Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

Mufti Taqi Usmani speech on Tabligh split

You have contributed 0.0% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf
Rank Image
sheikhonderun's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
150
Brother
156
sheikhonderun's avatar
#1 [Permalink] Posted on 13th February 2025 19:20
In my travels to different parts of the world, the Tabligh Jamaat has benefited the general Muslims far more than any other group. Allah has blessed this effort.

But how did this happen?

Ml Ilyas Kandhlawi رحمة الله عليه alone with a heart burned with fervour for Muslims to return to their religion. With this, he started the effort.

Did Ml Ilyas Kandhlawi رحمة الله عليه initially intend to create a partisan group? Was the purpose to develop an Emir? Was the intent to form a Shura? Was the intent to establish one specific Markaz? Was there some strategic plan? Was there a committee? Was there any report? Was there any budget? Was there to make a secretary? None of this was the objective.

The actual objective was what? To call people to Allah, his religion, one’s self-rectification. He stood with sincerity, solely for Allah’s pleasure.  So he can say before Allah with conscience, ‘I did what I could for your religion.’

Over time, yes, Emir is created, Shura is created. That’s fine. But this is not the objective. Making a partisan group is not the objective. Companions of the Prophet (saw) were not brought together to form a group. Darul Uloom Deoband was initially just a teacher and student. It wasn’t to create a group.  

Deficiencies occur when the group itself becomes the objective. Initially, the objective was Allah, religion, and sincerity, but later, the group itself became the objective.

This deviance has caused one Muslim to fight another Muslim. It has reached such a level that people have inflicted physical harm on others. Some have been killed. Incidents in Bangladesh are worth crying tears of blood for. If Ml Ilyas رحمة الله عليه had been alive, he would have shed tears of blood.

If Tabligh's effort has been split, let it be. I made efforts earlier to prevent this division. It's unfortunate, but it couldn’t be prevented, and it's done.

So now tell me. Is belonging to a particular group the objective? Or is aiding Islam the objective? Tell me. Is the effort the objective? Or belonging to a specific group the objective? For Allah’s sake, stop condemning one another.

Whoever takes Allah’s name and is inviting towards the religion is welcome. Think of them as your own. Deal them with love. Don’t harbour enmity towards them.

What’s the command?

“Read (iqra)” (96:1)

What should you read? Read about the religion. Someone wants to read Fazail Amaal. Someone wants to read Muntakhab Hadith. Both are under the commandment of ‘read.’ There is a slight difference in the methodology. But dividing the Muslims is not something the Prophet (saw) would ever approve of.

Someone wants to learn the religion. My focus is he doesn’t go to any other teacher but learns only from me. Would this be called sincerity or vanity? If someone is learning the religion from one group, why bear enmity towards him? He is also doing your work.

Tabiin would state when we would ask a question from one of the Companions (rad). The Companion (rad) would say, "Go to this companion; he is much more knowledgeable. Go ask him." When they would go to that companion (rad), he would say, "Go ask another companion." Sometimes, they would go to different companions and return to the companion they had initially asked.

What did they want? Each companion wished the other companion to gain the blessing of teaching the religion. They deemed this better for themselves.

Fame was not the objective.

Nowadays, people are focused on creating a name for themselves. I swear on Allah, if Ml Ilyas رحمة الله عليه knew the world would eventually know of him, he wouldn’t have begun this effort. He رحمة الله عليه did this solely for Allah.   

Who belongs to my group belongs to me. Who doesn’t belong to my group is not mine. He is my enemy. If required, I will fight with him. If needed, I will kill him. Allah protect us. If it has reached such depravity, know this is the devil’s work. When a Muslim is willing to kill another Muslim, know this is the devil’s work.

The Companions (rad) differed, but they had the company of the Prophet (saw). Even after conflicts among themselves, they remained the Companions of the Prophet (saw). Why? Because both sides were sincere.

But in our times, killing among Muslims. One pushes, condemns, willing to stone or shoot the other. This is solely the devil’s work.

Alhumdulillah, there are people from both sides in this gathering. This made me happy that people have gathered only for Allah and to aid his religion. InshAllah, Allah will shower blessings on this gathering. Remove this hatred and malice from your hearts.

Come to the understanding that, yes, we have separated, but we will not forgo our objective. What is that?

“Read (iqra)” (96:1)

Hold firmly on ‘read (iqra)’. Read and study the religion. Teach the religion. Spread the religion.

Whoever brings someone closer to the religion, consider him your brother. Don’t consider him your enemy. Live among each other with love.

Good, we see from the effort is due to the blessings of Ml Ilyas Kandhlawi رحمة الله عليه, Ml Hussain Ahmed Madani رحمة الله عليه, and Ml Inamul Hasan Kandhlawi رحمة الله عليه. Don’t destroy those blessings by bearing enmity, hatred, and fighting amongst one another.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Winner x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Rajab's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
2,245
Brother
1,030
Rajab's avatar
#2 [Permalink] Posted on 13th February 2025 20:38
As-salāmu ʿalaykum wa raḥmatullāhi wa barakātuh.

