Conspiracy Theories?

The problem in your argument is that you are trying to convince me when you should be trying to convince the world. It makes no difference whether I believe it or not; its the wider world which you need to convince.

In my professional opinion (after serving 8 years in US Military) it is not possible to pull something like this off without having thousands of people involved and closing hundreds of loopholes; danger of too many leaks.

I do however accept that perhaps a blind eye was turned when an oppurtunity was sensed and normal response was delayed and/or thwarted or impeded; that is entirely plausible and possible.

All it would take is just a few on top to delay reaction times (and 9/11 commission report admits that). I will go along with your assessment to say that it was deliberate vs the report highlights systematic problems and catalog of errors.

Do you see what I am saying?

Now the discussion is getting interesting.

Naming Bin Ladin as the bogeyman within a few hours of 9/11 is obviously suspect and done (as I have said) to ensure that the incident is used for maximum leverage by the powers to be. No conspiracy theories needed; that’s obvious.

Shooting down a single plane can be easily done and made to look like a Terrorist Attack (false flag operation); that’s pretty easy too and very hard to uncover.

9/11 on the whole scale and unfolding in front of thousands is near-impossible to pull by the system ; unlike what the world thinks of US Government and its bureaucracy; its lazy, cumbersome, unyielding and prone to leaks every steps of the way.

We have differing and divergent accounts of the Bin Ladin Attack in Abbottabad (see the latest Intercept investigation last week) and that was a limited operation in a foreign country.

Classified drone footage gets leaked these days.

 To pull 9/11 off as an operation by a Government is near impossible without substantial leaks.

But it is possible to:

1. Provide covert support to 3rd parties to enable it to happen
2. Know about it and let it happen
3. Know about it and then delay the response
4. Know about it, let it happen and use it for maximum advantage

We know that Media will report what is advantageous to its National Interest. You don't have to be a zionist for that; you just need to be a Patriot; that's all.

There have been always been people in the history of mankind who worked for the other side due to greed or blackmail or even to achieve a mutual goal.

Muslims took help from CIA in the 1980s in Afghanistan because they wanted to defeat USSR which was common enemy.

Again, not conpiracy but fact of life.

The job of an intelligence agency is to carry out the foreign policy objectives within the confines of the law no matter how unpalatable or morally objectionable those actions may be.

If it’s in the National Interest to Arm certain groups that will be done.

If it’s in the National Interest to disarm and then kill the same groups that will be done.

I think people understand that.

Brother,

I have watched the "smoking gun" video and that's 38 minutes of my life I will never get back, so I didn't bother watching the rest. All of these mysteries can be (and have been) answered sufficiently in scientific terms.

I guess you all have your opinions and I have mine. I still maintain that an event can be used for maximum advantage or blind eye can be turned to ensure that an event occurs unimpeeded.

Jzk