Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

The Ottoman Empire

You have contributed 0.0% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
ummi taalib, xs11ax, abu mohammed
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,704
Brother
289
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#16 [Permalink] Posted on 25th October 2019 11:29

Churchill's Humiliation at the Hands of Ottoman Navy

www.telegraph.co.uk/history/world-war-one/11561066/Gallip...

This Saturday, Anzac day, marks the hundredth anniversary of one of the most important battles of the First World War - and forms one of the pillars of Britain's centenary schedule.

Yet despite intense remembrance in Turkey, Australia and New Zealand, this anniversary seems to resonate less with the British public than those of the First Battle of Ypres or the Marne. Perhaps this is because it was such a catastrophic loss for the Allies. Or perhaps it was because it is because Winston Churchill, the primary architect of the disastrous campaign, was to become a British icon and national hero in the next world war.

Gallipoli has been called "Churchill’s Folly", and the leader himself criticised as irresponsible and reckless. Recently, a historian on Twitter even said the entire scheme was "utter nonsense". However, this was not strictly true. Churchill’s scheme can only be understood in the context of his relationship with the Ottoman leaders before the First World War.

Winston Churchill’s World War Disaster

www.history.com/news/winston-churchills-world-war-disaster

A quarter-century before boldly leading Britain in World War II, Winston Churchill spearheaded a World War I military debacle—Gallipoli.

In the wake of the failed naval attack, the Allies launched a major land invasion of Gallipoli on April 25. The month-long delay allowed the Turks to rush reinforcements to the peninsula and boost their defenses, and the British, French and members of the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (ANZAC) could make little progress from their beachheads. The turquoise waters of the Aegean Sea turned crimson as the stiff Turkish resistance struck down the waves of Allied forces that washed ashore. The Battle of Gallipoli became a slaughter and quickly morphed into a stalemate just as bloody, just as pointless as that on the Western Front. In the first month after storming the peninsula, the Allies lost 45,000 men. The ill-fated Gallipoli Campaign lasted nine months before the evacuation of the last Allied troops in January 1916. Each side sustained 250,000 casualties with 46,000 Allied troops and 65,000 Turkish troops dead.

The invasion had been scuttled by incompetence and hesitancy by military commanders, but, fairly or unfairly, Churchill was the scapegoat. The Gallipoli disaster threw the government into crisis, and the Liberal prime minister was forced to bring the opposition Conservatives into a coalition government. As part of their agreement to share power, the Conservatives wanted Churchill, a renegade politician who had bolted their party a decade earlier, out from the Admiralty. In May 1915, Churchill was demoted to an obscure cabinet post.

report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,704
Brother
289
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#17 [Permalink] Posted on 10th June 2020 23:27
Wow! Wow! Wow! Masha'Allah!

twitter.com/AliSahin501/status/1270427569075163136

Pakistani F-16 upgraded by Turkey



Pakistani JF-17 carrying Turkish Aselpod in it's belly (not admitted).





Pakistani air force trains Turkish Pilots in combat training (not admitted).

MILGEM class by Turkey for Pakistan





P.S: This will carry classified 16 VLS missile tubes which will carry Cruise Missiles outgunning anything in India's arsenal which has got Indians riled up...

report post quote code quick quote reply
+5 -0Like x 4Winner x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abuzayd2k's avatar
Offline
Eraf
1,328
Brother
413
abuzayd2k's avatar
#18 [Permalink] Posted on 20th February 2021 08:16
Imām Ibn Kamāl Pāshā al-Ḥanafī
Shaykh al-Islām of The Ottoman Empire

A Brief Biography
By Abu Dawud Mahbub ibn 'Abd al-Karim

Quote:
Ibn Kamāl Pāshā narrates regarding himself that he was with Sulṭān Bāyazīd Khān during a journey. The vizier at the time was Ibrāhīm Pāshā ibn Khalīl Pāshā and he was of high rank. There was also a commander of very high rank at that time, whose name was Aḥmad Bak ibn Awranūs. No other commander would go ahead of him.

Ibn Kamāl Pāshā says: I was standing on my feet in front of the mentioned vizier [facing him] and the commander was sitting next to him. Then a man that was from the ʿulamā’ - who was of shabby appearance and in mediocre dress - sat in front of the mentioned commander, yet nobody prevented him from doing so. I was quite taken aback by this so I asked some of my companions: “Who is this person that has sat in front of the commander?”; one answered: “He is a man of knowledge (ʿālim) and a teacher in the Madrasah of Filibe (Plovdiv) called Mawlā Luṭfī”. I asked: “What is his stipend?”; he answered: “Thirty dirhams”. I asked: “Then how is it that he is sitting in front of this commander and his rank is of such a degree!?”; my companion answered: “Indeed the ʿulamā’ are revered because of their knowledge - if he was behind them, neither the commander nor the vizier would approve of that”.

Ibn Kamāl Pāshā says: I pondered to myself and thought: I will never reach the rank of this mentioned commander in terms of authority whereas if I devote myself to knowledge it would be possible to reach the rank of this mentioned ʿālim. Thus I resolved thereafter to dedicate to sacred knowledge.

