In a very sad story available on the BBC website, when mentioning the cruelty on the deceased Khyra Ishaq, the reporter makes a very important Sunnah sound like barbaric torture on the child(ren).
The reporter writes:
Many illiterate uneducated people even know that Muslims eat with their hand and sitting on the floor yet this reporter probably knowingly states this fact as part of the torture. No matter what was intended, but the fact that Muslims have left the Sunnah opens up ways to write such things without the reporters feeling it may be of any offense or discrimination towards Muslims.
The story itself is horrific enough without me finding any indirect attacks on Sunnah. Who is there to blame? The reporters who ensure that no one is offended unless Muslims are or the Muslims who have left true Sunnah to such an extent that it's easy to attack it?
The reporter writes:
"The court was told Khyra and the other children were occasionally fed porridge, dry bread and fruit.
They would have to eat with their hands on the floor of the small upstairs room they shared."
Many illiterate uneducated people even know that Muslims eat with their hand and sitting on the floor yet this reporter probably knowingly states this fact as part of the torture. No matter what was intended, but the fact that Muslims have left the Sunnah opens up ways to write such things without the reporters feeling it may be of any offense or discrimination towards Muslims.
The story itself is horrific enough without me finding any indirect attacks on Sunnah. Who is there to blame? The reporters who ensure that no one is offended unless Muslims are or the Muslims who have left true Sunnah to such an extent that it's easy to attack it?
