Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

The most concise Article on Tablighi Jamaat Split for general muslims

You have contributed 0.0% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
akbar703, sharjan8643
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
40
Brother
24
#1 [Permalink] Posted on 27th January 2023 15:26
Alhamdulillah, I have written the most concise article regarding the Tablighi Jamaat Split / Ikhtilaaf. It is for the General Public as it is light and not too 'Tablighi'

Just share (this link) on Facebook, WhatsApp, etc, to anyone who wants to know about the Tablighi Jamaat Split Crisis.

https://unite.tablighi-jamaat.com

The beauty of this page is that it is short but has Wikipedia-style subject links for those who want to know more.



Jazakumullah Khair
report post quote code quick quote reply
+3 -0Like x 2
back to top
Rank Image
mSiddiqui's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
607
Brother
123
mSiddiqui's avatar
#2 [Permalink] Posted on 28th January 2023 04:17
due2myweakness wrote:
View original post

JazakAllah Khair brother for all your hard work.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Agree x 1
back to top
Rank Image
akbar703's avatar
Offline
India
1,808
Brother
63
akbar703's avatar
#3 [Permalink] Posted on 28th January 2023 08:16
This is for the information of Maulana Saad sahib supporters.

List of Members of shura constituted by Hazrath Umar رضي الله عنه is:
Hazrat Uthman رضي الله عنه
Hazrat Ali رضي الله عنه
Hazrat Talha رضي الله عنه
Hazrat Zubair رضي الله عنه
Hazrat Sa'd bin Abi Waqas رضي الله عنه
Hazrat Abdur Rahman bin Auf رضي الله عنه

And.... Hazrat Abdullah bin Umar رضي الله عنه will intervene when there is a tie.

Supporters of Maulana Saad sahib db claim that since Hazrat Ali رضي الله عنه was the last member left from the shura.... he was Ameer by default.

We check the year of passing away of these members... we find that Saad bin abi Waqqas رضي الله عنه passed away 14 years later than Hazrat Ali رضي الله عنه, then he was default Ameer after Hazrath Ali رضي الله عنه.
Hazrat Ali رضي الله عنه 40AH
Hazrat Saad bin abi Waqqas رضي الله عنه 54 AH

Hazrat Umar رضي الله عنه strongly opposed that Hazrat Abdullah bin Umar رضي الله عنه shall not be selected Ameer after him. So inheritance theory is negated.

They claim lineage of Abu Bakr Siddiq رضي الله عنه.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
mSiddiqui's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
607
Brother
123
mSiddiqui's avatar
#4 [Permalink] Posted on 28th January 2023 13:43
akbar703 wrote:
View original post

Can an admin please remove this post or the last paragraph. I know you didn't write it. Who ever did is moronic. It is utterly disrespectful.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
akbar703's avatar
Offline
India
1,808
Brother
63
akbar703's avatar
#5 [Permalink] Posted on 28th January 2023 14:00
mSiddiqui wrote:
View original post


We are compelled to give history lessons to these ignorant. This was hidden, Maulana saad sahib and his supporters are compelling us to invite them to read history.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
mSiddiqui's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
607
Brother
123
mSiddiqui's avatar
#6 [Permalink] Posted on 28th January 2023 14:15
akbar703 wrote:
View original post

You only displayed your ignorance by what you wrote. Keep your history lessons to yourself.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Yasin's avatar
UK
6,695
Brother
941
Yasin's avatar
#7 [Permalink] Posted on 28th January 2023 14:42
mSiddiqui wrote:
View original post

Sorry had to dislike your last posts. Ask for clarification. Explain why someone is wrong. Do not condemn. Statements become moronic only after they dodge issues and not answering which has happened here many times.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
mSiddiqui's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
607
Brother
123
mSiddiqui's avatar
#8 [Permalink] Posted on 28th January 2023 15:04
Yasin wrote:
View original post

Mufti Saab he edited his post. I'm not sure if you read what was written. It was something outrightly against the Azmat of a Shahabhi رضی اللہ تعالیٰ عنہ.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
mSiddiqui's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
607
Brother
123
mSiddiqui's avatar
#9 [Permalink] Posted on 28th January 2023 15:07
akbar703 wrote:
View original post

This was written prior to the edit.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
akbar703's avatar
Offline
India
1,808
Brother
63
akbar703's avatar
#10 [Permalink] Posted on 28th January 2023 15:16
mSiddiqui wrote:
View original post


Lineage doesn't stop someone from erring. Yes sahabah are magfoor, their repentance is accepted. They have left this world clean.

But claiming that today's syeds can't err, someone with lineage with hazrath Ali رضي الله عنه can't err.. this is blunder.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
akbar703's avatar
Offline
India
1,808
Brother
63
akbar703's avatar
#11 [Permalink] Posted on 28th January 2023 15:20
mSiddiqui wrote:
View original post


Today grandson of Maulana Anwar shah kashmiri RA is bitter enemy of Ahnaf, Imam abu Hanifa RA and even Hazrat Abdullah ibn Masood RA. He is against ijma of sahabah. He has left ahlussunnah wal jama'ah.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
mSiddiqui's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
607
Brother
123
mSiddiqui's avatar
#12 [Permalink] Posted on 28th January 2023 15:20
akbar703 wrote:
View original post

I never claimed that. Who ever does is incorrect. But the statement you shared disparages the Honor of Sahabah رضی اللہ تعالیٰ عنہم.

Next time please be careful.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
akbar703's avatar
Offline
India
1,808
Brother
63
akbar703's avatar
#13 [Permalink] Posted on 28th January 2023 15:35
mSiddiqui wrote:
View original post


But the incident is not deleted form history books. It has lessons for us.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Yasin's avatar
UK
6,695
Brother
941
Yasin's avatar
#14 [Permalink] Posted on 28th January 2023 17:16
mSiddiqui wrote:
View original post

Dislikes removed. Jzk for explaining. I just checked the original post now and my small advice still stands.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
mSiddiqui's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
607
Brother
123
mSiddiqui's avatar
#15 [Permalink] Posted on 28th January 2023 18:04
akbar703 wrote:
View original post

You are still failing to realize your mistake. Stating the obvious about it being in history books is not a defense for your error. Remember this a public forum. 100's if not 1000's end up viewing what is written.
Every thread or post doesn't need to be treated as a debate.
I'm in no way trying to one up you.

report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Agree x 1
back to top