you lot would be alright with SF mess on your forum on the main.

But If protects others from this fraudster then I don't see why not because he's spreading like wildfire in Pakistan. The guy has 17 year old kids working for him from UK who are deluded into thinking that they have muakil sahabi and muakil of Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jilani rahimullah

Can you please change the thread title to something more punchy, something like : Avoid Noor Zaman Shazli Batil Peer ( exposed by his ex Khalifah )
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
27,246
Brother
9,735
abu mohammed's avatar
#17 [Permalink] Posted on 4th May 2014 22:50
Dr76, May you please edit your post and leave just

Quote:
i request this thread to be moved on to the mains..

Jazakallah khair..


Brother Jinn, I'm unable to edit in this section, so if you may, please edit the first post so the title can be changed from there. Please copy the original post before selecting update just in case the post gets messed up.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Jinn's avatar
Unspecified
2,891
Brother
279
Jinn's avatar
#18 [Permalink] Posted on 4th May 2014 23:02
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post


Done akhi

جزاك الله خيرا
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Jinn's avatar
Unspecified
2,891
Brother
279
Jinn's avatar
#19 [Permalink] Posted on 5th May 2014 00:16
Assalam Alaikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatuhu,

Reapected mufti sahib,

I want to ask you about a famous amil in pakistan who has recently turned into a shaikh. His name is Syed Noorzaman naqshbandi shazli (website: www.markazeilaj.com). He appeared on tv approximately two years ago and from there he gained popularity all over the world. I will mention some of his views, his actions and his sayings inshaAllah.

The below points are taken from his bayans found on youtube and his private majalis. I was his khalifah and he made me an abdaal of the city I reside in. He has a zahiri naqshbandi silsila which cannot be confirmed from anyone because his shaikh is not alive.

This person is basically an amil and he claims the following:

1) Imam shazli has given me his silsila in dreams.

2) imam jafar sadiq ra has given me all his ilm in a dream.

3) He does ilaaj of non mehram women through skype video and live in his markaz e ilaj. Sometimes he tells women to remove their niqab because jinn/jadoo is checked by looking at the face.

4) this person and his ijazat yaafta amils and khulafa sit on skype all night talking to girls in the pretext of ilaaj. They tell them to open their videos because face needs to be seen for ilaaj and dam.

5) one of his senior khulafa claimed that sometimes even the private part (sharamgah) of a woman needs to be seen for ilaaj and one such case came to him but he said I won't look without doing nikah with the girl.

6) this person claimed that rasoolullah sall Allahu alaihi wasallam came and stamped on his back 'Ghos ul fard' 'qayyoom e zaman'

7) whenever this person is told that why do u do ilaaj of non mehram women he says that a doctor sometimes sees a naked woman we're just seeing the face.

8) once he was asked about looking at non mehrams on skype and his answer was when the girls don't have a problem why do u hav a problem?

9) another daleel he gave was it is written in 'lataaif e ilmiyyah' that a tabeeb put his hand inside inside the 'farj' of a woman.

10) He claims that he is a siddique and looking at non mehram women doesn't have any effect on me.

11) he claims that our silsila is run by a sahabi jinn named abu yusuf and this sahabi comes and tells him ahadith.

12) This shaikh claims that he has jadoo on him and it has two effects, one is on his namaz that he can't pray on time or properly and second is on hsi mamoolaat. This shaikh sits on skype all night and it has been witnessed by many people many times that he keeps on talking on skype to patients/mureeds at fajr time and doesn't go to pray in the masjid. When the time of fajr is about to end only then he gets up.

13) this shaikh has three brothers who are all amils but have become shaikhs. They have the same routine and I've seen it myself many times that they stay awake on skype all night and sleep just before fajr.

14) People go to him for ilaaj of jadoo/jinnat. He gives them zikr and gives them ijazah of ilaaj and khilafat and makes them shaikh. These shaikhs are as young as 20 year old and amils as young as 17 year old. These people then go in the awaam and its imaginable what fitnah they are creating.