Respected Hazrat Aqdas Sheikh-ul-Islam, Maulana Mufti Muhammad Taqi Usmani Sahib (May Allah prolong his blessings upon you)

On January 28, 2025, at Markaz Darussalam, Tanzania, Africa, you delivered a speech after Maghrib prayer. Additionally, on October 6, in Madina Munawwara, you had a conversation with Saad Kandhalvi. From both of these, the message that reached the Ummah is that despite Saad Kandhalvi’s deviant beliefs and ideologies, it is permissible to work with him in the field of Dawah under his leadership.

Now, I have a brief question for you:

Do any of the four Imams (Imam Abu Hanifa, Imam Malik, Imam Shafi'i, or Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal) allow or provide room for blasphemy against the Prophets, disrespect toward the Companions, distortion of the Qur'an, or fabrication in Hadith? Because Saad Kandhalvi engages in these actions, and major Darul Iftas have issued fatwas confirming his deviation. However, you have likened Saad Kandhalvi’s deviation to the scholarly differences among the four Imams.

If your answer is "Yes", then kindly clarify which Imam permits such actions.

If your answer is "No", then safeguard yourself from introducing a new concept into Islam. Otherwise, the world will say that the four Imams never permitted following a deviant, but in the 14th century, a great Sheikh-ul-Islam emerged who made things easy for the Ummah and opened the door for following a deviant—allowing people to blaspheme the Prophets, disrespect the Companions, distort the Qur’an, and fabricate Hadith, all under the pretense of unity and cooperation. May Allah accept this ijtihad of yours.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
3,832
Brother
3,888
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf's avatar
#3 [Permalink] Posted on 13th February 2025 22:09
Rajab wrote:
View original post


Who is the questioner?
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Rajab's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
2,245
Brother
1,030
Rajab's avatar
#4 [Permalink] Posted on 13th February 2025 23:19
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf wrote:
View original post

a brother from India
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
akbar703's avatar
Offline
India
1,807
Brother
151
akbar703's avatar
#5 [Permalink] Posted on 14th February 2025 01:32
sheikhonderun wrote:
View original post


What is the solution?
what contribution is expected from saathees from both groups who are on the field .
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
sheikhonderun's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
150
Brother
156
sheikhonderun's avatar
#6 [Permalink] Posted on 14th February 2025 03:56
akbar703 wrote:
View original post


Mufti Taqi Usmani indicated that people should 'read' or get educated. I believe that through education (provided there is sincerity), people will gain direction and clarity on what they should do.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
akbar703's avatar
Offline
India
1,807
Brother
151
akbar703's avatar
#7 [Permalink] Posted on 14th February 2025 06:58
Mufti Usmani DB has offered a solution.
There should not have been 4 madhabs, today they exist.

The ethics followed by madhabis, follow your madhab, don't interfere in others madhab.

Similarly today, tableeghis must get busy in their respective groups and don't interfere in other group.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Rajab's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
2,245
Brother
1,030
Rajab's avatar
#8 [Permalink] Posted on 14th February 2025 07:08
akbar703 wrote:
View original post

so basically disregard erroneous statements of molvi Saad and continue to obey him? He make new gaffes at every ijtema he goes to and as recent as in mumbai this very month.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
akbar703's avatar
Offline
India
1,807
Brother
151
akbar703's avatar
#9 [Permalink] Posted on 14th February 2025 07:12
Rajab wrote:
View original post


One can be in tableegh with disassociating himself from maulana saad. We disassociated from many ijtihads of maulana saad from 1995-2014.

We kept a filter on what to take and what not to take from maulana saad. Similarly saathees who are associated with nizamuddin continue to do noble work of dawah but disassociate themselves from maulana saad. In practical they have not accepted many of his instructions:
1. dawat taleem isteqbal, even their city markaz are not aabaad with this.
2. Daily Quran halqa for ladies at home
3. 3 years for ulema
4. Reading Muntakhab ahadees.
5. Dawah must be given in masjid only, forcibly bring the saathees to masjid and give dawah.
6. 8 hours per day for masjid ki aabaadi, 4 months every year.

This is a sample list, the list is big.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
akbar703's avatar
Offline
India
1,807
Brother
151
akbar703's avatar
#10 [Permalink] Posted on 14th February 2025 07:30
Rajab wrote:
View original post


One can be in tableegh even after disassociating himself with maulana saad. Large number of sathees do that. Dump whatever you think is wrong at the gates of banglae wali masjid and carry the positives. We did it from 1995 to 2014.

There were sahaba (a big list and akabir) who were present during Yazeed and Hajjaj bin yusuf period, they were silent but disassociated themselves from the two. Also they didn't participate in the mission of Hazrat hussain RA or Zubair bin Asma RA
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top