Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

Whose is more senior?

You have contributed 0.0% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
To appreciate this topic, click 'Appreciate Topic' on the right.
Rank Image
rizmalek's avatar
Offline
Qatar, Doha
443
Brother
328
rizmalek's avatar
#1 [Permalink] Posted on 13th August 2012 13:05
Who is more senior?

Imam Bukhari?

Or

Imam Ghazali?

How and Why?
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,705
Brother
295
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#2 [Permalink] Posted on 13th August 2012 13:43

"rizmalek" wrote:
Whose is more senior? Imam Bukhari? Or Imam Ghazali? How and Why?

W-Salam,

  • In age Imam Bukhari (810-870AD) is Senior to Imam Ghazali (1058–1111 C.E.).
  • As a Scholar of Hadeeth it is the almost unanimous that Imam Bukhari (RA) is Ameerul-Mumineen Fil Hadeeth
  • As far as strength of hadeeth Saheeh Bukhari it is almost unanimous that it is the most Authentic Book after Qur'aan

    • Some (minority) Ulamah regard Muwatta Imam Malik (RA) to be most Authentic
    • None of the Imam Ghazali (RA)'s books even make the grade on account of authenticity of Hadeeth
  • Imam Ghazali (RA) was a brilliant Scholar in his own right but not in Hadeeth.

Jazakullah Khairun

report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
rizmalek's avatar
Offline
Qatar, Doha
443
Brother
328
rizmalek's avatar
#3 [Permalink] Posted on 13th August 2012 19:12
Any more evidence / arguments. I want to show this to some idiot at work who told me sahih Bukhari is no good.

report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
27,481
Brother
9,579
abu mohammed's avatar
#4 [Permalink] Posted on 13th August 2012 20:00

"rizmalek" wrote:
Any more evidence / arguments. I want to show this to some idiot at work who told me sahih Bukhari is no good.

Imam Ghazali would not have had such a status if Imam Bukhari hadn't compiled the famous books of Hadith. The Muslim ummah owe Imam Bukhari greatly, that would include Imam Ghazali too.That's just my opinion.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Yasin's avatar
UK
6,700
Brother
944
Yasin's avatar
#5 [Permalink] Posted on 13th August 2012 20:08
rizmalek wrote:
Any more evidence / arguments. I want to show this to some idiot at work who told me sahih Bukhari is no good.

Did you ask him on what basis?
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
rizmalek's avatar
Offline
Qatar, Doha
443
Brother
328
rizmalek's avatar
#6 [Permalink] Posted on 14th August 2012 02:29
Yasin wrote:
rizmalek wrote:
Any more evidence / arguments. I want to show this to some idiot at work who told me sahih Bukhari is no good.

[/quote]Did you ask him on what basis?[/quote]


He was singing Michael Jackson and I told him that he's fasting and singing.

He needs to fear Allah and stop cos music and singing is haram.

He said no, music ain't haram and started chatting crap.

So I told him this hadith

[quote]�"The Prophet, peace be upon him, said:

"There will be (at some future time) people from my ummah (community of Muslims) who will seek to make lawful: fornication, the wearing of silk, wine-drinking and the use of musical instruments (ma'azif). Some people will stay at the side of the mountain and when their shepherd comes in the evening to ask them for his needs, they will say, 'Return to us tomorrow 'Then Allah will destroy them during the night by causing the mountain to fall upon them, while He changes others into apes and swine. They will remain in such a state until the Day of Resurrection." (hadeeth #494B in Vol. 6, Sahih Al-Bukhari)


Then he said no that's crap because Imam ghazali said its ok.

And called me salafi lol.

I then told him that he needs to repent.

Later he sent me that Arabic email I sent you to translate that apparently states imam ghazalis argument / conversation of justifying music.

I asked him what madhab he follows and he said Malik, so quoted him back via email

[quote]You're a Maliki - so I'm sending you an extract from Imam Malik's book of Fiqh. So what will you do with this knowledge?

Imam Malik
It is related by Ibnul-Jowzi that Ishaq bin Esaa At-Tabaa asked Imam Malik bin Anas, the leading jurisprudence of Madinah, about the view of the people of Madinah regarding singing (ghinaa). He replied,
"In fact, that is done by the sinful ones."
Abut-teeb At-Tabari said,
"As for Malik bin Anas, he truly did prohibit singing and listening to it."
He further related that Malik said,
"If one purchased a servant-girl and found her to be a professional singer, he could return her to the original owner for reimbursement on the claim of having found fault in the merchandise."
The ruling of prohibition (tahreem) is generally agreed upon by the scholars of Madinah.
The Maliki jurisprudence and commentator, Al-Qurtubi, reports Ibn Khuwayz Mandad, as saying that Imam Malik had learned singing and music as a small boy until his mother encouraged him to leave it for a study of the religious sciences. He did, and his view became that such things were prohibited.
Al-Qurtubi confirmed Malik's view by saying that the only exception to this general ruling was the type of innocent songs such as those sung to placate the camels during travel, or during hard labor or boredom or during times of festivity and joy, such as the Eid days and weddings-the latter to the accompaniment of a simple duff(hand drum).
Al-Qurtubi then said,
"As for that which is done in our day, by way of the (blameworthy) innovations (bidah) of the Sufi mystics in addition to their hearing songs to the accompaniment of melodious instruments such as flutes, string instruments etc. such is haram (forbidden)."


