Comprehensive Pakistan Thread

Imran Khan => Maulana Diesel

Imran Khan => Bilawal Bhutto Sahiba

No, I don't believe that Imran Khan is a Hero or even the best but he is better than his (recent) predecessors and he is certainly better than Maulana at Governance & Islamic implementation. "Maulana" held an iron grip on Balochistan from 1998-2018 and held the reins of KPK for a number of years.

During his rule, both provinces had no Islamic laws no improvements in any civil society. The issue is not about him being a "Maulana" although his character, behavior and attitude is a far cry from that lofty status but he is most certainly not an able Administrator of any kind.

1. Being a "Maulana" does not mean that if we back him when he fails to implement basic Qur'aanic education
2. Being a "Maulana" does not mean that if we back him when he fails to implement Hijab/Niqab in Schools
3. Being a "Maulana" does not mean that if we back him when he supported Musharraf the butcher of our children
4. Being a "Maulana" does not mean that if we back him when he supported Benzir the woman who dented Khalistan movement and turned thousands of Sunnah following people to the CIA on mere suspicion of Terrorism
5. Being a "Maulana" does not mean that if we back him when he supported Benazir & turned 150 orphan (Chinese) children in Madaris back to China who were executed in cold blood at the border

Imran Khan has done nothing of that sort and his record as an Administrator is better.

These "Deobandees" are two faced hypocrites (in English & not Arabic) because they hated Benazir & Musharaf but have nothing to say about "Maulana" who supported them along the way. In his speech on the 3rd of November 2019 he openly said it again that his role in protecting "Democracy" has been exemplary.

We don't want Democracy at the cost of (orphan) Madrasa children being shot to pieces and executed. "Deobandees" may be so shameless in their partisanship but ordinary Pakistanees know and understand the role of "Maulana" and he will not rise again (politically). My fear is that by aligning themselves with "Maulana" these Deobandees are actually damaging Islam and Sunnah because ordinary Pakistanees are actually equating Islam and Deobandi'ism with "Maulana". I believe that crackdown on Madaris is coming and these "Deobandees" will rise against Imran Khan when it is not him but "Maulana" who is the reason. There are thousands of Jihadees carrying weapons in the Nation's capital 7 KM from the Parliament and sensitive institutions, what do these "Deobandees" think that the state would do?

The level of basic research skills among "Deobandees" is dire. They have just heard of "IMF" but what they are not aware or are unwilling to accept that for the first time Pakistan has actually paid back Interest and loan payments so the actually liability related tousury in net rate is actually lower under Imran Khan. It does not befit any Nation to be burdened with debt and if things stay favorable the curse of usury will be reduced further within the next 18 months and these are cold hard facts of Imran Khan. When you read the research of Mufti Taqi Usmani (HA) he does not propose (rashly) defaulting on loans, he suggests gradually weaning the Nation off and that's exactly what Imran Khan says (although not for Qur'aan/Sunnah but economic reasons). These "Deobandees" don't understand that nobody wants IMF loans or interest based loans, forget a Muslim even Non-Muslims don't want a nation saddled with debt. Forget nations, people don't like loans and particularly interest based loans. Do you know anyone in your life who just takes a loan because they want to be in debt?

The alternative is to DEFAULT which has NEVER been proposed by any Ulama. First bring a Fatwa from major Ulama that in case of (interest) based debts a person or nation should simply abscond and default. Nobody proposes anything like that at all. Imran Khan has only been in power for a little over a year, what do these "Deobandees" want him to do?

This is the clear example of bias and partisanship.

I am not defending Imran Khan or anyone who accuses or slanders anyone. It is despicable and wrong no matter who perpetrates it

However, there has to be a difference in behavior between a Secular Cricketer and a Maulana/Mufti, otherwise how can you consider Ulama to be inheritors of Prophets? Is this how "Prophets" behaved? Did the Prophets began cursing and using bad language when they were abused? Forget Prophets, did the Ulama behave in this manner? Did Imam Abu Haneefa (RA) did this or advocated cursing, slandering others

An Alim/Mufti should set the example and display exemplary behavior and not curse no National TV just because Imran Khan curses, slanders and accuses. Who is the role model for these "Deobandees"? Imran Khan or Nabi (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)?

You live in the west and plenty of good brothers have made disastrous relationship choices and have children from (Haram or Halal) relationships which are not on the Deen. My Duas are with these Brothers but neither Islam nor (basic human decency) holds them responsible for the actions of adult mature children and may Allah Ta'ala ease everyone's pain and suffering (Ameen).

I know grown men who cry with tears about their children but unable to do anything about these issues. The wife and children of Prophet Nuh (AS) were not only Non-Muslims but open aggressors towards Allah Ta'ala and believers.

Loading Qur'aan Verse

Loading Qur'aan Verse

1. A Maulana/Mufti has to be held to a higher standard compared to an ordinary Muslim.
2. A Maulana/Mufti is not allowed to transgress the Shariah even when an ordinary Muslim does so

Which bit of these two statements is trolling and why?

Double Standards:

1. You keep assuming that we have love for Maulana and your assumption is wrong
   
2. But our assumption that you have love for Imran Khan is entirely valid and justified.