I believe this is the main reason for our â€˜sufferingâ€™ today. It is a compulsory training for â€˜future warsâ€™, and yes, it is working !
There are trained and battle hardened Jihadees with weapons 7 KM from the nerve center of Islamabad. When Maulana exits there will be a crack down on Madaris and Darul-ulooms and upon Deobandees in Pakistan.
These same "Deobandees" who are unable (or unwilling) to clearly, expressly and unequivocally distance themselves from a "Maulana" and his clearly unIslamic antics will be crying in no time about Secular crackdown on Madaris.
Jamia Hafsa was a tragic and regrettable incident in our Nation's history but the "Deobandees" stood by and let it build up. You cannot have a "Maulana" or "Mufti" stand in the capital and threaten the authority of the state. Maulana stood up and threatened to lead a march (of mob) to the Prime Minister's house and handcuff the PM when there is no rhyme or reason for it. The state machinery cannot stand idly by in the face of these threats.
This would be HARAM in an Islamic Khilafah under similar circumstances and it is illegal in a Parliamentary democracy.
The Labour Party is attempting to defuse a row that has seen British Hindus urged not to vote for them at the general election.
There has been much anger from Hindu communities over Labour passing a motion criticising India's actions in Kashmir at its annual conference.
It has led to claims the party is "anti-Indian" and "anti-Hindu".
Labour has now distanced itself from the conference motion after criticism from a major Hindu charity.
This cannot be undone and I am sure it will be greatly appreciated.