15) these people claim that there are 100 takweeni people in their silsila.

16) this person had made me abdaal of the city I live in and said now whatever u think will happen. I contested this according to hadith. I said hadith say there will be only 40 abdaals and they are in syria, they say where is it written there can't be more.

17) These people have a zahiri naqshbandi sanad of some shaikh who has given all these four brothers his khilafah. Apart from that he claims that after shahwali ullah ra, tasawwuf has opened up on me and it didn't open up on anyone before me.

18) one of his top khalifah told me himself that hazrat has made a new claim that after shah waliullah ra I have understood sahih bukhari''. This person can't even read arabic properly.

19) Shaikh feroz memon, khalifah of hakeem akhtar sahib ra has said in his bayan '' aik naya group nikla hai aur kayi zina k cases me pakray gaye hain''. The bayan titled 'jali amilon ka fitnah'can be found on his website www.truetasawwuf.org.

20) People come to this shaikh for ilaaj and he gives them a huge list of zikr, makes them his mureed and it has been noticed that those who keep in contact with him their situation worsens most of the time. He then says, 'badguman ho gaye hain aap is liye ilaaj nahi ho raha' the daleel he gives is 'zaalik akitaabu la raiba feeh'. Whoever becomes badguman with me, shayateen attack him.

21) whoever comes to him for ilaaj he claims 'poori dunia ghoom lo kaheen ilaaj nahi ho sakta'

22) this person openly says in his bayans that badnazri is a sagheera gunah and gheebat is bigger gunah. He says this in almost all his bayans and majalis. His mureeds and students now believe that badnazri (looking at non mehrams) is a small sin and doesnt have any effect on taqwa. Whenever pointed he says there's a hadith 'momin zani ho sakta hai, sharabi ho sakta hai, jhoota nahi ho sakta'. Then he goes on to say wali se gunah ho sakta hai and ml ashraf ali thanvi ra has said that wali gunah to kia zina bhi kar sakta hai. He downplays zina and claimed in a bayan gheebat is stronger than zina.

23) he said that in his last days Rasoolullah sallAllahu alaihi wasallam's sehr returned on him and this was the reason why he used to blow muawwazatain on himself. I showed him ahadith from sahih bukhari that it was the effect of the poison that returned. Its mentioned explicitly in hadith. When I showed him this he said sehr also returned. I said its mentioned in hadith that Allah gave complete shifa to rasoolullah sall Allahu alaihi wasallam from sehr. He said sehr was cut but 'asar' remained.

Then I asked him where is it written? Their answer was where is it written that sehr didn't return?

Because these people are amils so they twist everything to prove their own point about jadoo.

24) he once said in a majlis in a masjid to me and another khalifah that I'm telling u a secret. Its that nisbat is strengthned by gunah just like crops are noursihed by dirty fertilizer.

25) this shaikh gave talaq to one of his wives and then brought her back without halala. He claimed that there was sehr on me and a person who has sehr his talaq doesn't take place. He mentions this in his bayans openly. He said I have a daleel and no mufti can answer my daleel. He said in a recent bayan 'whoever gave talaq and says I had jadoo, bring him to me I'll tell in a minute whether he had sehr or not, jadoo se talaq nahi hoti'.

26) he once related a story of his tht one of his wives had jadoo on her and a jinn used to come on her every minute. She came to me for ilaaj and it reduced to once every hour and she became better. Then once she had a strong attack, he called and said u have become badguman with me that's why shayateen have attacked u and I can't do anything. Now it is coming in istikhara I have to either divorce u or shayateen will kill u.he pretended tht this sign came from Allah. So he divorced her and then said I killed all her shayateen and then did rujoo.

27) whoever comes to him for ilaaj, he'll say things like ur sahib e nisbat, actually ur siddeeq thts why this is happening with u.