The next day I told him, your a Maliki and you ain't following Maliki ruling, rather you nafs, so your a SALAFI!

Then he shut up.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Seifeddine-M's avatar
London
4,762
Brother
4,174
Seifeddine-M's avatar
#7 [Permalink] Posted on 14th August 2012 02:46
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
rizmalek's avatar
Offline
Qatar, Doha
443
Brother
328
rizmalek's avatar
#8 [Permalink] Posted on 14th August 2012 08:30
Shaykh Abdul-Fattaah Abu Ghuddah (RA) states in 'Atta'aleeqaatul Haafilah' pg.118,

'Imaam Ghazzaaly (RA) was unique in regards to the knowledge of Jurisprudence, its principles, Tasawwuf, beliefs, philosophy and others
except for the knowledge of Hadith, for verily he did not spare time to master it. And he has mentioned regarding himself in his book, 'Qaanoonut ta-aweel' (pg.16), 'And my knowledge of Hadith is but scanty.'



Shaykh Abdul Fattaah further states another reason for this,

'Perhaps his excuse for doing that (i.e. including fabrications in Ihyaa) is that he relied on the book, 'Qootul Quloob' of Abu Taalib Makki and he mentioned those Ahaadith therefrom.' (Ibid)

SOURCE : www.sunniforum.com/forum/showthread.php?42854-Downloading...]
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
rizmalek's avatar
Offline
Qatar, Doha
443
Brother
328
rizmalek's avatar
#9 [Permalink] Posted on 14th August 2012 11:13
imam Ghazali's apparent permission to allow music is well known to be misinterpreted.
Imam Ghazali actually forbade the use of musical instrument in majority scenearios - Here is an extract translation from Imam Ghazali's Ihya Ulumuddin

"It is not permissible to enter the house of a person without his permission to investigate secret sins he commits behind closed and locked doors. But if the sounds of musical instruments and games are heard from outside, those who hear those sounds can enter the house and break the musical instruments."

"Avoiding the manufacture of musical instruments and similar prohibited tools is [tantamount to] avoiding zulm [sin, cruelty]."

These are from Ihya (second volume, pages 218 and 802 in the most widely available Turkish translation).

In Kimya (and with different wording in Ihya) he states:

"Praising the Prophet [sallallahu alayhe wa sallam] is an ibadat [good and serious deed]. It is not permissible to do so with daf which is an instrument of entertainment."

Note that Imam Ghazali states that "daf" is permitted under many conditions (in weddings, in Muslim festivals [ıyds], etc), but not when praising the Prophet. This is a very important point, one which seems to be ignored or overlooked by those who use Imam's writings to argue that music with instruments is allowed.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Yasin's avatar
UK
6,700
Brother
944
Yasin's avatar
#10 [Permalink] Posted on 14th August 2012 14:52
I actually wanted to know on what basis he said this about Imam Bukhari
Quote:
Then he said no that's crap
- forget his misunderstanding of Imam Ghazali or his ignorance about Salafis, there's no reason you should go out of your way to prove something without knowing the basis of his argument because as far as I can see, he has none. He just wants Music to be Halaal so he'll find anything. If he misunderstood Imam Bukhari or anyone else instead, he'd say they're bigger than Imam Ghazali. So ask him, on what basis does he swear at Imam Bukhari or reject him?
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,705
Brother
295
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#11 [Permalink] Posted on 14th August 2012 15:11

Asslamo Allaikum All,

I am struggling to understand something here...

WHY is someone who follows Maliki Madhab quoting an opinion of a Shaf'ae (Imam Ghazali (RA)) who is NOT even regarded as the top Faqih in his own (Shaf'ae Madhab)? To prempt the next question the two most reliable Fuqaha of the Shaf'ae Madhab are:

  1. Imam Nawawi (RA)
  2. Imam Rifai (RA)
  • Where they both agree it is the Madhab
  • Where they disagree Imam Nawawi (RA)'s opinion takes precedence

Jazakullah Khairun

report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1
back to top