Full article linked here:
https://ahlussunnah.boards.net/thread/959/imam-ibn-kamal-pasha-hanafi?page=1&scrollTo=2040
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Maripat's avatar
Offline
Gham-o-Huzn
3,269
Brother
3,512
Maripat's avatar
#19 [Permalink] Posted on 19th March 2021 05:29
Oriya Maqbool Jan on the end of the Ottoman Empire.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
1
Brother
2
#20 [Permalink] Posted on 19th March 2021 11:56
Maripat wrote:
View original post

The End of the Ottoman Caliphate
by
Orya Maqbool Jan

The end of the Ottoman Caliphate signals the end of times, according to the sayings of the Prophet SAW. The hadith paraphrased says the chain links of the Muslim Ummah will break one by one towards the end of times. The first chain link that will be broken is the caliphate, which is a rule based on justice. People will then grasp on to the next intact chain link, until that too is broken. Finally, the last chain link to break will be salah (congregational prayer).

We Muslims consider salah (congregational prayer) to be the most important facet of our communal life, when in fact the hadith tells us that caliphate is the most important facet of our communal life. Until March 3, 1924 the caliphate had continued in the Muslim Ummah for 1400 years. Those who say caliphate ended 30 years after the passing away of our Prophet SAW are wrong.

We usually say that our institutions had collapsed after the Rashidun Caliphate, but this is incorrect. Had our economic system been overtaken by interest? No. Had our system of justice collapsed? No, we still had Qaza in the Ummah. Had our penal system collapsed? No. Had our foreign policy changed? No. Had our system of education collapsed? No. Everything that existed in the Rashidun Caliphate continued up to the end of the Ottoman Caliphate on March 3, 1924. The only thing that was weakened was the system of selection of the Caliph. Other than this, everything else remained intact in the Ottoman Caliphate. The presence of the Caliphate in the Muslim Ummah was very dangerous for the enemies of Islam.

What happened in the 1910s and 1920s was foretold in the Quran (Ambiya 95-96) -- "We destroyed a nation, and they will now not return, until we release Gog and Magog, and they will attack you from high up." The nation here is Palestine, and for the Jews to return to Palestine, it was imperative to destroy the Ottoman Caliphate. During the 1910s, there were five major empires -- The Austro-Hungarian, The German, The Russian, The British, and The Ottoman.

The Prince of the Austro-Hungarian Empire was an ethnic Bosnian. He was assassinated by Serbs when he was on a visit to Bosnia. This triggered the First World War. This was the deadliest war the world had seen up to that time. It is estimated that 100 million people died in that war. This was followed by a famine, which also claimed another 100 million lives. After this came the Spanish Flu between 1918 and 1920, causing more loss of life. During this time, the Ottomans were called the Sick Man of Europe. There was a powerful movement in the Ottoman Empire at that time. It was called the Young Turks, led by Mustafa Kamal Pasha Ataturk. His ancestors were Jewish, and they had emigrated to the Ottoman Empire from Spain. They were called the Donmeh. They had synagogues in their houses, but they appeared to be Muslims outwardly.

The Western powers fought the Ottoman Empire at the Battle of Gallipoli, and Mustafa Kamal was in command. The Ottoman Empire achieved a decisive victory, and Mustafa Kamal was declared a national hero.

Meanwhile, the Ottoman Caliphs had been weakened due to their indulgence in luxuries. Earlier Caliphs did not have any harems. Even the Ummayyads and the Abbasids did not have harems. The later rulers such as the Turks and Mughals established royal harems. This opened a door through which foreign women could be sent into the palace to bring about intrigue.

The Western powers trained a man called Lawrence of Arabia. He was taught Arabic and fiqh and he was sent to the Hejaz. He met Sharif Hussain of Makkah, who was a Sayyid, and convinced him that Caliphate is the right of the progeny of the Prophet SAW. The Sharif declared independence in 1924. The Turks handed over Hejaz to the Sharif and returned to Istanbul with the holy relics of prophethood SAW.

The Balfour Declaration was signed in 1916, paving the way for Jewish dominanace of the Levant. Rothschild was part of the delegation that signed the Balfour agreement. Rothschild carried the charter of the Bank of England. General Allenby took over Jerusalem. His forces were made up of Muslims from Chakwal, Khushab, and other neighboring regions in Pakistan. General Allenby went to the grave of Sultan Salahuddin RA and said, "Saladin, we are back!" Along with Jerusalem, they also conquered Egypt. The area of Shaam came under French control, and Iraq came under the British.

The West kept the Caliphate intact in Turkey, so that Muslims do not rise up against them. They appointed Caliph Abdul Hamid to be the ceremonial head, while power was held by a body of nominees. They told the Caliph that they would give Hejaz to his son Ali, Iraq to his son Faisal, and Jordan to Sharif Abdullah, the father of Sharif Hussain. They raised the House of Saud in Arabia, and the House of Saud took over Arabia, and dislodged the Sharif from the Hejaz.

May Allah Taala reward the Muslims of the Subcontinent, Maulana Muhammad Ali Johar RA and his colleagues. They started the Khilafat Movement to prevent collapse of the Ottoman Caliphate. This, despite the fact that these Muslims were also under British rule. This movement greatly alarmed the Western powers. They knew that if the Caliph declared Jihad, Muslims from all over the world would converge on Istanbul and join the Ottoman forces in defense of the Ottoman Empire.

The Western powers forced the Caliph to leave Istanbul. The Caliph tried to cement his position by offering his daughter in marriage to the Nizam of Hyderabad. It is said about the Nizam that he was so wealthy that no one in history has ever held as much wealth as the Nizam of Hyderabad. Despite his riches, he could not save the Caliphate. The Ottoman Empire was then divided up among the Western powers.

Our power will not return to us until we are able to come together globally in the form of a caliphate.

The hadith foretells that Caliphate will return. How it returns will be the topic of our next talk.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 2
back to top