28) this shaikh claims that whoever does my zikr and becomes my shagird his istikhara is opened. All his shagirds and khulafa base their decisions on istikhara. Their istikhara is that they say it comes in the heart. When I asked him how do u do ilaaj by looking at face of a woman, what the technique? He answered that it comes in istikhara. I said to him so a man's istkhara will always tell him to look at a woman's face.

This istikhara is the usool they base everything on, even if it goes against shariah like this shaikh's khalifah who said that farj will be seen for ilaaj of jadoo and he based this on istikhara.

These are some of the points which I have summarized from my own talks with him and some of his bayans that I have listened to. The things other than this must be enormous. This person lives in karachi. He has a huge following of ulama and muftis. What they do other than this is more shameful.

Another thing that needs to be clarified by muftis is what's the hudood of an amil doing ilaaj of a non mehram woman. Is there really a need for an amil to see the face of a non mehram woman? Many muftis listen to his bayans but they never say a word.

A mufti in karachi has made bayans against him but when asked for a fatwa he said these people have been threatening me so I can't do much.

A mufti of khatm e nubuwwat gave fatwa against his silsila and he was also threatened.

This fitnah is spreading very quickly all over the world. This shaikh sits on skype all night and has many mureeds in western countries esp uk.

This is a summary of this shaikh. Inspite of all these actions He claims to be a staunch deobandi and has big names on his website like that of mufti Rasheed Ahmed ludhianvi ra that he was mureed of mufti sahib.

What does shariat say about this person? Please reply with dalaail because this person challenges all mufti openly that come and talk to me with usool and dalaail. No one can talk to me.

Sorry for such a long email. I hope a detailed answer will be given which can be then sent to muftis of pakistan so they take a step.

JazaakAllaah Khayran.

---------------------------------
Assalam Alaikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatuhu,

Respected mufti sahib,

I sent you an email earlier about a shaikh in Pakistan. Wanted to add a few points. In his most recent bayan found on his facebook (www.facebook.com/markazeilaj) he said a few new things. The strangest thing is that he has a deobandi mufti sitting with him in all his bayans and the mufti doesn't say a word.

The shaikh said, these girls who are sick they call me and say love you... jab love you keh diya to phas gayi phir me kehta hoon jao ''fuyooz un noor'' (his zikr book) karo ja kar.

In the same bayan he goes on to say, shaikh ko i love you kehna jaiz hai, jesay baap ko kehtay hain, bhai ko kehtay hain, shaikh ko kehna jaiz hai. Mujhay shadi ki offer bhi kar sakti hain, me bhi keh sakta hoon kisi ko bhi.

JazakAllah Khair


report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Jinn's avatar
Unspecified
2,891
Brother
279
Jinn's avatar
#20 [Permalink] Posted on 5th May 2014 01:21
ASSALAMU ALAIKUM

27 Jamadil Ula 1435 (29 March 2014)

Aajiz Naqshbundi

Your e-mail dated 27 March 2014 refers.

In brief, the villain whom you have described is Abush Shaitaan or the Father of Shaitaan. In fact, he is worse than Iblees. He is a fraud, debaucher, adulterer - a vile criminal perpetrating all his immorality and filth in the name of the Deen.

Was-salaam

A.S. Desai

For

Mujlisul Ulama of S.A.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+6 -0Like x 2Winner x 2
back to top
Rank Image
dr76's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
2,178
Brother
5,852
dr76's avatar
#21 [Permalink] Posted on 5th May 2014 05:40
I have done the needful.. so plz move the thread on public.

Jazakallah khair
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1
back to top
#22 [Permalink] Posted on 6th May 2014 03:43
salam alaikum

Alhumdulilah Molana has realised don't know why he is changing Shaykh every few months. if he wants an aamil Shaykh then he should give Baiyaa to Shaykh Bilal of Bury In'sha'Allah he will be able to help him.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Arfatzafar's avatar
Offline
India
1,269
Brother
1,586
Arfatzafar's avatar
#23 [Permalink] Posted on 6th May 2014 09:02
(salaam)

What's the purpose of this thread...?

Lets expose ulama/shuyukh's faults?

ulama are too coward to speak the truth (in form of fatwa) against the wrong shaykh ?

