Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

Pfizer, Oxford and other Vaccines

Jump to page:

You have contributed 0.0% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
abuzayd2k, member2, Yasin, ssaad
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
24,644
Brother
9,125
abu mohammed's avatar
#361 [Permalink] Posted on 8th January 2022 14:30
Loading tweet
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
24,644
Brother
9,125
abu mohammed's avatar
#362 [Permalink] Posted on 8th January 2022 17:18
Double vaccinated London radio host, Majid Nawaz sacked with immediate effect from LBC for his exposure to the tyranny of World governments (with examples given), the British PM, children being vaccinated and boosters.

Mr Nawaz wrote online: “What we do know already, backed up by much academic research, is that MASS-VACCINATION DURING A PANDEMIC, with a jab that has not been studied for long-term side effects, could be doing more harm than good.”
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
547
Brother
-162
#363 [Permalink] Posted on 9th January 2022 04:59
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post
Quote:
Mr [Majid] Nawaz wrote online: “What we do know already, backed up by much academic research, is that MASS-VACCINATION DURING A PANDEMIC, with a jab that has not been studied for long-term side effects, could be doing more harm than good.”

Abdur Rahman ibn Awf wrote:
View original post
Quote:
Maajid Nawaaz is a hostile Islamaphobic swine no credence should be given to him on any topic.
Both members quoted above are respected senior members. Whose opinion takes precedence?
Blocked from replying in this thread.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Facepalm x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
24,644
Brother
9,125
abu mohammed's avatar
#364 [Permalink] Posted on 9th January 2022 12:56
sharjan8643 wrote:
View original post

Brother, you specialise in twisting words and manipulating posts to cause confusion.

You agree for the sake of conversing even if you have no knowledge of the matter.

I shared this news because you, sharjan8643, find much pleasure in listening/watching him. I assume you will be very disappointed on hearing he has been silenced. Whilst in the other hand, it is good news for the Muslims that he won't be able to voice his pathetic views and lies about Islam!
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Winner x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
547
Brother
-162
#365 [Permalink] Posted on 9th January 2022 15:43
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post
Quote:
Brother, you specialise in twisting words and manipulating posts to cause confusion.
Brother AM, I'm very sorry if that is what it appears I'm doing. It is not my intent to cause trouble. I only ask for my own clarification. I don't want to make any assumptions about any members here, which is why I ask rather blunt questions. I'm very sorry if my tone is inappropriate or if my wording/phrasing is inappropriate. Sometimes I need to be walked through simple sentences multiple times before I understand an issue. This was evident in the exchange between Brother Yasin and me a couple of days ago. I only ask that you bear with me as you would with a rather naive and impulsive younger brother.
Blocked from replying in this thread.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
547
Brother
-162
#366 [Permalink] Posted on 9th January 2022 15:51
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post
Quote:
I shared this news because you, sharjan8643, find much pleasure in listening/watching him.
I apologize once again for my sarcasm about Majid Nawaz. It was inappropriate of me.
Quote:
I assume you will be very disappointed on hearing he has been silenced.
Again, my sarcasm was inexcusable. I will try to be more careful.
Quote:
Whilst in the other hand, it is good news for the Muslims that he won't be able to voice his pathetic views and lies about Islam!
It would have been even better if he had been silenced because of his erroneous opinions about Muslims and Islams, but if it's good news for Muslims, It's good news for me.
Blocked from replying in this thread.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
24,644
Brother
9,125
abu mohammed's avatar
#367 [Permalink] Posted on 9th January 2022 16:31
sharjan8643 wrote:
View original post

Quote:
Brother AM, I'm very sorry if that is what it appears I'm doing.

An example of why it appears as it does. This does not come down to sarcasm, rather fitnah mongering

In this post, a very important point was raised and no mention of Majid Nawaz at all, rather, it was a mention of the professor and his comments!
Asaaghir wrote:
View original post

Instead, what you did was diverted everyone's attention away from the actual interview, the actual facts that prove a lot of what we are saying based on similar evidence and you started talking about a secularist.

If this isn't fitnah mongering, then what is it. It most definitely isn't sarcasm!

You were clearly asked to watch the video of the professor, to which you replied in the first instance:

Quote:
Majid Nawaz is always a pleasure to watch/hear.

And then after that you made a mention of something just to make it look like you paid attention to the interview, yet still diverted off topic.

Asaaghir did not mention Majid Nawaz, neither did he comment on it or him afterwards, possibly because he doesn't know of him or didn't want to digress. He let the fitnah stop. But it seems you like to regurgitate rubbish. Perhaps this is narcissistic behaviour or what appears to be a charlatan, Allah knows best.

There is no need to apologies nor is there any need for further clarification because this will just repeat over and over.

