Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

Indian congress party distances from Indian muslims

You have contributed 0.0% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
To appreciate this topic, click 'Appreciate Topic' on the right.
Rank Image
akbar703's avatar
Offline
India
1,329
Brother
80
akbar703's avatar
#1 [Permalink] Posted on 27th February 2023 15:49
Indian political party Congress has removed picture of Muslim leader Maulana Abul Kalam Azad from its 85th annual meeting advertisement.

Till now..... Indian freedom fighter and close associate of Mahatma Gandhi and Nehru, Abul Kalam azad's picture was always presented by Congress Party.

May be, their body language indicates....... no one can satisfy Indian muslims, they continue to vote for their own religious party. And ruling party's propaganda is Congress party gives undue advantages and benefits to Indian Muslims.

A message to UK muslims.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
Rajab's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
1,902
Brother
932
Rajab's avatar
#2 [Permalink] Posted on 27th February 2023 18:55
Recalling a Legend: Abul Kalam Azad (1888-1958)

Abul Kalam Azad was one of the towering figures of the Indian freedom movement. A scholar, a journalist, a statesman, a religious leader and a nationalist, he was a multi-faceted personality who played an important role in shaping the destiny of modern India.

Born in Mecca in 1888, Azad was brought to Calcutta at a young age by his father, who was a scholar and teacher. Azad soon emerged as a child prodigy, mastering several languages and displaying a remarkable aptitude for learning. His father, recognizing his talents, gave him the best possible education and exposed him to a wide range of intellectual traditions.

Azad’s education was marked by a deep engagement with Islamic theology and philosophy, which left a lasting impression on his worldview. He was also deeply influenced by the ideas of modernity and progress that were sweeping through Europe and America in the early 20th century. These twin influences – traditional Islamic learning and modern secular ideas – came together to shape his vision of an India that was both modern and true to its heritage.

Azad was only 16 when he began his career as a journalist, writing for a number of Urdu and English newspapers. His writings soon earned him a reputation as a brilliant young thinker and he became a leading voice of the anti-colonial movement in India.

In 1912, Azad joined the Indian National Congress, which was then at the forefront of the struggle for Indian independence. He soon became a close associate of Mahatma Gandhi, who recognized his talents and appointed him to several key positions within the Congress.

Azad played a crucial role in the Congress-led civil disobedience movement of 1930-31, which saw tens of thousands of Indians take to the streets to protest against British rule. He was imprisoned along with other Congress leaders, but continued to inspire and lead the movement from behind bars.

After India gained independence in 1947, Azad became the country’s first Minister of Education, a position he held until his death in 1958. As Education Minister, he played a key role in shaping India’s educational policy and institutions, laying the foundation for the country’s system of higher education.

Azad’s legacy lives on in modern India, where he is remembered as a towering figure who fought tirelessly for the country’s freedom and helped lay the foundations of its democracy and educational system. His life and work serve as an inspiration to generations of Indians, and his vision of a modern, secular and inclusive India remains as relevant today as it was in his time.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
Rajab's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
1,902
Brother
932
Rajab's avatar
#3 [Permalink] Posted on 27th February 2023 19:06
There has been a concerted effort in recent years to marginalise Maulana Azad and diminish India's Islamic heritage. If the Congress party does not rise up in these circumstances and demonstrate its commitment to the entire idea of India, for which leaders like Maulana Azad fought until their last breath, it is understandable that the party will follow in the footsteps of Hindutva forces. The only difference is that while Hindutva forces actively target Muslims and other minority religious communities, the Congress does so by ignoring and marginalising minority concerns and members.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
3,474
Brother
3,802
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf's avatar
#4 [Permalink] Posted on 27th February 2023 19:37
Malcolm X spoke about this nearly 60 years ago. About the conservative/nationalists and the Liberals being two sides of the same coin. The Conservative is like a Wolf who does not hide his enemity. The Liberal is like a Fox treacherous and deceitful.

I will post extracts from his speech below. And if you replace the words America with India, Conservative with BJP and Negroes and Blacks with Muslim and White with Hindu. It perfectly fits the situation of the muslims in India.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
3,474
Brother
3,802
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf's avatar
#5 [Permalink] Posted on 27th February 2023 19:42
Bismillah.

Malcolm X (aka Al Hajj Malik el Shabazz.)

In this deceitful American game of power politics, the Negroes (i.e., the race problem, the integration and civil rights issues) are nothing but tools, used by one group of whites called Liberals against another group of whites called Conservatives, either to get into power or to remain in power. Among whites here in America, the political teams are no longer divided into Democrats and Republicans. The whites who are now struggling for control of the American political throne are divided into "liberal" and "conservative" camps. The white liberals from both parties cross party lines to work together toward the same goal, and white conservatives from both parties do likewise......

"Let us examine briefly some of the tricky strategy used by white liberals to harness and exploit the political energies of the Negro. The crooked politicians in Washington, D.C., purposely make a big noise over the proposed civil rights legislation. By blowing up the civil rights issue they skillfully add false importance to the Negro civil rights "leaders." Once the image of these Negro civil rights "leaders" has been blown up way beyond its proper proportion, these same Negro civil rights "leaders" are then used by white liberals to influence and control the Negro voters, all for the benefit of the white politicians who pose as liberals, who pose as friends of the Negro.

The white conservatives aren't friends of the Negro either, but they at least don't try to hide it. They are like wolves; they show their teeth in a snarl that keeps the Negro always aware of where he stands with them. But the white liberals are foxes, who also show their teeth to the Negro but pretend that they are smiling. The white liberals are more dangerous than the conservatives; they lure the Negro, and as the Negro runs from the growling wolf, he flees into the open jaws of the "smiling" fox.

The job of the Negro civil rights leader is to make the Negro forget that the wolf and the fox both belong to the (same) family. Both are canines; and no matter which one of them the Negro places his trust in, he never ends up in the White House, but always in the dog house.

The white liberals control the Negro and the Negro vote by controlling the Negro civil rights leaders. As long as they control the Negro civil rights leaders, they can also control and contain the Negro's struggle, and they can control the Negro's so-called revolt. The Negro "revolution" is controlled by these foxy white liberals, by the government itself. But the black revolution is controlled only by God.


The white liberal differs from the white conservative only in one way: the liberal is more deceitful than the conservative. The liberal is more hypocritical than the conservative. Both want power, but the white liberal is the one who has perfected the art of posing as the Negro's friend and benefactor; and by winning the friendship, allegiance, and support of the Negro, the white liberal is able to use the Negro as a pawn or tool in this political "football game" that is constantly raging between the white liberals and white conservatives.

Politically the American Negro is nothing but a football and the white liberals control this mentally dead ball through tricks of tokenism: false promises of integration and civil rights. In this profitable game of deceiving and exploiting the political politician of the American Negro, those white liberals have the willing cooperation of the Negro civil rights leaders. These "leaders" sell out our people for just a few crumbs of token recognition and token gains. These "leaders" are satisfied with token victories and token progress because they themselves are nothing but token leaders."
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
akbar703's avatar
Offline
India
1,329
Brother
80
akbar703's avatar
#6 [Permalink] Posted on 28th February 2023 01:22
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf wrote:
View original post


Rajab wrote:
View original post


What is happening today in India, it didn't happen earlier under secular government. Now you please judge what secular government gave to Indian Muslims.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
akbar703's avatar
Offline
India
1,329
Brother
80
akbar703's avatar
#7 [Permalink] Posted on 6th February 2024 10:05
This Indian state is implementing Uniform civil code.

Uttarakhand Civil Code: Rules For Divorce

  • Both men and women can approach a court to file for divorce on grounds of adultery, mental or physical cruelty by spouse, desertion without any reasonable cause, religious conversion by the spouse, unsoundness of mind, venereal diseases etc.
  • Women have special rights to seek divorce if the husband has been found guilty of rape or any other offence related to unnatural sex and if the husband has more than one wife.
  • A couple cannot approach the court for divorce in less than one year of their marriage, except in exceptional cases. (Hmmmm)


Uttarakhand Civil Code: Rules For Marriage

  • Registration for marriage has been made compulsory. The registration will have to be done in 60 days after the marriage.
  • All marriages after March 26, 2010, will have to be registered within six months.
  • Non-registration of marriage will entail a maximum fine of Rs 20,000. However, not registering a marriage will not make it invalid.
  • A marriage can be solemnised between a couple if neither the man nor the woman have a spouse living at the time of the marriage.
  • The man must have completed the age of 21 years and the woman 18 years.
  • At the time of the marriage, neither party should be incapable of giving valid consent in consequence of unsoundness of mind.
  • Even if they are capable of giving valid consent, neither party should be suffering from a mental disorder of such a kind so as to be unfit for marriage.
  • Marriages may be solemnised in accordance with the religious beliefs, practices, customary rites and ceremonies, including, but not limited to Saptapadi, Ashirvad Nikah, Holy Union, Anand Karaj under The Anand Marriage Act 1909 as well as under, but not limited to, The Special Marriage Act 1954 and Arya Marriage Validation Act, 1937.

Uttarakhand Civil Code: Rules For Live-In Relationships


  • Partners in live-in relationships, whether they are residents of Uttarakhand or not, have to submit a declaration to the district registrar. Uttarakhand's residents staying outside the state also have to submit a statement.
  • A copy of the declaration will be sent to the parents of the live-in partners if one of them is less than 21 years of age.
  • Children of a couple in live-in relationship will be considered legitimate.
  • A live-in relationship will not be registered if one of the partner is married or is already in a live-in relationship, if one person is a minor, and where the consent of one of the partners was obtained by force, coercion, or fraud.
  • Partners may terminate their live-in relationship by submitting statements to the Registrar.
  • Women deserted in a live-in relationship are entitled to claim maintenance and may approach court.
  • If partners in a live-in relationship fail to submit their declaration, a notice will be sent by the Registrar to submit their statement within 30 days.
  • If partners are in a relationship for more than one month without submitting a statement, the couple may face jail term for three months or a Rs 10,000 fine or both.
  • A false declaration in the statement will result in a jail term of three months or Rs 25,000 fine or both.
  • If live-in partners don't submit a statement after getting a notice, they may face jail term up to six months or be fined Rs 25,000 or both.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
akbar703's avatar
Offline
India
1,329
Brother
80
akbar703's avatar
#8 [Permalink] Posted on 6th February 2024 10:08
akbar703 wrote:
View original post


Quote:
Partners may terminate their live-in relationship by submitting statements to the Registrar.


Divorce after marriage is difficult, a crime....... but simple procedure to break live in relationship. (man made laws)

In the west they won't get married fearing strict procedures for divorce.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
3,474
Brother
3,802
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf's avatar
#9 [Permalink] Posted on 6th February 2024 11:46
Long term situation for muslims in India seems hopeless.
It is not helped by the apathy of the Arab gulf countries.
Or the lack of leadership amongst the Indian muslims.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
akbar703's avatar
Offline
India
1,329
Brother
80
akbar703's avatar
#10 [Permalink] Posted on 6th February 2024 15:09
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf wrote:
View original post


No leader can fight the present regime. The administration is provoking and expecting a knee jerk reaction from muslims to persecute muslims.

All institutions are captured by the rulers. All political leaders live in fear.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
157
Brother
61
#11 [Permalink] Posted on 6th February 2024 15:19
Im not surprised, problem with indian muslims and some madrassahs is they are totally based on deen with no education related to worldy affairs. Muslims then grow up ill equipped to deal with the world and the requirements of the modern world.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
akbar703's avatar
Offline
India
1,329
Brother
80
akbar703's avatar
#12 [Permalink] Posted on 6th February 2024 15:23
Saracen1 wrote:
View original post


What did the muslims who acquired worldly education achieve?

What is the contribution of Jamaat e Islami and salafi groups. all their members are from elite literate class.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
akbar703's avatar
Offline
India
1,329
Brother
80
akbar703's avatar
#13 [Permalink] Posted on 6th February 2024 15:33
Saracen1 wrote:
View original post


Why is that............ elite educated muslims who hold high offices, their concern for ummah begins after their retirement. Till retirement they are busy in concern towards their own family, all their efforts are totally focused on their families.

report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
3,474
Brother
3,802
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf's avatar
#14 [Permalink] Posted on 6th February 2024 15:48
What we are seeing now is a culmination of several decades worth of Anti-Islam propaganda in India.

What we are seeing now is a natural culmination of that, the Leadership from what I saw thought that by professing their love for India and condemning Pakistan in speeches they were helping the Muslims thwart an on slaught. They did not have any concrete plan other then that.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
akbar703's avatar
Offline
India
1,329
Brother
80
akbar703's avatar
#15 [Permalink] Posted on 6th February 2024 15:56
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf wrote:
View original post


Quote:
the Leadership from what I saw thought that by professing their love for India and condemning Pakistan in speeches they were helping the Muslims thwart an on slaught.


Why should Indian muslims support pakistan in their anti-India activities.

Quote:
They did not have any concrete plan other then that.


Indian muslims know and acknowledge what their religious leaders are doing for them.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top