Amliat can make us scared?

Tantriks are reliable ?

Some of us are highly superstitious?
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Disagree x 5Winner x 1Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
27,246
Brother
9,735
abu mohammed's avatar
#24 [Permalink] Posted on 6th May 2014 10:53
What's the purpose of this thread...? Expose Baatil

Lets expose ulama/shuyukh's faults? Yes, the dodgy ones

ulama are too coward to speak the truth (in form of fatwa) against the wrong shaykh ? Some thing is wrong somewhere!

Amliat can make us scared? :)

Tantriks are reliable ? It was a lesson within a lesson

Some of us are highly superstitious? Unfortunately
report post quote code quick quote reply
+6 -0Like x 2Winner x 4
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
1,011
Brother
881
#25 [Permalink] Posted on 6th May 2014 14:22
afriki_haqq wrote:
View original post

Please stay far far away from this maulana t, madani. Whatever he calls himself as he is a very very unreliable person. This warning is especially to sisters who are easily impressionable. Please note nobody should contact him sharing their experiences with nur uz zaman as madani/maualaana T whatever you want to call him is equally unreliable. This is a strong warning as a believer in not bitten in the same whole twice. I shall start another thread for this. This is nothing personal against him but I have little regard for those who marry women without the permission of their wali and then quote out of all people bin baz....should show you the stupidity of the individual.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+4 -0Like x 1Agree x 2
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
74
Brother
166
#26 [Permalink] Posted on 7th May 2014 11:11
30
Assalamualaykum,

Those who are juhalaa and/or emotionally tied up with 'Shaykh' Noor Zaman and as such fail to comprehend the tone of the following fatwa are requested simply to suspend judgement, and not comment on the strong language employed therein. Rather, appreciate the fact that Allah (azza wa jal) has kept behind a few Ulama-e-Haqq in this belated age, through whom Haqq is differentiated from Baatil, regardless of how many followers Baatil acquires.

NOORZAMAN "NAQSHABANDI" "SHAZLI"

THE BEDFELLOW OF SHAITAAN MASQUERADING AS A SPIRITUAL GUIDE
(SHAIKH)


THIS IS A SPECIAL WARNING FOR WOMEN TO BEWARE OF THIS DEVIL ON THE INTERNET. HE OPERATES FROM KARACHI, PAKISTAN. HE EXPLOITS STUPID WOMEN FOR ATTAINMENT OF SEXUAL GRATIFICATION IN THE NAME OF ISLAM.

HE IMPOSES ON WOMEN TO REVEAL THEIR FACES, BODIES AND MORE ON THE PRETENCE OF TREATING THEM FOR JADOO (MAGIC), ETC. IT IS HARAAM FOR WOMEN TO REVEAL THEIR FACES TO UNSCRUPULOUS SHAYAATEEN IN HUMAN FORM. DON'T DEFILE YOUR MODESTY AND YOUR SACRED BODY TO GRATIFY THE FILTHY URGES OF THE DEVIL IN HUMAN FORM.

HE CLAIMS TO BE IN TOUCH WITH THE GREAT AULIYA WHO HAVE DIED MORE THAN A THOUSAND YEARS AGO, YET LIKE A MUNAAFIQ HE ABANDONS SALAAT CLAIMING THAT MAGIC HAS BEEN PERPETRATED ON HIM. HE CLAIMS TO APPOINT ABDAALS, YET HE PROPAGATES THAT IT IS PERMISSIBLE FOR FEMALES TO SAY TO THEIR "SHAIKH" --"I LOVE YOU." A WOMAN WHO FALLS IN THIS TRAP, IN REALITY SAYS TO SHAITAAN: "I LOVE YOU."

BEWARE OF THIS IMPOSTER ON THE INTERNET PAGES. DON'T EVER EXPOSE YOUR FACES TO HIM. DON'T POLLUTE YOUR MODESTY AND CHASTITY BY SOILING YOURSELF WITH THIS SHAITAANUL INS, OR BETTER - ABUSH SHAITAAN - THE FATHER OF THE DEVIL.