So it's better you stop or share something worthwhile.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
547
Brother
-162
#368 [Permalink] Posted on 9th January 2022 17:00
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post
Quote:
So it's better you stop or share something worthwhile.
Thank you. I'll try.
Blocked from replying in this thread.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
547
Brother
-162
#369 [Permalink] Posted on 9th January 2022 17:19
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post
Quote:
So it's better you stop or share something worthwhile.
I have one last very important question to ask. May I?
Blocked from replying in this thread.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Old x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
24,644
Brother
9,125
abu mohammed's avatar
#370 [Permalink] Posted on 10th January 2022 11:29
Asaaghir wrote:
In total there have been 6,682 eye disorders reported as adverse reactions to the Pfizer jab as of 8th Dec 21.

In 2 weeks alone, (up to 22nd Dec 2021) there has been an average of over 55 people a day in the UK who have suffered eye disorders from the vaccines alone.

Pfizer affected an average of 27 people a day in the following 2 weeks!
AstraZeneca affected an average of 8 people a day in the following 2 weeks!
Moderna affected an average of 20 people a day in the following 2 weeks!
Brand Unspecified affected a total of 79 people

These are just those that were reported. Countless more have not even been reported
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
Asaaghir's avatar
Spinistan Throne
1,060
Brother
708
Asaaghir's avatar
#371 [Permalink] Posted on 11th January 2022 15:28
BEFORE
As Muadh_Khan pointed out very rightly with a link, bless him ;)
www.wifaqululama.co.uk/wifaq-pfizer/
WifaqulUlama wrote:
Thus in the light of the available data, official statement and clarification, we have concluded the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine to be permissible for British Muslims.

NOW
youtu.be/lhMbKyDq9_w?t=96 20 seconds from the horses mouth or watch the full interview about the new vaccine v1.1 that will come out in March 2022.

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla
“And we know that the two doses of vaccine offer very little protection if any…..”
"The 3 doses with the booster offers reasonable protection against hospitalisation and death (inaudible for me) and less protection against infection"

PENDING
Given the benefit of doubt, waiting patiently to see a new article or fatwa starting with "This statement is being issued on the 11th of January 2022 and supersedes all previous statements on the subject"
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
24,644
Brother
9,125
abu mohammed's avatar
#372 [Permalink] Posted on 11th January 2022 22:42
Fauci warns of ‘urgent need’ for super vaccine as other variants emerge

New variants will pose continued threat, NIAID chief warns

Dr Anthony Fauci warned at a Senate committee hearing that the US faced an “urgent need” for a so-called super vaccine that would be more effective at preventing new variants of Covid-19 and other coronaviruses.

“Looking ahead in the context of the inevitable continual emergence of new variants, the importance of developing a pan-coronavirus vaccine, namely one that would be effective against all SARS-COVID-2 variants, and ultimately against all coronaviruses, becomes even more apparent,” he told the senators on Tuesday.

He added that there was an “urgent need for such an effort”, and added that NIAID was making significant progress on the issue.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
24,644
Brother
9,125
abu mohammed's avatar
#373 [Permalink] Posted on 13th January 2022 21:37
www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-59989476

US Supreme Court blocks Biden's workplace vaccine mandate

The US Supreme Court has blocked President Joe Biden's rule requiring workers at large companies to be vaccinated or masked and tested weekly.

The justices at the nation's highest court said the mandate exceeded the Biden administration's authority.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
547
Brother
-162
#374 [Permalink] Posted on 14th January 2022 02:47
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post
Quote:
vaccine mandate
Mandates of any kind are always problematic, especially in democratic states. Consensus building is always the way to go. And that requires bipartisan understanding. Unfortunately, these vaccine mandates have become a political tool in many countries because there is so much polarization in politics. Even the science behind it has become politicized.
Blocked from replying in this thread.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
24,644
Brother
9,125
abu mohammed's avatar
#375 [Permalink] Posted on 14th January 2022 10:55
Asaaghir wrote:
View original post

I thought one of the other members would have translated this for you by now, although the title and description of the video does say what happened.

Basically this 12-13 year old child who was given the vaccine by force in Islamiya school in Nihari. The childs father then says that he was a healthy jolly kid who was forced to take the vaccine. He was doing his homework and suddenly died. The reporter then requests PM Imran Khan to take care of these kids..... This is the basic gist of the incident.


One a side note:

When we spoke about these incidents happening around the world, my father in law dismissed it saying that people just put two and two together and link everything to the vaccine and his attitude was that these things were just rumours.

Last nite, my father in law was at a hospital in Karachi (not as a patient) and he said there was a young girl with her father. The girl was there to be vaccinated so she could attend university. She was looking forward to going to university but her parents were not happy for her to be vaccinated. Anyways, she got her vaccine and was told to stay seated for observation for about 15 minutes. During this time, she vomitted profusly and died on the spot! إِنَّا لِلَّٰهِ وَإِنَّا إِلَيْهِ رَاجِعُونَ, Now that my father in law saw this with his own eyes, his views have changed but is helpless because people are being forced into taking the vaccine to carry on with their daily lives, from withdrawing money from banks, to studying, to shopping!

report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top

Jump to page: