You have contributed 0.0% of this topic


Hazrat! Can you see the tone of op?
I understand that you are concerned about fabricated hadees, but I think our Shuyookh are more concerned about this than any layman! And to raise fitnah on public forums by giving air to topics concerning which layman shouldn't be concerned, is something that I am concerned about!
For OP (not for you): Leave this topic to Ulama and don't produce wasawis in laymen, as there is nothing that laymen can do about this topic except copy-paste! Really... plz.... it's above their capacity.
Jazakumullah

Mufti Saheb,
Takhreej of Fazail-e-Amaal and expunging weak Ahadeeth are two separate matters.
Takhreej is enhancement while expunging is Academic butchery! Al-Adab Al-Mufrad of Imam Bukhari (RA) has weak Ahadeeth (or some may be even fabricated), why would anyone (apart from Shaykh Al-Albani RA)) clip the work of Imam Bukhari (RA)? It will no longer remain original and classic.
You can do Takhreej, add Hashiya, add footnotes and all that is complimentary. You can even summarise the work (as it has been done by many Ulama) but you cannot butcher Fazail-e-Amaal and still call it that.
I am strongly in favour of using Riyadus-Saliheen instead of Fazail-e-Aamaal and then let whoever wants to use Fazail-e-Amaal use it.
In this thread, a Hadeeth is being quoted which the Author didn’t believe to be fabricated at all. This isn’t an error at all.


Use this formula for all the books, wa'az etc. not just Fadhail e Amaal. Can you?
Our shuyookh call it Sheikh Zakaria's Masterpiece, why? Are they decieving us?




Sorry I disagree with you that those who praise this book are unaware of the fact that there are some weak ahadees in fadhail e amal. Please read the book that I posted in my previous post. The shuyookh surely aren't deceiving us, but actually they analyse this work in the same way and with the same glasses as they analyse any other work of tafseer, or Fadhail book etc.
In the book that I posted shaykh writes about Hafiz Zahbi RhA, the great imam of science of hadees, that he called a hadees baatil in his meezan and used the same hadees in kitaabul kabaair (which is written for targheeb and tarheeb) with the words "Indeed it came in hadees". There a many other examples also in that book.
So what shaykh RhA wrote, he wrote following the way of salaf. This is the mizaaj of salaf in case of targheeb wa tarheeb, fadhail etc.
Please do read this book:
www.darululoom-deoband.com/urdu/books/tmp/1432203251%20Fa...
Please dissect the books written in defence of Fadhail e amaal by DEOBANDI MUHADDISEEN instead of debating with laymen, and then share your work with us here, we'll then have a discussion on YOUR work in shaa Allah.


This cannot be undone and I am sure it will be greatly appreciated.
Please wait...