WOMEN CAN, EVEN BY APPLYING THEIR DEFECTIVE INTELLIGENCE, UNDERSTAND THE VILLAINY AND SHAITAANIYAT OF THIS VILLAIN PARADING AS A "SHAIKH". BUT THEY ARE SIMPLY NOT APPLYING THEIR MINDS WHEN THEY EXPOSE THEMSELVES ON THE INTERNET AND VIDEO TO THE SHAITAAN WHO ROBS THEM OF THEIR HAYA.

THE GULLIBILITY WHICH WOMEN DISPLAY WHEREBY THEY DENUDE THEMSELVES FOR THE VILE GRATIFICATION OF THE DEVIL, IS ALMOST UNFORGIVEABLE. IMMODESTY AND LEWDNESS ARE NEVER THE EFFECTS OF 'NUQS FIL AQL' WHICH IS THE NATURAL ATTRIBUTE OF WOMEN. EXPOSING THEMSELVES TO MALES, ESPECIALLY DEVILS WHO CLAIM TO BE 'SPIRITUAL GUIDES', IS THE EFFECT OF THE BESTIAL NAFS, NOT THE EFFECT OF MISUNDERSTANDING WHICH CAN BE THE EFFECT OF DEFECTIVE INTELLIGENCE.

WOMEN WHO FREQUENT THE INTERNET ARE AGAIN WARNED TO BE ON THEIR GUARD FOR THIS NOORZAMAN SHAITAAN MASQUERADING AS A 'SAINT' AND A 'SHAIKH'.

THIS BEDFELLOW OF SHAITAAN IS NEITHER A NAQSHABANDI NOR A SHAZLI. IN REALITY HE IS A SHAITAANI. HENCEFORTH HIS NAME IS ZULMATZAMAAN (THE DARKNESS OF THE AGE), NOT NOORZAMAN.

[Mujlisul Ulama]
report post quote code quick quote reply
+6 -0Like x 1Winner x 2
back to top
Rank Image
Arslan.'s avatar
Unspecified
909
Brother
82
Arslan.'s avatar
#27 [Permalink] Posted on 7th May 2014 11:33
Masha'Allah, one of the FEW 'ulamaa' who isn't afraid to pass a fatwa against him.

Im sure no one will have any objections to a fatwa against abush-shaytaan.

May Allah give us all the tawfeeq to speak the truth. Ameen.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+4 -0Like x 4Ameen x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,537
Brother
131
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#28 [Permalink] Posted on 7th May 2014 11:37

Arslan. wrote:
View original post

If this was an "English" problem then I would suggest going through his Bayans and highlighting his mistakes something like "Shaykh" Akram Owaisi but since this is mostly a Pakistani/Urdu issue then those in Pakistan should most certainly do that...

The problem with Shaykh (Mufti) A.S. Desai (HA)'s Fatwaas are is that many will simply ignore it due to language and tone and not pay attention.

 

report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,537
Brother
131
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#29 [Permalink] Posted on 7th May 2014 11:40
The method of our Akabir is to make people convinced of the error of the Baatil as much as possible.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
1,011
Brother
881
#30 [Permalink] Posted on 7th May 2014 11:48
Muadh_Khan wrote:
View original post

I would agree with you muadh. The best thing to do would be to go through the bayans of nur uz zaman and analyse the mistakes. Apparently his last bayan has something where he justifies I love you from a mureedah to a shaykh. These kind of extracts should be transcribed and then thoroughly refuted from a fiqhi perspective. If one looks at mufti zameel ur rahman's fatwas then the methodology adopted is very convincing. The time of giving short 1 line fatwas are long gone. Maybe for the villager in India that was sufficient but these days our opponents bring heaps and heaps of evidence in a professional manner thus confusing the masses. G F Haddad is a good example.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+3 -0Like x 1Agree x 2
back to top

Jump to page: